eISSN: 1896-9151
ISSN: 1734-1922
Archives of Medical Science
Current issue Archive Special issues Subscription
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

 
3/2009
vol. 5
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 

Review paper
Role of cyclooxygenase-2 in cervical cancer

Małgorzata Klimek
,
Krzysztof Urbański
,
Zbigniew Kojs
,
Kazimierz Karolewski
,
Jacek Pudełek
,
Paweł Blecharz

Arch Med Sci 2009; 5, 3: 303-307
Online publish date: 2009/10/22
Article file
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 
Introduction
Irradiation associated with chemotherapy (radiochemotherapy) is a standard treatment of loco-regional advanced cervix cancer. Despite overall and disease free survival improvement (on 12 and 18% respectively), cancer recurrence has been observed in a significant percentage of patients. Further improvement in the treatment of advanced cervix cancer is desperately needed. FIGO stage, lymph nodes status, tumor size, hemoglobin level are well recognized prognostic factors for radiochemotherapy results, but in some patients with the radioresistance tumor, aggressive clinical course treatment results were not always correlated with the mentioned factors. Recognition of biological tumor markers allowing for better treatment failure risk prediction is very important in developing of new therapeutic methods and better patients selection for different methods of treatment.
For fifteen years the role of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in carcinogenesis and tumor progression has been a subject of a lot of research. Cyclooxygenase enzyme exist in two main isoenzyme forms (Figure 1). COX-1 is expressed in most of tissues and catalyzes the synthesis of prostaglandins from arachidonic acid, which are required for normal, physiologic functions e.g. gastrointestinal cytoprotection and platelet activity, it is also expressed in endothelial cells, renal microvasculature [1, 2]. COX-2 is not detectable in most normal tissues, and basal conditions. It is induced by cytokines (inflammatory response), growth factors, tumor promoters and then COX-2 is overexpressed in many cell types like macrophages, epithelial, endothelial cells, fibroblast and thus contributes to increased prostaglandins synthesis in inflamed and neoplastic tissues [2, 3]. COX-2 overexpression was observed in early carcinogenesis stages in colon cancer and carcinogenesis suppression was observed in mice disable of COX-2 gen. COX-2 overexpression has been noticed in different types of cancer including pancreatic, lung, breast, colorectal, esophageal, gastric, bladder, ovary, endometrial and cervix cancer [4-6].

Experimental evidence of a role of COX-2 in carcinogenesis
COX-2 contribution in carcinogenesis may go through a different mechanisms, including procarcinogens activation like benzopyren found in tobacco and grilled foods [7], increase of cancer cell invasiveness, inhibition of apoptosis, immunosupression and stimulation of angiogenesis (Figure 2). Inhibition of apoptosis has been observed in rat intestinal cells: overexpression of COX-2 lead to increase the anti apoptotic protein Bcl-2 level and to suppression of apoptosis and allow to survival of cancer cell [8]. The invasive potential of human colon cancer cells may increased when COX-2 is overexpressed: it is associated with activation of metalloproteinase-2, which promote invasion. COX-2 induce prostaglandin E2, which suppresses humoral and cellular immune response and stimulates immunosuppressive cytokines. This effect can be reversed by COX-2 inhibition, as it was observed in a murine Lewis lung carcinoma model [8-10].
In experimental conditions on colon carcinoma cell line angiogenesis inhibition by the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS 398 has been proven [11].

COX-2 and irradiation in cell cultures
The mechanism of COX-2 inhibited radiosensitivity is not completely understood. Steinauer et al. demonstrated that COX-2 can be blocked by the use of a specific inhibitor before radiotherapy [12]. In experimental cell lines an enhancement of tumor cell radiosensitivity by selective inhibitor of COX-2 has been shown in murine sarcoma cell culture, human cancer cell lines, and in rat intestinal epithelial cells COX-2 overexpressing [13, 14]. This increasing radioresponse may be attributable to enhancement of radiation-induced apoptosis, accumulation of cells in the radiosensitive G2-M phase of the cell cycle and inhibition of sublethal radiation damage repair. The radiation-induced G2-M arrest by using selective COX-2 inhibitor was observed also in the COX-2 low expressing cells, caused by another not very understanding mechanism. Selective COX-2 inhibitor showed synergistic with irradiation antitumor activity without increasing radiation damage to normal tissue in an sarcoma cell line model.

COX-2 and cytostatics in cell cultures
Interaction between COX-2 inhibitors and cisplatin and paclitaxel has been investigated in non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer in vitro: sulindac, the non specific COX-2 inhibitor enhanced growth inhibition of cytostatics [15]. In the same cell lines induction of apoptosis has been observed when a selective COX-2 inhibitor was given with cisplatin, etoposide, irinotecan, docetaxel. The synergistic effects between chemotherapy and COX-2 inhibitors may be considered in the treatment [16].

OX-2 and HPV
The role of human papilloma virus oncoproteins E6 and E7 in cervix cancer genesis have been well known. The effects of virus proteins E6 and E7 on COX-2 expression are unknown. In experimental condition increased levels of COX-2 mRNA, protein, and prostaglandin E2 were detected in HPV16 E6- and E7-expressing cervical cancer cells culture compared with HPV-negative cervical cancer cell line. HPV16 oncoproteins stimulated EGFR, induced also some coactivators/corepressor and in this way induced COX-2 transcription. Munoz et al. [17] and zur Hausen et al. [18] have shown that HPV may play role in induction of COX-2. Kim et al. [19] suggested that COX-2 overexpression was not correlated with HPV positivity. Molecular changes caused by HPV may not affect the synthesis of COX-2 in cervical cancer cells. Similar conclusion have been made by Song et al. [20].

COX-2, cervical cancer and clinical studies
The increasing knowledge of proteins, which physiologic levels use to be disturb in time of carcinogenesis and cancer progression and development of new immunohistochemical techniques have lead to use biomarkers as a prognostic and/or predictive factors. The expression of COX-2 has been detected in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and in cervical cancer tissue. Most authors suggested, that COX-2 is undetectable in normal cervix tissue. A very sparse suggested, that normal cervical tissue expressed COX-2 more frequently than cervical cancer, but their clinical material concerned a very small groups of patients [21].
A few studies tested correlation between COX-2 expression and pathological parameters in cervix cancer. The relationship between tumor grade and COX-2 expression is not very clear. Both low grade of histological differentiation and high COX-2 expression are accepted as a poor prognostic factors, but Chen et al. [22] observed inverse relationship: the expression of COX-2 in grade I tumor was significantly higher compared to grade II and III. Chen put hypothesis, that COX-2 expression is important first of all during carcinogenesis and later its role might be not very significant. Ferrandina et al. [23], Lee et al. [24], Dai et al. [25] did not observe differences with respect to tumor grade and COX-2 expression. These results suggest, that COX-2 is not involved in tumor grade determination or, that COX-2 expression might be reduced in the presence of aggressive cellular differentiation.
Kim et al. [26], Ryu et al. [27] have shown, that COX-2 overexpression correlated with stage, risk of lymph nodes metastasis and parametrial involvement. Similar results have been shown by Pyo et al. [28] and Ferrandina et al. [23]: they attributed this correlation to a direct association high COX-2 level and advanced tumor stage and tumor size. Some of them suggest more important role of COX-2 expression in local tumor spread (also on context of risk of lororegional recurrence) than in nodal metastases. Others, could not demonstrate any correlation between COX-2 expression and parametrial invasion and/or lymph node metastases [22, 29]. Dursum et al. [30] observed significantly higher expression of COX-2 in patient with cervix tumor size > 4 cm and with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). The same relationship between COX-2 level and LVSI was observed by Chen et al. [22] and Lee et al. [24]. Some researches could not find any dependence between COX-2 expression and cervix cancer tumor size [22, 31].
Relationship between HPV status and COX-2 expression is analyzed in a few clinical reports. HPV infection may play an important role in stimulation of COX-2 as it was shown by Munoz et al. [32] and zur Hausen et al. [33]. On the other hand Kim et al. [19] and Kulkarni et al. [6] did not find correlation between COX-2 expression and HPV positivity. This lack of relationship may be caused by different pathways in cervical carcinogenesis, or molecular changes caused by HPV may not have influence on COX-2 overexpression.
The analysis of radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy results in patients with cervical cancer indicate that high COX-2 expression may be correlated with lower survival. Kim et al. [31] noticed significantly higher incidence of local failure for patients with high COX-2 expression then for patients COX-2 negative. Pyo et al. [28], Kang et al. [34], Ferrandina et al. [35, 36], noticed decreased survival in patients with elevated COX-2 expression. Ferrandina et al. [37] in the group of 175 patients with different stage of cervix cancer confirmed that COX-2 status in both tumor and stroma compartment (ratio) can help in identification of cervix cancer patients with low probability of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
The mechanism by which COX-2 is up-regulated in cervix cancer is not very clear. Kulkarni et al. [6] suggest first deregulation of EGFR signaling pathway and then COX-2 increased expression. Most of authors concentrated on aftermath of COX-2 expression. In Stolina et al. [10] study COX-2 expression is correlated with antagonize host immunogenity against cancer cells, similarly Chen et al. [38] suggested that high COX-2 level might be important in inhibiting host immune system (indicated by lower tumor intraepithelial CD8+ lymphocyte count) which is poor prognostic factor for patients. Ryu et al. [39] have shown in group of cervix cancer patients treated by radical surgery that expression of COX-2 may downregulate apoptosis and in this way enhance invasion and metastases. Nagai et al. [40] find interesting correlation between lack of COX-2 expression and significant induction of apoptosis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In patients with COX-2 overexpression the difference in apoptotic index before and after chemotherapy is not considerable. Initially COX-2 level may be a predictor of response of chemotherapy. It has been documented by better pathological response to chemotherapy in patients with COX-2 protein negative. The same reported Ferrandina et al. [35]. Ishikawa et al. [41] prospectively assessed apoptotic index in specimens taken before and during radiotherapy (after the dose of 9 Gy) and they find significant negative correlation between initial COX-2 expression and apoptotic index during treatment. Complete response rate was 80% for COX-2 negative patients and 59% for patients with COX-2 overexpression. The 2-year local control was statistically better for COX-2 negative patients. Level of COX-2 expression before radiotherapy may help to predict response for treatment. Concurrent chemotherapy had no impact on apoptotic index measured during radiotherapy probability because of a limited effect of low dose of cisplatin.

COX-2 inhibitors, cervical cancer and clinical studies
A lot of epidemiologic, experimental and clinical studies suggest that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have anticancer activity. This group of drugs have anti-inflammatory effects due to inhibition the synthesis of prostaglandins, but prostaglandins mainly E2 have also the important role during carcinogenesis, and the inhibition of prostaglandins formation by blocking COX-2 may protect against many types of cancers like breast, colon, head and neck, skin, cervix and ovary cancer.
Rao et al. [42] showed that indomethacin, non specific COX inhibitor protects against chemically induced cervical cancer in mouse. Recently Ferrandina et al. [43] in pilot study have shown that treatment with celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor patients with cervical cancer could affect important aspects of tumor biology: prostaglandins E2 level, microvessel density, apoptosis level.
Gaffney et al. [44] in phase II study of acute toxicity for Celebrex and chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced cervix cancer found a high incidence of acute reactions. Most frequent toxicities were hematologic, gastrointestinal, skin.
Herrera et al. [45] in a prospective phase I-II trial of COX-2 inhibitor Celecoxib in patients with cervix cancer observed higher than expected late complications mainly rectovaginal fistula. There are some limitations in these two studies with regard to the effectiveness of celecoxib in cervical cancer treatment: pretreatment COX-2 expression was not examined. The most effectiveness of COX-2 inhibitors would be expected in COX-2 overexpressing tumors. The toxicities of NSAIDs include gastrointestinal bleeding, renal toxicity, inhibition of platelet function. COX-2 selective inhibitors newer generation (valdecoxib, parecoxib) are more safety particularly in gastrointestinal tract. In cancer treatment it is very important to consider agents that are effective and have minimal toxicity. Some reports suggest that COX-2 inhibitors increase risk for stroke, myocardial infarction up to 3.7 fold compare with placebo, some authors conclude that risk is dose-related. On the other hand, on most in vitro studies the COX-2 inhibitors concentration in cancer tissues that was correlated with optimal results was higher than 35 µmol/l [46, 47]. This suggest higher doses may be needed for significant antitumor effect. According to these results, if proper selection of COX-2 inhibitor, the smallest effective dose giving in as short as possibly time during radiotherapy could be recognized, more effective treatment for advanced cervix cancer may be defined.

References
1. Smith TJ. Cyclooxygenases as the principal targets for the actions of NSAIDs. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1998; 24: 501-23.
2. Crofford LJ. COX-1 and COX-2 tissue expression: impli-cations and predictions. J Rheumatol 1997; 24 (suppl 49): 15-9.
3. Smith WL, Garavito RM, DeWitt DL. Prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthases (cyclooxygenases)-1 and -2. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 33157-60.
4. Fosslien E. Molecular pathology of cyclooxygenase-2 in neoplasia. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2000; 30: 3-21.
5. Fosslien E. Review: molecular pathology of cyclooxygenase-2 in cancer-induced angiogenesis. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2001; 31: 325-48.
6. Kulkarni S, Rader JS, Zhang F, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 is overexpressed in human cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 429-34.
7. Wiese FW, Thompson PA, Kadlubar FF. Carcinogen substrate specificity of human COX-1 and COX-2. Carcinogenesis 2001; 22: 5-10.
8. Tsujii M, DuBois RN. Alterations in cellular adhesion and apoptosis in epithelial cells overexpressing prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2. Cell 1995; 83: 493-501.
9. Tsujii M, Kawano S, DuBois RN. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human colon cancer cells increases metastatic potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 3336-40.
10. Stolina M, Sharma S, Lin Y, et al. Specific inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 restores antitumor reactivity by altering the balance of IL-10 and IL-12 synthesis. J Immunol 2000; 164: 361-70.
11. Masferrer JL, Leahy KM, Koki AT, et al. Antiangiogenic and antitumor activities of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 1306-11.
12. Steinauer KK, Gibbs I, Ning S, French JN, Armstrong J, Knox SJ. Radiation induces upregulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) protein in PC-3 cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 48: 325-8.
13. Raju U, Yang P, Newman RA, Ang KK, Milas L. In vitro enhancement of tumor cell radiosensitivity by a selective inhibitor of cyklooxygenase-2 enzyme: mechanistic considerations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 54: 886-94.
14. You Keun Shin, Ji Sun Park, Hyun Seok Kim, et al. Radiosensitivity enhancement by celecoxib, a cycloxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitor, via COX-2- dependent cell cycle regulation on human cancer cell expressing differential COX-2 levels. Cancer Research 2005; 65: 9501-9.
15. Soriano AF, Helfrich B, Chan DC, Heasley LE, Bunn PA Jr, Chou TC. Synergistic effects of new chemopreventive agents and conventional cytotoxic agents against human lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 6178-84.
16. Hida T, Kozaki K, Muramatsu H, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor induces apoptosis and enhances cytotoxicity of various anticancer agents in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 2006-11.
17. Munoz N, Bosch FX, Castellsague X, et al. Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? The international perspective. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 278-85.
18. zur Hausen H. Papillomavirus and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 342-50.
19. Kim MH, Seo SS, Song YS, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 associated with expression of VEGF in primary cervical cancer and at metastatic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90: 83-90.
20. Song SH, Lee JK, Hur JY, et al. The expression of epiderma growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor, matrix metalloproteinase-2 and cyclooxygenase-2 in relation to human papilloma viral load and persistence of human papillomavirus after conization with negative margins. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16: 2009-17.
21. Landem CN Jr, Matur SP, Richardson MS, Creasman WT. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in cervical, endometrial and ovarian malignancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1174-6.
22. Chen YJ, Wang LS, Wang PH, et al. High cyclooxygenase-2 expression in cervical adenocarcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 88: 379-85.
23. Ferrandina G, Ranelletti FO, Legge F, et al. Prognostic role of the ratio between cyclooxygenase-2 in tumor and stroma compartments in cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10, 3117.
24. Lee JS, Choi DY, Lee JH, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix and its relation to angiogenesis and tumor growth. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95: 523-9.
25. Dai Y, Hang X, Peng Y, et al. The expression of cyclooxygenase-2, VEGF and PGs in CIN and cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 97: 96-103.
26. Kim MH, Seo SS, Song YS, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 associated with expression of VEGF in primary cervical cancer and at metastatic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 90: 83-90.
27. Ryu HS, Chang KH, Yang HW, et al. High cyclooxygenase-2 expression in stage IB cervical cancer with lymph node metastases or parametrial invasion. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 76: 320-5.
28. Pyo H, Kim YB, Cho NH, et al. Coexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 and thymidine phosphorylase as a prognostic indicator in patients with FIGO stage IIB squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix treated with radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 725-32.
29. Kim YB, Kim GE, Cho NH, et al. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radiation and concurrent chemotherapy. Cancer 2002; 95: 531-9.
30. Dursum P, Yuce K, Usubutun A, Ayhan A. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III and squamous cell cervical carcinoma and its correlation with clinicopathologic variables. Int J Gynecol Oncol 2007; 17: 164-73.
31. Kim YB, Kim GE, Pyo HR, et al. Differentia cyclooxygenase-2 expression in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 60: 822-9.
32. Munoz N. Human papillomavirus and cancer: the epidemiological evidence. J Clin Virol 2000; 19: 1-5.
33. zur Hausen H. Cervical carcinoma and human paillomavirus: on the road to preventing a major human cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 252-3.
34. Kang M, Park W, Choi Y, et al. Correlation between cyclooxygenase-2 expression and tumor volume response in patients treated with radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 66 (3 Supppl 1): 402.
35. Ferrandina G, Lauriola L, Distefano MG, et al. Increased cyclooxygenase-2 expression is associated with chemotherapy resistance and poor survival in cervical cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 973-81.
36. Ferrandina G, Ranellefi FO, Legge F, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in locally advanced cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation plus surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 55: 21-7.
37. Ferrandina G, Ranelletti FO, Legge F, et al. Prognostic role of the ratio between cyclooxygenase-2 in tumor and stroma compartments in cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 3117-23.
38. Chen TH, Fukuhara K, Mandai M, et al. Increased cyclooxygenase-2 expression is correlated with supressed antitumor immunity in cervical adenocarcinomas. Int J Gynecol Oncol 2006; 16: 772-9.
39. Ryu HS, Chang KH, Yang HW, et al. High cyclooxygenase-2 expression in stage IB cervical cancer with lymph nodes metastasis or parametrial invasion. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 76: 320-5.
40. Nagai N, Tian X, Mukai K, et al. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 protein and its relationship to apoptosis in cervical carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Molecular Med 2003; 12: 709-14.
41. Ishikawa H, Ohno T, Kato S, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 impairs treatment effects of radiotherapy for cervical cancer by inhibition of radiation-induced apoptosis. Int J Radiat 2006; 66: 1347-55.
42. Rao CV, Rivenson A, Simi B, et al. Chemoprevention of colon carcinogenesis by sulindac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 1464-72.
43. Ferrandina G, Ranelletti FO, Legge F, et al. Celecoxib modulates the expression of cyclooxygenase-2, Ki67, Apoptosis-related marker and microvessel density in human cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 4324-31.
44. Gaffney D, Winter K, Dicker AP, et al. A phase II study of acute toxicity for Celebrex (Celecoxib) and chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: primary endpoint analysis of RTOG 0128. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 104-9.
45. Herrera F, Chan P, Doll C, et al. A prospective phase I-II trial of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor Celecoxib in patients with carcinoma of the cervix with biomarker assessment of the tumor microenvironment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 97-103.
46. Song X, Lin HP, Johnson AJ, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2, player or spectator in cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 585-91.
47. Waskewich C, Blumenthal RD, Li H, et al. Celecoxib exhibits the greatest potency amongst cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors for growth inhibition of COX-2-negative hematopoietic and epithelial cell lines. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 2029-33.
Copyright: © 2009 Termedia & Banach. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2021 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe