eISSN: 2084-9869
ISSN: 1233-9687
Polish Journal of Pathology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2012
vol. 63
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 

RAD51 gene polymorphisms and sporadic colorectal cancer risk in Poland

Hanna Romanowicz-Makowska
,
Dariusz Samulak
,
Magdalena Michalska
,
Stanisław Sporny
,
Ewa Langner
,
Adam Dziki
,
Radosław Sychowski
,
Beata Smolarz

Pol J Pathol 2012; 3: 193-198
Online publish date: 2012/11/09
Article file
- RAD51 gene.pdf  [0.11 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is detected in more than 600 000 cases per year and is the fourth most common form of cancer in the United States and the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the Western world [1].

The risk of colorectal cancer is increased by several factors such as age, polyps of the colon, dietary factors, history of cancer (women who have had cancer of the ovary, uterus, or breast are at a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer), heredity, smoking, alcohol and gene mutations [2-4].

The relationships between risk factors and colorectal carcinoma development are not exactly known. Therefore, the identification of new risk factors for colorectal cancer is urgently needed, and an analysis of some gene polymorphisms could be an interesting option.

Mutations in DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) repair genes are involved in the pathogenesis of tumours. Defects in this pathway may play a role in development and progression of colorectal cancer. DSB in DNA may be rectified by either homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) [5, 6].

RAD51 is involved in homologous recombination and repair of double-strand breaks in DNA and DNA cross-links and for the maintenance of chromosome stability [7].

RAD51 is associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumour suppressor gene products, suggesting that a defect in recombination leads to tumour development [8, 9].

RAD51 gene is polymorphic. Two common RAD51 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphism), 135G>C and 172G>T in the 5’UTR have been reported to be associated with altered gene transcription [10].

This SNP is located in the regulatory element of the RAD51 promoter and is suggested to be associated with messenger RNA expression.

It is knowledge that RAD51 gene 135G>C and 172G>T polymorphisms have been studied as a risk factor for various cancers. Data of literature suggest that RAD51 gene 135G>C polymorphism may contribute to head and neck cancer and mammary carcinogenesis [11-17]. A study of women matched for BRCA1 mutation revealed that the C allele of this polymorphism is associated with a 2-fold reduction in the breast and ovarian cancer risk as compared with the wild-type G allele [18].

RAD51 172TT homozygous variant genotype was associated with a significantly reduced risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) [19].

Moreover, the variant T allele of the RAD51 172G>T SNP was shown to be associated with a non-significantly decreased risk of sporadic breast cancer in women [20, 21].

The relationships between RAD51 polymorphisms and colorectal carcinoma development are not exactly known [22, 23]. Therefore, in the present work, the association between RAD51 135G>C and 172G>T polymorphisms and colorectal carcinoma in the Polish population was investigated.

Material and methods

Colorectal cancer patients



Tumour tissues were obtained from 320 subjects with colorectal cancer treated at the 2nd Department of Surgery, Military Academy of Medicine in Lodz (Poland) between 2000 and 2006. Clinical data for the patients and histological data were registered (Table I). There were 196 males and 124 females and their mean age was 59 years (range: 37-71 years). All tumours were staged according to Dukes’ classification. DNA from normal colorectal tissue (n = 320) served as control (mean age 54.42 ±19.22). The Local Ethic Committee approved the study and each patient gave his written consent.

The colorectal tissue samples (cancerous and non-cancerous) were fixed routinely in formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, cut into thin slices and stained with hematoxylin/eosin for pathological examination. DNA for analysis was obtained from an archival pathological paraffin-embedded tumour and healthy colorectal samples which were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in ethanol and distilled water. In order to ensure that the chosen histological material is representative for cancerous and non-cancerous tissue, every tissue sample qualified for DNA extraction was initially checked by a pathologist. DNA was extracted from the material using commercially available QIAmp Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), a DNA purification kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction.



Genotype determination



Single nucleotide polymorphisms 135G>C and 172G>T of RAD51 gene was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), using primers 5’-TGG GAA CTG CAA CTC ATC TGG-3’ (forward) and 5’-GCT CCG ACT TCA CCC CGC CGG-3’ (reverse).

RAD51 135G>C genotyping was analyzed by PCR amplification of a 175-bp region around nucleotide 135. This region contained a single MvaI site that was abolished in the 135C allele. Wild type alleles were digested by MvaI resulting in 86- and 71-bp product. The 135C allele was not digested by the enzyme, resulting in a single 157-bp product.

The PCR was carried out in a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Applied Biosystems) thermal cycler. PCR amplification was performed in a final volume of 25 l. The reaction mixture contained 5 ng genomic DNA, 0.2 mol of each appropriate primer (ARK Scientific GmbH Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dNTPs and 1 unit of Taq Polymerase (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). The PCR cycle conditions were 94°C for 60 s, 54°C for 30 s, then 72°C for 40 s, repeated for 35 cycles. After digestion with MvaI for 4 h at 37°C samples were run on 7% polyacrylamide gel and visualised by ethidium bromide staining. Each subject was classified into one of the three possible genotypes: G/G, G/C or C/C.

PCR for 172G>T SNPs was performed in 25 l reaction systems containing 5 ng genomic DNA, 0.2 mol of each appropriate primer (ARK Scientific GmbH Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dNTPs and 1 unit of Taq Polymerase (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). The PCR profile consisted of an initial melting step at 95°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 65°C for 45 s and 72°C for 50 s and a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. The product after PCR was digested with NgoMIV (New England BioLabs) overnight. The products were separated in 7% polyacrylamide gel. The 172G/G genotype produced two bands (110 and 21 bp), whereas the 172T/T genotype produced only one band (131 bp) and the 172G/T heterozygote displayed all three bands (131, 110 and 21 bp).



Statistical analysis



For each polymorphism, deviation of the genotype frequencies in the controls from those expected under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed using the standard 2-test. Genotype frequencies in cases and controls were compared by 2-tests. The genotype-specific risks were estimated as odds ratios (ORs) with associated 95% intervals (CIs) by unconditional logistic regression. P-values < 0.05 were considered to be significant. STATISTICA 6.0 software (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) was used to perform analyses.

Results

Table II shows genotype distribution of RAD51 135G>C polymorphism in cases and controls. Odds ratio analysis showed a statistically significant positive association of colorectal cancer risk for carriers of the 135C allele of the 135G>C polymorphism of the RAD51 gene. We observed an association between colorectal carcinoma occurrence and the presence of the C/C genotypes. A stronger association was observed for the C/C homozygotes than for the G/C heterozygotes.

No statistically significant differences were observed in the alleles or in the genotype frequencies of the RAD51 172G>T gene polymorphisms between the control group and patients with colorectal cancer (p > 0.05) (Table III).

The association between the haplotypes analysis of RAD51 and colorectal cancer is displayed in Table IV. The halophyte/haplotype analysis according to wild-type of G135G-G172G showed a high association with CRC. The findings indicated that a statistically significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer was associated with the combined C/C-G/G genotype and C/C-T/T genotype. The higher risk of CRC occurrence was associated with the combined C135C-G172T genotype but no altered risk was associated with other haplotypes.

Dukes’ staging was related to the RAD51 135G>C and 172G>T polymorphisms. The histological stage was evaluated in all cases (n = 320). 91 cases were stage A, 179 cases were stage B, 28 cases were stage C and 22 cases – stage D. Stage B, C and D were grouped together for the purposes of statistical analysis (Table V). We did not observe any difference between RAD51-135G>C and 172G>T genotype distributions in these groups. There was no correlation between genotypes of the polymorphisms and colorectal cancer invasiveness.

We did not observe any difference in the distribution of genotypes of investigated polymorphisms between patients with lymph node metastasis (N+) and without (N–) lymph node. Additionally, there was no difference in distribution of genotypes and frequency of alleles in a group of patients with different TNMs.

Discussion

Despite advanced diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, colorectal cancer (CRC) is still responsible for high morbidity and mortality of women. The contribution of polymorphisms of DNA repair genes in developing colorectal carcinoma is controversial. Therefore, we investigated the role of 135G>C and 172G>T genetic variation in homologous recombination repair gene and risk of this cancer.

Engin et al. examined the role of SNPs in genes that participate in the base excision repair (BER) pathway (hOGG1) which repairs lipid hydroperoxide-induced oxidative DNA base modifications and single-strand breaks and nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway (XPD, XPC) which repairs bulky adducts induced by smoking- and lipid hydroperoxide acetaldehyde-induced adducts genes and risk of colorectal cancer. The presence of the hOGG1, XPD and XPC variant allele was not associated with the increased risk of cancer progression [24].

We found in the literature that the studies performed in Chinese and Korean populations did not find any association between variants in DNA mismatch repair genes (MMR) and sporadic CRC [25, 26]. The Asp132His variant was present but not associated with sporadic CRC in the Chinese population [25].

The MLH1 415G>C (Asp132His) variant has been shown to be associated with susceptibility to sporadic CRC in the Israeli population, although the CRCs associated with the variant usually are not MSI [27].

The other polymorphism of hMLH1 gene A655G may play a role in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. These results suggest that this polymorphism may be a potential marker to predict the prognosis of colorectal cancer cases [28].

From a review of the literature we learned that polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair gene were investigated in CRC.

The researches found the association between XRCC4 gene C-1622T polymorphism and colorectal cancer [29].

The results of several studies showed that polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair gene XRCC2 may play an important role in colorectal cancer aetiology [30].

