Postępy Psychiatrii i Neurologii

Full text

2/2026 vol. 35
Original article

Suicide attempts among youth attending special education centres: risk and protective factors

  1. Prevention Unit, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland
Adv Psychiatry Neurol 2026; 35 (2): 94-105
Data publikacji online: 2026/05/13
Article file
PPiN-00515-Suicidal.pdf
Confronting perimenopausal women’s knowledge of coronary heart disease with their health behaviours. Controversial role of hormone replacement therapy in the protection of coronary heart disease

INTRODUCTION

The subject of this article is suicide attempts among at-risk youth who, due to various emotional and beha-vioural problems, have dropped out of the mainstream education system and have been referred to special edu-cation centres.

A factor contributing to suicidal behaviours is undoubtedly the experience of severe life adversities. However, before such a tragic event as suicide occurs, various symptoms of an emerging crisis can often be observed. These include risky behaviours such as substance abuse and violence which may serve as coping mechanisms for problems, severe stress or suffering [1]. In general, such risky behaviours are perceived as incompatible with social norms and simultaneously pose a threat to the psychophysical and social development of children and adolescents. In Poland, young people experiencing such difficulties may be referred to educational institutions outside mainstream schools, namely Youth Sociotherapy Centres (YSCs) and Youth Correctional Centres (YCCs).

The formal grounds for referring young people to YSC and YCC are manifestations of social maladjustment. However, information obtained from YCC headmasters indicates that increasingly, the reasons for placing teenagers in these facilities involve serious mental health issues, including self-destructive behaviours such as self-harm, suicidal thoughts, and suicide attempts [2]. In the case of YCC, a teenager is placed in the facility pursuant to a court decision, whereas placement in YSC is based on the request of parents or legal guardians, supported by an opinion issued by a psychological and pedagogical counselling centre.

The source of the problems experienced by students in YSC and YCC is typically the family environment. Fami-lies of YSC/YCC youth often face multiple adversities, including unemployment, financial and housing difficulties, mental health issues, substance abuse, and criminal activity. Within intra-family relations, a serious concern is the disruption of bonds between parents and children, manifested in a lack of parental support, understanding, and acceptance, as well as violence, neglect, and failure to meet the child’s basic emotional and biological needs [3].

The risk factors associated with suicidal behaviour in young people identified in the literature are consistent with the experiences of YSC and YCC youth, their individual characteristics, and their family situations. These factors include, among others: depressive symptoms [4-9], sensation seeking [10], impulsivity [11, 12], psychoactive substances use [6-8, 12], involvement in or exposure to bullying and cyberbullying [11, 13], as well as disturbances in family relationships and violence against the child [11, 14]. On the other hand, research indicates that parental support and attachment [15-18], support and positive peer relationships [18], school connectedness [19], and religiosity [20] serve as protective factors against suicide.

Studies further suggest that the way adolescents spend their leisure time is an important factor associated with risky behaviours and mental health problems, including suicidal behaviours [21, 22].

The aim of this article is to identify the risk and protective factors associated with suicide attempts among adolescents under the care of YSC and YCC.

Methods

Sample selection and study implementation

A detailed description of the research methodology has been presented elsewhere [23]. In brief, the study was conducted in 2018 and involved students from randomly selected YSC and YCC in Poland.

Initially, 40% of all YSCs (30 facilities) and YCCs (35 facilities) were selected to participate in the project. Due to a lack of consent from directors or difficulties in obtaining parental consent in nine centres, as well as a lower-than-expected number of students in most faci-lities, the sample was supplemented with an additional 10 centres. Ultimately, young people from 25 YSCs and 39 YCCs took part in the study.

The number of students in each YSC ranged from 9 to 53, and in each YCC from 12 to 79. The survey questionnaire was completed by all students present at the centre on the day of the study who agreed to participate. A total of 2,063 students completed the survey, which constituted 76% of the eligible sample. However, the surveys collected from 333 respondents were excluded from the analysis due to significant missing data, inconsistent answers, or comments indicating that the research was not taken seriously.

The final sample consisted of 1,730 students. The surveys were administered by trained interviewers from outside the YSCs/YCCs, in accordance with procedures designed to ensure the anonymity of individual students, classes, and centres.

Measures

The frequency of suicide attempts was measured using a single-item measure as the dependent variable. Despite being assessed with only one item (using a 4-point response scale), the measure demonstrates satisfactory theoretical validity, as indicated by a moderately strong positive correlation with the depressive symptom scale (Spearman’s ρ = 0.460). The independent variables consisted of a set of psychosocial risk and protective factors reflecting adolescents’ individual characteristics, including personality traits, mental health problems, risky behaviours, and extracurricular interests/activities, as well as their social environment (family, peers, and the educational centre attended). Sociodemographic variables included gender (1 = ‘male’ and 2 = ‘female’) and family structure (1 = ‘living with both parents’ and 2 = ‘not living with both parents’). Detailed information on all variables included in the analysis is presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Descriptive statistics of the dependent and independent variables

Variables (number of items)M (SD)αSample item (type of scale used)Source
Dependent variable
Frequency of suicide attempts (1)1.77 (1.10)NAHave you ever in your life tried to attempt suicide? Answers ranging from 1 to 4 (where 1 stands for ‘no’, 2 – ‘yes, once’, 3 – ‘yes, twice’, 4 – ‘yes, three or more times’).Research team
Independent variables
Risk factors: Personality traits
Sensation seeking (4)2.66 (1.16)0.80In the last 6 months, how often have you done anything dangerous only for the thrill it causes? 5-point scale from 1 – ‘never’ to 5 – ‘very often’.[24]
Impulsiveness (7)2.39 (0.54)0.70I act on impulse. 4-point scale from 1 – ‘never or rarely’ to 4 – ‘almost always or always’.[25, 26]
Risk factors: Mental health
Depressive symptoms (4)2.11 (0.86)0.86In the last 7 days how often have you felt sad? 4-point scale from 1 – ‘never or rarely’ to 4 – ‘all the time’.[27, 28]
Risk factors: Psychoactive substance and medicine use
Cigarette smoking (1)4.07 (1.52)NADo you smoke cigarettes? 5-point scale from 1 – ‘no’ to 5 – ‘yes, every day’.[29]
Alcohol related problems (8)2.62 (2.31)NAWhile under the influence of alcohol, how often during the past 12 months have you experienced the following? For example: Have you been drunk or hungover when you had something important to do, such as school-related tasks or household chores? Two answers to choose: 0 – ‘no’, 1 – ‘yes’.[30, 31]
Marijuana/hashish use (1)3.90 (2.36)NAOn how many occasions (if any) in the last 12 months have you used marijuana or hashish? 7-point scale from 1 – ‘I did not use’ to 7 – ‘40 times or more’.[30, 31]
Novel psychoactive substance use (1)1.29 (0.45)NAOn how many occasions (if any) in the last 12 months have you used boosters (slang name of NPS)? 7-point scale from 1 – ‘I did not use’ to 7 – ‘40 times or more’.Research team
Medicine use (5)1/2.13 (1.28)2/1.84 (1.21)3/1.80 (1.38)NAHow often in the last 30 days have you used medication for following problems: 1) headache, 2) stomach ache, 3) negative emotional states (a combined indicator that includes medications taken for difficulties falling asleep, nervousness, depression, or low mood). 7-point scale from 1 – ‘I did not use’ to 7 – ‘40 times or more’.[23]
Risk factors: Experiencing various form of violence
Bulling (1)2.97 (1.04)NAHow often in the last 12 months have you experienced bullying? 4-point scale from 1 – ‘every day or almost every day’ to 4 – ‘never’.[32, 33]
Cyberbullying (1)1.49 (0.84)NAHave you ever been in a situation where one or more people from your school, class, or online community regularly bullied you via the Internet or a cell phone for an extended period, causing you suffering and making it difficult for you to defend yourself? 4 point scale from 1 – ‘did not happen’ to 4 – ‘it happened 4 times or more’.[34]
Domestic conflicts and violence (5)1.79 (0.73)0.86Family members get angry at each other. 4 point scale: 4-point scale from 1 – ‘it does not happen’ to 4 – ’often’[23, 35]
Risk factors: Using various forms of violence
Bullying against peers (1)1.94 (0.98)NAHow often in the last 12 months have you been involved in physical or psychological violence against other students? 4-point scale from 1 – ‘every day or almost every day’ to 4 – ‘never’.[32, 33]
Cyberbullying against peers (1)1.57 (0.93)NAHave you ever, either by yourself or as part of a group, regularly harassed a schoolmate via the Internet or mobile phones over a period of time, making it difficult for them to defend themselves? 4 point scale from 1 – ‘never’ to 4 – ‘it happened 4 times or more’.[34]
Independent variables cont.
Protective factors: Social environment (family, peers, YSC/YCC facility)
Parental support (8)3.17 (1.20)0.90My mother enjoys hearing about what I say. 5 point scale from 1 – ‘not true/false’ to 5 – ‘very true’.[36, 37]
Positive relationship with peers (6)2.99 (0.68)0.94Is it easy for you to make friends and stay connected with your peers? 4-point scale from 1 – ‘definitely not’ to 4 – ‘definitely yes’.[38]
Social climate at the YSC/YCC (12)2.69 (0.61)0.89I like my YSC/YCC. 4-point scale from 1 – ‘definitely not’ to 4 – ‘definitely yes’.Research team elaboration based on the OntarioStudent Drug Survey Question- naire [32]
Other protective factors
Religious commitment (1)2.31 (0.91)NAHow important is faith (religion) in your life? 4-point scale from 1 – ‘not important at all’ to 4 – ‘very important’.[39]
Forms of leisure activities (5)1/2.13 (1.27)2/3.55 (1.22)3/3.28 (1.35)4/3.02 (1.27)5/1.96 (1.08)NAOn average, how many hours a day do you spend on the following activities: 1) playing computer games, 2) listening to music, 3) using the Internet for non-school-related activities, 4) engaging in personal interests or hobbies, 5) reading books for pleasure? 5-point scale from 1 – ‘0 hours’ to 5 – ‘5 hours or more’.[40]
Participation in organised or unorganised after- school activities (3)1/1.91 (1.07)2/1.76 (0.94)3/2.59 (1.14)NAHow many hours per week do you spend on: 1) organised sport activities, 2) organised extracurricular activities other than sports, 3) various unorganised forms of physical activity? 5-point scale from 1 – ‘0 hours’ to 5 – ‘8 hours or more’.[40]

Data analysis

Differences in the prevalence of suicide attempts were analysed using the chi-square test. Hierarchical linear regression was employed to examine the relationship between the frequency of suicide attempts and a set of risk and protective factors, despite the fact that the distribution of the dependent variable deviated significantly from a normal distribution. However, the values of kurtosis (–0.252) and skewness (1.125) were within acceptable limits for this type of statistical analysis. Additionally, no evidence of collinearity was observed among the independent variables, as the VIF values for all analysed variables were below 2.

In the first stage of the analysis, correlations between the frequency of suicide attempts and the independent variables were examined using Spearman’s test. In the second stage, all independent variables that were found to be significant in the correlation analyses were entered into the regression model in three steps: (1) sociodemographic variables, (2) risk factors (positively correlated with suicide attempts), and (3) protective factors (negatively correlated with suicide attempts). At this stage, the independent variables were introduced to the model using the forward selection method. This approach made it possible to identify a set of independent variables that were significantly associated with the dependent variable – the frequency of suicide attempts.

Finally, in the third stage of regression analysis, the following variables were included in the model:

  1. sociodemographic variables: gender and family structure;

  2. risk factors: sensation-seeking tendencies, depressive symptoms, the ongoing use of medication for stomach ache and negative emotional states, exposure to peer bullying and cyberbullying, family conflict and violence, and leisure activities (listening to music);

  3. protective factors: religious commitment and leisure activities (playing computer games).

The following variables (parental support, positive peer relationship, social climate at the YSC/YCC, parti-ci-pation in organised or unorganised after-school acti-vities, use of novel psychoactive substances, use of marijuana/hashish, alcohol-related problems, cigarette smoking, perpetration of bullying and perpetration of cyberbullying were not used in the final regression analyses.

Due to significant gender differences in the prevalence of suicide attempts, regression analyses were conducted both for the entire sample and separately for girls and boys. The multiple imputation (MI) method was applied to handle missing data in the regression analysis [41]. All ana-lyses were carried out using the IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 software package.

Results

Study participants

Most of the study participants were boys (67.2%), reflecting the actual gender distribution in YSC/YCC faci-lities. Additionally, most respondents (66.9%) reported living in single-parent families [25]. This indicates signi-ficant differences between YSC/YCC youth and students attending mainstream schools, where approximately 77% are raised in two-parent households [42].

Table 2 presents data on suicide attempts among the respondents. Overall, 39.8% of young people in the YSC/YCC had attempted suicide. Of these, 8.7% had attempted suicide twice, and 14% had attempted suicide three or more times. Girls were significantly more likely to have attempted suicide (60% vs. 30%, p = 0.001). Notable gender differences were also observed in the frequency of suicide attempts. Among boys, the largest group consisted of those who had attempted suicide once (15.9%), whereas among girls, the largest group consisted of those who had attempted suicide three or more times (25.9%). This difference reflects the higher recurrence of suicide attempts among girls compared to boys within this high- risk population. No statistically significant differences were found between youth in YSC versus YCC facilities, nor between younger and older adolescents.

Table 2

The lifetime suicide attempts among Youth Sociotherapy Centre (YSC) and Youth Correctional Centre (YCC) students

Boys n = 1159Girls n = 565YSC n = 662YCC n = 1068Younger age group (12-15-years old) n = 682Older age group (16-19-years old) n = 1039Total (N = 1730)
Never806 (70%)224 (40.0%)***388 (59.0%)645 (60.4%)406 (60.0%)622 (60.3%)1033 (60.2%)
1 time183 (15.9%)109 (19.5%)119 (18.1%)173 (16.3%)122 (18.0%)167 (16.2%)292 (17.0%)
2 times65 (5.6%)82 (14.6%)***62 (9.4%)87 (8.2%)61 (9.0%)87 (8.4%)149 (8.7%)
3 times or more97 (8.4%)145 (25.9%)***89 (13.5%)154 (14.5%)88 (13.)%)155 (15.0%)243 (14.2%)
At least once345 (30.0%)336 (60.0%)***270 (40.1%)414 (39.1%)271 (40%)409 (39.7%)684 (39.8%)
in the lifetime

*** p < 0.001

Correlational analyses

Preliminary analyses revealed that correlation coefficients between the frequency of suicide attempts and the independent variables ranged from 0.10 to 0.26, indicating a weak relationship between these variables. Only the correlation between the frequency of suicide attempts and depressive symptoms was higher (Spearman’s ρ = 0.46), indicating a relationship of moderate strength (data not shown in the table).

Regression analyses

The results for the full sample (Table 3) indicate that all three blocks of variables entered into the hierarchical linear regression model – sociodemographic variables, risk factors, and protective factors – made statistically significant contribution to explaining the frequency of suicide attempts. The model accounted for approxi-mately 31% of the variance in suicide attempts. After controlling for sociodemographic variables, significant risk factors for suicide attempts among YSC/YCC students included depressive symptoms, sensation-seeking, experiences of cyberbullying, the ongoing use of medication for negative emotional states and stomach aches, and exposure to domestic conflict and violence. Interestingly, listening to music during leisure time also emerged as a risk factor. In contrast, religious involvement and playing computer games appeared to reduce the risk of suicide attempts.

Table 3

Hierarchical linear regression results predicting frequency of lifetime suicide attempts among youth attending Youth Sociotherapy Centre (YSC) and Youth Correctional Centre (YCC) (N = 1706)

Step/VariablesUnstandardized coefficientsStandardized coefficients, betaR2R2 change
BStandard error
1. Sociodemographic variables
Gender0.355***0.0580.1520.1030.103**
Family composition0.0650.0470.028
2. Risk factors
Sensation seeking0.125***0.0200.1330.3090.206***
Depressive symptoms0.372***0.0300.293
Use of medicine for stomach ache0.043*0.0210.047
Use of medicine for negative mental state0.084***0.0180.106
Experiencing bullying0.054**0.0230.051
Experiencing cyberbullying0.124***0.0280.095
Eexperiencing conflicts and domestic violence0.0500.0330.033
Listening to music during leisure time0.050**0.0190.056
3. Protective factors
Religious commitment–0.075**0.025–0.0620.3150.006***
Playing computer games–0.049*0.019–0.056

* p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Among boys (Table 4) the three blocks of variables included in the hierarchical linear regression model – sociodemographic variables, risk factors, and protective factors – made a statistically significant contribution to explaining suicide attempts. The model accounted for approximately 22% of the variance in suicide attempts among boys. Detailed results showed that the risk of suicide attempts among boys increased with higher levels of depressive symptoms, sensation-seeking, experiences of cyberbullying, and the ongoing use of medication for stomach aches. Listening to music during leisure time was also identified as a risk factor. Religious involvement and playing computer games were associated with a reduced risk of suicide attempts among boys.

Table 4

Hierarchical linear regression results predicting frequency of lifetime suicide attempts among boys attending Youth Sociotherapy Centre (YSC) and Youth Correctional Centre (YCC) (N = 1145)

Step/VariablesUnstandardized coefficientsStandardized coefficients, betaR2R2 change
BStandard error
1. Sociodemographic variables
Family composition0.0400.0520.0200.0040.004*
2. Risk factors
Sensation seeking0.117***0.0220.1480.2060.203***
Depressive symptoms0.372***0.0340.311
Use of medicine for stomach ache0.069**0.0270.076
Use of medicine for negative mental state0.0400.0230.052
Experiencing bullying0.0240.0250.027
Experiencing cyberbullying0.097**0.0320.086
Experiencing conflicts and domestic violence–0.0070.038–0.005
Listening to music during leisure time0.042*0.0210.056
3. Protective factors
Religious commitment–0.071**0.027–0.0700.2190.013***
Playing computer games–0.068***0.019–0.095

* p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Among girls (Table 5) only two blocks of variables included in the hierarchical linear regression model – socio-demographic variables and risk factors – made a statis-ti-cally significant contribution to explaining suicide attempts. The model accounted for approximately 30% of the variance in suicide attempts among girls. Detailed results showed that the risk of suicide attempts among girls increased with higher levels of depressive symptoms, sensation- seeking, experiences of bullying and cyberbullying, the ongoing use of medication for negative emotional states, and exposure to domestic conflict and violence. None of the factors included in the regression model appeared to offer protection against suicide attempts among girls.

Table 5

Hierarchical linear regression results predicting frequency of lifetime suicide attempts among girls attending Youth Sociotherapy Centre (YSC) and Youth Correctional Centre (YCC) (N = 561)

Step/VariablesUnstandardized coefficientsStandardized coefficients, betaR2R2 change
BStandard error
1. Sociodemographic variables
Family composition0.1240.0980.0450.0060.006
2. Risk factors
Sensation seeking0.153***0.0430.1350.2970.291***
Depressive symptoms0.370***0.0580.253
Use of medicine for stomach ache0.0160.0350.018
Use of medicine for negative mental state0.121***0.0290.162
Experiencing bullying0.131**0. 0510.103
Experiencing cyberbullying0.170**0.0550.118
Experiencing conflicts and domestic violence0.141*0.0600.089
Listening to music during leisure time0.0670.0390.065
3. Protective factors
Religious commitment–0.0720.052–0.0510.3000.003
Playing computer games0.0450.0520.032

* p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Discussion

Risk factors

The factor most strongly associated with suicide attempts was the presence of depressive symptoms. The significance of this factor has been confirmed by numerous studies conducted in Poland and other countries, both among adolescents and adults [6, 8, 9, 18, 43]. Most young people with suicidal ideation, plans, or attempts have experienced a mental health disorder during their lifetime, with depression showing the strongest association with suicidal behaviour [8]. The importance of mental health problems as a risk factor is further supported by findings indicating a relationship between suicide attempts and the ongoing use of medication. Previous analyses of medicine use among YSC/YCC youth suggest that the ongoing use of medication for problems such as pain or negative emotional states (i.e. difficulties falling asleep, nervousness, depression, and low mood) is much more prevalent among students attending these institutions than among youth in mainstream schools [44, 45]. Unfortunately, we have not collected information about the specific medications taken by the respondents in the present study. Yet, it is known that a considerable proportion of YSC/YCC students are diagnosed with mental disorders and may receive prescribed medication [2, 3].

In regression analyses conducted separately for boys and girls, the association between the use of medication for negative emotional states and suicide attempts turned out significant only among girls. In contrast, among boys, a significant association was found between suicide attempts and the ongoing use of medication for stomach ache. This finding may be explained in terms of somatization disorders – i.e., physical complaints such as abdominal pain for which no organic cause can be identified [46]. Research has shown that somatization disorders often co-occur with mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression [46]. It is possible that boys may manifest these problems through physical symptoms, such as stomach ache.

Our analyses also confirmed the relationship between suicide attempts and sensation seeking, which had been also documented in other studies. This association is explained in the literature by means of the Interpersonal Psychological Theory of Suicide [10, 11, 15], according to which, a suicide attempt is preceded by the desire to die and the acquired capability to engage in suicidal behaviour. The desire to die arises from two psychological states persisting over time: the perception of being a burden to others, and low sense of belonging or experience of alienation from one’s family, friends, or other signi-ficant individuals. The acquired capability for suicide refers to a reduced fear of pain, injury, or death, which develops through repeated direct or indirect exposure to painful and dangerous experiences, leading to gradual habituation, increased pain tolerance, and diminished fear of death [15]. Individuals with high sensation seeking tendencies often engage in risky behaviours, which, in turn, makes them particularly vulnerable to such experiences. As a result, they may acquire the capability to take their own life, thereby increasing the risk of suicidal behaviour [10].

In this context, it is worth emphasizing that students in YSCs and YCCs are predominantly young people from families experiencing serious difficulties and dysfunc-tional relational patterns. In some cases, children have been abandoned by their biological or adoptive parents [3], which can be considered an act of profound alienation that, according to the aforementioned theoretical framework, can contribute to suicidal behaviour.

