Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
eISSN: 2449-8580
ISSN: 1734-3402
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search

Open access

without publication fees
2/2025
vol. 27
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Original paper

Perceptions of family medicine residents regarding peer-to-peer feedback during the learning of clinical examination skills

Abdul Sattar Khan
1
,
Montasar AbuKhamseen
2
,
Mohammed AlEithan
2
,
Fatimah Albahrani
1

  1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Alhasa, Saudi Arabia
  2. Postgraduate Training Centre for Family Medicine, Ministry of Health, Alhasa, Saudi Arabia
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2025; 27(2): 178–183
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2025.149505
Online publish date: 2025/06/27
Article file
- 08 FM&PCR 2 25 - O - Khan - 1694 - Perceptions.pdf  [0.29 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Alharbi AA, Alharbi OA, Alkhayat ZA, et al. Family medicine research productivity in Saudi Arabia for 15 years: an urgent call for action. Cureus 2019; 11: e5955.
2. Aljuhani A, Alkhonaizan A, Almeajel A, et al. Saudi board for family medicine curriculum. Saudi Commission for Health Specialities, 2022 [cited 19.11.2022]. Available from URL: https://scfhs.org.sa/sites/default/files/2022-05/6589%20Family%20Medicine_Family%20Planning%20Updated%20Curriculum%202022.pdf.
3. Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, et al. Feedback in the clinical setting. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20(Suppl. 2): 460.
4. De la Cruz MS, Kopec MT, Wimsatt LA. Resident perceptions of giving and receiving peer-to-peer feedback. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7: 208–213.
5. Ibrahim NK, Al-Sharabi BM, Al-Asiri RA, et al. Perceptions of clinical years’ medical students and interns towards assessment methods used in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah. Pak J Med Sci 2015; 31: 757–762.
6. Nagoshi K, Zaidi Z, Wright A, et al. Peer assisted feedback: a successful approach for providing feedback on United States medical licensing exam-style clinical skills exam notes in the United States. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2019; 16: 29, doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.29.
7. Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, et al. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. Int J Qual Methods 2017; 16(1): 1–13.
8. AlHaqwi AI, Mohamed TA, Al Kabba AF, et al. Problem-based learning in undergraduate medical education in Saudi Arabia: Time has come to reflect on the experience. Medical Teacher 2015; 37(Suppl. 1): S61–S66.
9. Alghamdi AK. The effects of an integrated curriculum on student achievement in Saudi Arabia. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed 2017; 13(9): 6079–6100.
10. Aldossari AS. Vision 2030 and reducing the stigma of vocational and technical training among Saudi Arabian students. Empirical Res Voc Ed Train 2020; 12(1): 3, doi: 10.1186/s40461-020-00089-6.
11. Van Schaik SM, Regehr G, Eva KW, et al. Perceptions of peer-to-peer interprofessional feedback among students in the health professions. Acad Med 2016; 91: 807–812.
12. Oktaria D, Soemantri D. Undergraduate medical students’ perceptions on feedback-seeking behaviour. Malays J Med Sci 2018; 25: 75–83.
13. Burgess A, Roberts C, Lane AS, et al. Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy. BMC Med Educ 2021; 21: 426, doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02821-6.
14. Van Rompay-Bartels I, Geessink J. Exploring peer feedback on behaviour in the international classroom: a case study on students’ experiences and perceptions. J Int Educ Bus 2023; 16: 1–17.
15. Natesan S, Jordan J, Sheng A, et al. Feedback in medical education: an evidence-based guide to best practices from the council of residency directors in emergency medicine. West J Emerg Med 2023; 24: 479–494.
16. Kistler EA, Chiappa V, Chang Y, et al. Evaluating the spikes model for improving peer-to-peer feedback among internal medicine residents: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36: 3410–3416.
17. Hartranft TH, Yandle K, Graham T, et al. Evaluating surgical residents quickly and easily against the milestones using electronic formative feedback. J Surg Educ 2017; 74: 237–242.
18. Lerchenfeldt S, Taylor TAH. Best practices in peer assessment: training tomorrow’s physicians to obtain and provide quality feedback. Adv Med Educ Pract 2020; 11: 571–578.
19. Sheahan G, Reznick R, Klinger D, et al. Comparison of faculty versus structured peer-feedback for acquisitions of basic and intermediate-level surgical skills. Am J Surg 2019; 217: 214–221.
Copyright: © 2025 Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
  
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.