eISSN: 2084-9869
ISSN: 1233-9687
Polish Journal of Pathology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
vol. 69
Original paper

Increased angiogenesis seems to correlate with inferior overall survival in myeloid sarcoma patients

Pier P. Piccaluga, Stefania Paolini, Mohsen Navari, Maryam Etebari, Giuseppe Visani, Stefano Ascani

Pol J Pathol 2018; 69 (3): 254-265
Online publish date: 2018/11/20
Article file
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero


Myeloid sarcoma (MS), also termed as “granulocytic sarcoma” “extra-medullary myeloid tumor”, or “chloroma”, is a rare condition that is characterized by the occurrence of one or more tumor masses, consisting of myeloblasts or immature myeloid cells and presenting at an extra-medullary site [1]. The latter more often corresponds to the skin, bone or lymph node, although the process can affect almost every site of the body [2, 1, 3]. It may develop de novo or concurrently with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), myeloproliferative neoplasia (MPN) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) [1, 3]. Interestingly, MS may be the first evidence of AML or precede it by months or years [1, 2]. Finally, it can represent the initial manifestation of relapse in a previously treated AML in remission [1, 3].
Histologically, MS most commonly consists of myeloblasts (MB), with or without features of promyelocytic or neutrophilic maturation, that partially or totally efface the tissue architecture. In a significant proportion of cases, it displays myelomonocytic (MMo) or pure monoblastic (MoB) morphologic features. However, this morphologic sub-classification has been largely criticized, being no longer included in the WHO classification [1, 4]. In contrast, different studies demonstrated that the immunophenotype is of paramount importance for the lineage definition and differential diagnosis [1, 5, 4]. The latter is mainly based on the differentiation of the process from malignant lymphoma, and specially lymphoblastic lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma.
The genetic features are quite heterogeneous, monosomy 7, trisomy 8 and MLL rearrangement being the most common alterations in adult patients [3]. Recently, new genetic analyses including next generation sequencing were demonstrated to be able to identify clinically actionable molecular markers in this setting even starting from formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples [6, 7]. The clinical course is more often aggressive and it is likely that intensive treatments including stem cell transplantation can determine improved outcomes [3, 8, 9].
Formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing ones (angiogenesis) is an absolute requirement for the viability and growth of solid tumors [10, 11] This neovascularization is mediated by angiogenic molecules released by tumor cells themselves and by accessory host cells such as macrophages, mast cells, and lymphocytes. In turn, the newly formed endothelial cells of the tumor can stimulate tumor growth in a paracrine fashion [12]. Furthermore, angiogenesis is important for the development of a malignant phenotype [12] and numerous studies [12] have demonstrated that the vascular density of a tumor directly correlates with metastasis and patient outcome. Interestingly, angiogenesis was found to have a significant role in hematological malignancies, such as plasma cell myeloma, acute leukemias, myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and lymphomas [13, 14, 15, 16, 21]. In particular, an increased micro-vascular density (MVD) was demonstrated in the bone marrow of acute myeloid leukemia patients [22]. However, no data have been reported so far concerning angiogenesis in MS.
In the present study, we investigated the extent of angiogenesis in a large series of MS in adult patients, aiming to: 1) assess whether angiogenesis is different in MS, bone marrow of AML patients, and normal bone marrow; 2) assess whether angiogenesis is associated with other clinico-pathological feature in MS; and 3) assess the prognostic impact of angiogenesis related parameters in MS.

Material and methods

Tissue samples and clinical information

Sixty MS cases (median age 60.5, range 16-87 years), 24 AML bone marrow samples, 5 normal bone marrows and 2 cases of extramedullary (ectopic) hemopoiesis encountered in patients without any evidence of hematological malignancy were retrieved from the files of the Hematopathology Unit of Bologna University (collected between 1990 and 2004). These cases were included in a larger panel previously described in details [3], the follow up being updated to January 2015. Complete clinical data were available in all the cases, while conventional cytogenetics and eventually FISH data were available for 31/60 patients. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the institutional ethical committee approved tissue collection and study design.
Patients’ characteristics are detailed in Table I and Supplementary Table I.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Biopsies (excisional for lymph-nodes and testis; punch for skin and surgical/CT-guided for other sites) were performed in all patients before treatment; all specimens were reviewed by two of the authors to confirm the accuracy of the diagnosis and assess the cytological subtype according to the WHO classification as well as the MVD. The histopathological analysis was conduced as previously reported [3, 23]. The percentage of neoplastic cells positive for immunohistochemical markers (see below) was independently assessed by four experienced pathologists. In case of discrepancy, the slide was collectively discussed at a multi-head microscope until consensus was reached. Each marker was regarded as positive when it was clearly expressed by at least 20% of the neoplastic cells. Bone marrow biopsies have been also evaluated in all the MS cases.

Micro-vascular density analysis

In order to evaluate endothelial cells, anti-CD34 and anti-FVIII antibodies (Ab) were used [17, 18].
Two separate previously described methods were used to estimate MVD [18, 24, 25]. Briefly, in the first method, visual micro-vessel grading, the slides were visually scanned at × 100, × 200 and × 400 magnification and semi-quantitatively graded for the extent of CD34/FVIII staining. To ensure the accuracy of the grading method, each sample was reviewed by two of the authors. Morphologic analysis was performed carefully to ensure vessel specificity of the CD34/FVIII-stained stroma considered for the analysis. Four different micro-vessel grades (MVG) have been considered: MVG 1, normal or slightly increased MVD; MVG 2, micro-vessels easy to detect and definitely increased in respect to normal; MVG 3, abundant microvessels; MVG 4, strongly increased MVD. The second method, visual count, involved counting of micro-vessels according to previously described methods [17, 18, 24, 25]. In performing this visual count, each of the slides was first scanned at × 100 magnification, and three areas with abundant micro-vessels were chosen and defined as ‘hot spots’. The number of micro-vessels in each of these hot spots was then determined at × 400 magnification. The final MVD number (micro-vessels for high-power magnification field/× 400) was assigned by taking the average of the three separate visual counts. During the count process large vessels were excluded as well vessels in periosteum or bone as regards bone marrow specimens. Areas of staining with no discrete breaks were counted as single vessels and the presence of a lumen was not required. Five bone marrow samples as well as 2 cases of extramedullary (ectopic) hemopoiesis without tumor evidence were studied as controls.
For MVD, if different scores were proposed by different observers, consensus was reached by simultaneous analysis and discussion.

Statistical analysis

For clinical analysis, all data were evaluated with the Stat view 5.0 software package (SAS Institute Inc, North Carolina, USA). In order to assess possible correlations between angiogenesis parameters (MVD and MVG) and other clinico-pathological features, covariate analysis was performed by the means of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho) for numerical (continuous) variables (i.e. age); conversely, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were adopted for nominal (non-continuous) variables (i.e. gender, tissue localization, cytology, cytogenetics, and presence of concomitant hematological malignancy), when two or more groups were evaluated, respectively. Such non parametric tests were chosen to ensure the maximal accuracy also in case of small (<30 cases) subgroups. Survival curves were plotted according to the Kaplan-Meier method [26]. Relapse free survival (RFS) was calculated from the date of complete remission (CR) achievement until relapse, death or date of the last contact; overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis until death or date of the last contact for living patients. When appropriate, survival data were censored at the time of stem cell transplant (SCT) administration. The univariate association between individual clinical features and RFS/OS was determined with the Cox proportional hazards regression model [27] and, when appropriate, with also the log-rank [28]. A multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards regression model [27] was performed to compare the factors turned out to be significantly associated with survival at univariate analysis [29].
The limit of significance for all analyses was defined as a p value < 0.05; 2-sided tests were used in all calculations. Sample size of groups considered in each analysis as well as the relative descriptive statistics are depicted in Table II.


