Medical Studies
eISSN: 2300-6722
ISSN: 1899-1874
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
3/2025
vol. 41
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Amateur sports activity in the course of traumatic injury to the Achilles tendon and its surgical treatment in a long-term observation period

Maciej Szczęśniak
1
,
Jarosław Pasek
2
,
Łukasz Rodak
1
,
Rafał Skowroński
3
,
Bogdan Koczy
1
,
Tomasz Stołtny
1

  1. District Hospital of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Piekary Slaskie, Poland
  2. Władysław Biegański Collegium Medicum, Jan Długosz University, Czestochowa, Poland
  3. Department and Clinic of Orthopedics, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland
Medical Studies 2025; 41 (3): 219–224
Online publish date: 2025/06/12
Article file
- Amateur sports.pdf  [0.90 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Sports activity is closely related to broadly understood health, in particular to the proper function of the musculoskeletal system. This is only possible when all the elements work together [1, 2].
In the event of failure of any of them, functioning is limited or even impossible. One of the key elements of the entire system is the Achilles tendon (AT), which is the body’s largest and strongest tendon [3].
In the case of its damage, in sports active people, there is a lack of consensus regarding the best treatment to get the athlete back to sport [4]. Return to play (RTP) to pre-injury levels is often impossible. According to Johns et al., AT rupture prohibits nearly 25% of professional athletes from returning to their respective sport [5].
According to Danish reports, the epidemiology of AT injuries has a steady upward trend. According to Houshian et al. it was, respectively, 18.2/100,000 in 1984 to 37.3/100,000 in 1996, while as stated by Ganestam et al. in the years 1994 to 2013 this number increased from 26.95/100,000 to 31.17/100,000 inhabitants [6, 7]. Also Lemme et al. observed a significant increase in the incidence of AT ruptures, from 1.8 per 100,000 person-years in 2012 to 2.5 per 100,000 person-years in 2016 [8]. A similar increasing trend was observed by Longo et al. and Strojek et al. [9, 10]. Despite the significant incidence of Achilles tendon rupture (ATR), according to Tarantino et al., there are no universally accepted outcomes regarding the return to play (RTP) process. According to Johns et al., returning to play (RTP) to pre-injury levels in professional athletes is often impossible [5, 11].

Aim of the research

The main goal of the study was the long-term evaluation of the possibility of returning to baseline or comparable levels of activity after traumatic injury and surgical treatment of the AT. Additional objectives were the assessment of functionality, structural imaging with ultrasound, and the analysis of quality of life and pain.

