eISSN: 2449-8580
ISSN: 1734-3402
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2022
vol. 24
 
Share:
Share:
Review paper

An overview of factors influencing cancer screening uptake in primary healthcare institutions

Artur Prusaczyk
1
,
Paweł Żuk
1
,
Marika Guzek
1
,
Magdalena Bogdan
2
,
Aneta Nitsch-Osuch
2
,
Joanna Oberska
2
,
Sabina Karczmarz
1

1.
Medical and Diagnostic Centre in Siedlce, Siedlce, Poland
2.
Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2022; 24(1): 71–77
Online publish date: 2022/03/27
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Globocan 2018. All cancers incidence and mortality. 2018 [cited 24.05.2020]. Available from URL: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/39-All-cancers-fact-sheet.pdf.
2. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Screening Overview (PDQVR) – Health Professional Version. 2017 [cited 24.05.2020]. Available from URL: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/screening/hp-screening-overview-pdq.
3. The Global Cancer Observatory. Poland. Fact sheet 2018 [cited 25.05.2020]. Available from URL: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/616-poland-fact-sheets.pdf.
4. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Screening programmes: a short guide. Increase effectiveness, maximize benefits and minimize harm 2020 [cited 16.05.2020]. Available from URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/330829.
5. Sarma EA, Silver MI, Kobrin SC, et al. Cancer screening: health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions. Psychol Health 2019; 34(9): 1036–1072.
6. The Council of the European Union. Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening (2003/878/EC) 2003 [cited 24.05.2020]. Available from URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:327:0034:0038:EN:PDF.
7. Jansen EEL, Zielonke N, Gini A, et al. Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2020; 127: 207–223.
8. Gini A, Jansen EEL, Zielonke N, et al. Impact of colorectal cancer screening on cancer-specific mortality in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2020; 127: 224–235.
9. Zielonke N, Gini A, Jansen EEL, et al. Evidence for reducing cancer-specific mortality due to screening for breast cancer in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2020; 127: 191–206.
10. Emery JD, Shaw K, Williams B, et al. The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 11(1): 38–48.
11. Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia. Programy profilaktyczne [cited 19.12.2020]. Available from URL: https://www.nfz.gov.pl/dla-pacjenta/programy-profilaktyczne/ (in Polish).
12. World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. CanScreen5 [cited 24.05.2020]. Available from URL: https://canscreen5.iarc.fr.
13. Minister Zdrowia. Profilaktyka raka jelita grubego [cited 19.12.2020]. Available from URL: http://www.archiwum.mz.gov.pl/zdrowie-i-profilaktyka/narodowy-program-zwalczania-chorob-nowotworowych/profilaktyka-raka-jelita-grubego/ (in Polish).
14. Program Badań Przesiewowych Raka Jelita Grubego. Zgłaszalność w latach 2012–2017 [cited 16.05.2020]. Available from URL: http://pbp.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Zg%C5%82aszalno%C5%9B%C4%87_2012-2017-1.pdf (in Polish).
15. Karsa L, Patnick J, Segnan N, eds. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Consumers, Executive Agency for Health and Consumers, World Health Organization, Publications Office; 2010.
16. Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Li Q, et al. Do Primary Care Provider Strategies Improve Patient Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112(4): 622–632.
17. Beaber EF, Tosteson ANA, Haas JS, et al. Breast cancer screening initiation after turning 40 years of age within the PROSPR consortium. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 156(1): 109–116.
18. Brenner AT, Dougherty M, Reuland DS. Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Patients. Med Clin North Am 2017; 101(4): 755–767.
19. Buist DSM, Gao H, Anderson ML, et al. Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters. Prev Med 2017; 102: 49–58.
20. Carney TJ, Morgan GP, Jones J, et al. Hypothesis generation using network structures on community health center cancer-screening performance. J Biomed Inform 2015; 57: 288–307.
21. Chuang E, Pourat N, Chen X, et al. Organizational Factors Associated with Disparities in Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Community Health Centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2019; 30(1): 161–181.
22. Clouston K, Katz A, Martens PJ, et al. Does access to a colorectal cancer screening website and/or a nurse-managed telephone help line provided to patients by their family physician increase fecal occult blood test uptake? Results from a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2014; 14(1): 263.
23. Deding U, Henig AS, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. The effects of reminders for colorectal cancer screening: participation and inequality. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34(1): 141–150.
24. Everett T, Bryant A, Griffin MF, et al. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 2011(5): CD002834.
25. Gimeno Garcia AZ, Hernandez Alvarez Buylla N, Nicolas-Perez D, et al. Public awareness of colorectal cancer screening: Knowledge, attitudes, and interventions for increasing screening uptake. ISRN Oncol 2014; 2014: 425787.
26. Giordano L, Stefanini V, Senore C, et al. The impact of different communication and organizational strategies on mammography screening uptake in women aged 40–45 years. Eur J Public Health 2012; 22(3): 413–418.
27. Goldzweig CL, Parkerton PH, Washington DL, et al. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates. Am J Manag Care 2004; 10(4): 265–272.
28. Ingrand I, Defossez G, Richer J-P, et al. Colonoscopy uptake for high-risk individuals with a family history of colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter, randomized trial of tailored counseling versus standard information. Medicine 2016; 95(33): e4303-e.
29. Kitchener HC, Gittins M, Rivero-Arias O, et al. A cluster randomised trial of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC). Health Technol Assess 2016; 20(68): 1–138.
30. Krok-Schoen JL, Oliveri JM, Paskett ED. Cancer care delivery and women’s health: the role of patient navigation. Front Oncol 2016; 6: 2.
31. Lin SC, McKinley D, Sripipatana A, et al. Colorectal cancer screening at US community health centers: Examination of sociodemographic disparities and association with patient-provider communication. Cancer 2017; 123(21): 4185–4192.
32. MacLaughlin KL, Swanson KM, Naessens JM, et al. Cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study of the effects of historical patient compliance and a population-based informatics prompted reminder on screening rates. J Eval Clin Pract 2014; 20(2): 136–143.
33. Molina Y, Kim SJ, Berrios N, et al. Patient Navigation Improves Subsequent Breast Cancer Screening After a Noncancerous Result: Evidence from the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018; 27(3): 317–323.
34. Offman J, Wilson M, Lamont M, et al. A randomised trial of weekend and evening breast screening appointments. Br J Cancer 2013; 109(3): 597–602.
35. Percac‐Lima S, López L, Ashburner JM, et al. The longitudinal impact of patient navigation on equity in colorectal cancer screening in a large primary care network. Cancer 2014; 120(13): 2025–2031.
36. Peterson EB, Ostroff JS, DuHamel KN, et al. Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: a systematic review. Prev Med 2016; 93: 96–105.
37. Raine R, Duffy SW, Wardle J, et al. Impact of general practice endorsement on the social gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening. Br J Cancer 2016; 114(3): 321–326.
38. Robinson-White S, Conroy B, Slavish KH, et al. Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs 2010; 33(2): 127–140.
39. Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43(1): 97–118.
40. Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136(9): 641–651.
41. Underhill ML, Kiviniemi MT. The association of perceived provider–patient communication and relationship quality with colorectal cancer screening. Health Educ Behav 2012; 39(5): 555–563.
42. Yano EM, Soban LM, Parkerton PH, et al. Primary care practice organization influences colorectal cancer screening performance. Health Serv Res 2007; 42(3 Pt 1): 1130–1149.
43. Abadi MMM, Vakilian K, Safari V. Motivational interview on having Pap test among middle-aged women – a counseling service in primary care. Fam Med Prim Care Rev 2018; 20(2): 101–105.
44. Helfrich CD, Simonetti JA, Clinton WL, et al. The association of team-specific workload and staffing with odds of burnout among VA primary care team members. J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32(7): 760–766.
45. Wells KJ, Battaglia TA, Dudley DJ, et al. Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer 2008; 113(8): 1999–2010.
46. Paskett ED, Harrop JP, Wells KJ. Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61(4): 237–249.
47. Vries EF de, Struijs JN, Heijink R, et al. Are low-value care measures up to the task? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16(1): 405.
48. Isaac T, Rosenthal MB, Colla CH, et al. Measuring overuse with electronic health records data. Am J Manag Care 2018; 24(1): 19–25.
49. Kruzikas D, Smith JS, Harley C, et al. Costs Associated with Management of Cervical Human Papillomavirus-Related Conditions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012; 21(9): 1469–1478.
50. Verkerk EW, Tanke MAC, Kool RB, et al. Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation. Int J Qual Health Care 2018; 30(9): 736–739.
51. Sirocco. SCIROCCO Maturity Model for Integrated Care [cited 19.12.2020]. Available from URL: https://www.scirocco-project.eu/maturitymodel/.
52. Luxford K, Safran DG, Delbanco T. Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience. Int J Qual Health Care 2011; 23(5): 510–515.
Copyright: © 2022 Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.