Family Medicine & Primary Care Review

Abstract

1/2024 vol. 26
Original paper

Evaluating primary care programmes: a problem-solving cycle with literature review on programme evaluation for cervical cancer screening at a community health centre, Jakarta, Indonesia

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  2. Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  3. Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2024; 26(1): 26–38
Online publish date: 2024/03/15
View full text
Confronting perimenopausal women’s knowledge of coronary heart disease with their health behaviours. Controversial role of hormone replacement therapy in the protection of coronary heart disease

Background

Cervical cancer (CC) poses a significant burden on various aspects of public health, including overall well-being, social dynamics and economic factors.

Objectives

This report aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a primary care programme focused on CC screening through the Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) test at a community health centre (CHC) in urban South Jakarta, Indonesia.

Material and methods

We used a problem-solving cycle (PSC) approach to evaluate the programme’s implementation and outcomes. This evaluation process included problem identification, situation analysis, root-cause determination using the Ishikawa diagram, prioritisation of problem-solving strategies based on the urgency, seriousness and growth (USG) and importance, technical feasibility and resource availability (ITR) matrix, as well as proposing recommendations for improvement using the magnitude, importance, vulnerability and cost (MIV/C) matrix.

Results

The low VIA test coverage at our CHC (13.39% in 2020) highlights the need for targeted interventions to increase participation. Inefficient implementation of the programme stems from various reasons (input, process and environmental factors). The solutions target root causes such as material, actuation and community response to improve CC screening. Inadequate knowledge, limited healthcare accessibility and socio-economic disparities hinder programme success. Despite these challenges, programme evaluation can enhance the level of community health, improve the quality of life, increase early CC case detection and reduce morbidity and mortality.

Conclusions

This study offers valuable insights and guidance for healthcare professionals in improving primary care programmes for CC screening. Future efforts should focus on addressing barriers and implementing targeted strategies to enhance programme effectiveness and reach.

Share
without publication fees
Coverage in
Integrated with