eISSN: 2299-0046
ISSN: 1642-395X
Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
6/2016
vol. 33
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Specificity and sensitivity assessment of selected nasal provocation testing techniques

Edyta Krzych-Fałta
,
Konrad Furmańczyk
,
Bolesław Samoliński

Adv Dermatol Allergol 2016; XXXIII (6): 464-468
Online publish date: 2016/12/02
View full text Get citation
 
Introduction: Nasal provocation testing involves an allergen-specific local reaction of the nasal mucosa to the administered allergen.

Aim: To determine the most objective nasal occlusion assessment technique that could be used in nasal provocation testing.

Material and methods: A total of 60 subjects, including 30 patients diagnosed with allergy to common environmental allergens and 30 healthy subjects were enrolled into the study. The method used in the study was a nasal provocation test with an allergen, with a standard dose of a control solution and an allergen (5,000 SBU/ml) administered using a calibrated atomizer into both nostrils at room temperature. Early-phase nasal mucosa response in the early phase of the allergic reaction was assessed via acoustic rhinometry, optical rhinometry, nitric oxide in nasal air, and tryptase levels in the nasal lavage fluid.

Results: In estimating the homogeneity of the average values, the Levene’s test was used and receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for all the methods used for assessing the nasal provocation test with an allergen. Statistically significant results were defined for p < 0.05. Of all the objective assessment techniques, the most sensitive and characteristic ones were the optical rhinometry techniques (specificity = 1, sensitivity = 1, AUC = 1, PPV = 1, NPV = 1).

Conclusions: The techniques used showed significant differences between the group of patients with allergic rhinitis and the control group. Of all the objective assessment techniques, those most sensitive and characteristic were the optical rhinometry.
keywords:

nasal provocation test, receiver operating characteristic

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.