eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2011
vol. 7
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:

Original paper
The use of a new generation self-expanding stent, Vascuflex SEC, for carotid artery stenting

Piotr Pieniążek
,
Piotr Musiałek
,
Łukasz Tekieli
,
Karolina Dzierwa
,
Rafał Motyl
,
Mariusz Trystuła
,
Elżbieta Dura
,
Andrzej Brzychczy
,
Roman Machnik
,
Krzysztof Żmudka
,
Piotr Podolec

Post Kardiol Interw 2011; 7, 2 (24): 105–110
Online publish date: 2011/07/04
View full text Get citation
 
Background: Technological developments in the embolic protection device (EPD) and stent designs contribute significantly to the progress in endovascular management of carotid artery stenosis.

Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a new generation self-expanding nitinol stent, Vascuflex SEC, with different types of embolic protection.

Material and methods: Carotid artery stenting with Vascuflex SEC was performed in 50 consecutive patients (age 66.4 ±7.8 years, men 66%, symptomatic 40%) referred for the procedure after independent neurological consultation. Embolic protection device type was selected on the basis of atherosclerotic plaque morphology by duplex ultrasound and CT angiography. In a subset of patients (n = 20), we tested the feasibility of using intravascular ultrasound with virtual histology (IVUS-VH) to guide the EPD choice and final stent post-dilation. Proximal neuroprotection by flow reversal or temporary flow cessation was applied in 23 procedures (46%). Clinical evaluation was performed at discharge and at 30 days.

Results: Procedural success was 100% and, in all cases, only one stent was implanted per patient/lesion. Direct stenting was performed in 20 patients (40%). Intraprocedural IVUS-VH was feasible and safe. Diameter stenosis was reduced from 84.1 ±7.5% to 9.1 ±7.7% (p < 0.001). There were two neurological events: one periprocedural ipsilateral minor stroke and one contralateral major stroke within 30 days. A closure device was used in 80% of patients and no access site complications occurred.

Conclusions: In an unselected population referred for carotid revascularization, CAS with Vascuflex SEC stents is safe and effective. Lesion morphology-guided selection of EPD may contribute to the low complication rate.
keywords:

carotid artery stenosis, carotid artery stenting, self-expanding carotid stents, open-cell stent design

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.