eISSN: 1644-4124
ISSN: 1426-3912
Central European Journal of Immunology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

vol. 37

Review paper
Immunotropic activity of Echinacea. Part I. History and chemical structure

Barbara J. Bałan
Filip Różewski
Robert Zdanowski
Ewa Skopińska-Różewska

(Centr Eur J Immunol 2012; 37 (1): 45-50)
Online publish date: 2012/03/29
Article file
- Immunotropic part I.pdf  [0.08 MB]
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero


Echinacea is a plant contained within the botanical family of Asteraceae (Compositae), commonly known as a coneflower. It is a perennial plant, reaching up to 40-150 cm of height, depending on the species. The most characteristic feature of Echinacea genus is the shape of its flower. These are basket-type inflorescentia, composed of tubular flowers, placed singly on the stalks.

The genus name stems from a Greek word echinos, meaning a hedgehog. The botaniser Conrad Moench in 1794 was the one, who gave the plant this name, due to the acanthous, prickly scales on a dry seed head. In fact, the flowers of Echinacea are spherical, with spiny flower bottoms and long, tongue-shaped petals of corolla, which resemble hedgehog. The basket-type inflorescences measure up to 12 cm in diameter. Pink-purple or white flowers surround a spiny, protuberant central part. Echinacea blooms from July to October. So far 9 different species of Echinacea have been recognised and described, all of them are naturally endemic only in North America (US, Canada), practically in its south-eastern part, including the Great Lakes area, the Appalachian Mountains and Rocky Mountains. Echinacea can be found there growing as perennial plants on the prairies and forests mainly in states of Missouri, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Arkansas.

There are three closely-related species of Echinacea being currently used for the pharmaceutical and medical purposes: Echinacea purpurea or purple coneflower, Echinacea pallida or pale coneflower and Echinacea angustifolia or narrow-leaved Echinacea. Originated from North America, however currently cultivated also in Europe, all three exhibit similar therapeutic effects. After the acclimatisation process, Echinacea purpurea (purple coneflower), can be cultivated also in Poland, providing a full-valued, medical herb. Since 1990 it is also cultivated in China [1-8].


The very first descriptions of Echinacea appeared in the 18th century, first in 1737, in the Catalogue of Plants, Fruits, and Trees Native to Virginia, written by John Clayton from Virginia and then in 1762, in Flora Virginica, published by Frederic Gronovius.

Later on, in 1787, the subject of Echinacea has been broached in Materia Medica Americana, as Echinacea was used in horses in cases of skin ulcers caused by saddles. In 1887, Echinacea was also acknowledged by the American Society of Pharmacists, and has been added to its medicine register [9]. However, the plant of Echinacea itself and its therapeutic properties were known and used much earlier, by numerous Indian tribes of North America.

They have been all using it commonly and successfully, from skin problems to alimentary tract illnesses, fevers, respiratory and urinary system disorders. The spectrum was even broader, as the plant was used also in snakes and venomous insects bites, contagious diseases, various infections, venereal diseases, wound healing [10, 11].

Subsequently, as soon as analgetic properties of Echinacea were discovered, it has been also used as a painkiller and a stimulant. Traditionally, chronic skin inflammations, burns and local infections were also treated with Echinacea. This tradition was later on passed to white settlers, who, due to the scarcity of other medicines, were somewhat forced to use the Indian remedy. Gradually, they deepened their knowledge of the medical utilisation of Echinacea and it was them in fact, who brought the remedy to Europe on the verge of 19th and 20th century [9, 12].

Originally, Echinacea was used in ethno medicine, as a broad-spectrum agent, including antidote against snail venoms. During the 18th and 19th century white inhabitants of US were using the herb and root of Echinacea in multiple kinds of afflictions, among which there were arthral pains, cough-related pleuric and intercostal pains, headaches and many others. With regard to its anti inflammatory, sudorific and wound healing properties, Echinacea was a remedy against high fevers, and abscessed, infected wounds during the American Civil War. Extracts proved to disinfect and improve the regeneration process of damaged tissues. The same extracts were administered as well in cases of burns, frostbites, bedsores and ulcerations. Moreover, Echinacea was administered preventively and therapeutically in patients with liver diseases and biliary tract dysfunction, as it exhibited biligenic, choleretic and spasmolytic actions. It also stimulates the secretion of digestive juices (gastric, pancreatic and intestinal) [13].

In 18th and 19th century, Echinacea preparations were used to treat many bacterial and virus infections, parasite diseases and mycosis (such as influenza, herpes simplex, measles, small-pox, herpes zoster, and water-pox, rubeola, angina, syphilis, diphtheria, scarlatina, malaria, upper respiratory tract diseases and sinusitis, vaginal yeast, cryptococcosis) or even cases of rabies. Taking into account the broad spectrum of therapeutic use, in the late 19th century Echinaceas were officially introduced to the US pharmacopoeia by John King and John Uri Lloyd. First clinical trials of Echinacea were conducted by Meyer and King in a Cincinnati hospital [14-16].

Consequently, an immensely broad medical utilisation, as well as a raising, public and scientific interest in Echinacea brought about such a popularity, that in the twenties of 20th century Echinacea had become the bestselling medical plant in the US.

In Europe Echinacea first appeared between 19th and 20th century as a homeopathic agent, after a while however, it became a commonly administered medicine. In the thirties of 20th century, Gerhard Madaus launched in Germany a cultivation of Echinacea on an industrial scale.

The development of chemotherapy in medicine led to the loss of interest in medical plants (including Echinacea), even though the research had been previously started on a larger scale. Intense trials conducted worldwide managed to restore the interest and create the scientific basics to use Echinacea as an immunomodulator. Since the seventies onwards, in Canada and US a great increase in the interest in Echinacea has been observed.

Today, numerous, immune-stimulating preparations produced from roots and herbs of Echinacea purpurea or angustifolia are available on the market. They contain various active substances and it is now well known that several groups of those compounds are concerned in the process of immune-stimulation [17-20].

Active compounds

The raw materials used for the manufacture of medicinal preparations from Echinacea are both blooming herbs and their roots. All three species of Echinacea being used in therapy can be characterised by an outstanding diversity of substances, which can affect the parameters of the immune system. Due to the abundance of those substances (various additionally in each species), obtaining the standardised preparations was highly problematic. Among many others, chemical compounds such as carbohydrates, fatty acids, derivatives of caffeic and tartaric acids, flavonoids, fitosterols, polisaccharides (heteroxylans and arabinoramnogalactans) and isobutyloamides (the last two being highly immune-stimulating), poliacetylenes and essential oils were detected in a fresh raw material. Chicoric and caftaric acids were the main phenolic compounds of Echinacea purpurea herb, cynarin was a characteristic component of Echinacea angustifolia roots, echinacoside was the main phenolic in Echinacea angustifolia and Echinacea pallida roots [21-25].

Echinacea is well known and used as an immunostimulating agent. It has been proved to increase the number of white blood cells and potentiate the process of phagocytosis by macrophages and granulocytes. Echinacea is a wide-spectrum immunomodulator that modulates both innate and adaptive immune responses [26-29].

It is known that thanks to the inhibition of the enzyme hyaluronidase, the cell membranes structure, collagen and proteoglycans are strengthened, which impedes the penetration of pathogens into the vulnerable tissues [30].

It is also correlated with the increase of interferon (INF) release, which immunize the organism against viral infections and limits its proliferation. Moreover, thanks to a decrease in secretion of inflammatory mediators such as histamine, prostaglandins or leukotrienes, the anti-inflammatory and anti-exudative effect of Echinacea is exhibited. Keratinocytes and Langerhans-cells in epithelium are stimulated, they present the antigens to lymphocytes, which leads to the release of intercellular, signalling proteins – cytokines. Another regenerating activity of Echinacea is a stimulation of collagen and elastic fibres synthesis in chondroblasts, osteoblasts and fibroblasts. Metabolic conversion is generally intensified, the tonic and regenerating action is demonstrated both locally or throughout the whole organism, depending on the way of administration and chemical composition of the preparation [31-33].

Among many chemical compounds, playing the role of active substances contained in the extracts of Echinacea there are numerous, different, chemical groups ranging from carbohydrates, phenolic compounds being very common in the aboveground parts of the plant, all the way to polyterpens and antibiotic-like type of substances.

Diversity aside however, only the physiologically active, secondary metabolites are of high, therapeutic significance. They are all the products of special metabolic conversions and cannot be related to any basic life-function, unlike primary metabolites such as monosaccharides, amylum, lipids, chlorophyll, all the other pigments, amino acids, proteins and nucleic acids, which are all essential to the life of the plant.

Presently, it is acknowledged that some plants (including Echinacea) are able to synthesise aromatic compounds, mainly phenols and their derivatives. Phenols in their free form are often a component of essential oils. They can also occur in a glycoside-form. As phenolic acids, they are almost constantly present in plants, mainly as caffeic acid or its ester, chlorogenic acid. The antiseptic (antibacterial, disinfection) properties of natural phenols are commonly known. Polyphenols influence omnidirectionally the humoral immune response by modulating the release of various cytokines. Phenolic acids contribute also to the production of antibodies. Chlorogenic and caffeic acids intensify in vitro the migration activity of macrophages in mice. Yet, it is not to be forgotten that during the air-drying of fresh Echinaceas over 30% of active substances decompose. Many valuable components (including the chicoric acid) may be lost during the improper process of extraction [34-36].

In the last decade of 20th century the medical use of Echinacea was once again intensively examined. Substances obtained from this plant tempt the scientists with its antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, anti inflammatory, immune-stimulant and angiogenesis modulation effects. Phenols and phenolic acids are one of the simplest bioactive compounds present in Echinacea. Caffeic acid and its derivatives, which come under the caffetanins, exhibit antiviral, antibacterial and antifungal activity. It is likely that their toxicity against microorganisms stems from the presence of hydroxyl group, situated in phenolic ring. Some authors stated that with the increase of hydroxylation, the activity is also augmented but this remains to be clarified. On the other hand however, there are publications concerning the flavonoids, which despite the loss of hydroxyl group in the phenolic ring maintain intense and effective activity against microorganisms. This might be explained by higher lipophilicity and therefore greater affinity to pathogen’s bilayer lipid membrane, which is the target of action.

Flavonoids are, in fact, able to form complex compounds with extracellular, soluble proteins and the elements of bacterial cell wall.

Phenolic acids and their esters have moreover strong anti inflammatory and antioxidant properties, that enables to maintain the right balance between oxidants and reductants, being essential to organism homeostasis. In a full competence of immunological system, the active oxidants destroy pathogens and then gradually undergo the inactivation by both extra and intracellular enzymes. All pathological conditions correlated with chronic inflammatory response favour the production of oxidants, which leads to their surplus, consequently – the neutrophil oxidase NADPH and myeloperoxidase are being activated excessively, producing constantly more and more different forms of active oxidants. Due to the superabundance of oxidants in organism, numerous detrimental reactions occur, such as the oxidation of lipids, intracellular organelles, nuclear membranes and unsaturated fatty acids.

Furthermore, inflammations with increased number of free radicals favour the promotion of tumours. Some of the substances contained in Echinacea are thus used in dermatology and cosmetology, as they inactivate the free oxygen radicals and by that, help to protect the nucleic acids, proteins and many other microstructures in living skin cells [37, 38].

Phenolic antioxidants inhibit the NF-B (nuclear factor B) and AP1, which participate in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin 1 (IL-1), IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor  (TNF-).

Phenolic acids present in Echinacea may be used in prevention of inflammation. The molecular mechanism of anti inflammatory activity of CAPE (caffeic acid phenetyl ester) has been so far the best known and described.

It has been observed that CAPE completely block the NF-B, produced in cells under the influence of inflammation process inductors – TNF- and the esters of phorbol. Caffeic acid phenetyl ester in a specific way prevents the translocation of p65 subunit in NF-B, and therefore inhibits the binding of NF-B to DNA [39-43].

Flavonoids also directly inhibit lipooxygenase and cyclooxygenase thereby preventing the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins, leukotrienes and thromboxanes. Quercetin present in the herb of Echinacea has an ability to inhibit the viral replication by activating NF-B. Just like hesperetin and catechin it counteracts Herpes simplex type-1 (HSV-1), polio type-1, RSV and human parainfluenza virus type-3 proliferation. The flavonol quercetin has an additional, universal, anti-infective action.

Compound such as quercetin, CAPE and few other flavonoids present in Echinacea inhibit the HIV-1 integrase. Some authors state in their publications, that administering the remedies based on Echinacea to patients with AIDS is risky, others however, that it is moderately hazardous whereas the clinical benefits are significant.

Immunological effect of Echinacea is mainly an immunomodulation, that is, a stimulation of the production of antibodies, cytokines, growth factors and a direct modification of effector cells functions (i.e. phagocytosis, cytotoxicity). Substances, originated from this plant, can also influence both the thymus itself (central immunological organ) and its cells – thymocytes, as well as various subpopulations of thymus-dependent T-lymphocytes.

In Echinacea angustifolia it is a root, which is the most commonly used raw-material, while in Echinacea purpurea the aboveground parts play a more important role. Despite the differences in type and content of the immunologically active substances in both of the species, they happen to exhibit similar anti-oxidative action, which stems from the synergistic action of their ingredients [44].

The herb of Echinacea contains up to 0.32% of volatile, liquid compounds, being called ethereal (or essential) oils. These are the secondary metabolites, structurally based on isoprene.

Apart from the influence (fragrance) on human psyche, they demonstrate somewhat an antimicrobial activity. Ethereal oils are mixtures of dozens or even hundreds of chemical substances of numerous functions, which are not all structurally explored.

The predominant ingredient of ethereal oils are monoterpenes or their oxygen derivatives – alcohols, aldehydes and ketones. Di-, tri-, tetra- or sesqiterpenes (in the root) can be also present.

Over 1000 compounds has been so far discovered in oils and sesqiterpenes resins and the number is still growing. They inhibit the proliferation of Gram-positive bacteria such as: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Propionibacterium acnes and -hemolitic Streptococcus, as well as Gram-negative bacteria such as: Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter, Escherichia coli, Shigella sonnei, Proteus mirabilis, Legionella sp. Ethereal oils prevent additionally the proliferation of fungi: Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger. The antiviral activity against influenza virus was also observed. Substances present in ethereal oils proved themselves to be effective in the treatment of acne, herpes, dandruff, psoriasis, burns and others. The antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and anti-protozoa activity is a result of the presence of active, chemical compounds in ethereal oils.

The bioactivity of the Echinacea extracts and their stimulating immune system properties are closely correlated with alkamides, mainly the isobutyloamides of dodecatetraenic acid, polisaccharides, glycoproteins, phenolic acids and their derivatives. The roots of Escherichia angustifolia contain echinacoside and cinarine, which both exhibit antibacterial and antiviral properties. Alkamides, phenolic acids (caffeic, chlorogenic and chicoric) and other thermo-stable fractions of Escherichia purpurea extracts also act antivirally and antifungally.

Alkamides are thermo-labile, hence the use of high temperature during the process of their production may inactivate them and change the bioactivity of the whole, obtained preparation.

It could be perhaps the explanation of differences between the activity of preparations manufactured by different producers and between liquid and powdered preparations, especially if the process of drying requires higher temperatures.

Echinaceas react on many elements of immune response, stimulating both specific and non-specific immunity. The main mechanisms of their action are to stimulate phagocytosis and to augment the antibacterial activity of macrophages, then to inhibit the production of both endo and exogenous hyaluronidase, thereby limiting the spreading of infection and inflammation. They may also stimulate the T-lymphocytes-dependent cell-type immunity, the cytotoxic cells and the cytokines production including interferons, TNF-, IL-1 and others. Another mechanism can be either to activate the alternative route of complement system by increasing the production of P-factor (Properdin), or to inhibit the lipooxygenesis, or finally either to stimulate the production of antibodies, or to intensify the immunological angiogenesis (which could be of high significance in the treatment of the impairments of recovery processes in wound healing, bone fractures and ulcerations or even in future cardiology as a prevention against ischaemic heart disease or myocardial infarctions).

Glycoproteins, being present in similar quantities in roots of both Echinacea purpurea and Echinacea angustifolia, stimulate the activity of type-B lymphocytes and the production of cytokines by macrophages [45-53].

However, one should remember, that many herbal remedies (among them extracts of Rhodiola and Echinacea plants), being stimulatory in lower doses, in higher doses presented inhibitory effects, affecting proliferation and mobility of lymphocytes [54].


 1. WHO monographs on selected medicinal plants. Vol. 1, Geneva 1999; 125-145

 2. Echinacea – history and traditional use: http://www.naturalmedicinesofnc.org/Echinacea.

 3. Echinacea – history and description: http://www.chinese-herbs.org/echinacea.

 4. Liu YC, Zeng JG, Chen B, Yao SZ (2007): Investigation of phenolic constituents in Echinacea purpurea grown in China. Planta Med 73: 1600-1605.

 5. Bauer R, Wray V, Wagner H (1987): The chemical discrimination of Echinacea angustifolia and E. pallida. Pharm Weekbl Sci 9: 220.

 6. Zheng Y, Dixon M, Saxena PK (2006): Growing environment and nutrient availability affect the content of some phenolic compounds in Echinacea purpurea and Echinacea angustifolia. Planta Med 72: 1407-1414.

 7. McGregor RL (1968): The taxonomy of the genus of Echinacea (Compositae). Univ Cansas Sci Bull 48: 113-142.

 8. Osowski S, Rostock M, Bartsch HH, Massing U (2000): Pharmaceutical comparability of different therapeutic Echinacea preparations. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd 7: 294-300.

 9. McLaughlin G (1992): Echinacea. Aust J Med Herbalism 4: 104-111.

10. Gilmore MR (1919): Uses of plants by the Indians of the Missouri River region. Thirty-third Annual Report of the Bureau of the America Ethnology. Government Printing Office, Washington DC; 145-154.

11. Moerman D (2008): Native American herbal prescription sticks: Indigenous 19-th Century Pharmacopeias. HerbalGram 77: 48-53.

12. Sun LZ, Currier NL, Miller SC (1999): The American coneflower: a prophylactic role involving nonspecific immunity. J Altern Complement Med 5: 437-446.

13. Murray MT (1995): Echinacea: pharmacology and clinical applications. Am J Natural Med 2: 18-24.

14. King J (1887): Echinacea angustifolia. Eclectic Med J 42: 209-210.

15. King J, Newton RS (1852): Eclectic Dispensatory of the United States of America. Cincinnati.

16. Loyd JU (1904): History of Echinacea angustifolia. Pharm Rev 22: 1-14.

17. Woelkart K, Marth E, Suter A, et al. (2006): Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of Echinacea purpurea preparations and their interaction with the immune system. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 44: 401-408.

18. Bauer R (1996): Echinacea-drugs – effects and active ingredients. Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena) 90: 111-115 [Article in German].

19. Bauer R, Remiger P, Juric K, et al. (1989): Beeinflussung der Phagozytose-Aktivitat durch Echinacea-Extracte. Zeitschr Phytother 10: 43-48.

20. Wagner H (1986): Examination of the immune-stimulation effect of some plant homeopathic drugs. Biol Ther 4: 21-27.

21. Bauer R (1999): Standardization of Echinacea purpurea expressed juice with reference to chicoric acid and alkamides. J Herbs Spices Med Plants 6: 51-62.

22. Bauer R, Remiger P (1989): TLC and HPLC analysis of alkamides in Echinacea drugs. Planta Med 55: 367-371.

23. Bauer R, Remiger P, Alstat E (1990): Alkamides and caffeic acid derivatives from the root of Echinacea tennesseensis. Planta Med 56: 533-534.

24. Bauer R (1998): Echinacea: biological effects and active principles. In: Lawson LD, Bauer R. Phytomedicines of Europe: Chemistry and Biological Activity, ACS Symposium Series 691. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC; 140-157.

25. Perry NB, Burgess EJ, Glennie VL (2001): Echinacea standardization: analytical methods for phenolic compounds and typical levels in medicinal species. J Agric Food Chem 49: 1702-1706.

26. Matthias A, Banbury L, Stevenson LM, et al. (2007): Alkylamides from Echinacea modulate induced immune responses in macrophages. Immunol Invest 36: 117-130.

27. Block KI, Mead MN (2003): Immune system effects of Echinacea, Ginseng, and Astragallus: a review. Integr Cancer Ther 2: 247-267.

28. Luettig B, Steinmüller C, Gifford GE, et al. (1989): Macrophage activation by the polysaccharide arabinogalactan isolated from plant cell cultures of Echinacea purpurea. J Natl Cancer Inst 81: 669-675.

29. Stimpel M, Proksch A, Wagner H, Lohmann-Matthes ML (1984): Macrophage activation and induction of macrophage cytotoxicity by purified polysacharide fractions from the plant Echinacea purpurea. Infect Immun 46: 845-849.

30. Büsing KH (1952): Inhibition of hyaluronidase by echiancine. Arzneimittelforschung 2: 467-469.

31. Barnes J, Anderson LA, Gibbons S, Phillipson JD (2005): Echinacea species (E. angustifolia, E. pallida, E. purpurea): a review of their chemistry, pharmacology, and clinical properties. J Pharm Pharmacol 57: 929-954.

32. Bone K (1997): Echinacea: what makes it work? Alternat Med Rev 2: 87-93.

33. Zhai Z, Liu Y, Wu L, et al. (2007): Enhancement of innate and adaptive immune functions by multiple Echinacea species.

J Med Food 10: 423-434.

34. Li TS, Wardle DA (2002): Effects of root drying temperature and moisture content on the levels of active ingredients in Echinacea roots. J Herbs Spices Med Plants 8: 15-22.

35. Stuart DL, Wills RB (2003): Effect of drying temperature on alkylamide and cichoric acid concentrations of Echinacea purpurea. J Agric Food Chem 51: 1608-1610.

36. Nüsslein B, Kurzmann M, Bauer R, Kreis W (2000): Enzymatic degradation of cichoric acid in Echinacea purpurea preparations. J Nat Prod 63: 1615-1618.

37. Hu C, Kitts DD (2000): Studies on the antioxidant activity of Echinacea root extract. J Agric Food Chem 48: 1466-1472.

38. Crozier A, Jaganath IB, Clifford MN (2009): Dietary phenolics: chemistry, bioavailability and effects on health. Nat Prod Rep 26: 1001-1043.

39. Cheminat A, Zawatzky R, Becker H, et al. (1988): Caffeoyl conjugates from Echinacea species: structures and biological activity. Phytochemistry 27: 2787-2794.

40. da Cunha FM, Duma D, Assreuy J, et al. (2004): Caffeic acid derivatives: in vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory properties. Free Radic Res 38: 1241-1253.

41. Mishima S, Saito K, Maruyama H, et al. (2004): Antioxidant and immuno-enhancing effects of Echinacea purpurea. Biol Pharm Bull 27: 1004-1009.

42. Göçer H, Gülçin I (2011): Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE): correlation of structure and anti-oxidant properties. Int J Food Sci Nutr 62: 821-825.

43. Mancuso G, Midiri A, Beninati C, et al. (2002): Mitogen-activated protein kinases and NF-kappa B are involved in TNF-αlpha responses to group B streptococci. J Immunol 169: 1401-1409.

44. Dalby-Brown L, Barsett H, Landbo AK, et al. (2005): Synergistic anti-oxidative effects of alkamides, caffeic acid derivatives and polysaccharide fractions from Echinacea purpurea on in vitro oxidation of human low-density lipoproteins. J Agric Food Chem 53: 9413-9423.

45. Laasonen M, Wennberg T, Harmia-Pulkkinen T, Vuorela H (2002): Simultaneous analysis of alkamides and caffeic acid for the identification of Echinacea purpurea, Echinacea angustifolia, Echinacea pallida, and Parthenium integrifolium roots. Planta Med 68: 572-574.

46. Langer R (2001): Anatomy of the underground parts of four Echinacea species and of Parthenium integrifolium. Scientia Pharm 69: 237-247.

47. Sasagawa M, Cech NB, Gray DE, et al. (2006): Echinacea alkylamides inhibit interleukin-2 production by Jurkat T cells. Int Immunopharmacol 6: 1214-1221.

48. Steinmüller C, Roesler J, Gröttrup E, et al. (1993): Polysaccharides isolated from plant cell cultures of Echinacea purpurea enhance the resistance of immunosuppressed mice against systemic infections with Candida albicans and Listeria monocytogenes. Int J Immunopharmacol 15: 605-614.

49. Wagner H, Stuppner W, Schafer W (1988): Immunologically active polysaccharides of Echinacea purpurea cell cultures. Phytochemistry 27: 119-126.

50. Gertsch J, Schoop R, Kuenzle U, Suter A (2004): Echinacea alkylamides modulate TNF alfa gene expression via cannabinoide receptor CB2 and multiple signal transduction pathways. FEBS Lett 577: 563-569.

51. Bauer R, Remiger P, Wagner H (1988): New alkamides from Echinacea angustifolia and Echinacea purpurea roots. Planta Med 54: 563-564.

52. Bauer R, Foster S (1991): Analysis of alkamides and caffeic acid derivatives from Echinacea simulata and E. paradoxa roots. Planta Med 57: 447-449.

53. Chen Y, Fu T, Tao T, et al. (2005): Macrophage activating effects of new alkamides from roots of Echinacea species.

J Nat Prod 68: 773-776.

54. Hartwich M (2010): The importance of immunological studies on Rhodiola rosea in the new effective and safe herbal drug discovery. Centr Eur J Immunol 35: 263-266.
Copyright: © 2012 Polish Society of Experimental and Clinical Immunology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2020 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe