|
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
2/2021
vol. 25 Review paper
Review of Selected Physiotherapeutic Methods Used in the Rehabilitation of Low Back Pain in Light of Evidence-Based Medicine Principles
Aleksander Kaletka
1
1.
Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
PTrev 2021; vol 25 (2) 5-15
Online publish date: 2021/06/23
Article file
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
1. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, et al. A systematic re view of the global prevalence of low back pain. Ar thritis 2.
Rheum. 2012; 64: 2028-2037. 3.
Kamper S.J. et al. Musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016; 16: 10. 4.
Global Burden of Disease, Injury Incidence, Preva lence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disabi lity for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a sys tematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388: 1545-1602. 5.
Hartvigsen J. et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet 2018; 391: 2356- 2367. 6.
Balagué F. et al. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2012; 379: 482-491. 7.
Hoy D. i wsp. The Epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res: Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24: 769-781. 8.
Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2016) Stan Zdrowia Ludności Polski w 2014 r. Dostęp: https://stat.gov. pl/obszary-tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/stan- -zdrowia-ludnosci-polski-w-2014-r-,6,6.html. 9.
Garcia A.N. et al. McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy was slightly more effecti ve than placebo for pain, but not for disability, in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised placebo controlled trial with short and longer term follow-up. Br J Sports Med. 2018: 52 (9): 594-600. 10.
Halliday M.H. et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the McKenzie Method to Motor Control Exercises in People With Chronic Low Back Pain and a Directional Preference. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016; 46 (7): 514-522. 11.
Hodges P.W., van Dieën J.H., Cholewicki J. Time to Reflect on the Role of Motor Control in Low Back Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019; 49 (6): 367- 369. 12.
Murtezani A. et al. A comparison of mckenzie the rapy with electrophysical agents for the treatment of work-related low back pain: A randomized con trolled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015; 28 (2): 247-253. 13.
Ebadi S. et al. No immediate analgesic effect of dia dynamic current in patients with non-specific low back pain in comparison to TENS. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018; 22 (3): 693-699. 14.
Facci L.M. et al. Effects of transcutaneous electri cal nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential cu rrents (IFC) in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J. 2011; 129 (4): 206-216. 15.
Buchmuller A. et al. Value of TENS for relief of chronic low back pain with or without radicular pain. Eur J Pain 2012; 16: 656-665. 16.
Valenza M.C. et al. Results of a Pilates exercise program in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Reha bil. 2017; 31 (6): 753-760. 17.
Cruz-Díaz D. et al. The effectiveness of 12 weeks of Pilates intervention on disability, pain and kine siophobia in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 2018; 32 (9): 1249-1257. 18.
Natour J. et al. Pilates improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015; 29 (1): 59-68.
|
 |
POLSKI
