eISSN: 2299-0046
ISSN: 1642-395X
Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Journal's reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2021
vol. 38
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

Evaluation of demodicosis, nailfold capillaroscopy, and oxidative stress in rosacea: a case-control study

Ezgi Aktaş Karabay
1, 2
,
Özlem Unay Demirel
3

1.
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey
2.
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
3.
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey
Adv Dermatol Allergol 2021; XXXVIII (4): 590–596
Online publish date: 2021/09/17
Article file
- Evaluation.pdf  [0.20 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Introduction

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disorder, with remission and exacerbation periods [1]. Flushing, erythema, telangiectasia, oedema, papules, pustules, phymatous changes, and ocular lesions are the signs of the disease [1, 2]. Various factors are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of rosacea, including genetic predisposition, immune system disorders, pilosebaceous unit abnormalities, ultraviolet light exposure, Demodex colonization, neurovascular dysregulation, and oxidative stress [13]. However, the aetiology of rosacea remains uncertain [2].

Several researchers have investigated the factors that could contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Studies evaluating the relationship between Demodex mites and rosacea have mostly indicated a positive relationship [46]. Demodex mites are found on normal human skin, but an increased number of mites is considered to play a role in inflammatory and immune reactions during the development of rosacea [5, 6].

Nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) is an easy, non-invasive technique to assess the microcirculation morphology [7]. NFC is considered a useful tool for the early detection of microvascular changes that could develop in inflammatory conditions. While systemic sclerosis and Raynaud’s phenomenon are the two most common diseases for which NFC is performed in determining the diagnosis and prognosis [8], changes in the nailfold capillaries have been identified in several conditions, including autoimmune diseases, rheumatic diseases [9], peripheral arterial obliterative disorders [10], venous insufficiency [11], diabetes mellitus [12], hypertension [13], psoriasis [14], and aging [15]. In a recent study, NFC was performed in rosacea patients, but no specific findings were revealed [16].

The role of oxidative stress in several inflammatory diseases, including rosacea, has also been examined [3, 1719]. Total antioxidant status (TAC) and total oxidant status (TOC) are the parameters that provide an assessment of global oxidative stress [20, 21].

Aim

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the presence of Demodex mites, the morphologic features of the nailfold capillaries as an indicator of microvascular changes, and the systemic oxidative stress status by measuring TOC, TAC, and the oxidative stress index (OSI) of patients with rosacea, which may reflect the key mechanisms of the rosacea pathogenesis: inflammation, immune system disorder, and vascular changes.

Material and methods

The study was reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee (Protocol number: 22481095-020-1259; Date of approval: 26/06/2018), and all the individual participants gave written informed consent. The study was carried out according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

A prospective case-control study was planned to investigate the presence of Demodex infestation and determine the findings of NFC and the status of oxidative stress in patients with rosacea.

Patient selection

Thirty-one patients diagnosed with rosacea by clinical examination were recruited from the dermatology outpatient clinic. For comparison, 37 healthy age- and gender-matched controls with no evidence of rosacea or any other inflammatory skin disease were recruited from among hospital staff volunteers.

Rosacea is classified as erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR), papulopustular rosacea (PPR), phymatous rosacea, ocular rosacea, and variant granulomatous rosacea, according to the American National Rosacea Society (NRS) Expert Committee classification and staging system, which also acts as a diagnostic tool [1].

Only those with normal body mass index (BMI) (18.5–25 kg/m2) were included. For each patient, the age, sex, clinical diagnosis, and symptoms were recorded. None of the subjects were under any topical treatment, including moisturizers, within the last 2 months. Subjects with a history of any ablative facial treatments (e.g., peels and laser procedures) in the prior 6 months were also excluded. Patients with a history of any systemic treatment, including corticosteroids, vasoconstrictive or vasodilator agents, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and immunosuppressants, within 6 months of the study and any systemic diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune diseases, peripheral vascular diseases (e.g., including scleroderma, Reynaud’s phenomenon, dermatomyositis, or concomitant inflammatory or infectious diseases) were excluded. Currently pregnant or lactating females, smokers, and patients with a history or current diagnosis of malignancy were also excluded. The patients who recently had a manicure or who had removed a cuticle in the last 2 months or had a history of trauma involving the nail bed and proximal nail fold in the last 6 months were excluded, since cuticle trauma could affect the evaluation of the nailfold capillaries by NFC.

Data on the baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and test results were obtained on the same day.

Evaluation of Demodex infestation

The presence of demodicosis was evaluated by the same dermatologist in each patient. Cyanoacrylate glue standardized skin surface biopsies (SSSBs) were taken and microscopically examined for mites in both the patient and control groups. Two samples were taken for mite examination from the erythematous/inflammatory lesions of the disease on the face. Samples were collected from cheeks and frontal areas in the controls. A slide covered with cyanoacrylate glue and a marked square was pressed against the skin surface. After 30 s, the slide was removed and the samples were collected. The preparation was examined under a light microscope at 40× and 100× magnification. The result was considered positive when there were more than five Demodex mites in a 1-cm2 area [22].

Performing nailfold capillaroscopy

NFC was performed by a single dermatologist for all subjects. MoleMax HD digital dermoscopy programme was used for the NFC examination. All of the digits of both hands except the thumbs were evaluated during the examination using transparent oily medium (mineral oil) drops on the area to be examined so that the skin would be more translucent and less irregular. The morphologic characteristics of the nailfold capillaries were identified as follows: (1) avascular areas, (2) increases in the diameters of the capillaries, (3) microhaemorrhages, (4) hairpin capillaries, (5) crossing capillaries, (6) tortuous capillaries, and (7) abnormal structures (none of the morphologies that have been identified) (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Nailfold capillaroscopy. A – Increase in the diameters of the capillaries. B – Hairpin structures. C – Hairpin structures, one slightly tortuous capillary (green arrow), microhaemorrhage (orange arrow). D – Absence in capillaries

/f/fulltexts/PDIA/45083/PDIA-38-45083-g001_min.jpg

Assessment of oxidative capacity

Serum TOC and TAC were measured in all subjects using fasting venous blood samples. The venous blood samples were drawn from the participants between 9:00 and 11:00 a.m. following a 12-hour fasting period. TOC and TAC were spectrophotometrically measured using Rel Assay commercial kits (Rel Assay Kit Diagnostics, Turkey). OSI was calculated as the ratio of TOC to TAC.

Statistical analysis

The Number Cruncher Statistical System 2007 (NCSS; Kaysville, Utah, USA) program was used for the statistical analysis. The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median (first quartile, third quartile), count, and percentages. In the analysis of normally distributed variables, an independent samples t-test was applied to examine the differences between the two groups. The differences between two independent groups were examined using the Mann Whitney U test for non-normally distributed variables. A one-way ANOVA, with Bonferroni corrected post-hoc tests, was used to compare normally distributed variables between three or more groups. A Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to compare non-normally distributed variables between three or more groups. A Pearson c2 test, Fisher’s exact test, and Fisher-Freeman-Halton test were used to compare categorical variables. The association between variables was evaluated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 31 patients with rosacea and 37 healthy control subjects were included in the study. No significant differences were observed in terms of gender or age between the patients with rosacea and the healthy controls (p > 0.05) (Table 1). None of the subjects had any accompanying disease or smoking habit. The rosacea group consisted of 21 (30.9%) patients with ETR and 10 (14.7%) patients with PPR. The duration of the disease ranged from 6 to 120 months (mean: 25.42 ±24.53).

Table 1

Comparison of demographic data and the presence of Demodex infestation, NFC findings and oxidative stress status between patients with acne vulgaris, rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis and controls

ParameterHealthy controlsRosacea patientsP-value
Age [year]; mean ± SD34.68 ±7.4036.55 ±11.880.431
Gender; n (%)
 Female24 (64.9)22 (71)0.592
 Male13 (35.1)9 (29)
BMI; mean ± SD22.91 ±1.3222.97 ±1.570.877
Fitzpatrick skin type; n (%)
 11 (2.7)8 (25.8)§0.007**
 215 (40.5)15 (48.4)
 317 (45.9)5 (16.1)
 44 (10.8)3 (9.7)
Demodex infestation; n (%)0 (0)16 (51.6)< 0.001**
NFC findings; n (%)
 Avascular area5 (13.5)23 (74.2)< 0.001**
 Increase in the diameter of the capillaries0 (0)5 (16.1)0.016*
 Microhaemorrhage6 (16.2)8 (25.8)0.330
 Hairpin structures29 (78.4)11 (35.5)< 0.001**
 Tortuous structures11 (29.7)14 (45.2)0.189
 Crossing structures8 (21.6)15 (48.4)0.020*
 Abnormal structures0 (0)14 (45.2)< 0.001**
Oxidative stress; min.–max. (med.):
 TOC5 (1.44, 9.33)7.22 (2.33, 10.44)0.379
 TAC4.36 (1.45, 7.27)4.36 (1.45, 13.09)0.522
 OSI1.09 (0.53, 3.37)1.39 (0.28, 5.59)0.772

† Independent groups t-test,

‡ Pearson χ2 test,

§ Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test,

II Fisher’s exact test,

¶ Mann-Whitney U test;

* p < 0.05,

** p < 0.01.

BMI – body mass index, TAC – total antioxidant capacity, TOC – total oxidant capacity, OSI – oxidative stress index.

Sixteen of the 31 (51.6%) patients had a Demodex infestation, while none of the 37 (0%) healthy controls had an infestation. The Demodex infestation rates were significantly higher in patients than in the controls (p = 0.001) (Table 1). When patients with rosacea were evaluated according to disease subtype, the Demodex infestation was more common in the PPR group than in the ETR group (p = 0.018).

The most common morphologic pattern of nailfold capillaries in rosacea patients was avascular areas (n = 23, 74.2%), followed by crossing capillaries (n = 15, 48.4%), tortuous capillaries (n = 14, 45.2%), abnormal structures (n = 14, 45.2%), hairpin capillaries (n = 11, 35.5%), microhaemorrhages (n = 8, 25.8%), and increases in the diameters of the capillaries (n = 5, 16.1%).

The most common morphologic pattern of the nailfold capillaries in the healthy subjects was hairpin capillaries (n = 29, 78.4%), followed by tortuous capillaries (n = 11, 29.7%), crossing capillaries (n = 8, 21.6%), microhaemorrhages (n = 6, 16.2%), and avascular areas (n = 5, 13.5%), while none of them had increases in the abnormal structures (n = 0) or the diameters of the capillaries.

The presence of avascular areas, increases in the diameters of the capillary structures, and crossing and abnormal structures were significantly more common in the rosacea patients than in the healthy controls (p < 0.01, p = 0.016, p = 0.02, p < 0.001, respectively).

The presence of hairpin structures was more common in the controls than in the rosacea patients (p < 0.001).

No significant differences were observed in the levels of TAC or TOC between the rosacea group and the control group (4.36 vs. 4.36, p = 0.522, 7.22 vs. 5, p = 0.379, respectively). The OSI values also did not show any significant difference between the two groups (1.39 vs. 1.09, p = 0.772).

The evaluations for Demodex infestation, NFC findings, and TAC, TOC, and OSI values according to disease subtypes (ETR and PPR) are shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Subgroup comparisons in terms of demographic data and the presence of Demodex infestation, NFC findings and oxidative stress status

ParameterHealthy controlsETRPPRP-value
Age [years]; median (Q1, Q3)33 (30, 38)33 (28, 40)38.5 (29, 40)††0.616
Gender; n (%):
 Female24 (64.9)17 (81)5 (50)0.197
 Male13 (35.1)4 (19)5 (50)
BMI; median (Q1, Q3)23.1 (21.8, 23.8)23.6 (21.3, 24.1)23.55 (23.2, 24.6)††0.508
Fitzpatrick skin type; n (%):
 11 (2.7)6 (28.6)2 (20)§0.016*
 215 (40.5)11 (52.4)4 (30)
 317 (45.9)2 (9.5)3 (30)
 44 (10.8)2 (9.5)1 (10)
Demodicosis; n (%)0 (0)7 (33.3)9 (90)§< 0.001**
Avascular area; n (%)5 (13.5)13 (61.9)10 (100)< 0.001**
Increase in the diameters of the capillaries; n (%)0 (0)4 (19)1 (10)§0.017*
Microhaemorrhage; n (%)6 (16.2)4 (19)4 (40)§0.317
Hairpin structures; n (%)29 (78.4)7 (33.3)4 (40)0.002**
Tortuous structures; n (%)11 (29.7)10 (47.6)4 (40)§0.393
Crossing structures; n (%)8 (21.6)15 (71.4)0 (0)< 0.001**
Abnormal structures; n (%)0 (0)9 (42.9)5 (50)§< 0.001**
TAC; median (Q1, Q3)4.36 (1.45, 7.27)4.36 (1.45, 13.09)2.18 (1.45, 10.18)††0.693
TOC; median (Q1, Q3)5 (1.44, 9.33)6.67 (2.33, 10.11)8.62 (3.11, 13.11)††0.556
OSI; median (Q1, Q3)1.09 (0.53, 3.37)0.91 (0.33, 4.06)4.02 (0.28, 7.2)††0.492

‡ Pearson χ2 test,

§ Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test,

†† Kruskal-Wallis test,

* p < 0.05,

** p < 0.01,

Q1 – first quartile, Q3 – third quartile, BMI – body mass index, ETR – erythematotelangiectatic rosacea, PPR – papulopustular rosacea, TAC – total antioxidant capacity, TOC – total oxidant capacity, OSI – oxidative stress index.

A positive correlation was noted between the presence of crossing capillaries and higher TOC levels (p = 0.05). The abnormal structures discerned from NFC were found to be correlated with lower levels of TAC (p = 0.045).

Discussion

In this study, the presence of a Demodex infestation was demonstrated to be more common in the patients with rosacea than in the healthy controls. Furthermore, some of the morphologic capillary patterns, namely, avascular areas, increases in the diameters of the capillaries, crossing capillaries, and abnormal structures were shown to be more common in the rosacea patients. In addition, abnormal structures in the nailfold capillaries were found to be correlated with lower levels of TAC, while the presence of crossing capillaries was correlated with higher levels of TOC. However, no difference was observed in terms of the values of TAC, TOC, and OSI between the two groups.

Chronic inflammation is the main contributor to the development of rosacea. Immune responses to Demodex mites, the dysregulation of the immune system, vascular changes, and oxidative tissue damage are the factors associated with inflammation [3, 19, 23, 24].

Recently, many studies have been conducted examining the relationship between Demodex mites and rosacea, mostly demonstrating a positive relationship. Demodex mites may contribute to the pathogenesis of rosacea in several ways. The blockage of hair follicles and sebaceous glands by an increased number of mites may result in cutaneous barrier disruption and tissue damage. Subsequent increases in TLR expression, chitin mite exoskeletons and releases of internal mite contents, including bacterial antigens, may trigger an inflammatory reaction and also result in an immune response followed by neutrophil and macrophage activation [2, 2527].

NFC is a non-invasive imaging technique that provides an assessment of peripheral microcirculation by direct visualization of the dermal papillary capillaries [28]. In some of the diseases that are accompanied by vascular damage, changes in the capillaries may be observed even before the clinical symptoms occur [29]. Moreover, abnormalities in the capillary structure have been demonstrated to be indicators of the severity and prognosis of certain diseases. Systemic sclerosis, which is a disease for which NFC is commonly performed, a correlation was shown between the decreased capillary density and the severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension [30]. While the use of NFC in the assessment of microvascular involvement in rheumatologic diseases has been well established, this technique was recently reported to be a useful tool in various other diseases, including arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and cardiac syndrome X [3133]. However, little is known about the changes in microcirculation in patients with rosacea. As far as we know, one study (of 8 rosacea patients) has been conducted in which a specific capillaroscopic pattern or capillary morphological changes could not be detected [16].

Oxidative stress contributes to the development of rosacea through the activation of neutrophils that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), oxidative modification of proteins and lipids by ROS, alterations in lipid balance, antimicrobial peptides (cathelicidin LL-37), cytokines, and other inflammatory mediators (IL-1 and TNF-α) [19, 34]. Increased oxidative stress manifesting as higher levels of TOC and OSI and lower levels of TAC has been reported in patients with rosacea in recent studies [3, 1719].

A growing body of evidence suggests that rosacea is associated with systemic diseases. A shared pathophysiologic link between the systemic diseases and rosacea has not been clarified, but chronic inflammation is the most prominent underlying mechanism among the metabolic, immune, and endocrine changes [35]. Cardiovascular diseases and gastrointestinal, neurologic, and psychiatric disorders are the main conditions that are reported to accompany rosacea and chronic inflammation, and increased oxidative stress is thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of each disease [3, 35].

It is known that inflammation is considered the key factor in the pathogenesis of rosacea. Inflammation is also associated with other factors, including vascular changes and oxidative stress. In this study, we hypothesized that there might be a correlation between the presence of Demodex infestation, which may act as a trigger for the inflammatory and immune reactions, the vascular changes in nailfold capillaries, and increased oxidative stress, as a result of inflammation and contributors to inflammation in patients with rosacea.

In the present study, patients with rosacea had significantly higher rates of Demodex infestations than the healthy controls, which is consistent with the extant literature. In NFC examinations, the presence of avascular areas, increases in the diameters of the capillary structures, and the presence of crossing and abnormal structures were significantly more common in the rosacea patients than in the healthy controls. Abnormal structures and increases in the diameters of the capillaries were not detected in the NFC examinations of any of the healthy subjects, which suggests that these two features might be specific to rosacea. Moreover, a positive correlation between the presence of crossing capillaries and higher TOC levels was observed, and a correlation between abnormal structures and lower levels of TAC was observed. Taken together, it may suggest that abnormal structures in the nailfold capillaries of rosacea patients associated with lower oxidative capacity may be a predictor of comorbidities in rosacea, which might be a subject of another study. However, no correlation was found between the oxidative stress markers and the occurrence of rosacea.

The small sample size is an important limitation of the study. The variations of subgroup numbers are also a limitation.

Conclusions

Demodex infestations and some NFC findings, such as the presence of avascular areas, increases in the diameters of the capillaries structures, crossing capillaries and abnormal structures, have been demonstrated to be significantly more common in rosacea patients. Among them, abnormal structures may require caution for two reasons: (1) none of the healthy subjects had abnormal capillaries in the NFC examination, and (2) abnormal structures in nailfold capillaries were found to be associated with lower antioxidant capacities. We believe that studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to make conclusions on the diagnostic and prognostic role of the oxidative status and NFC in rosacea.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M, et al. , authors. Standard grading system for rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the classification and staging of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004. 50:p. 907–12

2 

Crawford GH, Pelle MT, James WD , authors. Rosacea: I. Etiology, pathogenesis, and subtype classification. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004. 51:p. 327–41

3 

Falay Gur T, Erdemir AV, Gurel MS, et al. , authors. The investigation of the relationships of demodex density with inflammatory response and oxidative stress in rosacea. Arch Dermatol Res. 2018. 310:p. 759–67

4 

Casas C, Paul C, Lahfa M, et al. , authors. Quantification of Demodex folliculorum by PCR in rosacea and its relationship to skin innate immune activation. Exp Dermatol. 2012. 21:p. 906–10

5 

Chang YS, Huang YC , authors. Role of Demodex mite infestation in rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017. 77:p. 441–7

6 

Moran EM, Foley R, Powell FC , authors. Demodex and rosacea revisited. Clin Dermatol. 2017. 35:p. 195–200

7 

Cutolo M, Sulli A, Smith V , authors. How to perform and interpret capillaroscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013. 27:p. 237–48

8 

van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, et al. , authors. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013. 72:p. 1747–55

9 

Cutolo M, Melsens K, Wijnant S, et al. , authors. Nailfold capillaroscopy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Autoimmun Rev. 2018. 17:p. 344–52

10 

Lambova SN , author. The place of nailfold capillaroscopy among instrumental methods for assessment of some peripheral ischaemic syndromes in rheumatology. Folia Med. 2016. 58:p. 77–88

11 

Aguilar Peralta GR, Arévalo Gardoqui J, Llamas Macías FJ, et al. , authors. Clinical and capillaroscopic evaluation in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency with Ruscus aculeatus, hesperidin methylchalcone and ascorbic acid in venous insufficiency treatment of ambulatory patients. Int Angiol. 2007. 26:p. 378–84

12 

Maldonado G, Guerrero R, Paredes C, Rios C , authors. Nailfold capillaroscopy in diabetes mellitus. Microvas Res. 2017. 112:p. 41–6

13 

Junqueira CLC, Magalhães MEC, Brandão AA, et al. , authors. Microcirculation and biomarkers in patients with resistant or mild-to-moderate hypertension: a cross-sectional study. Hypertens Res. 2018. 41:p. 515–23

14 

Ribeiro CF, Siqueira EB, Holler AP, et al. , authors. Periungual capillaroscopy in psoriasis. An Bras Dermatol. 2012. 87:p. 550–3

15 

Li L, Mac-Mary S, Sainthillier JM, et al. , authors. Age-related changes of the cutaneous microcirculation in vivo. Gerontology. 2006. 52:p. 142–53

16 

Fonseca GP, Brenner FM, de Souza Muller C, Wojcik AL , authors. Nailfold capillaroscopy as a diagnostic and prognostic method in rosacea. An Bras Dermatol. 2011. 86:p. 87–90

17 

Takci Z, Bilgili SG, Karadag AS, et al. , authors. Decreased serum paraoxonase and arylesterase activities in patients with rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015. 29:p. 367–70

18 

Tisma VS, Basta-Juzbasic A, Jaganjac M, et al. , authors. Oxidative stress and ferritin expression in the skin of patients with rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009. 60:p. 270–6

19 

Erdogan HK, Bulur I, Kocaturk E, et al. , authors. Advanced oxidation protein products and serum total oxidant/antioxidant status levels in rosacea. Adv Dermatol Allergol. 2018. 35:p. 304–8

20 

Erel O , author. A new automated colorimetric method for measuring total oxidant status. Clin Biochem. 2005. 38:p. 1103–11

21 

Erel O , author. A novel automated direct measurement method for total antioxidant capacity using a new generation, more stable ABTS radical cation. Clin Biochem. 2004. 37:p. 277–85

22 

Eser A, Erpolat S, Kaygusuz I, et al. , authors. Investigation of Demodex folliculorum frequency in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. An Bras Dermatol. 2017. 92:p. 807–10

23 

Gerber PA, Buhren BA, Steinhoff M, Homey B , authors. Rosacea: the cytokine and chemokine network. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2011. 15:p. 40–7

24 

Holmes AD , author. Potential role of microorganisms in the pathogenesis of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013. 69:p. 1025–32

25 

Koller B, Muller-Wiefel AS, Rupec R, et al. , authors. Chitin modulates innate immune responses of keratinocytes. PLoS One. 2011. 6:p. e16594

26 

Lee JB, Moon J, Moon KR, et al. , authors. Epidemiological and clinical features of rosacea in Korea: a multicenter cross-sectional study. J Dermatol. 2018. 45:p. 546–53

27 

Yamasaki K, Kanada K, Macleod DT, et al. , authors. TLR2 expression is increased in rosacea and stimulates enhanced serine protease production by keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2011. 131:p. 688–97

28 

Karbalaie A, Emrani Z, Fatemi A, et al. , authors. Practical issues in assessing nailfold capillaroscopic images: a summary. Clin Rheumatol. 2019. 38:p. 2343–54

29 

Martínez-Sales V, Vila V, Ricart JM, et al. , authors. Increased circulating endothelial cells and microparticles in patients with psoriasis. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2015. 60:p. 283–90

30 

Hofstee HM, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Voskuyl AE, et al. , authors. Nailfold capillary density is associated with the presence and severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009. 68:p. 191–5

31 

Pasqui AL, Puccetti L, Di Renzo M, et al. , authors. Structural and functional abnormality of systemic microvessels in cardiac syndrome X. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2005. 15:p. 56–64

32 

Gallucci F, Russo R, Buono R, et al. , authors. Indications and results of videocapillaroscopy in clinical practice. Adv Med Sci. 2008. 53:p. 149–50

33 

Francischetti EA, Tibirica E, da Silva EG, et al. , authors. Skin capillary density and microvascular reactivity in obese subjects with and without metabolic syndrome. Microvasc Res. 2011. 81:p. 325–30

34 

Jones DA , author. Rosacea, reactive oxygen species, and azelaic acid. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2009. 2:p. 26–30

35 

Haber R, El Gemayel M , authors. Comorbidities in rosacea: a systematic review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018. 78:p. 786–92

Copyright: © 2021 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2021 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe