eISSN: 2084-9869
ISSN: 1233-9687
Polish Journal of Pathology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2018
vol. 69
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

BRCA1 and PARP1 mRNA expression during progression from normal breast to ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer: a laser microdissection study

Jolanta Hybiak, Pawel Domagala, Wenancjusz Domagala

Pol J Pathol 2018; 69 (4): 347-355
Online publish date: 2019/01/31
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
The contribution of DNA damage repair mechanisms to the progression of normal breast to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma is largely unknown. The purpose of this report was to assess the mRNA expression levels of two important genes associated with DNA repair, BRCA1 and PARP1, in normal breast tissue, DCIS G1, G2 and G3, and co-existing adjacent invasive ductal carcinoma. BRCA1 and PARP1 mRNA expression was assessed in 32 ductal carcinomas in situ of the breast using a laser microdissection and pressure catapulting system and quantitative real-time PCR. The relative expression of BRCA1 mRNA was significantly increased in DCIS G2 and DCIS G3 relative to normal breast tissue (p = 0.02, p = 0.001, respectively). Significant differences in BRCA1 expression were observed between DCIS G1 and G2 (p = 0.02) and between DCIS G1 and G3 (p = 0.0007). No significant differences in BRCA1 expression were observed between normal breast tissue and DCIS G1 and between DCIS component and adjacent invasive ductal carcinoma. No significant differences in the relative expression of PARP1 mRNA were observed between groups. Increased BRCA1 mRNA expression (but not PARP1 mRNA) occurs early in the development of breast cancer, i.e. at the noninvasive (DCIS) stage, suggesting a demand for increased activity of a DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. DCIS G1 and normal breast tissue share highly similar BRCA1 and PARP1 expression level. This finding supports the idea that DCIS G1 belongs to a separate family of precursor lesions with low malignant potential.
keywords:

breast cancer, BRCA1, PARP1, laser microdissection, DCIS

references:
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67: 7-30.
Schnitt SJ, Allred C, Britton P, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ. In: WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast, Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ (eds). IARC, Lyon 2012; 90-94
Thompson A, Brennan K, Cox A, et al. Evaluation of the current knowledge limitations in breast cancer research: a gap analysis. Breast Cancer Res 2008; 10: R26.
Allred DC, Wu Y, Mao S, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ and the emergence of diversity during breast cancer evolution. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14: 370-378.
Bombonati A, Sgroi DC The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression. J Pathol 2011; 223: 307-317.
Ma XJ, Salunga R, Tuggle JT, et al. Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2003; 100: 5974-5979.
Castro NP, Osorio CA, Torres C, et al. Evidence that molecular changes in cells occur before morphological alterations during the progression of breast ductal carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res 2008; 10: R87.
Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11: 1513-1530.
Cowell CF, Weigelt B, Sakr RA, et al. Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: revisited. Mol Oncol 2013; 7: 859-869.
Volinia S, Galasso M, Sana ME, et al. Breast cancer signatures for invasiveness and prognosis defined by deep sequencing of microRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 3024-3029.
Lubinski J, Korzen M, Gorski B, et al. Breast cancer susceptibility genes. J BUON 2007; 12 Suppl 1: S23-S29.
Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991; 19: 403-410.
Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 2002; 3: research0034.1-research0034.
de Kok JB, Roelofs RW, Giesendorf BA, et al. Normalization of gene expression measurements in tumor tissues: comparison of 13 endogenous control genes. Lab Invest 2005; 85: 154-159.
To MD, Done SJ, Redston M, et al. Analysis of mRNA from microdissected frozen tissue sections without RNA isolation. Am J Pathol 1998; 153: 47-51.
Egawa C, Miyoshi Y, Taguchi T. Quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA expression in sporadic breast carcinomas and its relationship with clinicopathological characteristics. Jpn J Cancer Res 2001; 92: 624-630.
Specht K, Richter T, Muller U, et al. Quantitative gene expression analysis in microdissected archival formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. Am J Pathol 2001; 158: 419-429.
Chalabi N, Le Corre L, Maurizis JC, et al. The effects of lycopene on the proliferation of human breast cells and BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene expression. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40:1768-1775.
Clark-Langone KM, Wu JY, Sangli C, et al. Biomarker discovery for colon cancer using a 761 gene RT-PCR assay. BMC Genomics 2007; 8: 279.
Margeli M, Cirauqui B, Castella E, et al. The prognostic value of BRCA1 mRNA expression levels following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. PLoS One 2010; 5: e9499.
Raymaekers M, Smets R, Maes B, et al. Checklist for optimization and validation of real-time PCR assays. J Clin Lab Anal 2009; 23: 145-151.
NCBI Resource Coordinators. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41: D8-D20.
Mallona I, Weiss J, Egea-Cortines M. pcrEfficiency: a Web tool for PCR amplification efficiency prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12: 404.
Espina V, Mariani BD, Gallagher RI, et al. Malignant precursor cells pre-exist in human breast DCIS and require autophagy for survival. PLoS One 2010; 5: e10240.
Hoeijmakers JH Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 2001; 411: 366-374.
Narod SA, Foulkes WD. BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4: 665-676.
Liu S, Ginestier C, Charafe-Jauffret E, et al. BRCA1 regulates human mammary stem/progenitor cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105: 1680-1685.
De Vos M, Schreiber V, Dantzer F. The diverse roles and clinical relevance of PARPs in DNA damage repair: current state of the art. Biochem Pharmacol 2012; 84: 137-146.
Domagala P, Huzarski T, Lubinski J, et al. PARP-1 expression in breast cancer including BRCA1-associated, triple negative and basal-like tumors: possible implications for PARP-1 inhibitor therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 127:861-869.
Ellsworth RE, Ellsworth DL, Love B, et al. Correlation of levels and patterns of genomic instability with histological grading of DCIS. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 3070-3077.
Heaphy CM, Bisoffi M, Joste NE, Genomic instability demonstrates similarity between DCIS and invasive carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 117: 17-24.
Meeker AK, Hicks JL, Gabrielson E, et al. Telomere shortening occurs in subsets of normal breast epithelium as well as in situ and invasive carcinoma. Am J Pathol 2004; 164: 925-935.
van Hoesel AQ, Sato Y, Elashoff DA, et al. Assessment of DNA methylation status in early stages of breast cancer development. Br J Cancer 2013; 108: 2033-2038.
Deng CX, Scott F. Role of the tumor suppressor gene Brca1 in genetic stability and mammary gland tumor formation. Oncogene 2000; 19: 1059-1064.
Schuetz CS, Bonin M, Clare SE, et al. Progression-specific genes identified by expression profiling of matched ductal carcinomas in situ and invasive breast tumors, combining laser capture microdissection and oligonucleotide microarray analysis. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 5278-5286.
Hernandez L, Wilkerson PM, Lambros MB, et al. Genomic and mutational profiling of ductal carcinomas in situ and matched adjacent invasive breast cancers reveals intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity and clonal selection. J Pathol 2012; 227: 42-52.
Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Berroa Garcia LY, Bradley A, et al. Single-cell genetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer reveals enormous tumor heterogeneity yet conserved genomic imbalances and gain of MYC during progression. Am J Pathol 2012; 181: 1807-1822.
Balleine RL, Webster LR, Davis S, et al. Molecular grading of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14: 8244-8252.
Abdel-Fatah TM, Powe DG, Hodi Z, et al. Morphologic and molecular evolutionary pathways of low nuclear grade invasive breast cancers and their putative precursor lesions: further evidence to support the concept of low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32: 513-523.
Masood S, Rosa M. Borderline breast lesions: diagnostic challenges and clinical implications. Adv Anat Pathol 2011; 18: 190-198.
Barnes NL, Ooi JL, Yarnold JR. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. BMJ 2012; 344:e797.
Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, et al. Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 478-488.
Emery LA, Tripathi A, King C, et al. Early dysregulation of cell adhesion and extracellular matrix pathways in breast cancer progression. Am J Pathol 2009; 175: 1292-1302.
FEATURED PRODUCTS
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe