eISSN: 2449-8580
ISSN: 1734-3402
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
vol. 22
Original paper

Perceived community support about the implementation of a smoke-free environment regional regulations in the Tegal municipality

Meita Veruswati
1, 2, 3
Al Asyary
2, 4
Edi Sucipto
5, 6
Wahyu Sulistiadi
2, 7
Abdillah Ahsan

Department of Public Health Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jakarta, Indonesia
Centre for Educational and Community Services, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia (P3M FKM UI), Depok, Indonesia
Centre of Syariah Economic and Business, Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Indonesia (PEBS FE-UI), Depok, Indonesia
Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
District Health Office, the Local Government of Tegal Municipality, Slawi, Indonesia
Bhakti Mandala Husada Tegal School of Health Sciences, Slawi, Indonesia
Department of Health Administration and Policy, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2020; 22(3): 222–227
Online publish date: 2020/10/16
Get citation
PlumX metrics:
1. Republic of Indonesia Government. Government Act No. 36 about Health (Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia No. 36 Tentang Kesehatan). Jakarta, Indonesia: Republic of Indonesia Government; 2009.
2. Asyary A, Veruswati M. Compliance study of hotel and nightclub smoke-free zones in Bogor City, Indonesia. Tob Prev Cessat 2018; 4(25): 1–3.
3. Asyary A, Veruswati M, Sulistiadi W. Hotel and Nightclub Development: a reflected perspective of Smoke-Free Zone (SFZ) implementation in Bogor City, Indonesia. Public Heal Indones 2017; 3(4): 142–144.
4. Kemenkes-RI. Aliansi bupati/walikota dalam pengendalian masalah kesehatan akibat tembakau dan penyakit tidak menular. Bul Jendela Data dan Inf Kesehat. 2012; 2: pages from – to (in Indonesian).
5. Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Tegal. Profil Kesehatan Kabupaten Tegal [Internet]. Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Tegal. Slawi: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2016. Available from URL: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwifwJTugp7lAhXyILcAHbHZBKoQFjAAegQIABAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.depkes.go.id%2Fresources%2Fdownload%2Fprofil%2FPROFIL_KAB_KOTA_2015%2F3328_Jateng_Kab_Tegal_2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3pFdtfvRP3Qio14yhJh2W_ (in Indonesian).
6. Mubarok Z. Gender-based religious democracy: a study of Umi Azizah’s winning and women political movement of Tegal Regent election in 2018. In: SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences; 2018: 2009.
7. Arofah N. Peran Muslimat NU dalam Pemberdayaan Perempuan (Studi kasus: Muslimat NU Desa Tuwel Kabupaten Tegal). J Polit Gov Stud. 2018; 7(2): 51–60 (in Indonesian).
8. Shpakou A, Kovalevskiy V, Klimatskaia L, et al. Traditional smoking and e-smoking among medical students and students-athletes – popularity and motivation. Fam Med Prim Care Rev Prim Care Rev 2018; 20(1): 61–66, doi: 10.5114/fmpcr.2018.73705.
9. Otten R, Engels RCME, Prinstein MJ. A Prospective study of perception in adolescent smoking. J Adolesc Heal 2009; 44(5): 478–484, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.09.004.
10. Mills AL, Messer K, Gilpin EA, et al. The effect of smoke-free homes on adult smoking behavior: a review. Nicotine Tob Res 2009; 11(10): 1131–1141, doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp122.
11. Elgar FJ, Pförtner T-K, Moor I, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent health 2002–2010: a time-series analysis of 34 countries participating in the health behaviour in school-aged children study. Lancet 2015; 385(9982): 2088–2095.
12. Hill S, Amos A, Clifford D, et al. Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: review of the evidence. Tob Control 2014; 23(e2): e89–e97.
13. Pechmann C. Does antismoking advertising combat underage smoking? A review of past practices and research. In: editors of the volume. Social Marketing. CITY: Psychology Press; 2018: 189–216.
14. Schneider SK, Buka SL, Dash K, et al. Community reductions in youth smoking after raising the minimum tobacco sales age to 21. Tob Control 2016; 25(3): 355–359.
15. Robertson L, Cameron C, McGee R, et al. Point-of-sale tobacco promotion and youth smoking: a meta-analysis. Tob Control 2016; 25(e2): e83–e89.
16. Arrazola RA, Singh T, Corey CG, et al. Tobacco use among middle and high school students-United States, 2011–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64(14): 381–385.
17. Fryer CS, Seaman EL, Clark RS, et al. Mixed methods research in tobacco control with youth and young adults: a methodological review of current strategies. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(8): e0183471.
18. Astuti PAS, Assunta M, Freeman B. Raising generation ‘A’: a case study of millennial tobacco company marketing in Indonesia. Tob Control 2018; 27(e1): e41–e49.
19. Septiono W, Ng N, Kuipers M, et al. Did local smoke free policy in Indonesia prevent youth from smoking? In: editors of the volume. Tobacco Induced Diseases. CITY: EUEP European Publishing; 2018: 55–56.
20. Sebayang SK, Dewi DMSK, Ahsan A. Mixed-methods evaluation of a ban on tobacco advertising and promotion in Banyuwangi District, Indonesia. Tob Control 2019; 28(6): 651–656.
21. Hughes J, Smith LS, Garrett-Wright D. Brief intervention on nurses’ knowledge and behavior regarding smoking cessation. J Nurses Prof Dev 2018; 34(5): 257–262.
22. Abu Shomar RT, Lubbad IK, El Ansari W, et al. Smoking, awareness of smoking-associated health risks, and knowledge of national tobacco legislation in Gaza, Palestine. 2014; Cent Eur J Public Health 2014; 22(2): 80–89.
23. Prestwich A, Webb TL, Conner M. Using theory to develop and test interventions to promote changes in health behaviour: evidence, issues, and recommendations. Curr Opin Psychol 2015; 5: 1–5.
24. Veruswati M, Asyary A, Nadjib M, et al. Current activities in smokes-free zone policy: a tobacco control care reviews in Indonesia. Fam Med Prim Care Rev 2018; 20(4): 10–13.
25. Pambudi EW, Miyasto M. Analisis Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi (Kabupaten/kota Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Diponegoro J Econ 2013; 2(2): 51–61 (in Indonesian).
26. Barber S, Ahsan A. The tobacco excise system in Indonesia: hindering effective tobacco control for health. J Public Health Policy 2009; 30(2): 208–225.
27. Ahsan A, Wiyono NH, Setyonaluri D, et al. Illicit cigarette consumption and government revenue loss in Indonesia. Global Health 2014; 10(1): 75.
28. Temouri Y, Driffield N, Bhaumik SK. A strategic perspective of cross-listing by emerging market firms: Evidence from Indonesia, Mexico, Poland and South Africa. J Int Manag 2016; 22(3): 265–279.
29. Fowler E. Advancing reproductive rights in a religious world: a comparative survey of reproductive rights in Poland, Indonesia and Israel [A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws] University of Toronto; 2013.
30. Wnukowski D. Indonesia’s Potential as a Stronger Partner of Poland in Asia. Warszawa: Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych; 2015.
31. Petrova T. How Poland promotes democracy. J Democr 2012; 23(2): 133–147.
32. Majerska B. Comparative analysis of public facilities in Indonesia and in Poland, based on cultural values. Cultural center design in a public space of Surabaya. Warszawa: Zakład Architektury Współczesnej, Wnętrz i Form Przemysłowych; 2018.
Copyright: © 2020 Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2023 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.