Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
eISSN: 2449-8580
ISSN: 1734-3402
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search

Open access

without publication fees
2/2025
vol. 27
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Original paper

Patient satisfaction in the light of healthcare resources in hospitals

Mariola Borowska
1
,
Urszula Religioni
2
,
Piotr Merks
3
,
Zbigniew Doniec
4

  1. Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Warsaw, Poland
  2. School of Public Health Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  3. Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warsaw, Poland
  4. Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Regional Branch named after Jan and Irena Rudnik, Rabka Zdroj, Poland
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2025; 27(2): 166–172
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2025.149502
Online publish date: 2025/06/27
Article file
- 06 FM&PCR 2 25 - O - Borowska - 1796 - Patient.pdf  [0.30 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Manelin EB. Health Care Quality Improvement and the Ambiguous Commodity of Care. Med Anthropol Q 2020; 34(3): 361–377.
2. Butkus R, Rapp K, Cooney TG, et al. Envisioning a Better U.S. Health Care System for All: Reducing Barriers to Care and Addressing Social Determinants of Health. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172(2 Suppl): S50–S59.
3. Krot K. Jakość i marketing usług medycznych. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer; 2008.
4. Kautscha M, ed. Zarządzanie w opiece zdrowotnej. Nowe wyzwania. Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer; 2010 (in Polish).
5. Campbell RJ. Change Management in Health Care. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2020; 39(2): 50–65.
6. WHO Working Group. Quality Ace In Heath Care, 1989, I: 7–95. Available from URL: https://www.who.int/.
7. Yang BK, Johantgen ME, Trinkoff AM, et al. State Nurse Practitioner Practice Regulations and U.S. Health Care Delivery Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Med Care Res Rev 2021; 78(3): 183–196.
8. Geyman J. COVID-19 Has Revealed America’s Broken Health Care System: What Can We Learn? Int J Health Serv 2021; 51(2): 188–194.
9. Barć K, Weber C, Maksymowicz-Śliwińska A, et al. Healthcare provision in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: procedures, queries and pitfalls in Germany and Poland. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2020; 21(3–4): 193–202.
10. Rudawska I, Krot K. Obsługa pacjenta w usługach medycznych – podejście relacyjne. In: Brzozowska-Woś M, ed. Marketing. Ujęcie relacyjne. Gdańsk: Politechnika Gdańska; 2010: 126–130.
11. Kupcewicz E, Grochans E, Kadučáková H, et al. Personalized Healthcare: The Importance of Patients’ Rights in Clinical Practice from the Perspective of Nursing Students in Poland, Spain and Slovakia-A Cross-Sectional Study. J Pers Med 2021; 11(3): 191, doi: 10.3390/jpm11030191.
12. Quentin W. Measuring healthcare quality: Improving healthcare quality in Europe. Characteristics, effectiveness, and implementation of different strategies. WHO, OECD; 2019. Available from URL: https://www.oecd.org/.
13. Schoenfelder T, Klewer J, Kugler J. Determinats of patient satisfaction: a study among 39 hospitals in an in-patient setting in Germany. Int J Qual Health Care 2011; 23(5): 503–509, doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr038.
14. Program akredytacji szpitali. Zestaw standardów akredytacyjnych [cited 06.06.2023]. Available from URL: https://www.cmj.org.pl/akredytacja/standardy.php (in Polish).
15. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR), Standard Definitions. Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. IX Revision; 2016. Available from URL: https://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics/standard-definitions/.
16. WHO. Handbook for national quality policy and strategy – a practical approach for developing policy and strategy to improve quality of care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
17. Reichheld F. The Ultimate Question 2.0. How Net Promoter Companies Thrive in a Customer Driven World. Boston: Brain & Company; 2011.
18. Głowacka MD, Galicki J, Mojs E. (2009). Zarządzanie kapitałem opieki zdrowotnej. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska; 2009 (in Polish).
19. Avlijas T, Squires JE, Lalonde M, et al. A concept analysis of the patient experience. PXJ 2023; 10(1): 15–63, doi: 10.35680/2372-0247.1439.
20. Patient and Human Experience [cited 23.04.2024]. Available from URL: https://theberylinstitute.org/.
21. LaVela SL, Gallan AS. Evaluation and measurement of patient experience. PXJ 2014; 1(1): 28–36, doi: 10.35680/2372-0247.1003.
22. Wittenberg E, Reb A, Kanter E. Communicating with Patients and Families Around Difficult Topics in Cancer Care Using the COMFORT Communication Curriculum. Semin Oncol Nurs 2018; 34(3): 264–273, doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2018.06.007.
23. Litzelman K. Caregiver Well-being and the Quality of Cancer Care. Semin Oncol Nurs 2019; 35(4): 348–353, doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.06.006.
24. Mollica MA, Lines LM, Halpern MT, et al. Patient experiences of cancer care: scoping review, future directions, and introduction of a new data resource: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (SEER-CAHPS). PXJ 2017; 4(1): 103–121, doi: 10.35680/2372-0247.1167.
25. Internetowy System Badania Doświadczeń Pacjentów [cited 05.10.2023]. Available from URL: https://oopiece.pl/ (in Polish).
26. Opolski K, Dykowska G, Możdżonek M. Zarządzanie przez jakość w usługach zdrowotnych. Warszawa; Wydawnictwo Ce De Wu; 2009 (in Polish).
27. Krukiel A, Sienkiewicz Z, Wrońska I, et al. Próba porównania jakości opieki zdrowotnej w województwach mazowieckim i podlaskim – badanie pilotażowe. Pielęgn Pol 2017; 1(63): 83–89, doi: 10.20883/pielpol.2017.11 (in Polish).
28. Miller M, Supranowicz P, Gębska-Kurczerowska A. Ocena poziomu satysfakcji pacjentów leczonych na terenie województwa mazowieckiego. Warszawa: Centrum Medyczne Kształcenia Podyplomowego; 2007 (in Polish).
29. Miller M, Supranowicz P. Ocena jakości usług medycznych przez pacjentów szpitali. Prz Epidemiol 2018; 62(3): 643–650 (in Polish).
30. Miller M, Supranowicz P, Targowski M. Ocena jakości i dostępności materiałów edukacyjnych o zdrowiu. II. Opinie pacjentów. Rocz PZH 2014; 55: 125–131 (in Polish).
31. Hupert Z. Jakość w opiece medycznej: koncepcja pomiaru. Lublin: Instytut Medycyny Wsi; 2003 (in Polish).
32. Opinie o opiece zdrowotnej pod koniec drugiego roku reform [cited 05.10.2023]. Available from URL: http://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2001/K_002_01.PDF (in Polish).
33. Opinie na temat funkcjonowania systemu opieki zdrowotnej [cited 06.10.2023]. Available from URL: https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2021/K_125_21.PDF (in Polish).
34. Szpringer M, Chmielewski J, Kosecka J, et al. Poziom satysfakcji pacjenta jako jeden z aspektów jakości opieki medycznej. Med Og Nauk Zdr 2015; 21(2): 132–137 (in Polish).
35. Miller M, Supranowicz P, Gębska-Kurczerowska A, et al. Ocena poziomu satysfakcji pacjentów jako element jakości pracy podstawowej opieki zdrowotnej. Pol Merk Lek 2017; 23: 367–370 (in Polish).
Copyright: © 2025 Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
  
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.