The present analyses did not confirm a relationship between suicide attempts and impulsivity. However, previous research has yielded inconclusive results, and in models that account for mental health disorders, the association between impulsivity and suicidal behaviour has not always been found significant [10].

Similarly, regression analyses did not confirm the importance of psychoactive substance use as a factor influencing the frequency of suicide attempts among YSC/YCC youth, despite numerous studies showing that substance use significantly increases the risk of suicidal behaviour [6-8, 12]. However, as indicated by a review of studies on suicidal behaviour among youth in contact with the juvenile justice system, the relationship between substance use and suicidal behaviour in this population is not consistent [48].

Previous analyses have shown that students in YSCs and YCCs – i.e., young people, some of whom have been in contact with the justice system – are significantly more likely to use alcohol, cigarettes, and illegal drugs than their peers in mainstream schools [49]. The high pre-valence of substance use and related problems reduces the predictive value of this factor among justice-involved youth, although it still contributes to a higher incidence of suicidal behaviour [48].

Regression analyses revealed that experiencing bullying and cyberbullying is a significant risk factor for suicide attempts among students in YSCs and YCCs. This finding is supported by numerous studies demonstrating a strong association between exposure to violence and suicidal behaviour. Importantly, as in the present analyses, this relationship remains significant even after controlling for variables such as depression and other symptoms of mental health disorders [11].

However, the present research indicates a stronger association between suicide attempts and cyberbullying than with traditional bullying. Moreover, among boys, the association between experiencing bullying and suicide attempts was found to be non-significant. Other studies likewise suggest that the risk of suicidal behaviour is higher in cases of cyberbullying compared to traditio-nal bullying [11, 13]. One explanation offered in the lite-rature relates to the specific characteristics of cyberbullying: the anonymity of the perpetrator, the rapid spread and persistent availability of harmful content, difficulties in removing such content, its wide dissemination, the potential for continuous harm regardless of location or time of day, and the diverse forms it may take [34, 50].

Cyberbullying is associated with violations of dignity and privacy, social rejection, and emotional suffering, and as a result, it can induce feelings of hopelessness that are linked to suicidal behaviour in youth [13, 51]. Additio-nally, young people who have experienced cyberbullying are less likely to report it or seek help compared to those who have experienced traditional forms of bullying [13]. Perpetrating cyberbullying is also considered a risk factor for suicidal behaviour, although not to the same extent as experiencing this form of violence [9, 13].

In the group of girls, an association was found between suicide attempts and exposure to domestic conflict and violence. This finding, confirmed in other studies, indicates that dysfunctional family relationships, including parental substance use and physical, psychological, and sexual violence against children, are significant risk factors for suicidal behaviour in adolescents [11, 52]. In contrast, this association was not observed among boys. This difference is likely related to gender differences in responses to domestic conflict. Indeed, studies suggest that girls respond to family conflict with mood disorders, including suicidal ideation [53].

A risk factor associated with suicide attempts among YSC/YCC youth, especially boys, was listening to music during leisure time. While this finding may be surprising, research suggests that musical preferences can be related to youth’s mental health. It is known that listening to certain genres of music, such as heavy metal, rock, or blues, may be associated with risk behaviours and mental health problems, including suicidal tendencies [22, 54]. In the analyses presented here, the relevance of this factor to suicide attempts was marginal, indicating that this issue warrants further research.

Protective factors

The results of the present study indicate that a protective factor against suicide attempts among YSC/YCC youth is religious commitment, understood as the importance of religion in a young person’s life. Other studies also confirm that religion can serve as a potential protective factor against suicidal behaviour by shaping – among other things – moral beliefs against taking one’s own life and fostering a sense of belonging to a particular religious community. Faith can also be a source of hope, helping individuals make sense of suffering, while prayer may serve as a coping mechanism in the context of suicidal ideation [20].

However, the relationship between religion and suicide risk is complex and ambiguous. In some circumstances, religion can also be a potential risk factor, particularly when religious beliefs become a source of guilt, feelings of distance from God, or a sense of rejection by the religious community [20]. Further research is needed to explain why this factor was found to be significant only among boys.

Regression analyses did not confirm that factors related to the participants’ social environment, i.e., good relationships with peers and a positive social climate within the YSC/YCC facilities, are significant protective factors against suicidal behaviour. However, other studies have shown that school connectedness – which includes, among other things, good relationships among all members of the school community, a sense of care and respect from teachers and educators, and a sense of safety at school (defined in this study as a positive social climate within the YSC/YCC) – is an important protective factor against suicidal behaviour [19].

There was also no evidence in this study to support the role of parental support as a protective factor. This is likely due to the limited parental support received by young people attending YSC/YCC. Indeed, research shows that YSC/YCC youth rate the level of support from their parents much lower than adolescents attending mainstream schools [21].

The finding regarding the protective role of computer games is noteworthy. On the one hand, excessive gaming is seen as a potentially self-destructive way of coping with life’s difficulties. On the other hand, participation in such games provides a sense of power and autonomy and enhances self-esteem [55]. Low self-esteem is known to be one of the factors contributing to suicidal behaviour among young people [11]. In the present study, computer games turned out to be a protective factor only among boys. This may be because boys play computer games more often than girls and, moreover, they tend to use gaming as a way to make friends [55]. Social support is undoubtedly a protective factor against suicidal beha-viour [15].

In sum, the present study supports previous research demonstrating associations between suicidal attempts and mental health problems, personality traits such as sensation seeking, experiences of peer and domestic violence, and the protective role of religious involvement.

Strengths and limitations of the study

The cross-sectional nature of the study does not allow for conclusions about cause-and-effect relationships. Moreover, the study included adolescents exhibiting significantly higher levels of risky behaviours and mental health problems compared to those from mainstream schools, which limits the generalizability of the results. However, the study involved a large, randomly selected sample of young people residing and studying in YSC and YCC facilities, providing a solid basis for drawing conclusions about risk and protective factors associated with suicide attempts in this high-risk population. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only study conducted to date in Poland that includes such a large sample of residents from YSC/YCC facilities.

An important limitation of the study is the method used to measure the frequency of suicide attempts. The study employed an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire containing only one question about the number of suicide attempts (if any) participants had made in the past. As a result, detailed information on the history of suicide attempts among YSC/YCC youth is lacking. It is unclear how many of these attempts were non-suicidal self-injurious behaviours or cries for help without an actual intent to end one’s life, and how many required medical interventions due to a serious threat of death.

Furthermore, it is unknown at which stage of the suicidal process the participants were at the time of the study – for example, whether they were currently experiencing suicidal thoughts or intentions. The lack of more detailed data on participants’ suicidal behaviours did not allow for a more precise determination of the relationships with the examined risk and protective factors.

In addition to the question about suicide attempts, the survey included questions about substance abuse, mental health problems, and other sensitive topics that may have made some participants apprehensive about disclosing their answers to YSC/YCC staff. For this reason, a pilot study was conducted prior to the national survey to assess the reception and comprehension of the survey questions by potential respondents and to ensure that the questions did not compromise participants’ sense of safety. The surveys were administered by interviewers from outside the YSC/YCC facilities, and participants were assured of the anonymity and confidentiality of their responses before completing the surveys.

The present study was conducted prior to the occurrence of potential traumatic events that may have had both direct (the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020) and indirect (the onset of the full-scale war in Ukraine in 2022) effects on suicidal behaviours among youth in YSC/YCC. To the best of our knowledge, no institution responsible for supervising these facilities has systematically or continuously collected relevant data in this area. Available data from the Centre for Education Development, an agency of the Ministry of National Edu-cation, gathered during the pandemic period (March 20, 2020 – June 25, 2021) and limited to YCC facilities, indicate that a minority – i.e., one in three centres – reported an increase in mental health problems among their students, including internalizing problems such as depression, anxiety disorders, and acute stress reactions (information obtained via personal communication with Marta Paluch, Centre for Education Development). However, the impact of these problems on suicidal behaviours among youth in YSC/YCC remains difficult to determine.

Conclusions

The study presented here is another analysis of data collected from youth belonging to a group at increased risk of various mental health problems. Our previous studies have focused on risky behaviours, including substance use, aggressive and illegal behaviour, and use of medication [44, 45, 49, 56]. Research has also been published on factors associated with internalizing problems among these youth, such as depressive symptoms and other emotional difficulties [21]. The present study focuses specifically on suicidal attempts. The results indicate that YSC/YCC youth are at particular risk for suicidal behaviour, with at least one suicide attempt confirmed by 30% of boys and 60% of girls.

Previous suicide attempts are considered one of the strongest risk factors for subsequent attempts [14, 15, 57]. Therefore, YSC and YCC staff should be trained to carry out suicide prevention measures, including the early identification of young people experiencing mental health crises and the provision of appropriate support and assistance. The results of this study indicate that exposure to bullying and cyberbullying is one of the risk factors for suicidal behaviour. Implementing bullying and cyberbullying prevention programs, as well as intervening, when necessary, should also be key components of efforts to prevent suicidal behaviour among YSC/YCC youth.

The findings also indicate a lack of or limited protective effect of factors that could mitigate the risk of suicidal behaviour. In this context, the absence of a signi-ficant influence of parental support is noteworthy. It is also concerning that, in the case of girls, no protective factors emerged to counterbalance the negative impact of the identified risk factors.

Nevertheless, the findings confirm the protective role of religiosity among boys, as it may foster a sense of belonging and contribute to a greater sense of meaning in life. As a practical implication, it would be advisable to consider strengthening initiatives aimed at building posi-tive bonds between young people – both boys and girls attending YSC/YCC facilities – and the staff of these institutions. Such initiatives may offer opportunities that foster self-esteem and support the development of positive, empowering relationships with supportive adults.

Conflict of interest

Absent.

Financial support

The study was conducted within the frame of the research project financed by the National Health Program for 2016-2020 (Poland). This work was supported by the statutory funding from the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw, Poland.

Ethics

The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw (Poland), Resolution No. 34/2017 of 26 October 2017.

References

1 

Whitesell M, Bachand A, Peel J, Brown M. Familial, social, and individual factors contributing to risk for adolescent substance use. J Addict 2013; 2013: 579310. DOI: 10.1155/2013/579310.

2 

Siemionow J, Paluch M. Analiza stanu działalności młodzieżowych ośrodków wychowawczych w zakresie wsparcia psychologiczno-pedagogicznego i terapii w resocjalizacji wychowanków. Raport z badań. Ośrodek Rozwoju Edukacji; 2021. Available from: https://ore.edu.pl/2023/02/analiza-stanu-dzialalnosci-mlodziezowych-osrodkow-wychowawczych-w-zakresie-wsparcia-psychologiczno-pedagogicznego-i-terapii-w-resocjalizacji-wychowankow-raport-z-badan/.

3 

Góralczyk E. Diagnoza społeczna funkcjonowania Młodzieżowych Ośrodków Socjoterapii z uwzględnieniem form pracy i pomocy wychowankom, analiza potrzeb i problemów wychowanków oraz kadry ośrodków. Ośrodek Rozwoju Edukacji; 2011. Available from: https://ore.edu.pl/2023/02/analizy-i-raporty/.

4 

Bridge JA, Goldstein TR, Brent DA. Adolescent suicide and suicidal behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2006; 47: 372-394.

5 

Schwartz-Lifshitz M, Zalsman G, Giner L, Oquendo MA. Can we really prevent suicide? Curr Psychiatry Rep 2012; 14: 624-633.

6 

Turecki G, Brent DA. Suicide and suicidal behaviour. Lancet 2016; 387: 1227-1239.

7 

Miranda-Mendizabal A, Castellví P, Parés-Badell O, Alayo I, Almenara J, Alonso I, et al. Gender differences in suicidal behavior in adolescents and young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Public Health 2019; 64: 265-283.

8 

Hua LL, Lee J, Rahmandar MH, Sigel EJ; Committee on Adolescence; Council on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention. Suicide and suicide risk in adolescents. Pediatrics 2024; 153: e2023064800. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-064800.

9 

Richardson R, Connell T, Foster M, Blamires J, Keshoor S, Moir C, Zeng IS. Risk and protective factors of self-harm and suicidality in adolescents: an umbrella review with meta-analysis. J Youth Adolesc 2024; 53: 1301-1322.

10 

Ortin A, Lake AM, Kleinman M, Gould MS. Sensation seeking as risk factor for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in adolescence. J Affect Disord 2012; 143: 214-222.

11 

Cha CB, Franz PJ, Guzmán EM, Glenn CR, Kleiman EM, Nock MK. Annual research review: Suicide among youth–epidemiology, (potential) etiology, and treatment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2018; 59: 460-482.

12 

Dawes MA, Mathias CW, Richard DM, Hill-Kapturczak N, Dougherty DM. Adolescent suicidal behavior and substance use: developmental mechanisms. Subst Abuse 2008; 2: 13-28.

13 

John A, Glendenning AC, Marchant A, Montgomery P, Stewart A, Wood S, et al. Self-harm, suicidal behaviours, and cyberbullying in children and young people: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20: e129. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9044.

14 

Alvarez-Subiela X, Castellano-Tejedor C, Villar-Cabeza F, Vila-Grifoll M, Palao-Vidal D. Family factors related to suicidal behavior in adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 9892. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19169892.

15 

Joiner TE Jr, Van Orden KA, Witte TK, Selby EA, Ribeiro JD, Lewis R, Rudd MD. Main predictions of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior: empirical tests in two samples of young adults. J Abnorm Psychol 2009; 118: 634-646.

16 

Kerr DC, Preuss LJ, King CA. Suicidal adolescents’ social support from family and peers: gender-specific associations with psychopathology. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2006; 34: 103-114.

17 

Czyz EK, Liu Z, King CA. Social connectedness and one-year trajectories among suicidal adolescents following psychiatric hospitalization. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2012; 41: 214-226.

18 

Ostaszewski K. Myśli samobójcze a sytuacja rodzinna oraz problemy inter-i eksternalizacyjne u młodzieży w wieku 14–16 lat. Dziecko Krzywdzone 2018; 17: 42-61.

19 

Marraccini ME, Brier ZM. School connectedness and suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic meta-analysis. Sch Psychol Q 2017; 32: 5-21.

20 

Lawrence RE, Oquendo MA, Stanley B. Religion and suicide risk: a systematic review. Arch Suicide Res 2016; 20: 1-21.

21 

Ostaszewski K, Pisarska A, Bobrowski K, Greń J. Polish youth with limited family support: internalizing and externalizing problems. In: Mozes Sh, Israelashvili M (eds.). Youth without Family to Lean on: Global Challenges and Local Interventions. Routledge; 2022, p. 318-331.

22 

Stack S, Lester D, Rosenberg JS. Music and suicidality: a quantitative review and extension. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2012; 42: 654-671.

23 

Pisarska A, Bobrowski KJ, Greń J, Ostaszewski K. Czynniki ryzyka i czynniki chroniące powiązane z używaniem alkoholu i innych substancji psychoaktywnych przez podopiecznych młodzieżowych ośrodków socjoterapeutycznych i wychowawczych: projekt i metodologia badań ankietowych. Alkoholizm i Narkomania 2019; 32: 247-266.

24 

Frączek A, Stępień E. Kwestionariusz „Ty i zdrowie”. Warszawa: Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii; 1991.

25 

Steinberg L, Sharp C, Stanford MS, Tharp AT. New tricks for an old measure: the development of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-Brief (BIS-Brief). Psychol Assess 2013; 25: 216-226.

26 

Kata G, Poleszak W. Własności psychometryczne polskiej wersji narzędzia do badania impulsywności u młodzieży–BIS-BRIEF. Przegląd Psychologiczny 2021; 64: 41-58.

27 

Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385-401.

28 

Czabała JC, Brykczyńska C, Bobrowski K, Ostaszewski K. Problemy zdrowia psychicznego w populacji gimnazjalistów warszawskich. Adv Psychiatry Neurol 2005; 14: 1-9.

29 

Ostaszewski K. Używanie substancji psychoaktywnych innych niż alkohol. In: Ostaszewski K, Bobrowski K, Borucka A, Okulicz-Kozaryn K, Pisarska A, Biechowska D, et al. (eds.). Monitorowanie zachowań ryzykownych, zachowań nałogowych, problemów zdrowia psychicznego 15-letniej młodzieży. Badania mokotowskie 2004–2016. Badania ukraińskie, obwód lwowski 2016. Warszawa: Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii; 2017.

30 

Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2002. Volume I: Secondary school students. (NIH Publication No. 03-5375). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2003.

31 

Sierosławski J. Używanie alkoholu i narkotyków przez młodzież szkolną. Raport z ogólnopolskich badań ankietowych zrealizowanych w 2003 roku. Warszawa: Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii; 2003.

32 

Adlaf EM, Paglia A. The mental health and well-being of Ontario students: findings from the OSDUS. Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; 2007.

33 

Bobrowski K. Symptomy zaburzeń zdrowia psychicznego. In: Ostaszewski K, Bobrowski K, Borucka A, Okulicz- Kozaryn K, Pisarska A, Biechowska D, et al. (eds.). Monitorowanie zachowań ryzykownych, zachowań nałogowych, problemów zdrowia psychicznego 15-letniej młodzieży. Badania mokotowskie 2004–2016. Badania ukraińskie, obwód lwowski 2016. Warszawa: Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii; 2017.

34 

Pyżalski J. Agresja elektroniczna i cyberbullying jako nowe ryzykowne zachowania młodzieży. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Impuls; 2012.

35 

Moos RH, Moos DS. Family Environment Scale Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists; 1981.

36 

Zimmerman M. Flint [Michigan] Adolescent Study (FAS): A longitudinal study of school dropout and substance use, 1994--1997. ICPSR 34598-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research; 2014. DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR34598.v1.

37 

Ostaszewski K. Zachowania ryzykowne młodzieży z perspektywy mechanizmów resilience. Warszawa: Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii; 2014.

38 

Okulicz-Kozaryn K, Pisarska A. Poczucie własnej skuteczności a używanie substancji psychoaktywnych przez młodzież. Badania pilotażowe. Alkoholizm i Narkomania 2001; 14: 565-577.

39 

Bobrowski K. Poczucie koherencji oraz inne zasoby odpornościowe a używanie substancji psychoaktywnych przez młodzież. Alkoholizm i Narkomania 2002; 5: 221-239.

40 

Bobrowski K. Czas wolny a zachowania ryzykowne młodzieży (Free time activities and adolescents risk beha-viour). Alkoholizm i Narkomania 2007; 20: 267-287.

41 

Moczko J. Wnioskowanie statystyczne w przypadku występowania brakujących danych. Przegląd Lekarski 2012; 69: 1035-1039.

42 

Szeredzińska R. Dzieci w rodzinie. Dziecko Krzywdzone: teoria, badania, praktyka 2017; 16: 32-67.

43 

Busby Grant J, Batterham PJ, McCallum SM, Werner-Seidler A, Calear AL. Specific anxiety and depression symptoms are risk factors for the onset of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in youth. J Affect Disord 2023; 327: 299-305.

44 

Pisarska A, Ostaszewski K. Use of medicines to alleviate negative emotional states among adolescents attending Special Education Centres [published correction appears in J Prev Med Hyg 2023; 64: E375-E376]. J Prev Med Hyg 2023; 64: E178-E187. DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.2.

45 

Pisarska A. Przyjmowanie leków przeciwbólowych przez podopiecznych młodzieżowych ośrodków socjoterapii i młodzieżowych ośrodków wychowawczych. Pediatria i Medycyna Rodzinna 2023; 19: 87-91.

46 

Nitsch K, Jabłoński M, Samochowiec A, Kurpisz J. Zaburzenia pod postacią somatyczną: problematyczne zjawisko–problematyczna diagnoza. Psychiatria 2015; 12: 77-84.

47 

Haug TT, Mykletun A, Dahl AA. The association between anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms in a large population: the HUNT-II study. Psychosom Med 2004; 66: 845-851.

48 

Stokes ML, McCoy KP, Abram KM, Byck GR, Teplin LA. Suicidal ideation and behavior in youth in the juvenile justice system: a review of the literature. J Correct Health Care 2015; 21: 222-242.

49 

Greń J, Bobrowski K, Ostaszewski K, Pisarska A. Rozpowszechnienie używania substancji psychoaktywnych wśród podopiecznych młodzieżowych ośrodków socjoterapeutycznych i wychowawczych. Alkoholizm i Narkomania 2019; 32: 267-290.

50 

Bottino SM, Bottino CM, Regina CG, Correia AV, Ribeiro WS. Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: systematic review. Cad Saude Publica 2015; 31: 463-475.

51 

Walrave M, Heirman W. Skutki cyberbullyingu–oskarżenie czy obrona technologii? Dziecko Krzywdzone. Cyberprzemoc 2009; 8: 27-46.

52 

Consoli A, Peyre H, Speranza M, Hassler C, Falissard B, Touchette E, et al. Suicidal behaviors in depressed adolescents: role of perceived relationships in the family. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2013; 7: 8. DOI: 10.1186/1753-2000-7-8.

53 

Sitnik-Warchulska K, Izydorczyk B. Family patterns and suicidal and violent behavior among adolescent girls–genogram analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15: 2067. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102067.

54 

Bogt TT, Hale WW 3rd, Becht A. “Wild years”: rock music, problem behaviors and mental well-being in adolescence and young adulthood. J Youth Adolesc 2021; 50: 2487-2500.

55 

Paulus FW, Ohmann S, von Gontard A, Popow C. Internet gaming disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2018; 60: 645-659.

56 

Ostaszewski K, Bobrowski K, Greń J, Pisarska A. Nasilone zachowania ryzykowne wśród podopiecznych młodzieżowych ośrodków socjoterapeutycznych i wychowawczych. Alkoholizm i Narkomania 2019; 32: 291-316.

57 

Abrial E, Chalancon B, Leaune E, Brunelin J, Wallon M, Moll F, et al. Investigating predictive factors of suicidal re-attempts in adolescents and young adults after a first suicide attempt: a prospective cohort study. Study protocol of the SURAYA project. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13: 916640. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.916640.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). License allowing third parties to download and share its works but not commercially purposes or to create derivative works.
Share
without publication fees