Correlations between angiogenesis and clinico-pathological features in myeloid sarcoma

First, we compared MVD in MS, AML and controls. Indeed, although the antibody directed to CD34-stained myeloid progenitors, CD34 has been confirmed to be a useful antigen for assessing intra-tumor angiogenesis, as for other malignancies (Fig. 1) [17, 18]. We found that MS presented with significantly increased MVD in comparison to normal bone marrow. In particular, the median MVD was 15.65 (range, 7.8-124.4) vs. 5 (range, 4-5) in tumors and controls, respectively (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.0002). On the other hand, no significant difference was recorded between MS and AML (15.65 vs. 18) (Fig. 2A; Table II). Consistently, according to MV grading, MS were grouped as following: 4 MVG1; 21 MVG2; 16 MVG3; and 19 MVG4. Among AML cases, 2 were classified as MVG1, 5 as MVG2, 8 as MVG3, and 5 as MVG4. Conversely, all the normal bone marrow samples were regarded as MVG1 (χ2, p = 0.00000138) (Fig. 2B). Of note, we observed a remarkable degree of correlation between MVD and MVG (correlation, r2 = 0.33; p < 0.001). Similarly, inter-observer concordance was very high concerning MVG after the initial evaluation (r2 = 0.8; p < 0.001), while consensus was reached at the end in all instances.
We then tried to assess possible correlations between angiogenesis parameters (MVD and MVG) and the other clinico-pathological features of MS, including age, gender, cytogenetics, tissue localization, cytological subtype, and presence of a concomitant hematological disease (AML, MDS or MPN). Indeed, we found neither age (Spearman correlation, p = 0.9), nor gender (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.8), cytogenetics (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.9), and concomitant disease (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.7) to be associated with MVD or MVG. Afterward, we evaluated MVD and MVG in MS cytological subtypes (myeloblastic, MB; myelo-monocytic, MMo; and monocytic, Mo). We found that Mo forms had a significantly higher MVD when compared with MB and MMo ones (24.7 vs. 15.65 vs. 13.25, respectively; p < 0.0005) (Fig. 3A). Subsequently, we evaluated possible variations in MS cases at different localizations. Skin, gastro-intestinal, testicular and lymph-nodal lesion were considered, as at least 5 cases were available for each group. We found no significant differences in MS cases developing in different tissues (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.7). On the other hand, when we considered the remaining localizations in one unique group (being the single one too small to be analyzed) (Table I), we found the latter to have a significantly higher MVD (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.007) (Fig. 3B). In spite of this, due to the heterogeneity of this group, it was not possible to draw definite conclusions, identifying tissues with higher vascular development. However, to further explore this phenomenon, and try to definitely exclude the puzzling effects of extra-medullary normal tissues influences, we also evaluated MVD and MVG in two cases of ectopic (extra-medullary) hematopoiesis, not associated with hematological malignancies. Indeed, in such instances, the MVD (4 and 5, respectively) and MVG (grade 1 in both instances) did not differ from those of normal bone marrows. Suggesting that the invaded tissues were not major determinants of micro-vessel development.
Taken together, our results showed that angiogenesis was extremely increased in neoplastic samples in comparison to normal hemopoiesis, without significant differences as far as various clinico-pathological features are concerned, with the exception of the cellular subtype.

Increased angiogenesis correlated with poor survival in myeloid sarcoma patients

Median OS for MS patients was 10 months (range, 0.5-180) (Fig. 4A-B). Seven out of sixty (11.6%) are currently alive, 6 being in continuous CR (10%). The median RFS was 35 (range, 2-179) months (Fig. 4C). The median follow-up for alive patients was 102 (range, 96-180) months.
To assess whether increased angiogenesis was associated with patients’ clinical outcome, we first examined whether MVD correlated with treatment response. Indeed, median MVD was 14.8 (range 10.7-31.4) vs. 16.2 (7.8-124.4) in patients who achieved a CR (responders, n = 15 cases) or not (non-responders, n = 45 cases) (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.3). In addition, we calculated the response rate between patients with higher (n = 30 cases) or lower (n = 30 cases) MVD (50th percentile was taken to divide the two groups); again, we found no significant differences (6/30 vs. 9/30, respectively; Fischer exact test, p = 0.55).
Subsequently, we found that neither MVD (Cox model, p = 0.5) nor MVG (Cox model, p = 0.7; Kaplan-Meier plot, Log-rank, p = 0.3) were significantly correlated to RFS. Consistently, when patients were divided into quartiles according to their MVD levels (high, n = 15; intermediate-high, n = 15; intermediate-low, n = 15; and low, n = 15 cases) still there was no significant difference as far as RFS was concerned (Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank, p = 0.3).
Then, referring to OS, we found that patients with higher MVD tended to have a worse survival than patients with lower values (Cox model, p = 0.07). However, notably, if survival was censored at the time of SCT, MVD turned out to be significantly associated with OS (Cox model, p = 0.03). In addition, by dividing patients into quartiles according to the MVD levels (see above), we found MVD to be significantly associated with OS (Cox model, p = 0.05; Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank, p = 0.03; Fig. 5A). Consistently, when OS was censored for SCT, the association was again significant, and even more evident (Cox model, p = 0.03; Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank, p = 0.01; Fig. 5B). Finally, we found that patients with higher MVG had a slightly though not significantly worse outcome (Cox model, p = 0.09; Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank, p = 0.07; Fig. 5C); however, when OS was censored for SCT, the association turned out to be significant (Cox model, p = 0.04; Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank, p = 0.02; Fig. 5D).

Other clinico-pathological features associated with the clinical outcome

We then evaluated whether other parameters did correlate with survival. We found that age, as expected, was significantly associated with OS (Cox model, p = 0.0006; p = 0.0002 after censoring for SCT). Conversely, it was associated with only an unfavourable trend as far as RFS is concerned (Cox model, p = 0.07). Conversely, neither gender, nor cytogenetics, nor cytological subtype, nor tissue localization, nor the presence of a concomitant haematological malignancy were significantly associated with both RFS and OS (Table III). On the other hand, patients who achieved a CR had a significantly better outcome in terms of both RFS (Cox model, < 0.0001; Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank, p < 0.0001), and OS (Cox model, < 0.0001; Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank, p < 0.0001). Notably, this was true also when OS was censored at the time of transplant (Cox model, < 0.0001; Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank, p < 0.0001; Fig. 6A). In addition, patients who were submitted to SCT (n = 9 cases) presented with a significantly better outcome, in terms of both RFS (Cox model, < 0.0001; Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank, p<0.0001), and OS (Cox model, < 0.0001; Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank, p < 0.0001; Fig. 6B). Nonetheless, it should be noted that patients submitted to SCT were mainly those who achieved a CR. In fact, 6/15 responders vs. 3/42 non-responders actually received the procedure (Fischer exact test, p = 0.005).

Multivariate analysis of parameters associated with survival

To definitely assess the prognostic impact of parameters turned out to be associated with OS in univariate analysis, we performed multivariate analysis as previously reported [29]. Notably, when OS was not censored for SCT, only CR achievement significantly correlated with the OS (Cox model, p = 0.001; Table IV). Grippingly, on the other hand, when OS was censored for SCT, either age (p = 0.01), and CR achievement (p = 0.005), and MVD (p = 0.02), and MVG (p = 0.05) turned out to significantly affect the OS (Table IV).


