Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy

Abstract

5/2025 vol. 17
Original paper

Prospective trial on focal treatment with hemi- gland brachytherapy in low-risk prostate cancer: A negative study

  1. Brachytherapy Unit, Institut Català d’Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
  2. Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Barcelona, Spain
  3. Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  4. Health Services Research Group, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
  5. CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
  6. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
J Contemp Brachytherapy 2025; 17, 5: 307–314
Online publish date: 2025/10/31
View full text

Purpose

To determine whether hemi-gland seed brachytherapy (HGBT) is as effective as whole-gland seed brachytherapy (WGBT) in patients with single-lobe, low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

Material and methods

Phase II clinical trial in patients with low- and favorable intermediate-risk PCa with HGBT. Enrolment took place between 2016 and 2020. All patients (n = 38) underwent HGBT with iodine-125 (125I) seeds. Inclusion criteria: single-lobe prostate cancer, ≤ 2 positive cores in one lobe (≥ 10 core samples), < 50% core invasion, Glea-son ≤ 7 (3 + 4), non-visible or unilaterally visible tumor. Patient-reported expanded prostate cancer index (EPIC-26) questionnaire was administered to assess quality of life (QoL). Treatment outcomes were compared with a historical cohort of patients (n = 700), who underwent transperineal, ultrasound-guided 125I WGBT between 2000 and 2012.

Results

The mean age was 64.9 years (range, 50-78), the mean baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 6.12 ng/ml (range, 1.53-10), and the mean nadir was 1.4 ng/ml (range, 0.17-4.24). Most patients (37/38) had Gleason 3 + 3. The mean follow-up was 71.4 months (range, 44-93). Seventeen patients developed biochemical relapse, and 14 presented local clinical progression (contralateral, n = 9, ipsilateral + contralateral, n = 4; and regional, n = 1). Salvage therapy was: contralateral low-dose-rate (LDR) BT (n = 6), high-dose-rate (HDR) BT (n = 2), nodal radiation therapy (RT) + hormonotherapy (n = 2), hormonotherapy alone (n = 1), and prostatectomy (n = 1). Thirty-five patients (92.1%) remained alive (12 with biochemical failure) at the final follow-up, while three patients died of other causes. A slight impairment was observed on all EPIC domains (urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, bowel, sexual, and hormonal summaries). Compared with the WGBT cohort, urinary irritative/obstructive scores were significantly lower (p = 0.002). At 5 years, biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) was 54% in the HGBT group vs. 95% in the WGBT cohort.

Conclusions

In this trial, patients treated with hemi-gland brachytherapy had significantly higher biochemical failure and contralateral relapse rates than a historical cohort of patients treated with WGBT. Larger, well-designed clinical trials are needed to better assess the efficacy of HGBT in the treatment of low-risk PCa.

Share
without publication fees