eISSN: 2450-5722
ISSN: 2450-5927
Journal of Health Inequalities
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
 
2/2019
vol. 5
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Review paper

Nutrition and prostate cancer: review of the evidence

Miruna Dragomir
1
,
Patrick Mullie
1
,
Maria Bota
1, 2
,
Alice Koechlin
1, 2
,
Alina Macacu
1
,
Cécile Pizot
1
,
Peter Boyle
1, 2

1.
International Prevention Research Institute (iPRI), Lyon, France
2.
Strathclyde University Global Public Health Institute, Lyon, France
J Health Inequal 2019; 5 (2): 155-173
Online publish date: 2019/12/30
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Objectives
Of the possible causes of cancer, nutritional factors are supposed to play a major role in preventable cancers. Regarding prostate cancer, nutritional data remain contradictory. This article aims to review current evidence on the relation between nutrition and prostate cancer.

Material and methods
A systematic literature search for meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and pooled analyses was conducted in the PubMed database from its inception to September 2019. Eligible studies had to assess the association between nutrition and risk of prostate cancer.

Results
Generally, no evidence was found for an association between most food items or groups, including fruit, vegetables, meat, tea, coffee, and risk of prostate cancer. There was an inconsistent and weak positive association between milk and dairy foods and prostate cancer. Carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals were not associated with prostate cancer. Furthermore, no association was found with dietary patterns such as vegetarian or pesco-vegetarian, but increased adherence to a Mediterranean diet seemed to have a protective effect. In general, large heterogeneity between studies was observed. Studies included in meta-analyses were mostly observational, and therefore prone to several inherent biases.

Conclusions
The evidence on any potential association between diet and prostate cancer is weak. The reductionist approach considering individual nutritional factors is not suitable, and conducting more observational studies or small randomised trials evaluating the impact of individual nutritional factors on prostate cancer will not bring further answers. Large, well-designed, randomised, controlled trials are mandatory in order to clarify the relationship between nutrition and prostate cancer.

keywords:

diet, prostate cancer, review, nutrition, dietary patterns, dietary factors, dietary supplements

Quick links
© 2020 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe