eISSN: 1896-9151
ISSN: 1734-1922
Archives of Medical Science
Current issue Archive Special issues Subscription
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

vol. 4

Review paper
Uric acid and xanthine oxidase: perspectives in chronic heart failure

Pawan D. Patel
Rohit R. Arora

Arch Med Sci 2008; 4, 3: 219–225
Online publish date: 2008/10/15
Article file
- Uric.pdf  [0.08 MB]
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero

Despite advances in understanding the pathophysiology and management of heart failure (HF), it still constitutes one of the major public health problems. From 1979 to 2005 there was 171% increase in hospital discharge for HF. The estimated direct and indirect cost of HF in the United States for 2008 is $34.8 billion [1]. A high level of uric acid (UA) has been associated to be predictor of cardiovascular mortality [2-4]. Serum UA has been reported to be high in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) [5, 6]. However no mechanism whereby excessive UA could damage heart or the vasculature has been identified. Xanthine oxidase (XO) might be the possible link between UA and its effects seen in HF [7] as UA levels reflect the degree of activation of XO in HF [6].
Formation of uric acid – role of xanthine oxidoreductase
Traditionally UA is being considered to be a metabolically inert end-product of purine metabolism in humans, without any physiological value. Later this ubiquitous compound has proven to be a selective antioxidant, capable especially of reaction with hydroxyl radicals and hypochlorous acid [8]. The transformations of hypoxanthine into xanthine and of this metabolite UA are catalyzed by xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR), rate-limiting enzyme of the purine degradation pathway [9]. XOR is a ubiquitous metalloflavoprotein that appears in two interconvertible forms: xanthine dehydrogenase (XD), which is constitutively expressed in vivo; and XO, which is generated by the posttranslational modification of XD which occurs at low oxygen tension and in the presence of several proinflammatory mediators. Functionally, both XD and XO catalyze the oxidation of purines to UA. However, whereas XD requires NAD+ as an electron acceptor for these redox reactions, thereby generating the stable product NADH, XO is unable to use NAD+ and reduces molecular oxygen generating the highly reactive superoxide free radical [10]. XO may contribute to impaired vasodilator capacity in patients with CHF via upregulated oxidative stress [11]. Superoxide radical can combine with endothelium-dependent nitric oxide (NO) to form peroxynitrite (ONOO–), a potent non-radical oxidant species [12]. This superoxide aninons can inhibit endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation [13]. Negative regulators of XOR activity are superoxide [14], hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical [15]. Such product-mediated regulation may play a role in XOR inactivation in hyperoxia. In lower mammals, urate oxidase enzyme further metabolizes UA to allantoin, but this enzyme is inactivated in most primates. Humans lack urate oxidase because of a defective gene that is not transcribed [16]. Watanabe et al. [17] hypothesized that the mutation provided a survival advantage because of the ability of hyperuricemia to maintain blood pressure under low-salt dietary conditions. During primate evolution, UA may have a role in lengthening life-span and decreasing age-specific cancer rates in humans [18]. Most serum UA is excreted via urine by processes of glomerular filtration, tubular reabsorption, tubular secretion and again reabsorption in late proximal tubule [19].
Uric acid, xanthine oxidase and chronic heart failure
In patients with HF raised UA levels may be considered as a marker of hyperinsulinemia, inflammatory cytokine activation [6, 20], endothelial dysfunction, cardiac cachexia, exercise intolerance [21, 22], and worse cardiac function [23]. Among echocardiographic parameters, patients with raised UA have elevated filling pressures both in acute [24] and chronic heart failure [23]. Hyperuricemia seen in HF is independent of the effects of diuretics and renal impairment. There is an inverse relationship between serum UA levels and measures of functional capacity like Maximal oxygen uptake (MVO2), regression slope relating to minute ventilation to carbon dioxide output, exercise time and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class in patients with HF [6]. The principal sites for XO production are liver and gut but it may circulate in the blood and adhere to endothelium in distant sites [25]. XO is expressed in cardiac myocytes, as evident by immunohistochemistry and may participate in autocrine signaling [26]. In patients with CHF, XO (a potent radical producing enzyme) activity is increased >200% and endothelium-dependent SOD (Superoxide dismutase, a major vascular antioxidant enzyme; a scavenger of su- peroxide) activity is decreased and both are closely associated with increased vascular oxidative stress. This loss of vascular oxidative balance may represent a novel mechanism contributing to endothelial dysfunction in CHF [27]. UA preserves the activity of superoxide dismutase thereby providing a protective mechanism [28]. In the study by Waring et al acute exposure of high concentrations of UA levels did not impair haemodynamic variables, basal forearm blood flow and nitric oxide dependent endothelial function in healthy men suggesting that there may be no causal role of UA in the development of atherosclerosis. However in that study all the subjects were free of established cardiovascular risk factors [29]. In coronary system, a major site of production of UA is the microvascular endothelium, and there is generally a net release of UA from the human myocardium. UA prevents oxidative inactivation of endothelial enzymes (cyclooxygenase, angiotensin converting enzyme) and preserves the ability of the endothelium to mediate vascular dilatation in the face of oxidative stress [8]. However in vitro studies have shown that hyperuricemia may stimulate vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation via activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and stimulation of cyclooxygenase-2 and platelet-derived growth factor [17, 30] and can induce platelet secretion [31]. In a study on mouse model UA increased endotoxin-stimulated tumor necrosis factor-alpha production suggesting its role in proinflammatory cytokine activation [32].
Possible explanations for raised uric acid in heart failure
Serum UA is raised in HF, probably due to increased activity of XO [33, 34], increased conversion of XDH to XO [35] or due to reduced renal excretion. Also hyperuricemia in HF may result from the reduced renal tubular secretion and the clearance of UA [36]. CHF is an insulin resistant, hyperinsulinaemic state [37, 38] in which there is an accelerated rate of glycolytic metabolism. Insulin regulates the activity of the enzyme glyceraldehydes 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (the only oxidative step in glycolytic pathway) [39, 40]. In the presence of insulin resistance and hypoxia the activity of this enzyme is affected and leads to diversion of early glycolytic intermediates toward ribose-5-phosphate and phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate, which would favour UA production [41]. Also, low salt diets and insulin-resistance may increase the reabsorption of UA in the proximal tubules of kidney [42]. Diuretics used in the treatment of HF can also contribute to elevated UA concentrations [43]. Overproduction of UA in advanced HF could be related to tissue hypoxia which is known to increase adenosine triphosphate degradation [44]. Uric acid as a prognostic marker in heart failure Serum UA has a prognostic value in patients with CHF [21, 45]. Sakai et al. have suggested that the prognostic significance of UA measurement is independent of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and monitoring a combination of UA and BNP may be useful for the management of patients with CHF [46]. The assessment of UA provides even better information independent of other well-established parameters, like the clinical status, exercise capacity, parameters of renal function, and the computer-based 7-parameter heart failure survival score (HFSS). High UA level can predict mortality and indicate the need for transplantation in patients with CHF [45]. Also in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction, hyperuricemia has been shown to be associated with a higher risk of death and/or new hospitalizations in the long term [24]. In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), Kojima et al. have shown a close relation between serum UA concentrations and Killip’s classification suggestive of left ventricular failure. The combination of Killip’s classification and serum UA level after AMI may be a good predictor of mortality in patients with AMI [47].
Uric acid as a measure of altered oxidative metabolism
An accelerated utilization of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in excess of synthetic capacity promotes degradation of adenosine nucleotides to inosine, hypoxanthine, xanthine, and UA [48]. Hence UA levels are high in hypoxic conditions such as obstructive pulmonary disease, cyanotic heart disease, acute heart failure and neonatal hypoxia [49-53]. It is also increased in states of regional ischemia such as during coronary angioplasty [54] and coronary artery bypass operations [55]. In patients with CHF, there is an inverse relationship between serum UA and maximum oxygen uptake during treadmill exercise test [6] and to maximal leg blood flow [56]. Histologically in CHF there is a shift in skeletal muscle fiber distribution and derangements in mitochondrial structure, so during exercise there is an early depletion of ATP which promotes anaerobic metabolism. Also during exercise in patients with CHF, the perfusion of skeletal muscles is markedly reduced which further promotes early anaerobic skeletal muscle metabolism [57]. The anaerobic threshold (AT) is a measure of the balance between aerobic and anaerobic cellular metabolism. In CHF measurement of UA may provide the basis of surrogate measure of AT [58].
Antioxidant property of uric acid
UA possess antioxidant property by its ability to scavenge carbon-centered and peroxyl radicals and its inhibitory effect on lipid peroxidation [59-61]. Systemic administration of UA (100 mg intravenously) was found to raise serum free radical scavenging capacity to an extent greater than vitamin C (1000 mg) in healthy volunteers [20 of 1] and high concentrations of serum UA are associated reduced exercise-induced oxidative stress in healthy adults [62]. UA as an antioxidant may have a protective effect on endothelial function. However even though UA is an antioxidant, in vitro study have shown that it may accelerate the peroxidation of human Low density lipoprotein (LDL) trigger by copper, even in the presence of endogenous antioxidants [63]. As oxidized LDL can inhibit endothelial-derived relaxing factor – induced vasorelaxation [64], hyperuricemia may cause endothelial dysfunction.
Rationale for the use of xanthine oxidase inhibitor in heart failure
CHF is now being considered as a state of endothelial dysfunction [65] and increased oxidative stress [66, 67]. XO activity may contribute to abnormal energy metabolism in human cardiomyopathy by interfering with myocardial energitics [68] and myofilament calcium sensitivity [69]. In HF, the oxygen cost of ventricular contraction remains relatively unchanged despite markedly impaired left ventricular work, leading to decrease in mechanical efficiency of contraction [70]. This has been described as Mechanoenergetic uncoupling. Allopurinol inhibits XO and thus reduces the formation of xanthine, of UA and of reactive oxygen species [71]. Allopurinol and its major active metabolite Oxypurinol are hydroxyl radical scavengers [72]. Favorable effect of serum UA lowering treatment with allopurinol on the rate of cardiovascular complications has been reported in patients with congestive heart failure [73]. A serum level of UA has inverse relation with nitric oxide activity. Nitric oxide modulates the production of UA by interfering with the activity of XO [74]. In the failing heart the activity of XO is upregulated relative to nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity and contributes to the mechanoenergetic uncoupling. The energy-sparing effects of XO inhibitor (allopurinol) is seen only when NOS signaling is intact. Further the improvement in myocardial contractility and efficiency seen with allopurinol can be blocked by NOS inhibitor, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA). This points towards the role of XO and NOS cross-talk in HF and mediating mechanoenergetic uncoupling [75]. In the rat model hyperuricemia induced by uricase inhibitor have shown to induce hypertension by downregulation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS1) expression in macula densa and can be partially reversed by L-arginine (a substrate of NOS) [76]. In terms of cardiac effects, neuronal NOS have a facilitative effect on cardiac contractility by releasing calcium from sarcoplasmic reticulum [77]. Neuronal NOS directly interact with XO to regulate cardiac contraction. Deficiency of neuronal NOS can lead to profound increases in XOR-mediated superoxide production, which can depresses myocardial excitation-contraction coupling. This can be reverse by XOR inhibitor, allopurinol [78]. In the study by Ekelund et al. on dogs with HF, XO activity was 4-fold increased in failing dog hearts but was not detectable in plasma. Allopurinol decreased myocardial oxygen consumption and significantly increased mechanical efficiency (stroke work/myocardial oxygen consumption). Allopurinol possessed unique ionotropic action with an increased myocardial contractility and simultaneously reduces cardiac energy requirements [33]. In addition to improving left ventricular function at rest in dogs with HF [33], allopurinol also decreases oxygen consumption and increases myocardial contractility in response to exercise- and dobutamine-induced b-adrenergic stimulation [79]. In patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, Cappola et al. reported an increased XDH/XO protein abundance in failing heart compared with normal myocardium. In their study, infusion of allopurinol into the coronary circulation in HF patients improved myocardial efficiency by diminishing oxygen consumption. But the ionotropic action was not noted in human model; however the contractility did not decrease despite the fall in energy consumption [68]. In patients with HF, intake of 600 mg/day Oxypurinol (another XO inhibitor) for 1 month can decrease serum UA and improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with LVEF £40% [80]. Oxypurinol can increase the rat myofilament twitch tension and this effect is much more marked in failing myocardium, where total XO activity is elevated. Thus, the inotropic action of oxypurinol is in atleast relatively selective for HF. Oxypurinol does not affect resting tension, thus there is no impairment of diastolic myocardial function [81]. Myocardial infarction (MI) frequently produces left ventricular (LV) dilatation and hypertrophy of the noninfarcted myocardium, phenomenon of remodeling. This contributes to the development of depressed cardiac performance and increase the risk of development of HF. Increased myocardial reactive oxygen species production plays a critical role in cellular signaling pathways leading to hypertrophy, dilation, and dysfunction of the ventricle after MI [82]. In the study on animal model with HF by Engberding et al., treatment with allopurinol showed a marked attenuation of left ventricular remodeling processes and dysfunction after experimental MI [83]. Similarly in another animal model Mellin et al. reported that long-term treatment with allopurinol can improve cardiac haemodynamics, reduce left ventricular dilation, hypertrophy and collagen accumulation, and thus ameliorates cardiac systolic and diastolic function [84]. Also in a study on mouse model of postischemic cardiomyopathy chronic treatment with allopurinol improved survival and restored contractile function [85]. Thus, XO inhibition may offer a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of congestive heart failure as shown by studies on animals [33, 69] and humans [68]. Randomized trials have shown that allopurinol can improve peripheral vasodilator capacity and peak blood flow [86] and can improve endothelial dysfunction in CHF [87]. But in the study of Farquharson et al. [87] vast majority of study subjects had normal range of serum UA levels, suggesting that blocking XO even in the absence of hyperuricemia may still improve endothelial dysfunction. Investigators speculated that allopurinol blocks the production of reactive oxygen species mediated by XO as there was a significant reduction of plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) with allopurinol and as oxidative stress caused by oxidized LDL is a major determinant of endothelial dysfunction and MDA is released from oxidized LDL itself. Later George et al. reported 44% reduction of UA with 300 mg allopurinol and 46% reduction of UA with 1000 mg probenecid. Allopurinol improved endothelial-dependent vasodilatation by 53% compared to placebo, whereas probenecid did not alter endothelial-dependent vasodilatation at all. This suggests that allopurinol can improve endothelial function by its ability to reduce vascular oxidative stress and not by lowering UA [88]. In a recent study entitled ‘A Phase II–III Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Oxypurinol Added to Standard Therapy in Patients with NYHA Class III–IV Congestive Heart Failure’ (OPT-CHF), where 405 patients with class III-IV HF were randomly assigned to treatment with either oxypurinol (600 mg/day) or placebo, for 24 weeks. Oxypurinol failed to show benefit compared to placebo for the treatment of heart failure. However in the post-hoc analysis of patients with elevated serum UA levels at baseline, there was an indication of a beneficial effect for oxypurinol [89]. Treatment of hyperuricemia is not included in the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) updated guidelines on Heart failure. Thus, more prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies should be conducted to show that treatment of hyperuricemia can reduce cardiovascular events, mortality and hospitalization before recommending treatment of hyperuricemia for chronic heart failure. Newer agents that lower UA directly for example, recombinanat urate oxidase-Rasburicase may cause rapid and substantial reductions in circulating UA concentrations [90] and future randomized studies should be conducted to validate this agent in CHF patients. In conclusion, traditionally viewed as an inert end-product of purine metabolism, elevated levels of UA and its enzyme XO are now being considered as one of the major metabolic abnormality in patients with chronic heart failure. So the measurement of this readily available cheaper marker may be considered a routine protocol in the assessment and follow-up for patients with HF and every effort should be taken to correct it by XO inhibitor which not only correct hyperuricemia but also improve the vascular function and oxidative stress in patients with chronic heart failure.
1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al.; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2008; 117: e25-146. 2. Culleton BF, Larson MG, Kannel WB, Levy D. Serum uric acid and risk for cardiovascular disease and death: the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131: 7-13. 3. Fang J, Alderman MH. Serum uric acid and cardiovascular mortality the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971-1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 2000; 283: 2404-10. 4. Struthers AD, Donnan PT, Lindsay P, et al. Effect of allopurinol on mortality and hospitalisations in chronic heart failure: a retrospective cohort study. Heart 2002; 87: 229-34. 5. Hoeper MM, Hohlfeld JM, Fabel H. Hyperuricaemia in patients with right or left heart failure. Eur Respir J 1999; 13: 682-5. 6. Leyva F, Anker S, Swan JW, et al. Serum uric acid as an index of impaired oxidative metabolism in chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 858-65. 7. Berry CE, Hare JM. Xanthine oxidoreductase and cardiovascular disease: molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological implications. J Physiol 2004; 555: 589-606. 8. Becker BF. Towards the physiological function of uric acid. Free Radic Biol Med 1993; 14: 615-31. 9. Harrison R. Structure and function of xanthine oxidoreductase: where are we now? Free Radic Biol Med 2002; 33: 774-97. 10. Meneshian A, Bulkley GB. The physiology of endothelial xanthine oxidase: from urate catabolism to reperfusion injury to inflammatory signal transduction. Microcirculation 2002; 9: 161-75. 11. Keaney JF Jr, Vita JA. Atherosclerosis, oxidative stress, and antioxidant protection in endothelium-derived relaxing factor action. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1995; 38: 129-54. 12. Godber BL, Doel JJ, Durgan J, Eisenthal R, Harrison R. A new route to peroxynitrite: a role for xanthine oxidoreductase. FEBS Lett 2000; 475: 93-6. 13. Friedl HP, Till GO, Ryan US, Warda PA. Mediator-induced activation of xanthine oxidase in endothelial cells. FASEB J 1989; 3: 2512-8. 14. Terada LS, Beehler CJ, Banerjee A, et al. Hyperoxia and self- or neutrophil-generated O2 metabolites inactivate xanthine oxidase. J Appl Physiol 1988; 65: 2349-53. 15. Terada LS, Leff JA, Guidot DM, Willingham IR, Repine JE. Inactivation of xanthine oxidase by hydrogen peroxide involves site-directed hydroxyl radical formation. Free Radic Biol Med 1991; 10: 61-8. 16. Wu XW, Muzny DM, Lee CC, Caskey CT. Two independent mutational events in the loss of urate oxidase during hominoid evolution. J Mol Evol 1992; 34: 78-84. 17. Watanabe S, Kang D, Feng L, et al. Uric acid, hominoid evolution, and the pathogenesis of salt-sensitivity. Hypertension 2002; 40: 355-60. 18. Ames BN, Cathcart R, Schwiers E, Hochstein P. Uric acid provides antioxidant defense in humans against oxidant- and radical-caused aging and cancer: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1981; 78: 6858-62. 19. Capasso G, Jaeger P, Robertson WG, Unwin RJ. Uric acid and the kidney: urate transport, stone disease and progressive renal failure. Curr Pharm Des 2005; 11: 4153-9. 20. Leyva F, Anker SD, Godsland IF, et al. Uric acid in chronic heart failure: a marker of chronic inflammation. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1814-22. 21. Jankowska EA, Ponikowska B, Majda J, et al. Hyperuricaemia predicts poor outcome in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2007; 115: 151-5. 22. Doehner W, Rauchhaus M, Florea V, et al. Uric acid in cachectic and non-cachectic CHF patients-relation to leg vascular resistance. Am Heart J 2001; 141: 792-9. 23. Cicoira M, Zanolla L, Rossi A, et al. Elevated serum uric acid levels are associated with diastolic dysfunction in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 2002; 143: 1107-11. 24. Pascual-Figal DA, Hurtado-Martínez JA, Redondo B, Antolinos MJ, Ruiperez JA, Valdes M. Hyperuricaemia and long-term outcome after hospital discharge in acute heart failure patients. Eur J Heart Fail 2007; 9: 518-24. 25. White CR, Darley-Usmar V, Berrington WR, et al. Circulating plasma xanthine oxidase contributes to vascular dysfunction in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93: 8745-9. 26. Saavedra WF, Paolocci N, St John ME, et al. Imbalance between xanthine oxidase and nitric oxide synthase signaling pathways underlies mechanoenergetic uncoupling in the failing heart. Circ Res 2002; 90: 297-304. 27. Landmesser U, Spiekermann S, Dikalov S, et al. Vascular oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure: role of xanthine-oxidase and extracellular superoxide dismutase. Circulation 2002; 106: 3073-8. 28. Hink HU, Santanam N, Dikalov S, et al. Peroxidase properties of extracellular superoxide dismutase: role of uric acid in modulating in vivo activity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002; 22: 1402-8. 29. Waring WS, Adwani SH, Breukels O, Webb DJ, Maxwell SR. Hyperuricaemia does not impair cardiovascular function in healthy adults. Heart 2004; 90: 155-9. 30. Rao GN, Corson MA, Berk BC. Uric acid stimulates vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by increasing platelet-derived growth factor A-chain expression. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 8604-8. 31. Ginsberg M, Henson P, Henson J, Kozin F. Mechanisms of platelet response to monosodium urate crystals. Am J Pathol 1979; 94: 549-68. 32. Netea MG, Kullberg BJ, Blok WL, Netea RT, van der Meer JW. The role of hyperuricemia in the increased cytokine production after lipopolysaccharide challenge in neutropenic mice. Blood 1997; 89: 577-82. 33. Ekelund UE, Harrison RW, Shokek O, et al. Intravenous allopurinol decreases myocardial oxygen consumption and increases mechanical efficiency in dogs with pacing-induced heart failure. Circ Res 1999; 85: 437-45. 34. Hassoun PM, Yu FS, Shedd AL, et al. Regulation of endothelial cell xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase gene expression by oxygen tension. Am J Physiol 1994; 266: L163-71. 35. Saugstad OD. Role of xanthine oxidase and its inhibitor in hypoxia: reoxygenation injury. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 103-7. 36. Ochiai ME, Barretto AC, Oliveira MT Jr, Munhoz RT, Morgado PC, Ramires JA. Uric acid renal excretion and renal insufficiency in decompensated severe heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005; 7: 468-74. 37. Swan JW, Anker SD, Walton C, et al. Insulin resistance in chronic heart failure: relation to severity and etiology of heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 527-32. 38. Leyva F, Anker SD, Egerer K, Stevenson JC, Kox WJ, Coats AJ. Hyperleptinaemia in chronic heart failure. Relationships with insulin. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1547-51. 39. Alexander MC, Lomanto M, Nasrin N, Ramaika C. Insulin stimulates glyceraldehyde- 3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene expression through cis-acting DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1988; 85: 5092-6. 40. Liedtke AJ, Hugues HC, Neely JR. Effects of excess glucose and insulin on glycolytic metabolism during experimental myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 17-27. 41. Leyva F, Wingrove CS, Godsland IF, Stevenson JC. The glycolytic pathway to coronary heart disease: a hypothesis. Metabolism 1998; 47: 657-62. 42. Orynchak M, Neiko EM, Seredyuk VN. Insulin resistance and chronic heart failure. J Hypertens 2001; 19 (Suppl. 2): S284. 43. Reyes AJ. The increase in serum uric acid concentration caused by diuretics might be beneficial in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005; 7: 461-7. 44. McCord JM. Oxygen-derived free radicals in postischemic tissue injury. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 159-63. 45. Anker SD, Doehner W, Rauchhaus M, et al. Uric acid and survival in chronic heart failure. Validation and application in metabolic, functional, and hemodynamic staging. Circulation 2003; 107: 1991-7. 46. Sakai H, Tsutamoto T, Tsutsui T, Tanaka T, Ishikawa C, Horie M. Serum level of uric acid, partly secreted from the failing heart, is a prognostic marker in patients with congestive heart failure. Circ J 2006; 70: 1006-11. 47. Kojima S, Sakamoto T, Ishihara M, et al.; Japanese Acute Coronary Syndrome Study (JACSS) Investigators. Prognostic usefulness of serum uric acid after acute myocardial infarction (the Japanese Acute Coronary Syndrome Study). Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 489-95. 48. Ketai LH, Simon RH, Kreit JW, Grum CM. Plasma hypoxanthine and exercise. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136: 98-101. 49. Issel EP, Lun A, Pohle R, Gross J. Hypoxanthine levels in amniotic fluid: an indicator of fetal hypoxia? J Perinat Med 1982; 10: 221-5. 50. Hasday JD, Grum CM. Nocturnal increase of urinary uric acid:creatinine ratio. A biochemical correlate of sleep-associated hypoxemia. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 135: 534-8. 51. Elsayed NM, Nakashima JM, Postlethwait EM. Measurement of uric acid as a marker of oxygen tension in the lung. Arch Biochem Biophys 1993; 302: 228-32. 52. Hayabuchi Y, Matsuoka S, Akita H, Kuroda Y. Hyperuricaemia in cyanotic congenital heart disease. Eur J Pediatr 1993; 152: 873-6. 53. Woolliscroft JO, Colfer H, Fox IH. Hyperuricemia in acute illness: a poor prognostic sign. Am J Med 1982; 72: 58-62. 54. Huizer T, de Jong JW, Nelson JA, et al. Urate production by human heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1989; 21: 691-5. 55. Lazzarino G, Raatikainen P, Nuutinen M, et al. Myocardial release of malondialdehyde and purine compounds during coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 1994; 90: 291-7. 56. Anker SD, Leyva F, Poole-Wilson PA, Kox WJ, Stevenson JC, Coats AJ. Relationship between serum uric acid and lower limb blood flow in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart 1997; 78: 39-43. 57. Sullivan MJ, Knight JD, Higginbotham MB, Cobb FR. Relation between central and peripheral hemodynamics during exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 1989; 80: 769-81. 58. Leyva F, Chua TP, Anker SD, Coats AJ. Uric acid in chronic heart failure: a measure of the anaerobic threshold. Metabolism 1998; 47: 1156-9. 59. Teng RJ, Ye YZ, Parks DA, Beckman JS. Urate produced during hypoxia protects heart proteins from peroxynitrite-mediated protein nitration. Free Radic Biol Med 2002; 33: 1243-9. 60. Trostchansky A, Ferrer-Sueta G, Batthyany C, et al. Peroxynitrite flux-mediated LDL oxidation is inhibited by manganese porphyrins in the presence of uric acid. Free Radic Biol Med 2003; 35: 1293-300. 61. Muraoka S, Miura T. Inhibition by uric acid of free radicals that damage biological molecules. Pharmacol Toxicol 2003; 93: 284-9. 62. Waring WS, Webb DJ, Maxwell SR. Systemic uric acid administration increases serum antioxidant capacity in healthy volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2001; 38: 365-71. 63. Bagnati M, Perugini C, Cau C, Bordone R, Albano E, Bellomo G. When and why a watersoluble antioxidant becomes pro-oxidant during copper induced low-density lipoprotein oxidation: a study using uric acid. Biochem J 1999; 340: 143-52. 64. Myers PR, Wright TF, Tanner MA, Ostlund RE Jr. The effects of native LDL and oxidized LDL on EDRF bioactivity and nitric oxide production in vascular endothelium. J Lab Clin Med 1994; 124: 672-83. 65. Drexler H, Hayoz D, Münzel T, et al. Endothelial function in chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1596-601. 66. Prasad K, Kalra J, Chan WP, Chaudhary AK. Effect of oxygen free radicals on cardiovascular function at organ and cellular levels. Am Heart J 1989; 117: 1196-202. 67. Belch JJ, Bridges AB, Scott N, Chopra M. Oxygen free radicals and congestive heart failure. Br Heart J 1991; 65: 245-8. 68. Cappola TP, Kass DA, Nelson GS, et al. Allopurinol improves myocardial efficiency in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2001; 104: 2407-11. 69. Pérez NG, Gao WD, Marbán E. Novel myofilament calcium-sensitizing property of xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Circ Res 1998; 83: 423-30. 70. Suga H. Ventricular energetics. Physiol Rev 1990; 70: 247-77. 71. Desco MC, Asensi M, Marquez R, et al. Xanthine oxidase is involved in free radical production in type 1 diabetes: protection by allopurinol. Diabetes 2002; 51: 1118-24. 72. Moorhouse PC, Grootveld M, Halliwell B, Quinlan JG, Gutteridge JM. Allopurinol and oxypurinol are hydroxyl radical scavengers. FEBS Lett 1987; 213: 23-8. 73. Struthers AD, Donnan PT, Lindsay P, McNaughton D, Broomhall J, MacDonald TM. Effect of allopurinol on mortality and hospitalisations in chronic heart failure: a retrospective cohort study. Heart 2002; 87: 229-34. 74. Maxwell AJ, Bruinsma KA. Uric acid is closely linked to vascular nitric oxide activity. Evidence for mechanism of association with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1850-8. 75. Saavedra WF, Paolocci N, St John ME, et al. Imbalance between xanthine oxidase and nitric oxide synthase signaling pathways underlies mechanoenergetic uncoupling in the failing heart. Circ Res 2002; 90: 297-304. 76. Mazzali M, Hughes J, Kim YG, et al. Elevated uric acid increases blood pressure in the rat by a novel crystal-independent mechanism. Hypertension 2001; 38: 1101-06.
77. Barouch LA, Harrison RW, Skaf MW, et al. Nitric oxide regulates the heart by spatial confinement of nitric oxide synthase isoforms. Nature 2002; 416: 337-9. 78. Khan SA, Lee K, Minhas KM, et al. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase negatively regulates xanthine oxidoreductase inhibition of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 15944-8. 79. Ukai T, Cheng CP, Tachibana H, et al. Allopurinol enhances the contractile response to dobutamine and exercise in dogs with pacing-induced heart failure. Circulation 2001; 103: 750-5. 80. Cingolani HE, Plastino JA, Escudero EM, Mangal B, Brown J, Pérez NG. The effect of xanthine oxidase inhibition upon ejection fraction in heart failure patients: La Plata Study. J Card Fail 2006; 12: 491-8. 81. Kögler H, Fraser H, McCune S, Altschuld R, Marbán E. Disproportionate enhancement of myocardial contractility by the xanthine oxidase inhibitor oxypurinol in failing rat myocardium. Cardiovasc Res 2003; 59: 582-92. 82. Kinugawa S, Tsutsui H, Hayashidani S, et al. Treatment with dimethylthiourea prevents left ventricular remodeling and failure after experimental myocardial infarction in mice: role of oxidative stress. Circ Res 2000; 87: 392-8. 83. Engberding N, Spiekermann S, Schaefer A, et al. Allopurinol attenuates left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction after experimental myocardial infarction: a new action for an old drug? Circulation 2004; 110: 2175–9. 84. Mellin V, Isabelle M, Oudot A, et al. Transient reduction in myocardial free oxygen radical levels is involved in the improved cardiac function and structure after long-term allopurinol treatment initiated in established chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1544–50. 85. Stull LB, Leppo MK, Szweda L, Gao WD, Marbán E. Chronic treatment with allopurinol boosts survival and cardiac contractility in murine postischemic cardiomyopathy. Circ Res 2004; 95: 1005-11. 86. Doehner W, Schoene N, Rauchhaus M, et al. Effects of xanthine oxidase inhibition with allopurinol on endothelial function and peripheral blood flow in hyperuricemic patients with chronic heart failure: results from 2 placebo-controlled studies. Circulation 2002; 105: 2619-24. 87. Farquharson CA, Butler R, Hill A, Belch JJ, Struthers AD. Allopurinol improves endothelial dysfunction in chronic heart failure. Circulation 2002; 106: 221-6. 88. George J, Carr E, Davies J, Belch JJ, Struthers A. High-dose allopurinol improves endothelial function by profoundly reducing vascular oxidative stress and not by lowering uric acid. Circulation 2006; 114: 2508-16. 89. Abraham WT, Fonarow GC, Albert NM, et al.; OPTIMIZE-HF Investigators and Coordinators. Predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure: insights from the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF). J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 347-56. 90. De Angelis S, Noce A, Di Renzo L, et al. Is rasburicase an effective alternative to allopurinol for management of hyperuricemia in renal failure patients? A double blind-randomized study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2007; 11: 179-84.
Copyright: © 2008 Termedia & Banach. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2021 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe