eISSN: 2084-9869
ISSN: 1233-9687
Polish Journal of Pathology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2009
vol. 60
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:

Differential diagnosis of small round cell tumours (SRCT), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemical (IHC) study

Konrad Ptaszyński
,
Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz
,
Monika Pękul
,
Zbigniew Nowecki

Pol J Pathol 2009; 4: 151-162
Online publish date: 2010/01/06
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 

Introduction: Small round cell tumours (SRCT) of bone and soft tissue constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with similar histological and cytological features. Immunohistochemical studies with panels of antibodies are necessary in order to make the diagnosis. A molecular testing is helpful in many cases.
Aim of the study: To assess the value of IHC and FISH tests in the differential diagnosis of SRCT.
Material and methods: The material was obtained from patients diagnosed and treated at the Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute in Warsaw between February 2003 and March 2009. One hundred and thirty one patients with the initial diagnosis of SRCT of bone or soft tissue were qualified to the investigation. The material from the primary tumour was obtained by an open or core biopsy in all the patients. During the treatment the patients were monitored, the local recurrence and the distant metastases were reported. The IHC study was performed routinely using wide panels of antibodies. FISH tests: EWSR1, SS18 (SYT), FKHR (FOXO1A) and FUS were carried out using dual colour, break-apart probes.
Results: IHC tests for CD99 and FLI-1 showed low specificity, had low sensitivity, myogenin staining revealed high specificity and sensitivity. A “lymphoma” panel with LCA, CD20, CD79a, TdT, CD3 showed acceptable specificity and sensitivity. There were 28 (21.37%) uninformative FISH results showing no acceptable signals.
Conclusions: Diagnostic assessment of SRCT requires IHC studies as an introductory method. FISH is necessary in many cases of SRCT for the final diagnosis but it requires well-fixed and processed tissue, otherwise there is a high percentage of uninformative results. A diagnostic algorithm including IHC and FISH tests has been proposed.
keywords:

small round cell tumours, differential diagnosis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry

Quick links
© 2021 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe