|
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
 
|
5/2020
vol. 73 abstract:
Original paper
Rare primary craniofacial clefts: pattern, challenges, and management in a Nigerian population
Rowland Agbara
1
,
Benedict O. Akintububo
2
,
Benjamin Fomete
3
,
Kelvin U. Omeje
4
,
Yusuf T. Sambo
2
,
Ngeh Mangai
1
,
Enoch A. Idowu
5
J Stoma 2020; 73, 5: 240-245
Online publish date: 2020/11/11
View
full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction
There is inconsistent clinical presentation of rare orofacial clefts, and its low number has resulted in most studies on rare craniofacial clefts to be retrospective in nature, with significant amount published as case reports. Objectives To study the pattern, challenges, and management of rare craniofacial clefts in a Nigerian population. Material and methods This is a retrospective observational study of patients with rare facial clefts, who visited private health institutions between January 2009 and August 2018. Data retrieved was analyzed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results cial clefts, with typical to rare craniofacial cleft ratio of 46.3 : 1. The prevalence rate of rare craniofacial cleft was 22.2 per 1,000 cases. Age of patients ranged from 0.04 to 37.00 years, with median age of 3.50 ± 36.96 years. There were 10 males and 10 females, with male to female ratio of 1 : 1. Tessier number 0 had the highest frequency (n = 9, 36.0%), followed by Tessier number 7 (n = 3, 12.0%) and 2 (n = 3, 12.0%). Repair was achieved using local tissue advancement and direct closure techniques under general anesthesia in 10 patients and local anesthesia in 6 patients. Coloboma of the eyelid was the most common abnormality noted. Conclusions The prevalence of rare craniofacial clefts is low in this environment and Tessier 0 cleft is the commonest type seen. Treatment is generally challenging due to inadequate manpower. keywords:
craniofacial abnormalities, health resources, local advancement, surgery |
