Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy

Comprehensive clinical dosimetry in contact skin interventional radiotherapy (modern brachytherapy): Practical tips and tricks

  1. UOC Degenze di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy

  2. UOC Fisica per le Scienze della Vita, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy

  3. eCampus University, Novedrate (CO), Italy

  4. UOC Servizio di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy

  5. Brachytherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland

  6. Clinic of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany

  7. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

J Contemp Brachytherapy 2026

Online publish date: 2026/09/08
View full text

Purpose

Contact interventional radiotherapy (cIRT) is an effective option for non-melanoma skin cancers, particularly in anatomically complex sites, where organ preservation, functional results, and cosmetic outcomes are relevant. This paper summarized practical dosimetric considerations in cIRT, focusing on the therapeutic window, surface curvature, boluses and air gaps, dose calculation algorithms, and 3D-printed devices.

Material and methods

Key physical and clinical factors affecting dose distribution were analyzed from recent literature, including prescription depth, source-to-skin distance, applicator geometry, tissue interfaces, and patient-specific device design.

Results

Therapeutic window is influenced by target thickness, source-to-skin distance, and surface curvature. Multilayer and intensity-modulated arrangements may improve target coverage while limiting superficial hotspots. Bolus and air gaps can modify local dose distribution, especially in irregular anatomical regions, while model-based algorithms better account for heterogeneities and interfaces than TG-43. 3D-printed applicators may further enhance conformity, reproducibility, and organs at risk sparing.

Conclusions

Although clinically non-invasive, cIRT requires careful dosimetric optimization. Appropriate management of applicator geometry, dose calculation, bolus, air gaps, and patient-specific devices, may improve treatment accuracy, target coverage, and toxicity control.

Share
without publication fees