eISSN: 2084-9869
ISSN: 1233-9687
Polish Journal of Pathology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2014
vol. 65
 
Share:
Share:

Review of small cell carcinoma of the kidney with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects

Naoto Kuroda
,
Yoshiaki Imamura
,
Takeru Hamashima
,
Chisato Ohe
,
Shuji Mikami
,
Yoji Nagashima
,
Keiji Inoue
,
Delia Perez-Montiel
,
Fredrik Petersson
,
Michal Michal
,
Ondrej Hes

Pol J Pathol 2014; 65 (1):15-19
Online publish date: 2014/05/13
Article file
- Review of small.pdf  [0.18 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Small cell carcinoma (SmCC) predominantly occurs in the lung, but may arise in a wide variety of organs. Primary renal SmCC is an extremely rare neoplasm. According to the present World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the lung, neuroendocrine tumors are subdivided into four categories: (1) typical carcinoid, (2) atypical carcinoid, (3) small cell and (4) large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) [1]. All these tumors have also been reported in the kidney [2-5]. In this article, we present an overview of SmCC of the kidney with clinical and pathobiological aspects.

Clinical characteristics

Clinical data of 31 previously reported cases of SmCC of the kidney are summarized in Table I. Some investigators have reported a female preponderance whereas other studies suggest that there is no gender predominance [3, 6-8]. Patients frequently present with abdominal pain, gross hematuria, flank mass and weight loss [3, 6-10]. A smoking history is present in some cases [2]. Imaging analysis may disclose a large heterogeneous renal mass frequently with extension into the renal vein or inferior vena cava and/or metastasis to lymph nodes [7, 11]. An association with papillary RCC and chromophobe RCC has been reported [2, 12]. Small cell carcinoma with foci of glandular or squamous differentiation seems to be restricted to tumors that arise from the renal pelvis, but not from renal parenchyma [8, 13]. Primary renal SmCC arising after renal transplantation has been reported [14].

Pathological findings

Macroscopic findings

The tumor usually presents as a huge mass when discovered, and extends into the perinephric adipose tissue [3, 6-11, 15]. The cut surface of the tumor shows white, gray-white or gray-yellow color [10, 16, 17]. Multilobulation is frequently seen [18]. Invasion into the inferior vena cava or renal vein and metastasis to lymph nodes are frequent [3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 15]. Direct invasion into adjacent anatomical structures such as liver, diaphragm or abdominal wall may be observed [2, 6, 17].

Microscopic findings

The tumor consists of small neoplastic cells with a size of up to three times as large as a small, non-­stimulated/resting lymphocyte [6, 10, 17]. Several growth patterns such as solid-sheet, nesting, trabecular, rosette or tubular formation may be seen [17]. Extensive necrosis is often present (Fig. 1A) [2, 3, 8]. Nuclear molding and/or smudging of the chromatin, as seen in the pulmonary SmCC, are common features [8]. Tumor cells possess scant cytoplasm, oval to round nuclei, finely granular nuclear chromatin, and absent to inconspicuous nucleoli (Fig. 1B) [3, 6, 8, 9, 15-17, 19]. Mitotic activity is brisk and atypical mitotic figures are frequent [6, 15, 17].

Histochemical findings

The cytoplasm of tumorous cells demonstrates positivity for the argyrophilic Grimelius stain [15, 17, 19]. Argentaffin Fontana-Masson silver impregnation stain is generally negative [9, 16].

Immunohistochemical findings

Neoplastic cells show variable positivity for neuron-specific enolase, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, CD57 (Leu 7) and CD56 [2, 3, 6, 8-11, 16, 18-20]. In addition, tumor cells frequently demonstrate dot-like staining for cytokeratin (Fig. 2) [3, 20]. In some cases, immunoreactivity to hormonal polypeptides including calcitonin, serotonin and adrenocorticotropic hormone has been documented [3, 6, 15]. The main immunohistochemical data are summarized in Table I.

Ultrastructural findings

Tumor cells contain electron-dense neurosecretory granules, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, polyribosomes and intermediate filaments in the cytoplasm [6, 16, 19, 20]. Intercellular junctions with features suggesting desmosomes may be observed [3, 9, 20].

DNA flow cytometry

DNA analysis of the tumor cells shows an aneuploidy peak [9, 17].

Molecular genetic study

In a case with combined renal SmCC and papillary RCC, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis showed the amplification of the Myc gene [21].

Differential diagnosis

Renal SmCC should be discriminated from typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoma, LCNEC, high grade urothelial carcinoma, small cell oncocytoma with pseudorosettes (SCOP), thyroid-like follicular carcinoma of the kidney, blastemal-dominant Wilms’ tumor, Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (ES/PNET), neuroblastoma, malignant lymphoma, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT), synovial sarcoma (SS) and metastatic SmCC. Tumor cells of typical carcinoid are arranged in trabecular, ribbon-like, gyriform, insular, glandular and solid patterns, but mitotic figures are sparse [5]. In atypical carcinoid, increased mitotic activity is observed [22]. The size of tumor cells in LCNEC is larger than that of SmCC. Abundant cytoplasm, vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli and perilobular palisading are seen [2-4,18]. High grade urothelial carcinoma including the plasmacytoid variant or lymphoepithelioma-like variant should be distinguished from SmCC [23]. Neoplastic cells of SCOP consist of oncocytes and oncoblasts surrounding hyaline-basement membrane-like material [24]. Thyroid-like follicular carcinoma has follicular architecture composed of microfollicles and macrofollicles filled with colloid-like material [25]. Wilms’ tumor predominantly occurs in children and the blastemal component is positive for WT1 [26]. Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor is immunohistochemically positive for CD99 and Fli-1. The identification of a chimeric transcript specific for ES/PNET is diagnostically useful [26]. Malignant lymphoma has cleaved, convoluted or lobulated nuclei and is generally immunoreactive for CD45 (leukocyte common antigen). Neuroblastoma generally occurs in the adrenal gland and histologically has a delicate cytoplasmic process. Rhabdomyosarcoma generally affects infants or children and tumor cells display eosinophilic or clear cytoplasm and may show striation. Rhabdomyosarcoma is positive for desmin, myogenin or Myo D1. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor generally occurs in children and adolescents and is immunohistochemically positive for WT1 and desmin. The detection of EWS-WT1 chimeric transcript is very helpful in establishing the accurate diagnosis [27]. Synovial sarcoma is immunohistochemically positive for CD99 and bcl-2. The identification of a chimeric transcript such as SYT-SXX1 or SYT-SXX2 is diagnostic for this tumor [28]. Finally, it is for clinicians to exclude the possibility of metastatic cancer, particular SmCC derived from the lung [9, 17]. In this situation, TTF-1 immunohistochemistry is not helpful in determining the primary site, because TTF-1 is generally expressed in SmCC of various anatomic sites. Accordingly, the clinical information is most important in establishing the differential diagnosis whether the tumor is primary or metastatic.

Therapy

Surgical resection by nephrectomy and systemic chemotherapy is the currently available therapeutic modality [7, 9, 16, 29, 30]. Nephrectomy helps to establish the correct diagnosis, i.e. to rule out other more common renal neoplasms within the spectrum of malignant small round blue cell tumors [10]. However, as renal SmCC often shows extra-renal extension, the tumor may be amendable to complete resection [18]. Regarding chemotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy improves overall survival [7]. Tumor thrombectomy may be effective [10]. Radiation therapy can be used for postoperative residual local disease or metastatic lesions [18, 20].

Prognosis

Patients usually have a poor clinical outcome despite multimodal therapy [2, 6-8, 18, 20, 30]. Most patients die of the disease within a few years [7, 8]. Distant metastasis occurs in the brain, bone, lung, liver and adrenal gland [2, 3, 6, 8, 16, 17, 20, 30]. It is possible that patients with organ-confined tumor may have a long-term survival with early discovery and treatment [8].

Future perspectives

Owing to the rarity of this tumor, there is a limited amount of genetic data on renal SmCC to date. Accordingly, a large scale genetic study is necessary to elucidate the pathogenesis of this tumor. According to the WHO classification of tumors of the digestive tract, the grading of neuroendocrine neoplasm is based on mitotic counts and the Ki-67 index. According to this scheme, neuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms have been subdivided into neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1, NET G2 and neuroendocrine carcinoma (large cell and small cell types) [31]. It is possible that neuroendocrine neoplasm arising from the kidney may follow the classification of other organs such as the digestive or respiratory tract in the near future [1, 31].

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Travis WD. The concept of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours: In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology & Genetics. Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. Travis WD, Brambillia E, Muller-Hermelink HK, Haris CC (eds). IARC Press, Lyon 2004; 19-20.
2. Lane BR, Chery F, Jour G, et al. Renal neuroendocrine tumours: a clinicopathological study. BJU Int 2007; 100: 1030-1035.
3. Mazzucchelli R, Morichetti D, Lopez-Beltran A, et al. Neuroendocrine tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs: clinical significance. BJU Int 2009; 103: 1464-1470.
4. Ratnagiri R, Singh SS, Majhi U, et al. Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the kidney: clinicopathologic features. Indian J Urol 2009; 25: 274-275.
5. Kuroda N, Tanaka A, Ohe C, et al. Review of renal carcinoid tumor with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects. Histol Histopathol 2013; 28: 15-21.
6. T˜tu B, Ro JY, Ayala AG, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the kidney. A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study. Cancer 1987; 60: 1809-1814.
7. Majhail NS, Elson P, Bukowski RM. Therapy and outcome of small cell carcinoma of the kidney. Report of two cases and a systemic review of the literature. Cancer 2003; 97: 1436-1441.
8. Si Q, Dancer J, Stanton ML, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the kidney: a clinicopathologic study of 14 cases. Hum Pathol 2011; 42: 1792-1798.
9. González-Lois C, Madero S, Redondo P, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the kidney. A case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125: 796-798.
10. Xu G, Chen J, Zhang Z. Primary small cell carcinoma of the kidney with tumor thrombus extension into inferior vena cava and pulmonary artery: a case report and review of the literature. J Int Med Res 2009; 37: 587-593.
11. Karadeniz-Bilgili MY, Semelka RC, Hyslop WB, et al. MRI findings of primary small-cell carcinoma of kidney. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 515-517.
12. Mackey JR, Au HJ, Hugh J, Venner P. Genitourinary small cell carcinoma: determination of clinical and therapeutic factors associated with survival. J Urol 1998; 159: 1624-1629.
13. Kitamura M, Miyanaga T, Hamada M, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the kidney: case report. Int J Urol 1997; 4: 422-424.
14. Lee HY, Wu WJ, Tsai KB, et al. Primary small cell carcinoma of kidney after renal transplantation: a case report and literature review. Chin J Cancer Res 2013; 25: 608-611.
15. Capella C, Eusebi V, Rosai J. Primary oat cell carcinoma of the kidney. Am J Surg Pathol 1984; 8: 855-861.
16. Yu DS, Chang SY, Wang J, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. Br J Urol 1990; 66: 590-595.
17. Kilicarsalan Akkaya B, Mustafa U, Esin O, et al. Primary small cell carcinoma of the kidney. Urol Oncol 2003; 21: 11-13.
18. Lane BR, Jour G, Zhou M. Renal neuroendocrine tumors. Indian J Urol 2009; 25: 155-160.
19. Masuda T, Oikawa H, Yashima A, et al. Renal small cell carcinoma (neuroendocrine carcinoma) without features of transitional cell carcinoma. Pathol Int 1998; 48: 412-415.
20. Morgan KG, Banerjee SS, Eyden BP. Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the kidney. Ultrastruct Pathol 1996; 20: 141-144.
21. La Rosa S, Bernasconi B, Micello D, et al. Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the kidney: morphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and cytogenetic study of a case and review of the literature. Endocr Pathol 2009; 20: 24-34.
22. Aung PP, Killian K, Poropatich CO, et al. Primary neuroendocrine tumors of the kidney: morphological and molecular alterations of an uncommon malignancy. Hum Pathol 2013; 44: 873-880.
23. Perez-Montiel D, Wakely PE, Hes O, et al. High-grade urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: clinicopathologic study of 108 cases with emphasis on unusual morphologic variants. Mod Pathol 2006; 19: 494-503.
24. Petersson F, Síma R, Grossman P, et al. Renal small cell oncocytoma with pseudorosettes. A histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 10 cases. Hum Pathol 2011; 42: 1751-1760.
25. Amin MB, Gupta R, Ondrej H, et al. Primary thyroid-like follicular carcinoma of the kidney: report of 6 cases of a histologically distinctive adult renal epithelial neoplasm. Am J Surg Pathol 2009; 33: 393-400.
26. Jimenez RE, Folpe AL, Lapham RL, et al. Primary Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 11 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26: 320-327.
27. Wang LL, Perlman EJ, Vujanic GM, et al. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor of the kidney in childhood. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31: 576-584.
28. Argani P, Faria PA, Epstein JI, et al. Primary renal synovial sarcoma: molecular and morphologic delineation of an entity previously included among embryonal sarcoma of the kidney. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24: 1087-1096.
29. Lo Re G, Canzonieri V, Veronesi A, et al. Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma: A single-institution experience and review of the literature. Ann Oncol 1994; 5: 909-913.
30. Kim JH, Lee S-H, Park J, et al. Extrapulmonary small-cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2004; 34: 250-254.
31. Rindi G, Klimstra DS, Arnold R, et al. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasm of the digestive system: In: World Health Organization classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. 4th ed. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (eds.). IARC Press, Lyon 2010; 13-14.

Address for correspondence
Naoto Kuroda

Department of Diagnostic Pathology
Kochi Red Cross Hospital, Shin-honmachi 2-13-51
Kochi City, Kochi 780-8562, Japan
tel. +81-88-822-1201
fax +81-88-822-1056
e-mail: kurochankochi@yahoo.co.jp
Copyright: © 2014 Polish Association of Pathologists and the Polish Branch of the International Academy of Pathology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.