Biology of Sport
eISSN: 2083-1862
ISSN: 0860-021X
Biology of Sport
Current Issue Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Archive Ethical standards and procedures Contact Instructions for authors Journal's Reviewers Special Information
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2020
vol. 37
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Worst case scenario match analysis and contextual variables in professional soccer players: a longitudinal study

José M. Oliva-Lozano
1
,
Daniel Rojas-Valverde
2, 3
,
Carlos D. Gómez-Carmona
4
,
Víctor Fortes
5
,
José Pino-Ortega
6

  1. Health Research Centre. University of Almería. Almería, Spain
  2. Centro de Investigación y Diagnóstico en Salud y Deporte, Escuela Ciencias del Movimiento Humano y Calidad de Vida, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica
  3. Grupo de Avances en Entrenamiento Deportivo y Acondicionamiento Físico (GAEDAF), Deporte Faculty of Sports Science. University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain
  4. Optimization of Training and Sports Performance Research Group (GOERD). Didactics of Music, Plastic and Body Expression Department. Faculty of Sports Science. University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain
  5. Unión Deportiva Almería, Almería, Spain
  6. Physical Activity and Sports Department. Faculty of Sports Science. University of Murcia, San Javier, Murcia, Spain
Biol Sport. 2020;37(4):429–436.
Online publish date: 2020/07/14
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
This study aimed to describe the worst-case scenarios (WCS) of professional soccer players by playing position in different durations and analyse WCS considering different contextual variables (match half, match location and match outcome). A longitudinal study was conducted in a professional soccer team. Data were collected from different WCS durations in the total distance (TD), high-speed running distance (HSRD), and sprinting distance (SPD). A mixed analysis of variance was performed to compare different WCS durations between playing positions and contextual variables, making pairwise comparisons by Bonferroni post hoc test. Positional differences were found for TD (p < 0.01, ωp 2 = 0.02), HSRD (p < 0.01, ωp 2 = 0.01) and SPD (p < 0.01, ωp 2 = 0.02). There was a significant interaction when comparing WCS by match half in TD (F = 6.1, p < 0.01, ωp 2 = 0.07) but no significant differences in HSRD (p = 0.403, ωp 2 = 0) or SPD (p = 0.376, ωp 2 = 0). A significant interaction was identified when comparing WCS by match location in TD (F = 51.5, p < 0.01, ωp 2 = 0.14), HSRD (F = 19.15, p < 0.01, ωp 2 = 0.05) and SPD (F = 8.95, p < 0.01, ωp 2 = 0.01) as well as WCS by match outcome in TD (F = 36.4, p < 0.01, ωp 2 = 0.08), HSRD (F = 13.6, p < 0.01, ωp 2 = 0.04) and SPD (F = 7.4, p < 0.01, ωp 2 = 0.02). Positional differences exist in TD, HSRD, and SPD in match-play WCS, and contextual variablessuch as match half, match location and match outcome have a significant impact on the WCS of professional soccer players.
keywords:

External load, competition demands, most demanding passage, GPS, playing positions, match outcome, match periods, match location

 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.