|
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
1/2026
vol. 79 abstract:
Original paper
Assessment of knowledge and clinical attitudes of Indian dentists in the diagnosis and management of oral traumatic neuroma: a case-based online questionnaire study
Manmeet Kaur
1
,
Kaja Sai Ragesvari
1
,
Mrinalini Mrinalini
2
,
Urvashi B. Sodvadia
3
,
Sushant Sushant
4
J Stoma 2026; 79, 1: 57-64
Online publish date: 2026/03/12
View
full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction
Oral traumatic neuroma, a rare but important condition, often results from nerve injury during dental procedures, such as extractions or local anesthesia administration. Due to its uncommon nature, many dentists may lack awareness of this condition, leading to potential misdiagnosis or inadequate management. The study aimed to assess the knowledge and clinical attitudes of Indian dentists towards the diagnosis and management of oral traumatic neuroma through a case-based online questionnaire. Material and methods A cross-sectional, structured questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 1,400 registered Indian dentists from June to October 2024. The questionnaire consisted of 16 questions addressing demographics, clinical approach, and knowledge of traumatic neuroma. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, c2, and logistic regression tests, to evaluate associations between participants’ characteristics (i.e., age, experience, occupation, and qualification), their knowledge, and clinical attitudes. Results Of the 703 responses, 71.7% exhibited poor knowledge, 26.4% had moderate knowledge, and only 2% demonstrated good knowledge of traumatic neuroma. Private practitioners had higher odds of poor knowledge compared with academicians (OR: 1.64, p = 0.025). Regarding clinical attitudes, 57.7% had poor attitudes, while 42.3% exhibited a fair-to-good clinical approach. A significant association was found between 15-20 years of experience and a better clinical attitude (OR: 0.24, p = 0.025). The majority of participants opted for radiographic tests, but few selected Tinel’s test, highlighting a gap in clinical knowledge. Conclusions The study reveals significant gaps in both the knowledge and clinical attitudes among Indian dentists regarding traumatic neuromas. keywords:
orofacial pain, traumatic neuroma, Tinel’s sign |