eISSN: 2299-0046
ISSN: 1642-395X
Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
vol. 39
Letter to the Editor

Multiple piloleiomyomas: a case series with dermoscopic features and a literature review

Magdalena Żychowska
Joanna Łudzik
2, 3
Magdalena Szczepanik
Anna Józefiak
Patrycja Niewinna
Agata Drożdżyk
Elżbieta Ostańska
Adam Reich

Department of Dermatology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszow, Poland
Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
Department of Telemedicine and Bioinformatics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
Students’ Scientific Group, Department of Dermatology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszow, Poland
Department of Pathology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszow, Poland
Adv Dermatol Allergol 2022; XXXIX (5): 992-995
Online publish date: 2022/11/09
Article file
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero

Cutaneous leiomyomas are rare benign tumours originating from smooth muscles, comprising 5% of all leiomyomas [1]. Histopathologically, they are divided into three subtypes: piloleiomyomas developed from the erector pili muscles in the pilosebaceous unit, angioleiomyomas derived from smooth muscle fibres of the cutaneous small- and medium-sized arteries and veins, and genital leiomyomas originated from vulvar, dartoic or mammary muscles [2].

Among these three subtypes, cutaneous piloleiomyomas (CPLs) are the most common. They more often develop in adults, with comparable frequency in men and women, and are frequently accompanied by pain, especially in response to friction or low temperature. CPLs may be solitary or multiple in an individual patient, and usually present as firm pink-to-red or brown papules or nodules. Multiple lesions may show disseminated, clustered or segmental (dermatomal-like) distribution [1, 2].

CPLs are usually clinically misdiagnosed and the proper diagnosis is made upon histopathological examination. Few reports characterizing the dermoscopic findings in CPLs are available in medical literature in English [38].

In the paper, we present 3 patients with multiple CPLs to highlight the dermoscopic findings. We also aim to summarize the diagnostic process and treatment methods of multiple CPLs.

Case 1 is a 27-year-old man referred to the Department of Dermatology with a 7-year history of multiple asymptomatic nodules of segmental distribution on the left cheek (Figure 1 A). The patient’s father had similar lesions on the left cheek and trunk. Videodermoscopy showed branching vessels and irregular yellow-white clods (Figure 1 B). Histopathological examination revealed orthokeratotic epidermis with focal intercellular oedema overlaying cords of spindle-shaped cells, which were positive for smooth muscle actin (SMA) and negative for S100 (Figures 1 C, D). On this basis, the diagnosis of segmental CPLs was made.

Figure 1

Case 1. A – Multiple pink-to-red nodules of segmental distribution on the left cheek. B – Videodermoscopy (Canfield D200EVO) showed branching vessels and irregular yellow-white clods. C – Histopathological examination revealed orthokeratotic epidermis overlying cords of spindle-shaped cells (haematoxylin & eosin). D – Positive staining for smooth muscle actin (SMA). Case 2. E – Multiple red nodules (black arrows) among psoriatic plaques; F – Videodermoscopy (Canfield D200EVO) showed discrete pigment network at the periphery, yellow-white clods, thick arborizing vessels that did not cross the midline and scattered dotted vessels. G – Histopathological examination showing cords of spindle-shaped cells (haematoxylin & eosin). H – Positive staining for desmin. Case 3. I – Two well-demarcated pink-to-red nodules in the left scapular region. J – Videodermoscopy (Canfield D200EVO) showed multifocal pigment network, white structureless areas and branching vessels. K – Histopathological examination showed cords of spindle-shaped cells (haematoxylin & eosin). L – Positive staining for caldesmon


Case 2 is a 44-year-old man with multiple asymptomatic red nodules of unknown duration (Figure 1 E) and concomitant plaque psoriasis. His family history was irrelevant. Physical examination, apart from psoriatic plaques, revealed presence of over 30 pink-to-red nodules of up to 1.5 cm in diameter, located on the trunk and upper extremities. Videodermoscopy showed discrete pigment network at the periphery of all nodules and vascular structures, predominantly consisting of thick arborizing vessels that did not cross the midline of the lesion. Some bigger nodules showed polymorphic vascular pattern consisting of thick arborizing vessels at the periphery, as well as of irregularly distributed comma and dotted vessels. Yellow-white clods were observed within several nodules (Figure 1 F). Chest X-ray, as well as the ultrasound of the abdomen and peripheral lymph nodes, were within normal limits. Histopathological examination of one of the nodules was consistent with the diagnosis of piloleiomyoma: SMA (+), desmin (+), S100 (–) (Figures 1 G, H).

Case 3 is a 41-year-old woman who was admitted to the Department of Dermatology for evaluation of three asymptomatic nodules of 5-year duration. One of the lesions on the back was surgically excised 5 years prior to hospitalization (histopathological examination was not available) but recurred at the site of the surgical scar. The patient had a negative history of uterine leiomyomas and her family history was irrelevant. Three well-demarcated, dense pink-to-red nodules of 1–2 cm in diameter located in the left scapular region (two lesions) and on the left breast (one lesion) were found on physical examination (Figure 1 I). Videodermoscopy showed multifocal pigment network, white structureless areas and branching vessels (Figure 1 J). Histopathological examination was consistent with the diagnosis of piloleiomyoma (Figures 1 K, L).

Dermoscopic findings in CPLs were initially described in 2012 and included presence of discrete peripheral pigment network and central scar-like area [3]. Presence of vascular structures under dermoscopy was rarely reported in CPLs. Vessels, if present, were predominantly arborizing, while dotted, linear irregular or polymorphic vessels were observed only in single cases [5, 8]. We observed presence of multiple yellow-to-white clods in two out of 3 patients from our case series. This dermoscopic feature has so far only been reported in 1 patient with multiple segmental CPLs [7].

In the largest study to date on dermoscopic aspects of cutaneous smooth muscle neoplasms, pigment network was found to be more common in CPLs (96.5%) than in angioleiomyomas (30.8%), while vascular structures were more often observed in angioleiomyomas (69.2%) than in CPLs (15.8%) [8]. Multifocal hypopigmented areas were observed only in CPLs. Asymmetry of the tumour and presence of ulceration, multilobulated structures, atypical pigment network of multifocal distribution, vascular structures (polymorphic-atypical vessels in particular) or white structures were more commonly observed in leiomyosarcoma [8]. Dermoscopic findings in CPLs are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

A summary of studies describing the dermoscopic features of cutaneous piloleiomyomas (CPLs)

ParameterPaschoal et al., 2012 [3]Diluvio et al., 2014 [4]Suzuki et al., 2015 [5]Behera et al., 2018 [6]Popadiæ et al., 2018 [7]Zaballos et al., 2019 [8]Current cases
Number of patients11151293
Number of lesions examined550148N/A114Multiple (> 50)
Type of examinationN/APolarized noncontactN/ANonpolarized contactN/APolarized contactNonpolarized contact
Pigment network:5/550/501/122/48Present110/1142/3
 Complete regular5/550/5015/2298/110
Linear irregular crypts16/48
Cerebriform pattern14/48
Fingerprint pattern3/48
Yellow-white area3/48
Scar-like area5/51/11/488/114
Cobble-stone pattern1/48
Blue-grey peppering1/48
Structureless area1/481/3
Cloud-like area (interrupted irregular cotton-white area)Present in some lesions5/48
Hypopigmented areas56/114
Whitish clodsPresent (head and neck)2/3
Vascular structures:1/15/4818/1143/3
 Branching vessels5/511/183/3
 Dotted vessels1/14/181/3
 Polymorphic vessels2/181/3
Circular and/or elongated hyperpigmented structures with hypopigmented centre4/5

Multiple cutaneous leiomyomas should raise the suspicion of multiple cutaneous and uterine leiomyomatosis (MCUL), an autosomal dominant condition with incomplete penetrance, formerly referred to as Reed’s syndrome [9]. In 2001, MCUL was linked to renal cancer and the term “hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer” (HLRCC) was coined [10]. Since then, the diagnosis of HLRCC has been made in approximately 180 families worldwide [11]. Mutations of the fumarate hydratase (FH) tumour suppressor gene are suggested to be responsible for the development of multiple leiomyomas [1, 11]. The syndrome has been predominantly linked to type 2 papillary renal cell cancer (PRCCII) of an exceptionally aggressive course [12]. So far, the screening guidelines for MCUL or HLRCC syndrome have not been established. Follow-up should include annual skin and gynaecological check-up, as well as annual renal ultrasound [1].

Treatment of multiple CPLs remains challenging as surgical excision is usually not possible. Several strategies for leiomyoma-associated pain have been implemented so far. Calcium channel blockers have been predominantly used. However, data on their efficacy are contradictory [1]. Another treatment strategy is based on the destruction of nerve fibres e.g. with the ablative or fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser [13]. Recent reports highlight also high efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A), which reduces muscle contraction and inhibits release of pain mediators including substance P, glutamate and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) [14]. Other treatment options of leiomyoma-associated pain comprise nifedipine, nitroglycerin, gabapentin, doxazosin, lidocaine, capsaicin and phenoxybenzamine [1].

In conclusion, CPLs are rare tumours with a wide variety of dermoscopic presentations. Early diagnosis of multiple CPLs is of importance as regular assessment for leiomyosarcoma and/or renal cancer should be performed in such cases.

Conflict of interest

Magdalena Żychowska, Joanna Łudzik, Magdalena Szczepanik, Anna Józefiak, Patrycja Niewinna, Agata Drożdżyk, and Elżbieta Ostañska declare no conflict of interest.

Adam Reich has worked as a consultant or speaker for AbbVie, Bioderma, Celgene, Chema Elektromet, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Medac, Menlo Therapeutics, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Sandoz, and Trevi, and participated as the Principal Investigator or a Subinvestigator in clinical trials sponsored by AbbVie, Drug Delivery Solutions Ltd, Galderma, Genentech, Janssen, Kymab Limited, Leo Pharma, Menlo Therapeutics, MetrioPharm, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Trevi.



Malik K, Patel P, Chen J, Khachemoune A. Leiomyoma cutis: a focus review on presentation, management, and association with malignancy. Am J Clin Dermatol 2015; 16: 35-46.


Raj S, Calonje E, Kraus M, et al. Cutaneous pilar leiomyoma: clinicopathologic analysis of 53 lesions in 45 patients. Am J Dermatopathol 1997; 19: 2-9.


Paschoal FM, Rezze GG. Dermoscopic findings in a patient with multiple piloleiomyomas. Dermatol Pract Concept 2012; 2: 204a06.


Diluvio L, Torti C, Terrinoni A, et al. Dermoscopy as an adjuvant tool for detecting skin leiomyomas in patient with uterine fibrinoids and cerebral cavernomas. BMC Dermatol 2014; 14: 7.


Suzuki R, Fukuda H, Mukai H. Dermoscopic findings of piloleiomyoma with hypertrichosis. Eur J Dermatol 2015; 25: 362-4.


Behera B, Vinupriya S, Kumari R, et al. Dermoscopic features of pilar leiomyomas. Br J Dermatol 2018; 179: 202-4.


Popadić M, Brasanac D, Milinković M, Milčić D. Dermatoscopy of multiple piloleiomyomas with disseminated and segmental distribution. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2018; 84: 726-9.


Zaballos P, Del Pozo LJ, Argenziano G, et al. Dermoscopy of cutaneous smooth muscle neoplasms: a morphological study of 136 cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33: 693-9.


Reed WB, Walker R, Horowitz R. Cutaneous leiomyomata with uterine leiomyomata. Acta Derm Venereol 1973; 53: 409-16.


Launonen V, Vierimaa O, Kiuru M, et al. Inherited susceptibility to uterine leiomyomas and renal cell cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 3387-92.


Smit DL, Mensenkamp AR, Badeloe S, et al. Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer in families referred for fumarate hydratase germline mutation analysis. Clin Genet 2011; 79: 49-59.


Merino MJ, Torres-Cabala C, Pinto P, Linehan WM. The morphologic spectrum of kidney tumors in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31: 1578-85.


Christenson LJ, Smit K, Arpey CJ. Treatment of multiple cutaneous leiomyomas with CO2 laser ablation. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26: 319-22.


Sifaki MK, Krueger-Krasagakis S, Koutsopoulos A, et al. Botulinum toxin type A – treatment of a patient with multiple cutaneous piloleiomyomas. Dermatology 2009; 218: 44-7.

Copyright: © 2022 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2022 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.