In this paper, we evaluated for the first time angiogenesis in MS, providing novel insights as far as both the biology and the clinic of this tumor are concerned. Indeed, we studied a large panel of cases, representative of adult forms [3].
First, we found that MS presented with significantly increased angiogenesis in comparison to normal bone marrow and extra-medullary non-neoplastic hemopoietic tissue. Actually, this was not totally surprising, as other myeloid malignancies, including AML, MDS, and CMN were found to have an increased vascular density [16, 17, 18, 19, 22]. Nevertheless, this is the first demonstration of the phenomenon in MS and may offer relevant issues for further future analyses.
In particular, angiogenesis may represent a relevant phenomenon favoring tissue colonization by neoplastic myeloid elements. To this regard, we found that monocytic forms had a significantly higher MVD in comparison to other cytological subtypes. On the other hand, it is well known that AML with monoblastic/monocytic differentiation do present more often with extra- medullary involvement and MS [30]. Indeed, the higher capability of myeloid blasts with monocytic differentiation to infiltrate and eventually efface different tissues may be related to a higher pro-angiogenic capacity. On the other hand, we failed to demonstrate significant differences among MS as far as the specific tissue localization was concerned. Particularly, though certain localizations were associated with higher MVD, there was no evidence that in non-neoplastic ectopic hemopoiesis occurring in the same sites was associated with particularly increased micro-vascular development. On the other hand, interestingly, cases developed in tissues which are more frequently involved by MS (skin, lymph nodes, testis, and gastro-intestinal tract) were characterized by lower MVD. Thus, it is conceivable that the spectrum of adhesion molecules would determine the tissue localization [31], while the pro-angiogenic properties would non-specifically favor tissue invasion and MS formation. It should be underlined, however, that we cannot definitely exclude that MS arising at different sites might differently affect the OS. In fact, this study was not powered to answer this issue and certain sites were involved in a very few cases. Similarly, we failed to find any difference between cases with or without an associated (preceding, concomitant or succeeding) bone marrow disease (AML, MDS, CMN). This can appear somehow surprising; however, it should be noted that MS per se, independently from any associated malignancy is generally provided with a poor prognosis.
Moreover, we showed that angiogenesis, in terms of both MVD and MVG, did significantly correlate with patients’ outcome. In particular, higher degrees of angiogenesis were associated with significantly inferior OS. Remarkably, MVD turned out to be the unique biological feature impacting OS. In fact, cytogenetics, tissue localization, cytology, and presence of concomitant hematological disease did not. To this regard, however, it should be noted that the number of cases for which cytogenetic information were available was relatively limited, probably affecting such result. Conversely, clinical parameters such as age (a major determinant of OS in AML patients as well) and the achievement of CR were significantly related to the OS. Importantly, with an extended, long-term follow up (ranging from 96 to 180 months) the administration of SCT was confirmed to be associated with a better outcome [3]. Nevertheless, it should be underlined that six out of the nine patients who received SCT had previously achieved a CR, while only three did not. Thus, it was not possible to definitely discriminate the beneficial effect of SCT from the obvious advantage represented by a responsive disease. On the other hand, of note, only 2/6 long term survivors did not receive SCT, and one patient, initially refractory, was rescued by the transplant. Further, some cautiousness has to be taken when considering survival data. In fact, treatments were relatively heterogeneous as patients were not included in a specific clinical trial.
Finally, our study offered new evidences for possible targeted treatment of MS patients [32]. In fact, MS is well recognized as an adverse prognostic factor in myeloid tumors [1], and angiogenesis probably contributes to tumor aggressiveness. In particular, new vessels were shown not only to provide metabolic support, but also to directly sustain tumor cells growth and survival. In fact, the interaction between endothelial cells and myeloid blasts have been demonstrated to provide fundamental sustainment through the VEGF/VEGFR2 pathway, being active both autocrine and paracrine loops [33, 34, 35, 36]. Noteworthy, in experimental models, the inhibition of VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling was shown to be essential for inducing durable remissions in AML xenografts [33]. Thus, anti-angiogenic therapy may be proposed also to patients with extra-medullary disease [18, 19, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 17, 50, 51].
The main limitation of the study probably relies in the lack of a complete genomic characterization. Unfortunately, the lack of available material did not allow neither a conventional approach nor a NGS or microarray based one [6, 7, 52, 53] to identify lesion with potential prognostic relevance.
In conclusion, we provided evidence, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, that angiogenesis is increased in MS, assuming a significant prognostic impact in this setting. Thus, we offered the basis for a better comprehension of the biology of the tumor, as well as the rationale basis for novel, targeted therapeutic approaches.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


1. Pileri S, Orazi A, Falini B. Myeloid sarcoma. In: Swerdlow S, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. (eds.) WHO Classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. V ed. IARC, Lyon 2017; 140-141.
2. Piccaluga PP, Ascani S, Agostinelli C, et al. Myeloid sarcoma of liver: an unusual cause of jaundice. Report of three cases and review of literature. Histopathology 2007; 50: 802-805.
3. Pileri SA, Ascani S, Cox MC, et al. Myeloid sarcoma: clinico-pathologic, phenotypic and cytogenetic analysis of 92 adult patients. Leukemia 2007; 21: 340-350.
4. Falini B, Lenze D, Hasserjian R, et al. Cytoplasmic mutated nucleophosmin (NPM) defines the molecular status of a significant fraction of myeloid sarcomas. Leukemia 2007; 21: 1566-1570.
5. Quintanilla-Martinez L, Zukerberg LR, Ferry JA, et al. Extramedullary tumors of lymphoid or myeloid blasts. The role of immunohistology in diagnosis and classification. Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 104: 431-443.
6. Mirza MK, Sukhanova M, Stolzel F, et al. Genomic aberrations in myeloid sarcoma without blood or bone marrow involvement: characterization of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples by chromosomal microarrays. Leuk Res 2014; 38: 1091-1096.
7. Li Z, Stolzel F, Onel K, et al. Next generation sequencing reveals clinically actionable molecular markers in myeloid sarcoma. Leukemia 2015; 29: 2113-2116.
8. Movassaghian M, Brunner AM, Blonquist TM, et al. Presentation and outcomes among patients with isolated myeloid sarcoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 56: 1698-1703.
9. Peker D, Parekh V, Paluri R, et al. Clinicopathological and molecular features of myeloid sarcoma as initial presentation of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms: a single institution experience. Int J Hematol 2014; 100: 457-463.
10. Gimbrone MA Jr., Leapman SB, Cotran RS, et al. Tumor dormancy in vivo by prevention of neovascularization. J Exp Med 1972; 136: 261-276.
11. Folkman J, Watson K, Ingber D, et al. Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasia. Nature 1989; 339: 58-61.
12. Cao Y, Arbiser J, D’Amato RJ, et al. Forty-year journey of angiogenesis translational research. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3: 114rv3.
13. Vacca A, Ribatti D, Roncali L, et al. Bone marrow angiogenesis and progression in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 1994; 87: 503-508.
14. Ribatti D, Vacca A, Nico B, et al. Angiogenesis spectrum in the stroma of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. Eur J Haematol 1996; 56: 45-53.
15. Vacca A, Ribatti D, Presta M, et al. Bone marrow neovascularization, plasma cell angiogenic potential, and matrix metalloproteinase-2 secretion parallel progression of human multiple myeloma. Blood 1999; 93: 3064-3073.
16. Pruneri G, Bertolini F, Soligo D, et al. Angiogenesis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 1398-1401.
17. Mesa RA, Hanson CA, Rajkumar SV, et al. Evaluation and clinical correlations of bone marrow angiogenesis in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Blood 2000; 96: 3374-3380.
18. Piccaluga PP, Visani G, Pileri SA, et al. Clinical efficacy and antiangiogenic activity of thalidomide in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. A pilot study. Leukemia 2002; 16: 1609-1614.
19. Piccaluga PP, Visani G, Finelli C, et al. Efficacy of thalidomide in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica 2002; 87: ELT18.
20. Pruneri G, Ponzoni M, Ferreri AJ, et al. Microvessel density, a surrogate marker of angiogenesis, is significantly related to survival in multiple myeloma patients. Br J Haematol 2002; 118: 817-820.
21. Pruneri G, Bertolini F, Baldini L, et al. Angiogenesis occurs in hairy cell leukaemia (HCL) and in NOD/SCID mice transplanted with the HCL line Bonna-12. Br J Haematol 2003; 120: 695-698.
22. Padro T, Ruiz S, Bieker R, et al. Increased angiogenesis in the bone marrow of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2000; 95: 2637-2644.
23. Pileri SA, Roncador G, Ceccarelli C, et al. Antigen retrieval techniques in immunohistochemistry: comparison of different methods. J Pathol 1997; 183: 116-123.
24. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, et al. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis-correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1-8.
25. Heimburg S, Oehler MK, Papadopoulos T, et al. Prognostic relevance of the endothelial marker CD 34 in ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res 1999; 19 (4A): 2527-2529.
26. Kaplan E, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observation. JAMA 1958; 58: 457-481
27. Cox D. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc 1982; 34: 187-220.
28. Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966; 50: 163-170.
29. Went P, Agostinelli C, Gallamini A, et al. Marker expression in peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a proposed clinical-pathologic prognostic score. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 2472-2479.
30. Arber D, Peterson L, Brunning R, et al. Acute myeloid leukaemia, not otherwise specified. In: Swerdlow S, Campo E, Harris NL et al. (eds.). WHO Classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. IV ed. IARC, Lyon 2008; 130-139.
31. Byrd JC, Weiss RB. Recurrent granulocytic sarcoma. An unusual variation of acute myelogenous leukemia associated with 8;21 chromosomal translocation and blast expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule. Cancer 1994; 73: 2107-2112.
32. Raanani P, Shpilberg O, Ben-Bassat I. Extramedullary disease and targeted therapies for hematological malignancies – is the association real? Ann Oncol 2007; 18: 7-12.
33. Dias S, Hattori K, Heissig B, et al. Inhibition of both paracrine and autocrine VEGF/ VEGFR-2 signaling pathways is essential to induce long-term remission of xenotransplanted human leukemias. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 10857-10862.
34. Dias S, Shmelkov SV, Lam G, Rafii S. VEGF(165) promotes survival of leukemic cells by Hsp90-mediated induction of Bcl-2 expression and apoptosis inhibition. Blood 2002; 99: 2532-2540.
35. Ghannadan M, Wimazal F, Simonitsch I, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of VEGF in the bone marrow of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Correlation between VEGF expression and the FAB category. Am J Clin Pathol 2003; 119: 663-671.
36. Santos SC, Dias S. Internal and external autocrine VEGF/KDR loops regulate survival of subsets of acute leukemia through distinct signaling pathways. Blood 2004; 103: 3883-3889.
37. Barosi G, Grossi A, Comotti B, et al. Safety and efficacy of thalidomide in patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Br J Haematol 2001; 114: 78-83.
38. Canepa L, Ballerini F, Varaldo R, et al. Thalidomide in agnogenic and secondary myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol 2001; 115: 313-315.
39. Pozzato G, Zorat F, Nascimben F, et al. Thalidomide therapy in compensated and decompensated myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Haematologica 2001; 86: 772-773.
40. Steins MB, Padro T, Bieker R, et al. Efficacy and safety of thalidomide in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2002; 99: 834-839.
41. Karp JE, Gojo I, Pili R, et al. Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor for relapsed and refractory adult acute myelogenous leukemias: therapy with sequential 1-beta-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine, mitoxantrone, and bevacizumab. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 3577-3585.
42. List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, et al. Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 549-557.
43. Reichert F, Barak V, Tarshis M, et al. Anti-angiogenic effects and regression of localized murine AML produced by anti-VEGF and anti-Flk-1 antibodies. Eur J Haematol 2005; 75: 41-46.
44. Barr P, Fu P, Lazarus H, et al. Antiangiogenic activity of thalidomide in combination with fludarabine, carboplatin, and topotecan for high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2007; 48: 1940-1949.
45. Lancet JE, List AF, Moscinski LC. Treatment of deletion 5q acute myeloid leukemia with lenalidomide. Leukemia 2007; 21: 586-588.
46. Raza A, Mehdi M, Mumtaz M, et al. Combination of 5-azacytidine and thalidomide for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 2008; 113: 1596-1604.
47. Fehniger TA, Byrd JC, Marcucci G, et al. Single-agent lenalidomide induces complete remission of acute myeloid leukemia in patients with isolated trisomy 13. Blood 2009; 113: 1002-1005.
48. Quintas-Cardama A, Kantarjian HM, et al. Lenalidomide plus prednisone results in durable clinical, histopathologic, and molecular responses in patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4760-4766.
49. Tefferi A, Verstovsek S, Barosi G, et al. Pomalidomide is active in the treatment of anemia associated with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4563-4569.
50. Mesa RA, Pardanani AD, Hussein K, et al. Phase1/-2 study of Pomalidomide in myelofibrosis. Am J Hematol 2010; 85: 129-130.
51. Visani G, Ferrara F, Di Raimondo F, et al. Low-dose lenalidomide plus cytarabine induce complete remission that can be predicted by genetic profiling in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients. Leukemia 2014; 28: 967-970.
52. Meyer SC, Levine RL. Translational implications of somatic genomics in acute myeloid leukaemia. Lancet 2014; 15: e382-394.
53. Walter RB, Othus M, Paietta EM, et al. Effect of genetic profiling on prediction of therapeutic resistance and survival in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2015; 29: 2104-2107.
54. Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, et al. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood 2010; 116: 354-365.

Address for correspondence

Pier P. Piccaluga
Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine
Bologna University School Medicine
40138 Bologna, Italy
Copyright: © 2018 Polish Association of Pathologists and the Polish Branch of the International Academy of Pathology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe