|
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
1/2026
vol. 79 abstract:
Review paper
Evaluation of different treatment modalities in patients with disc displacement with reduction using systematic review and meta-analysis
Akash P. Muralidharan
1
,
Yash Merchant
2
,
Shilpa Bawane
1
,
Vini Mehta
3
,
Toufiq Noor
3
J Stoma 2026; 79, 1: 65-72
Online publish date: 2026/03/15
View
full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction
Temporomandibular disorders is a collective term for a group of musculoskeletal conditions, involving pain and/or dysfunction in the masticatory muscles, temporomandibular joints, and associated structures. These symptoms include joint and muscle pain, restricted mandibular movements, and joint sounds. Objective To compare and evaluate different treatment modalities in patients with disc displacement with reduction (DDwR) using meta-analysis. Material and methods PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases were explored for studies from January 2011 to September 2024. A thorough search was carried out, and articles were screened for eligibility by two review-ers. Randomized controlled clinical trials were included, evaluating the efficacy of lasers, splint therapy, and ultrasounds compared with a controlled line of treatment and other conventional therapy, assessing out-comes in reduction of pain and maximum mouth opening. Where appropriate, a meta analysis was performed and standardized mean differences were calculated. Results Five out of 245 titles were found to meet the eligibility criteria. There was a substantial risk of bias across most domains, with high risk in selective reporting and incomplete outcome data. Through the pooled estimate, it was observed that laser was inferior to splints, with mean and standard deviation of [–0.37 (–0.88 to 0.14)], laser was inferior to ultrasound [–0.22 (–1.86 to 1.41)], and splints were inferior to ultrasound [–1.36 to 1.28)]. In terms of maximum mouth opening (MMO), laser was inferior to splints [0.47 (–0.86 to 0.08)], while ultra-sound showed greater MMO than splints [1.43 (–1.84 to 4.69)]. Conclusions The findings of this study shed valuable light on the role of splints and ultrasound, particularly in terms of pain reduction and improvement in MMO, and suggest that splints and ultrasound both hold promise as viable therapeutic options for patients suffering from DDwR. keywords:
lasers, splints, systematic review, temporomandibular disorders, ultrasound |