eISSN: 1644-4124
ISSN: 1426-3912
Central European Journal of Immunology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

vol. 34

Review paper
Toll-like receptor signaling pathway in sepsis

Robert Słotwiński
Sylwia M. Słotwińska
Barbara J. Bałan
Sylwia Kędziora

Centr Eur J Immunol 2009; 34 (2): 124-128
Online publish date: 2009/05/20
Article file
- Toll-like receptor.pdf  [0.12 MB]
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
In the group of patients treated in intensive care units the mortality rate caused by sepsis is the highest (25-60%) and still tends to increase, due to the lack of causal therapy methods to efficiently reduce the excessive inflammatory response to massive infections [1-6]. Many aspects of the immunopathology of sepsis are still unclear. The promising results of experimental studies on treating severe infections with LPS inhibitors, TNF-α, IL-1, PAF, NO, arachidonic acid metabolites, complement component inhibitors or free radicals did not considerably reduce the mortality rate in septic patients [7]. One of the ways of discovering new, more efficient treatment methods consists in regulating the mechanisms of inflammatory response to a massive infection. Activation of the innate immune system by microbial pathogens and their products contribute to systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) and organ failure (MOF). A significant role in innate antibacterial and inflammatory response play Toll-like receptors that recognize PAMPs-pathogen-associated molecular patterns. The changes in TLR expression and in the expression of signaling cascade proteins associated with their stimulation account not only for pathological inflammatory response to infection, but they can also have a protective action (e.g. increasing the apoptosis of selected cells, stimulation of signaling pathway inhibitors). To better understand the main signaling pathways of innate antibacterial immune response in septic patients it is required to briefly discuss some selected mechanisms regulating the expression of main proteins of TLR-dependent and independent pathways.

TLR-dependent and -independent signaling in sepsis
The rising frequency of septic infections in patients treated in intensive care units and still the highest mortality rates in this group make that TLR4 binding Gram-positive LPS bacteria and their participation in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock arise a lot of interest. The Toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize a few highly conservative structures existing in prevailing microorganisms. It was found that about 13 receptors (including 11 in humans) and it was indicated that they had mainly affinity to bacteria (TLR1, 2, 4, 5, 6). Some of them (TLR3, 7, 8, 9) show also some affinity to viral RNA and DNA. The prevailing TLRs show an expression on the surface of cells (TLR1, 2, 4, 5, 6), but some of them can be also active inside cells and (TLR3, 7, 8, 9) occur on the surface of endosomes [8, 9]. However, it is still unknown how ligands for those receptors (e.g. exogenic ligands: LPS, peptidoglycan, bacterial DNA) penetrate into the cells. The endogenic ligands for TLRs include mainly some heat shock proteins (HSP60, 70) released from injured cells.
The production of LPS complex – CD14 receptor- MD2 adaptor protein – TLR4 induces dimerization of TLR4 and initiates signaling cascade, which results in activation of phosphorylation kinases of NFkB (IkB) transcription factor inhibitor. This process induces a transcription of genes whose products take part in inflammatory response (e.g. cytokines TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-12). In the signaling cascade of antibacterial response apart from extracellular TLR part there are also such “participants” as cytoplasmic part referred to as the TIR domain (Toll-IL-1 receptor), adaptor protein MyD88 (myeloid differentiation factor 88), TIRAP (TIR-domain-containing adapter protein) and TRAM (TRIF-related adapter molecule), protein TRIF (Toll/IL-1-receptor domain-containing adapter inducing IFN), TRAF6 (TNF receptor-associated factor 6), kinases (IRAK1, IRAK4- IL-1 receptor-associated kinases, TAK – TGF-beta-activated kinases) and a kinase complex (IKK – inhibitory kB kinase complex) [10-12]. The proteins MyD88, TRAF6, TRIF or TRAM are key proteins of signaling pathways initiated by TRLs, which can be of signicant importance in treating sepsis [13, 14]. This process results in activation of NF-kB and cytokine promotor genes. The production of inflammatory cytokines begins already after 60 minutes from the activation of macrophages by TLR4-binding LPS. In the MyD88 – dependent transduction of signal from TLR4,2, TRAF6 protein plays a significant role, while in the MyD88 pathway – independent, the main participants are TRAM and TRIF proteins (Fig. 1). A deficiency of TRAM protein decreases the inflammatory response (cytokine production), whereas a deficiency of TRL4 or MyD88 protein delays bacterial phagocytosis. Attempts to block the signaling cascade in patients with severe infections attract the interest of many scientists. Especially interesting can be the use of negative regulation of signaling pathways associated with TLRs (e.g. RP 105/CD180 protein- TRL homolog, SIGIRR – single immunoglobulin IL-1-receptor-related protein, ST2L – signaling TIR family ligand, TOLLIP – Toll-interacting protein or Smad6), whose mechanism consists in suppressing the location of bond between the ligand (LPS) and the receptor, proteolysis of TLR, blocking intracellular receptors binding antibacterial antigens and blocking the activity of kinases (suppression of phosphorylation process) and suppressing the activation of NF-kB factor [15-20]. Numerous experimental studies indicate the possibility of conducting signals from TLRs to the inside of cells after connecting with LPS, which may prevent the activation of NF-kB. Mice deprived of signaling pathway proteins associated with TLR4 (TIRAP, MyD88, TRIF) do not respond to LPS and are resistant to septic shock [21-24]. On the other hand, mice deprived of TLR2 and adaptor protein MyD88 are more susceptible to Staphylococcus aureus infections [25]. It indicates a protective action of some TLRs and adaptor proteins. In mice deprived of MyD88 protein, the systemic inflammatory response to LPS was significantly reduced but still present, which suggested a cooperation of other routes of signal conduction in antibacterial response [26]. This fact partly explains that the effects of treatment are insufficient because of blocking the routes of signal conduction. For example, when there is a deficiency in MyD88 protein and there is no previous activation of NF-kB associated with stimulation of TRL4 by LPS, other adaptor protein called TRIF takes over its function regulating the genes of monocyte inflammatory response and increasing the production of particular chemokines [27, 28]. It was found that the TRIF molecule, whose blockage could have reduced the production of cytokines in septic patients, could activate NF-kB through the pathway associated with TRAF6 protein, whereas the trace amounts of TNF despite the lack of MyD88 protein can lead to late NF-kB activation [29]. Research on the MyD88 protein-independent pathway of antibacterial immune response in regulating the tolerance to endotoxins arise a lot of interest, because stimulating the signal conduction route can be one of the mechanisms to protect patients against the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). More detailed knowledge of MyD88-independent pathway could be helpful in the therapy modulating the activity of particular signaling proteins to increase the tolerance to LPS. It is well known that the locally produced pro-inflammatory cytokines (as a response to trauma and infections) by neutrophils and macrophages play a significant role in developing SIRS. A significant increase of cytokine concentration in peripheral blood was observed in septic patients. It was found that blocking the activity of cytokines and adhesive molecules reduced the susceptibility of animals to severe infections caused by LPS [30-32]. The priming effect of LPS on peptidoglycan induced a lung injury, whereas death in mice is preceded by NF-kB-mediated up-regulation of TLR-2 [33]. In vivo the transfection of NF-kB oligonucleotides strongly prevented the up-regulation of TLR-2 after LPS stimulation at pulmonary cellular and tissue levels.
Apart from TLRs, a significant role in recognizing the pathogen-related molecular patterns and the regulation of innate antibacterial response play also other proteins belonging to PAMP receptors, including peptoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs), cytosolic NOD (nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain) proteins and TREM1 receptor (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1) [34]. They possess the ability to (e.g. NLRs-node-like receptors: NOD1, NOD2) connect with LPS and bacterial peptidoglycan and transferring signal independently of TLRs, which also result in NF-kB activation and stimulates the expression of cytokine coding genes (for NOD1:TNF-α and IL-6, and for NOD2:TNF-α and IL-1b) and adhesive particles [35]. The NOD1 recognizes the compounds of Gram-negative bacteria (meso-diaminopimelic acid with peptidoglycan) and some Gram-positive [36], whereas the ligand for the NOD2 is muramylodipeptide (MDP) coming from the wall of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [37, 38]. The transduction of signal by NOD receptors does not require any participation of MyD88 protein. The highly conservative NOD2 receptors that mainly respond to peptidoglycan have the ability to regulate (suppress) the signals coming through TLR2. Any mutations in NOD2 located in monocytes, but also in intestinal mucosa correlate with the occurrence of Crohn’s disease [39]. TREM1 is a glycoprotein and occurs mainly in monocytes and macrophages. In infections caused by Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria its expression grows significantly at the same time intensifying the inflammatory response. The blockade of TREM1 prevents shock and sepsis [40]. Scientists try to use the changes in the protein plasma concentration in diagnosing sepsis [41].
An important group of proteins released as a result of tissue injury, damage to cells or infection includes endogenic molecules (heat-shock proteins HSP60, HSP70, fibronectin, b-defensin) and the ones having the ability to activate TLR4 and bind PAMPs, including high mobility group box1 protein (HMGB1) bound with DNA, stabilizing nucleosomes, and facilitating NF-kB activation and gene transcription [42, 43]. Like other inflammatory cytokines it is released from macrophages (within 24 hours) after LPS stimulation and plays an important role in regulating the release of nitric oxide (NO) by enterocytes and in activating neutrophils and macrophages that produce the increased amounts of cytokines and chemokines, but the scientists did not find a direct impact of HMGB1 on the process of releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines or chemokines. It is suggested that this action additionally needs LPS or inflammatory mediators to be involved (IL-1b) [44]. The last study demonstrates that HMGB1 modulates the inflammatory cascade in LPS-activated macrophages by inducing the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1b while attenuating the release of the anti-inflammatory mediators IL-10 and TGF-b1 [45]. Trauma and concomitant infection increase the release of HMGB1. High concentrations of this protein were observed in patients with severe infections. In an experimental study the specific inhibition of HMGB1, using antibodies or recombinant box A, reduced lethality, even when started 24 h after induction of peritonitis [46, 47]. TLR 2 and 4 receptors were identified to mediate the effects of HMGB1 in neutrophils and macrophages [48]. In contrast to monocytes/macrophages, any stimulation of neutrophils by HMGB1 results in TNF release within 60 minutes, whereas LPS induces a late TNF release peaking at 4 hrs [49]. Although both HMGB1 and LPS increased the nuclear translocation of NF-kB, the strength of this effect was greater in LPS-stimulated neutrophils from patients with sepsis-induced acute lung injury [50]. As some studies have found, the blockade of HMGB1 after administering the lethal dose LPS protects mice against death. In experimental studies it is nicotine that shows a suppressing action for this protein [51].
The intracellular equivalents of PAMPs include also the heat shock proteins (HSPs) that protect the cell against injury. Increased concentrations of those proteins were noticed in patients after surgical trauma. In contrary to LPS, they do not induce a release of TNF-α by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), they do not affect the ability to bind LPS by monocytes, but they can increase the expression of TLR4 in those cells (mainly HSP70). It may indicate the regulative action of those proteins to antibacterial response, where the TLRs act as mediators. Interestingly, HSP70 was found to induce in vivo and in vitro the responses in both TLR-2–/– and TLR-4–/– mice [52]. The heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) can play indispensable roles in the protective effects of glutamine from injuries caused by sepsis-induced endotoxin shock [53-55]. The results of those studies explain partly the beneficial glutamine impact that increases the production of HSP in septic patients. The heat shock proteins like HMGB1 protein can be secreted outside of cells and after binding TLRs can regulate their functions. One of the interesting examples of such action can be the allergizing impact of HMGB1 protein that intensifies the expression of TLR4 in dendritic cells after trauma and tissue ischemia [56].
The above-presented results of the studies are promising and suggest that modulating the activity of TLRs and related signaling pathways as well as a change in the expression of pathogen-binding proteins may reduce the life-threatening effects of massive infection, including mainly the increased inflammatory response and will have a significant impact on outcomes in patients with severe infections.

1. Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC (2004): Severe sepsis epidemiology: sampling, selection, and society. Crit Care 8: 222-226
2. Bernard GR, Vincent J-L, Laterre PF et al. (2001): Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 344: 699-709.
3. Alberti C, Brun-Buisson C, Goodman SV et al. (2003): Influence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis on outcome of critically ill infected patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168: 77-84.
4. Zieliński A, Czarkowski MP (2004): Choroby zakaźne w Polsce w 2002 roku. Przegl Epidemiol 58: 9-19.
5. Imahara SD, O’Keefe GE (2004): Genetic determinants of the inflammatory response. Curr Opin Crit Care 10: 318-324.
6. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE (2003): The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med 348: 138-150.
7. Riedemann NC, Guo R-F, Ward PA (2003): Novel strategies for the treatment of sepsis. Nature Medicine 9: 517-524.
8. Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O (2006): Pathogen Recognition and Innate Immunity. Cell 124: 783-801.
9. Kaisho T, Akira S (2006): Toll-like receptor function and signaling. J Allergy Clin Immunol 117: 979-987.
10. Takeda K, Akira S (2005): Toll-like receptors in innate immunity. Immunol 17: 1-14.
11. Akira S, Takeda K (2004): Toll-like receptors signaling. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 987-995.
12. Kawai T, Akira S (2006): TLR signaling. Cell Death Differ 13: 816-825.
13. Biswas SK, Tergaonkar V (2007): Myleoid differentiation factor 88-independent Toll-like receptor pathway: Sustaining inflammation or promoting tolerance? Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39: 1582-1592.
14. Yamamoto M, Takeda K, Akira S (2004): TIR domain-containing adaptors define the specificity of TLR signaling. Mol Immunol 40: 861-868.
15. Zhang G, Ghosh S (2002): Negative regulation of Toll-like receptor-mediatewd signaling by Tollip. J Biol Chem 277: 7059-7065.
16. Divanovic S, Trompette A, Atabani SF et al. (2005): Negative regulation of Toll-like receptor 4 signaling by the Toll-like receptor homolog RP105. Nat Immunol 6: 571-578.
17. Qin J, Qian Y, Yao J et al. (2005): SIGIRR inhibits interleukin-1 receptor- and Toll-like receptor 4-mediated signaling through different mechanisms. J Biol Chem 80: 25233-25241.
18. Brint EK, Xu D, Liu H et al. (2004): ST2 is an inhibitor of interleukin-1 receptor and Toll-like receptor 4 signaling and maintains endotoxin tolerance. Nat Immunol 5: 373-379.
19. Burns K, Janssens S, Brissoni B et al. (2003): Inhibition of interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor signaling through the alternatively spliced, short form of MyD88 is due to its failure to recruit IRAK- 4. J Exp Med 197: 263-268.
20. Choi KC, Lee YS, Lim S et al. (2006): Smad6 negatively regulates interleukin 1-receptor-Toll-like receptor signaling through direct interaction with the adaptor Pellino-1. Nat Immunol 7: 1057-1065.
21. Hoebe K, Du X, Goergel P et al. (2003): Identification of Lps2 as a key transducer of MyD88- independent TIR signaling. Nature 424: 743-748.
22. Kawai T, Adachi O, Ogawa T et al. (1999): Unresponsiveness of MyD88-deficient mice to endotoxin. Immunity 11: 115-122.
23. Yamamoto M, Sato S, Mori K et al. (2002): A novel Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adapter that preferentially activates the IFN-b promoter in the Toll-like receptor signaling. J Immunol 169: 6668-6672.
24. Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H et al. (2003): Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent Toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science 301: 640-643.
25. Takeuchi O, Takeda K, Hoshino K et al. (2000): Cellular responses to bacterial cell wall components are mediated through MyD88-dependentsignaling cascades. Int Immunol 12: 113-117.
26. Weighardt H, Kaiser-Moore S, Vabulas RM et al. (2002): Cutting edge: myeloid differentiation factor 88 deficiency improves resistance against sepsis caused by polymicrobial infection. J Immunol 169: 2823-2827.
27. Feterowski C, Mack M, Weighardt H et al. (2004): CC chemokine receptor 2 regulates leukocyte recruitment and 10 production during acute polymicrobial sepsis. Eur J Immunol 34: 3664-3673.
28. Weighardt H, Mages J, Jusek G et al. (2006): Organ-specific role of MyD88 for gene regulation during polymicrobial peritonitis. Infect Immun 74: 3618-3632.
29. Covert MW, Leung TH, Gaston JE et al. (2005): Achieving stability of lipopolysaccharide-induced NF-kappaB activation. Science 309: 1854-1857.
30. Kamochi M, Kamochi F, Kim YB et al. (1999): P-selectin and ICAM-1 mediate endotoxin-induced neutrophil recruitment, and injury to the lung and liver. Am J Physiol 277: L310-L319.
31. Raeburn CD, Calkins CM, Zimmerman MA et al. (2001): Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression is obligatory for endotoxin-induced myocardial neutrophil accumulation and contractile dysfunction. Surgery 130: 319-325.
32. Kumasaka T, Quinlan WM, Doyle NA et al. (1996): Role of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in endotoxin-induced pneumonia evaluated using ICAM-1 antisense oligonucleotides, anti-ICAM-1 monoclonal antibodies, and ICAM-1 mutant mice. J Clin Invest 97: 2362-2369.
33. Matsuda N, Yamazaki H, Takano K et al. (2008): Priming by lipopolysaccharide exaggerates acute lung injury and mortality in responses to peptidoglycan through up-regulation of Toll-like receptor-2 expression in mice. Biochemical Pharmacology 75: 1065-1075.
34. Carneiro LAM, Travassos LH, Philpott DJ (2004): Innate immune recognition of microbes through Nod1 and Nod2: implications for disease. Microbes Infect 6: 609-616
35. Sońdka Z, Tretyn A, Szeliga J et al. (2006): Udział białek zawierających powtórzenia bogate w leucynę (LLR) w molekularnych mechanizmach odporności wrodzonej roślin i zwierząt. Post Biol Kom 33: 635-655.
36. Chamaillard M, Hashimoto M, Horie Y et al. (2003): An essential role for Nod1 in host recognition of bacterial peptidoglykan containing diaminopimelic acid. Nat Immunol 3: 702-707.
37. Girardin SE, Boneca IG, Viala J et al. (2003): Nod2 is a general sensor of peptidoglykan through muramyl dipeptide (MDP) detection. J Biol Chem 278: 8869-8872.
38. Inohora N, Nunez G (2003): NODs: intracellular proteins involved in inflammation and apoptosis. Nat Rev Immunol 3: 371-382.
39. Hugot JP, Chamaillard M, Zouali H et al. (2001): Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature 411: 599-603.
40. Colonn M, Facchetti F (2003): TREM-1 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells): a new player in acute inflammatory response. J Infect Dis 187 (Suppl 2): S397-S401.
41. Gibot S, Kolopp-Sarda MN, Bene MC et al. (2004): Plasma level of a triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1: its diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected sepsis. Ann Intern Med 141: 9-15.
42. Bustin M (1999): Regulation of DNA-dependent activities by the functional motifs of the high-mobility-group chromosomal proteins. Mol Cell Biol 19: 5237-5246.
43. Wang H , Yang H, Czura CJ et al. (2001): HMGB1 as a late mediator of lethal systemic inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164: 1768-1773.
44. Sha Y, Zmijewski J, Xu Z et al. (2008): HMGB1 Developes enhanced proinflammatory activity by binding to cytokines. J Immunol 180: 2531-2537.
45. El Gazzar M (2007): HMGB1 modulates inflammatory responses in LPS-activated macrophages. Inflamm Res 56: 162-167.
46. Wang H, Bloom O, Zhang M et al. (1999): HMGB-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science 285: 248-251.
47. Yang H (2004): Reversing established sepsis with antagonists of endogenous high mobility group box 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 296-301.
48. Park JS, Svetkauskaite D, He Q et al. (2004): Involvement of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in cellular activation by high mobility group box 1 protein. J Biol Chem 279: 7370-7377.
49. Park JS, Arcaroli J, Yum HK et al. (2003): Activation of gene expression in human neutrophils by high mobility group box 1 protein. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 284: C870-C879.
50. Silva E, Arcaroli J, Qianbin He et al. (2007): HMGB1 and LPS induce distinct patterns of gene expression and activation in neutrophils from patients with sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med 33: 1829-1839.
51. Matthay MA, Ware LB (2004): Can nicotine treat sepsis? Nat Med 10: 1161-1162.
52. Khaleda RQ, Wulf O, Mahavir S et al. (2007): Microbial heat shock protein 70 stimulatory properties have different TLR requirements. Vaccine 25: 1096-1103.
53. Wischmeyer PE, Kahana MD, Wolfson R et al. (2001): Glutamine induces heat shock protein and protects against endotoxin shock in the rat. Journal of Applied Physiology 90: 2403-2410.
54. Wischmeyer PE, Musch MW, Madonna MB et al. (1997): Glutamine protects intestinal epithelial cells: role of inducible HSP70. Am J Physiol 272: G879-G884.
55. Wischmeyer PE (2002): Glutamine and heat shock protein expression. Nutrition 18: 225-228.
56. Tsung A, Zheng N, Jeyabalan G et al. (2007): Increasing numbers of hepatic dendritic cells promote HMGB1 mediated ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Leukoc Biol 81: 119-128.
Copyright: © 2009 Polish Society of Experimental and Clinical Immunology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe