eISSN: 1644-4124
ISSN: 1426-3912
Central European Journal of Immunology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2012
vol. 37
 
Share:
Share:

Experimental immunology
The effect of feeding with linseed cake versus extracted rapeseed meal on the activity of lysosome’s enzymes in blood serum of dairy goat

Justyna Jarczak
,
Artur Jóźwik
,
Ewa Kościuczuk
,
Nina Strzałkowska
,
Jarosław Horbańczuk
,
Jarosław Kaba
,
Józef Krzyżewski
,
Emilia Bagnicka

(Centr Eur J Immunol 2012; 37 (1): 20-24)
Online publish date: 2012/03/29
Article file
- The effect.pdf  [0.07 MB]
Get citation
 
 

Introduction



Lysosomes were first described in 1955 as a biochemical entities [1] and since then, they have been a favoured candidate for a pathogenic role in connective tissue diseases [2]. Lysosomes are small organelles (0.2 to 0.5 nm diameter), performing critical functions within the human and animal body, present in all cells of animals and containing more than 40 different types of lysosomal enzymes, such as glycosidases, proteases, acid phosphatases, sulfatases and lipases, which are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum and modified in the Golgi apparatus [3]. The lysosomal system plays an important role in the restoration of biochemical homeostasis which can be affected by different stress factors [4]. One of the factors influencing the homeostasis of both humans and animals is their diet. The properly balanced diet (protein to energy rate) is important for ruminants. The extracted rapeseed meal is a commonly used source of protein in animal feeding. Unfortunately, the biological quality of extracted rapeseed meal is low because of high level of antinutritional or even toxic factors (glucosinolates: thioglucosides and their hydrolysis products isothiocyanates and oxazolidinethiones) [5, 6]. Linseed cake could be the rich source of protein in animal diet, however, it also contains antinutritional substances like cyanogenic glucosides, but low level [7]. Moreover, linseed cake is the richest source of fitoestrogens, being strong antioxidants which help to keep the redox processes at the optimal level. They positively influence the functioning of the reproductive system and show antitumor activity, simultaneously having a beneficial effect on cardiovascular system diseases and osteoporosis [8-11].

There are some papers on the influence of linseed cake supplementation in the cows’ or goats’ diets on milk quality [12-15]. On the other hand, there is much information on lysosomal enzymes function and deficiency in humans [16, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1182830-overview#aw2aab6b3]. However, there is limited information about the influence of linseed cake diet supplementation on lysosomal enzymes activity in animal cells.

Thus, the aim of the study was to evaluate the activity of lysosomal enzymes from families: glycosidases such as -galactosidase (BGAL), -glucuronidase (BGRD), -glucosidase (BGLU), N-acetyl-hexosaminidase (HEX), -glucosidase (AGLU) and -mannosidase (MAN) as well as aminopeptidases such as alanine aminopeptidase (AlaAP), leucine aminopeptidase (LeuAP), arginine aminopeptidase (ArgAP) and acid phosphatase (ACP) in serum and productivity of dairy goats fed the diet with linseed cake vs. extracted rapeseed meal supplementation.

Material and methods



The study was conducted on 16 dairy goats of the Polish White Improved (PWI) breed. The experiment lasted from 12 to 17 week of lactation e.g. in the middle stage of lactation. The average milk yield obtained in 280 days of lactation was about 800 kg, with 3.35% of fat and 3.20% of total protein. Goats were machine milked twice a day. The animals were kept in a loose barn and fed according to the INRA feeding norms [17]. The goats were divided into two groups, analogous to each other, according to age of goats. The basic diet consisted of corn silage, wilted grass silage and concentrates (oats, triticale, extracted rapeseed meal), supplemented with mineral and vitamin mixtures. The diet of experimental group was supplemented with linseed cake instead of extracted rapeseed meal (Table 1). Water was available ad libitum. All animals were free from mastitis. According to the results of ELISA test (IDEXX CAEV/MVV Total Ab Screening Test) all goats included in the study were free from caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus infection. The serum samples were taken twice during experiment: three weeks after the start of the experiment and at the end of supplementation. Milk yield was recorded during morning milking and its parameters (fat, protein, lactose content and yield, somatic cell count, urea content) were established.

In the lysosomal fractions of blood serum the activities of alanyl-aminopeptidase (AlaAP – E.C. 3.4.11.2); leucyl-aminopeptidase (LeuAP – E.C. 3.4.11.1); arginyl-aminopeptidase (ArgAP – E.C. 3.4.11.6); acid phosphatase (AcP – E.C. 3.1.3.2); a-glucuronidase (BGRD – E.C. 3.2.1.31);

-galactosidase (BGAL – E.C. 3.2.1.23); -glucosidase (BGLU – E.C. 3.2.1.21); N-acetyl--glucosaminidase (HEX – E.C. 3.2.1.30), a-glucosidase (AGLU E.C. 3.2.1.20) and mannosidase (MAN, EC 3.2.1.25) were determined. The activity of AcP, BGRD, BGAL, BGLU, AGLU, MAN and HEX were measured as 4-nitrophenyl derivatives at 420 nm according to Barrett and Heath’s [18] micromethod. The activity of AlaAP, LeuAP and ArgAP were measured as Fast Blue BB salt (4-benzoyloamino-2, 5-diethoxybenzene-diazinium chloride) derivatives at 540 nm by the method of McDonald and Barrett [19]. In the blood serum the protein concentration was measured by the modified Total Protein-Biuret Method [20].

The statistical evaluation of results was performed with the CORR and GLM procedures of SAS Version 9.1 for Windows [21], using the model including a fixed effect of time of milk collection and effect of diet interaction.

All procedures involving animals were performed in accordance with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Research Animals, and were approved by the Local Ethics Commission (Permission No. 48/2005).

Results and discussion



The linseed cake supplementation had a positive impact on milk, protein and lactose yield in comparison with extracted rapeseed meal supplementation (Table 2). The differences were observed both between control and experimental groups and within experimental group between the times of sampling. The milk yield in control group tended to decrease while in experimental group increased during experiment in spite of the fact that the experiment was conducted after the peak of lactation. These results are in opposition to many studies summarizing by Petit [13], who concluded that the effect of linseed seed supplementation in the dairy cows diet had no or little effect on milk yield. Moreover, Bernard et al. [22] presented similar results from the study on dairy goats. However, similar to other studies [13, 22] we did not obtain differences in fat, protein and lactose content and urea level between both groups. In our study the somatic cell count (SCC) in milk was lower in experimental than in control group after 6 weeks of supplementation.

There were differences in activity of three from six studied glycosidases: BGAL, MAN and BGRD and in activity of two from four studied aminopeptidases: LeuAP, ArgAP between control and experimental group, especially after 6 weeks of supplementation. The high, positive correlation was found between two aminopeptidases (ArgAP, AcP) and milk, protein and lactose content, while high negative correlation between three glycosidases (BGRD, BGAL and MAN) and milk, protein and lactose content (Table 3). Milk fat yield was high and negative correlated only with MAN activity. Subsequent data suggested that BGRD and BGAL expression was up-regulated while the other glycosidase MAN was down-regulated after linseed cake in comparison to extracted rapeseed meal supplementation. According to aminopeptidases activity the linseed cake supplementation caused down-regulation of LeuAP and up-regulation of ArgAP activity. Lysosomal enzymes are a necessary ones to biological systems as a means of utilizing sugars for energy or have a critical roles in turnover of peptides or others. The degraded macromolecular substrates can be both internalized and endogenous. When the lysosomal enzyme deficiency occurs the un-degraded substrates accumulate within the lysosomes which leads to malfunction of the organs [16]. Thus, the sufficient activities of lysosomal enzymes are crucial for functioning of many organs and whole organisms.

Generally, aminopeptidases participate in protein maturation, activation, modulation, degradation and determination of stability of protein and peptides. Leucyl-aminopeptidase catalyzes the hydrolysis leucine, while ArgAP arginine residues from the N-terminal end of various peptides and proteins [23]. In the presented study the proteolytic enzymes such as leucine aminopeptidase activity decreased while arginine aminopeptidase increased in both groups towards the end of study but in experimental group the activity of enzymes were twice as low (LeuAP) or twice as high (ArgAP) as in the control group. The increase of activity of aminopeptidases suggested an increase in protein degradation in lysosomes and testified to overabundance of protein in the diet [24]. Moreover, Burley et al. [25] stated the decrease in AlaAP activity when the increase in protein level in diet occur. On the other hand, the activity of particular enzymes depends on the availability of substratum. It could mean that there are lower leucine and higher arginine residues content in linseed seed cake than in extracted rapeseed meal.

Glycosidases are hydrolase enzymes which catalyze the hydrolysis of glycosidic linkages in polysaccharides and glycosylamines (proteoglycans) as well. Fronczyk [24] found the increase in glycosidases activity in animals fed the diet with low level of protein and he suggested that it is the adaptation of organisms to inconvenient environmental circumstances e.g. deficit of protein. In the presented study BGRD and MAN activity decreased while BGAL activity increased after linseed cake supplementation.

Conclusion



The urea level in milk was similar in both groups and did not exceed referential values which means that both diets were well balanced according to energy/protein ratio. However, the activity of some lysosomal enzymes differed according to the type of diet: with extracted rapeseed meal or linseed cake supplementation. There were strong relationship between some lysosomal enzymes activity and milk yield traits. Moreover, the milk, protein and lactose yield were higher, while the level of SCC was lower after linseed cake than extracted rapeseed meal supplementation. The obtained result suggests that the using of linseed cake in the goats’ diet have beneficial impact on productivity and health status of animals.

References



 1. de Duve C, Pressman BC, Gianetto R, et al. (1955): Tissue fractionation studies. 6. Intracellular distribution patterns of enzymes in rat-liver tissue. Biochem J 60: 604-617.

 2. Gardner DL (1978): Diseases of connective tissue: a consensus. J Clin Pathol Suppl (R Coll Pathol) 12: 223-238.

 3. Kimball J (2007): Lysosomes and peroxisomes in Kimball’s Biology Pages. http://biology-pages.info/

 4. Jóźwik A, Śliwa-Jóźwik A, Jezierski T, et al. (2009): The activity of lysosomal enzymes in blood serum, liver, kidney and skeletal muscle of rabbits divergently selected for locomotor activity in open-field test. Anim Sci Pap Reports 27: 249-257.

 5. Ballester D, Rodrigo R, Nakouzi J, et al. (1970): Rapeseed meal. II. Chemical composition and biological quality of the protein. J Sci Food Agric 21: 140-142.

 6. Lajolo FM, Lanfer Marquez UM, Filisetti-Cozzi TM, McGregor DI (1991): Chemical composition and toxic compounds in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars grown in Brazil. J Agric Food Chem 39: 1933-1937.

 7. Oomah BD, Mazza G, Keneschuk EO (1992): Cyanogenic compounds in falxseed. J Agric Food Chem 40: 1346-1348.

 8. Murkies AL, Wilcox G, Davis SR (1998): Clinical review 92: Phytoestrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83: 297-303.

 9. Prasad K (2000): Flaxseed: a source of hypocholesterolemic and antiatherogenic agents. Drug News Perspect 13: 99-104.

10. Borys B (2007): Substancje antyżywieniowe w paszach roślinnych dla kóz [Antinutritional substances in plant feeds for goats]. Wiadomości Zootechniczne 1-2: 55-65.

11. Ahotupa M, Marniemi J, Lehtimäki T, et al. (1998): Baseline diene conjugation in LDL lipids as a direct measure of in vivo LDL oxidation. Clin Biochem/31:/257-261.

12. Soita HW, Meier JA, Fehr M, et al. (2003): Effects of flaxseed supplementation on milk production, milk fatty acid composition and nutrient utilization by lactating dairy cows. Arch Tierernahr 57: 107-116.

13. Petit HV (2010): Review: Feed intake, milk production and milk composition of dairy cows fed flaxseed. Can J Anim Sci 90: 115-127.

14. Hurtaud C, Faucon F, Couvreur S, Peyraud JL (2010): Linear relationship between increasing amounts of extruded linseed in dairy cow diet and milk fatty acid composition and butter properties. J Dairy Sci 93: 1429-1443.

15. Nudda A, Battacone G, Usai MG, et al. (2006): Supplementation with extruded linseed cake affects concentrations of conjugated linoleic acid and vaccenic acid in goat milk. J Dairy Sci 89: 277-282.

16. Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ, Clague AE, Carey WF (1999): Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA 281: 249-254.

17. Jarrige R. Alimentation des bovins ovins et caprins 2002. ISBN: 2738000215, INRA Editions 471p.

18. Barrett AJ, Heath MF (1972): Lysosomal enzymes. In: Lysosomes. A Laboratory Handbook. Dingle JT (ed.). North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam; 19-135.

19. McDonald JK, Barrett AJ (1986): Exopeptidases. In: Mammalian Proteases. A Glossary and Bibliography. 2nd ed. Academic Press, London; 111-144.

20. Krawczyński J, Osiński T (1967): Białko całkowite – metoda biuretowa. Laboratoryjne metody diagnostyczne. PZWL, Warszawa; 258-261.

21. SAS, SAS/STAT User’s Guide, 2002-2003 – Release 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

22. Bernard L, Rouel J, Leroux C, et al. (2005). Mammary lipid metabolism and milk fatty acid secretion in alpine goats fed vegetable lipids. J Dairy Sci 88: 1478-1489.

23. Taylor A (1993): Aminopeptidases: structure and function. FASEB J 7: 290-298.

24. Fronczyk W (2009): Wpływ glutationu zredukowanego (GSH) na aktywność enzymów lizosomowych w subfrakcjach komórkowych myszy pozostających na zróżnicowanym poziomie żywienia białkowego. PhD thesis.

25. Burley SK, David PR, Lipscomb WN (1991): Leucine aminopeptidase: bestatin inhibition and a model for enzyme-catalyzed peptide hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 6919-6920.
Copyright: © 2012 Polish Society of Experimental and Clinical Immunology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.