Abstract
4/2013
vol. 7
Original paper
Quality of life of patients with intestinal stoma
Pielęgniarstwo Chirurgiczne i Angiologiczne 2013; 4: 142–147
Online publish date: 2013/12/11
The aim of the study was to assess the quality of life of people with a stoma.
Material and methods: The research was conducted in a group of 57 adults who had the intestinal stoma formed for minimum 6 months prior to research. The study took place at the Stoma Clinic of University Hospital no. 2 in Bydgoszcz. The proper research tool was the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire.
Results: In the study, 60% of respondents defined their quality of life as very good and good, and 40% as neither good nor bad. The majority of respondents (56%) were very satisfied or satisfied with their health and 30% chose “neither satisfied nor unsatisfied” option. The conclusion is that the quality of life of people with colostomy is worse, especially in the somatic domain (p < 0.05). The time since the stoma was formed significantly worsens the quality of life described in the questionnaire in psychological (p = 0.015) and environmental (p = 0.008) domains. Activities connected with individual nursing of stoma are carried out by 82% of respondents. Also their age influences mainly social and environmental spheres (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
1. More than a half of respondents described their quality of life as good.
2. Patients with ileostomy had higher quality of life than patients with colostomy.
3. Respondents with a possibility of reconstruction of their gastrointestinal tract had higher quality of life in psychological and environmental domains.
Material and methods: The research was conducted in a group of 57 adults who had the intestinal stoma formed for minimum 6 months prior to research. The study took place at the Stoma Clinic of University Hospital no. 2 in Bydgoszcz. The proper research tool was the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire.
Results: In the study, 60% of respondents defined their quality of life as very good and good, and 40% as neither good nor bad. The majority of respondents (56%) were very satisfied or satisfied with their health and 30% chose “neither satisfied nor unsatisfied” option. The conclusion is that the quality of life of people with colostomy is worse, especially in the somatic domain (p < 0.05). The time since the stoma was formed significantly worsens the quality of life described in the questionnaire in psychological (p = 0.015) and environmental (p = 0.008) domains. Activities connected with individual nursing of stoma are carried out by 82% of respondents. Also their age influences mainly social and environmental spheres (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
1. More than a half of respondents described their quality of life as good.
2. Patients with ileostomy had higher quality of life than patients with colostomy.
3. Respondents with a possibility of reconstruction of their gastrointestinal tract had higher quality of life in psychological and environmental domains.
Keywords
stoma, quality of life, nursing care
Coverage in
Integrated with