Material and methods

Characteristics of the research group
The research group included patients treated surgically at the Independent Public Provincial Hospital of Trauma Surgery in Piekary Slaskie in the years 2010–2015. In 81.4% of cases, the injury occurred during sports activity. Due to the routine nature of the research, a written confirmation was received that the study did not require the approval of the competent Bioethics Committee. Due to the nature of the hospital, 97% of the surveyed patients were recreationally competitive amateur sports participants (their income does not come from sport). 102 patients were analyzed, out of 290 patients, who were treated surgically during this period. In the study, over 88% of patients were male and the mean age was 41 years (SD 8.87). The left side (58) was damaged more often than the right side (44). For the whole group, the mean body mass index (PRP) was 27.6 kg/m2 (SD 4.11). The mean follow-up was 81 months, between 48 and 117 months (SD 26.45). Among the sports practiced by the respondents, during which the AT was injured, the most common was football – 43.1%, then volleyball – 10.8% and badminton – 7.8% (Figure 1).
The level of activity was divided into 5 groups (Figure 2).
The patients underwent surgical treatment in the early period after the injury (within 72 h). All of them were operated by experienced surgeons from the above-mentioned hospital. The operative method was suturing the damaged AT with a Kessler suture. In 34 cases, plasty with the “inverted lobe” was used. In addition, 29 patients received autogenous platelet-rich plasma (PRP). This was due to a better valuation of the procedure by the National Health Fund. All patients were immobilized after surgery and then rehabilitated (Figure 3) [12].
Methodology
The study was based on functional scales – AOFAS (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score), Takakura, Kofoed, HAQ (The Health Assessment Questionnaire) quality of life scale, VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain rating scale and structural assessment of the AT using ultrasound. Additionally, the calf circumference was measured at the widest point of the shin and the symmetry of tendon reflexes was examined. The control group was a non-injured contralateral limb. Due to the insufficient number of data and the correlation to the AOFAS scale demonstrated by Kim et al. and Usuelli et al., the ATRS scale (Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score) was not used in the evaluation process [13, 14].
Main scale: AOFAS, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (Ankle-Hindfoot Scale), proposed by Kitaoka et al. [15] and the Takakura and Kofoed scales, using subscales, define the range of motion, position of the tarsus, gait propulsion, use of orthopedic equipment, as well as possible pain. Another scale used to assess the level of pain intensity is the VAS scale, which is based on the subjective assessment of the patient and, as shown by Karcioglu et al. is appropriate for clinical evaluation. To summarize overall well-being, the HAQ 20-point quality of life scale was used, which is defined as a scale that correlates well with the clinical picture [16]. Measurements were made using a centimeter ruler and goniometer. Tendon reflexes were elicited with a neurological hammer.
The ultrasound examination was an integral part of the follow-up visit and was performed using the same equipment (Hitachi Noblus with a 5–13 Mhz linear probe) by one person, additionally the image was assessed using the Power Doppler function.
To assess architectural disturbances, a 3-point scale developed for the purposes of the study was used. Classifies according to the degree of disorders in the form of obliteration of the correct anatomical structure: I degree – up to 30% (Figure 4), II degree – between 30% and 50% (Figure 5) and III – above 50% (Figure 6). An additional element was the presence of sutures in the ultrasound image, regardless of the degree of disturbance in the fiber architecture (Figure 7).
We confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All the examined patients gave written informed consent for their personal participation involved in the study protocols.
Statistical analysis
Statistica 12 PL and MS Excel 2016 were used for statistical analysis. Measurable variables were presented as the arithmetic mean with standard deviation (SD). Qualitative variables were shown as counts and percentages. The normality of the distribution was checked with the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the homogeneity of variance with the Levene’s test. The t-test with independent estimation of variance or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the control group and the study group. c2 statistics were used to evaluate the qualitative variables. The Spearman test was used to analyze the correlation. Changes at the significance level p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Obtained results of the clinical evaluation scales, during the last follow-up visit, were as follows: AOFAS – mean 93.79 points (SD 6.06), Kofoed – mean 94.81 points (SD 7.44) and Takakura – mean 95.05 points (SD 7.62). In all of them, a statistically significantly lower score was noted in relation to contralateral side (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant (p = 0.002) reduction in the calf circumference of the operated limb, measured at the widest point of the shin, the mean was 37.86 cm (SD 2.92) in the area of the operated limb (SD 2.92) compared with the opposite/contralateral limb – 39.00 cm (SD 2.87). The mean quality of life assessed with the HAQ scale was 21.02 points (SD 1.54). The mean level of pain in the VAS scale, ranged from 0 to 4 points, was 0.37 points (SD 0.94) (Figure 8). In the study group, the return to amateur sports was at the level of 81.9%.
In the ultrasound examination performed after the surgery, statistically significant disturbances in the architecture of the tendon fibers were found (p < 0.001). In addition, in all patients, thickening of the operated AT was observed, both in the frontal plane, mean 11.92 mm (SD 2.25) compared with the control group, mean 5.08 mm (SD 0.98) and in the sagittal plane, mean 18.27 mm (SD 2.70) compared with the control group, mean 13.09 mm (SD 1.92). Statistically, this means up to 135% thickening in the frontal plane and up to 40% in the sagittal plane. The presence of surgical sutures was found in 31% of cases, while the increased flow in the power Doppler study in 6.9% of patients, which in the study group was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). A comparative study of the tendon reflexes was not found to be statistically significant (p = 0.3) (Figures 9 and 10). In the study group, mean 90.2% of the reflexes were correct, for comparison, for the control group the mean was 94.1%.

Discussion

The use of surgical or non-operative treatment to return to practicing a given discipline is widely described in the literature as being at a similar level [17, 18]. However, on the basis of the obtained results, the authors lean towards surgical treatment as being a more predictable and shorter process of returning to sports activity [2]. Results obtained in the study group in the most common AOFAS scale, mean 93.79 points (SD 6.06), are similar to the reports of other researchers such as Rozis et al. (SD 96) and Yang et al. (SD 93.3) [19, 20]. Clinical analysis revealed deficiencies in the values of the scales only in the range from 3% to 5% in relation to the control group. This gives significant efficiency compared with the one before the injury. Moreover, ultrasound imaging of the AT shows a statistically significant disturbance in the architecture of the fibers compared with the control group and an increase in its dimensions in both planes. This means up to 135% thickening in the frontal plane and up to 40% in the sagittal plane. Just as in the opinion of Gumański et al., diagnosed disturbances in the architecture of the tendon fibers does not affect the clinical effect [21]. The mean results obtained in the HAQ scale was 21.02 points (SD 1.54) and VAS scale was 0.37 points (SD 0.94), which can also be found in the study by Jallageas et al. [22]. The quality of life and pain conditions remain at the pre-injury level. Despite the differences in the periods and types of immobilization in the long-term observation of the study, this did not affect the final result and time of return to sports activity. It was also noted by McCormack and Bovard [23]. However, whether in the case of immobilization or rapid early mobilization, there is still no specific rehabilitation protocol following the surgical treatment of an ATR [3, 24].
The method of surgical treatment and used rehabilitation protocol seem to be a good and repeatable method of treating patients with traumatic ATR. In the case of our study group, only slightly more than 18% of patients did not return to their previous level of sports activities, either because of a functional deficit or a psychological trauma. This is a significant difference from the data contained in the work of Trofa et al. concerning professional athletes, where over 30% of respondents were unable to continue their competitive sports activity [18]. In the long-term observation period, we found that surgical treatment of a traumatically injured AT does not limit amateur sports activity and allows to return to the previous level of advancement.

Conclusions

The surgical treatment of the ATR does not restrict amateur athletic activity and allows the patient to return to the previous level of advancement.

Funding

No external funding.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Ho G, Tantigate D, Kirschenbaum J, Greisberg JK, Vosseller JT. Increasing age in Achilles rupture patients over time. Injury. 2017; 48(7): 1701-1709.
2. Caldwell JE, Vosseller JT. Maximizing return to sports after achilles tendon rupture in athletes. Foot Ankle Clin. 2019; 24(3): 439-445.
3. Kauwe M. Acute achilles tendon rupture: clinical evaluation, conservative management, and early active rehabilitation. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2017; 34(2): 229-243.
4. Okewunmi J, Guzman J, Vulcano E. Achilles tendinosis injuries-tendinosis to rupture (getting the athlete back to play). Clin Sports Med. 2020; 39(4): 877-891.
5. Johns W, Walley KC, Seedat R, Thordarson DB, Jackson B, Gonzalez T. Career outlook and performance of professional athletes after achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Int. 2021; 42(4): 495-509.
6. Houshian S, Tscherning T, Riegels-Nielsen P. The epidemiology of Achilles tendon rupture in a Danish county. Injury. 1998; 29: 651-654.
7. Ganestam A, Kallemose T, Troelsen A, Barfod KW. Increasing incidence of acute achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013. A nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(12): 3730-3737.
8. Lemme NJ, Li NY, De Froda SF, Kleiner J, Owens BD. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures in the United States: athletic and nonathletic injuries from 2012 to 2016. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018; 6(11): 238-243.
9. Longo UG, Salvatore G, Risi L, Ambrogioni L, Cella E, Candela V, Carnevale A, Schena E, Ciccozzi M, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon surgery in Italy: a nationwide registry study, from 2001 through 2015. BMC Musculoskel Disord. 2020; 21(1): 687-693.
10. Strojek K, Piekorz Z, Kaźmierczak U, Strączyńska A, Zukow W. The etiology and pathomechanism damage to the Achilles tendon. J Educ Health Sport. 2016; 6(11): 147-160.
11. Tarantino D, Palermi S, Sirico F, Corrado B. Achilles tendon rupture: mechanisms of injury, principles of rehabilitation and return to play. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020; 5(4): 95.
12. Pasek J, Stołtny T, Szczęśniak M, Dugiełło B, Gąsior W, Czarnecki M, Jaczyński J, Koczy B. Algorithm of physiotherapy after traumatic injury of the Achilles Tendon. Fizjoter Pol. 2020; 20(2): 76-87.
13. Kim U, Choi YS, Jang GC, Choi YR. Early rehabilitation after open repair for patients with a rupture of the Achilles tendon. Injury. 2017; 48(7): 1710-1713.
14. Usuelli FG, D’Ambrosi R, Manzi L, Indino C, Villafañe JH, Berjano P. Clinical outcomes and return to sports in patients with chronic Achilles tendon rupture after minimally invasive reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon graft transfer. Joints. 2017; 5(4): 212-216.
15. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15(7): 349-353.
16. Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018; 36(4): 707-714.
17. Deng S, Sun Z, Zhang C, Chen G, Li J. Surgical treatment versus conservative management for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 56(6): 1236-1243.
18. Trofa DP, Miller JC, Jang ES, Woode DR, Greisberg JK, Vosseller JT. Professional athletes’ return to play and performance after operative repair of an Achilles tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45(12): 2864-2871.
19. Rozis M, Benetos IS, Karampinas P, Polyzois V, Vlamis J, Pneumaticos SG. Outcome of percutaneous fixation of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2018; 39(6): 689-693.
20. Yang GG, Pan YX, Li ZW, Lei H. Clinical investigate of functional exercise immediate after operation for Achilles tendon rupture. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019; 32(8): 692-695.
21. Gumański R, Kruczyński J, Matewski D, Sniegowski M, Drewa J, Lianeri M. Evaluation of operative treatment of subcutaneous rupture of the achilles tendon: correlation between clinical presentation and ultrasound examination. Chir Narządu Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2010; 75(3): 147-153.
22. Jallageas R, Bordes J, Daviet JC, Mabit C, Coste C. Evaluation of surgical treatment for ruptured Achilles tendon in 31 athletes. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(5): 577-584.
23. McCormack R, Bovard J. Early functional rehabilitation or cast immobilisation for the postoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49(20): 1329-1335.
24. Zhao J, Guo W, Zeng X, Kan S. Research progress of early postoperative rehabilitation for acute Achilles tendon rupture after surgical repair. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 33(3): 382-386.
Copyright: © 2025 Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.