Wang et al. suggested that the XRCC3 241Met allele showed a protective tendency against rectal cancer. Moreover, a combination of the XRCC1 399Gln allele with XRCC3 Thr/Thr genotype and the XPD 751Gln allele demonstrated the highest rectal cancer risk [31].

Unfortunately, it is difficult to find in the literature reports directly binding SNPs in DNA repair gene RAD51 with clinicopathological features of the tumour. Only in single studies, researchers suggest that the homologous recombination repair gene polymorphism 135G>C may play a role in carcinoma of the colorectal occurrence [22, 23].

Few studies have investigated the association between the RAD51 172G>T SNP and risk of cancer. In a large European case-control study of patients with breast cancer, the 172T variant genotypes of RAD51 were found to be associated with a non-significantly reduced risk of breast cancer [20]. Similar results were reported in a Korean case-control study of breast cancer [21].

Conversely, in a recent case-control study of epithelial ovarian cancer, none of the 135G>C and 172G>T variants of RAD51 were associated with a reduction in risk [32].

Our earlier study suggests that the polymorphism 135G>C of the RAD51 gene may be positively associated with endometrial carcinoma in the Polish women [33].

In this work we investigated single nucleotide polymorphisms of RAD51 135G>C and 172G>T and their association with human colorectal cancer. Single nucleotide polymorphisms have been identified in the 5’ untranslated region of the RAD51 gene and have been shown to influence gene transcription activity. RAD51 expression is often increased in various malignancies [34].

What is important, recent reports demonstrate the role of RAD51 135G>C polymorphism in the development of CRC.

Krupa et al. found that C135C genotype decreased the risk of colorectal cancer in the Polish population. However, TNM and Dukes’ staging were not related to RAD51 polymorphism [23].

Other data show that G/C heterozygote of the 135 G/C RAD51 polymorphism may be associated with the increased risk of colorectal cancer development [23].

In conclusion, in the recent studies, the 135G>C polymorphism of RAD51 may be associated with an elevated tumour risk in the Polish population in CRC [11]. There are no data about the significance of the RAD51 135G>C and 172G>T polymorphisms in CRC in other populations.

Our results confirm the important role of RAD51 135G>C polymorphism for colorectal carcinoma occurrence in Poland. In this study, RAD51 C/C genotype increased the risk of CRC in the Polish population. There was a 5-fold increased risk of colorectal carcinoma for individuals carrying RAD51-C/C genotype, compared with subjects carrying RAD51-G/G, G/C genotype, respectively. We identified the combined genotype of C135C-G172G, C135C-G172T and C135C-T172T that was associated with CRC risk and may have an impact on identification of a high-risk population. The 135C allele increased the risk of CRC. RAD51 G135C polymorphism was not related to the cancer stage. The reason can be a relatively small group of A, B and C stage enrolled in our study.

It is possible that the presence of the C allele is in linkage disequilibrium with another, so far unknown, mutation located outside the coding region in the RAD51 gene, which may be of importance for the RAD51 concentration in plasma. To our knowledge, this is the first study linking the 172G>T polymorphism of the RAD51 gene with colorectal cancer.

Finally, we suggested that RAD51 135G>C might be used as a predictive factor for precancerous lesion for colorectal cancer in the Polish population. Further studies on the role of these genes on CRC is warranted.

References

 1. Ahmed FE. Colon cancer: prevalence, screening, gene expression and mutation, and risk factors and assessment. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 2003; 21:

65-131.

 2. Markowitz SD, Bertagnolli MM. Molecular origins of cancer: Molecular basis of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2449-2460.

 3. Strate LL, Syngal S. Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Cancer Causes Control 2005; 16: 201-213.

 4. Park Y, Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, et al. Dietary fiber intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies. JAMA 2005; 294: 2849-2857.

 5. Jackson SP. Sensing and repairing DNA double-strand breaks. Carcinogenesis 2002; 23: 687-696.

 6. Helleday T. Pathways for mitotic homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mutat Res 2003; 532: 103-115.

 7. Thacker J. The RAD51 gene family, genetic instability and cancer. Cancer Lett 2005; 219: 125-135.

 8. Scully R, Chen J, Plug A, et al. Association of BRCA1 with Rad51 in mitotic and meiotic cells. Cell 1997; 88: 265-275.

 9. Sharan SK, Morimatsu M, Albrecht U, et al. Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2. Nature 1997; 386: 804-810.

10. Hasselbach L, Haase S, Fischer D, et al. Characterisation of the promoter region of the human DNA-repair gene RAD51. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2005; 26: 589-598.

11. Sliwinski T, Walczak A, Przybylowska K, et al. Polymorphisms of the XRCC3 C722T and the RAD51 G135C genes and the risk of head and neck cancer in a Polish population. Exp Mol Pathol 2010; 89: 358-366.

12. Krupa R, Sobczuk A, Popławski T, et al. DNA damage and repair in endometrial cancer in correlation with the hOGG1 and RAD51 genes polymorphism. Mol Biol Rep 2011; 38: 1163-1170.

13. Costa S, Pinto D, Pereira D, et al. DNA repair polymorphisms might contribute differentially on familial and sporadic breast cancer susceptibility: a study on a Portuguese population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 103: 209-217.

14. Jara L, Acevedo ML, Blanco R, et al. RAD51 135G>C polymorphism and risk of familial breast cancer in a South American population. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2007; 178: 65-69.

15. Antoniou AC, Sinilnikova OM, Simard J, et al. RAD51 135GC modifies breast cancer risk among BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from a combined analysis of 19 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81: 1186-1200.

16. Romanowicz H, Smolarz B, Baszczyński J, et al. Genetics polymorphism in DNA repair genes by base excision repair pathway (XRCC1) and homologous recombination (XRCC2 and RAD51) and the risk of breast carcinoma in the Polish population. Pol J Pathol 2010; 61: 206-216.

17. Lee KM, Choi JY, Kang C, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of selected DNA repair genes, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and breast cancer risk. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 4620-4626.

18. Jakubowska A, Gronwald J, Menkiszak J, et al. The RAD51 135 G>C polymorphism modifies breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk in Polish BRCA1 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16: 270-275.

19. Lu J, Wang LE, Xiong P, et al. 172G>T variant in the 5’ untranslated region of DNA repair gene RAD51 reduces risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and interacts with a P53 codon 72 variant. Carcinogenesis 2007; 28: 988-994.

20. Kuschel B, Auranen A, McBride S, et al. Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer susceptibility. Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11: 1399-1407.

21. Lee KM, Choi JY, Kang C, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of selected DNA repair genes, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and breast cancer risk. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 4620-4626.

22. Krupa R, Sliwinski T, Wisniewska-Jarosinska M, et al. Polymorphisms in RAD51, XRCC2 and XRCC3 genes of the homologous recombination repair in colorectal cancer – a case control study. Mol Biol Rep 2011; 38: 2849-2854.

23. Wiśniewska-Jarosińska M, Sliwińfski T, Krupa R, et al. The role of RAD 51 gene polymorphism in patients with colorectal cancer in the Polish subpopulation. Pol Merkur Lekarski 2009; 26: 455-457.

24. Engin AB, Karahalil B, Engin A, Karakaya AE. Oxidative stress, Helicobacter pylori, and OGG1 Ser326Cys, XPC Lys939Gln, and XPD Lys751Gln polymorphisms in a Turkish population with colorectal carcinoma. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010; 14: 559-564.

25. Mei Q, Yan HL, Ding FX, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of mismatch repair genes in healthy Chinese individuals and sporadic colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2006; 171: 17-23.

26. Kim JC, Roh SA, Koo KH, et al. Genotyping possible polymorphic variants of human mismatch repair genes in healthy Korean individuals and sporadic colorectal cancer patients. Fam Cancer 2004; 3: 129-137.

27. Lipkin SM, Rozek LS, Rennert G, et al. The MLH1 D132H variant is associated with susceptibility to sporadic colorectal cancer. Nat Genet 2004; 36: 694-699.

28. Song L, Zhang XM, Wang DQ, et al. Mismatch repair gene hMLH1 A655G/A polymorphism and colorectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2010; 13: 216-218.

29. Bau DT, Yang MD, Tsou YA, et al. Colorectal cancer and genetic polymorphism of DNA double-strand break repair gene XRCC4 in Taiwan. Anticancer Res 2010; 30: 2727-2730.

30. Curtin K, Lin WY, George R, et al. Genetic variants in XRCC2: new insights into colorectal cancer tumorigenesis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009; 18: 2476-2484.

31. Wang J, Zhao Y, Jiang J, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC3 and XPD, and colorectal cancer risk: a case-control study in an Indian population. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2010; 136: 1517-1525.

32. Auranen A, Song H, Waterfall C, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and epithelial ovarian cancer risk. Int J Cancer 2005; 117: 611-618.

33. Smolarz B, Samulak D, Michalska M, et al. 135G>C and 172G>T polymorphism in the 5’ untranslated region of RAD51 and sporadic endometrial cancer risk in Polish women. Pol J Pathol 2011; 62: 157-162.

34. Klein HL. The consequences of Rad51 overexpression for normal and tumor cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 2008; 7: 686-693.



Address for correspondence



Beata Smolarz


Laboratory of Molecular Genetics

Department of Pathology

Institute of Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital

Rzgowska 281/289, 93-338 Lodz, Poland

tel. +48 42 271 20 71

e-mail: smolbea@wp.pl
Copyright: © 2012 Polish Association of Pathologists and the Polish Branch of the International Academy of Pathology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2022 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.