eISSN: 2299-0046
ISSN: 1642-395X
Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Journal's reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
6/2021
vol. 38
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

Sun protection among university students in Poland: a survey of awareness and attitudes

Magdalena Łyko
1
,
Magdalena Kruzel
1
,
Aleksander Kuś
1
,
Joanna Maj
2
,
Jacek C. Szepietowski
2
,
Alina Jankowska-Konsur
2

1.
Student Research Group of Experimental Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
2.
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
Adv Dermatol Allergol 2021; XXXVIII (6): 961–966
Online publish date: 2021/10/26
Article file
- Sun protection.pdf  [0.13 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Introduction

Photoprotection measures are methods that guard the skin from the adverse effects of sunlight. They include avoidance of sun exposure during the peak ultraviolet hours (from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.), the use of products with ultraviolet (UV) filters, protective clothing, wide-brimmed hats and sunglasses [1]. Sunscreen is important in prevention of basal cell carcinoma and melanoma [2, 3], as well as in prophylaxis of squamous cell carcinoma [4]. Properly selected sunscreen also protect the skin against photoaging and dyspigmentations, and at the same time do not impair vitamin D production [5–7]. In recent years awareness about photoprotection has increased. Every year more social projects and campaigns are presented, but continuous education in this topic is essential.

Aim

The aim of the study was to evaluate students’ awareness and attitudes related to skin protection against ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and to demonstrate whether medical students differ from other faculty students in terms of health-promoting attitudes in photoprotection.

Material and methods

The questionnaire was developed based on the interview with 20 students who expressed their opinion about their knowledge, educational needs and attitudes related to the sun protection. The survey was created using Google® Forms and consisted of 24 questions (17 single choice, 4 multiple choice, 3 open ones). It included questions about students’ practices related to sun exposure, the current sunscreen use and its use in the childhood, past sunburn and the use of tanning booths, as well as the use of additional methods of protection. Regarding the phototype assessment, the respondents rated their phototypes themselves using the attached Fitzpatrick scale. The survey was posted online on 12 Facebook® students groups with a short invitation to complete the survey (Appendix 1). The data collection was carried out between March and May 2019. A total of 252 questionnaires were obtained and 9 were excluded due to being incomplete or incorrect.

Statistical analysis

The data were collected and analysed anonymously. Complete responses were downloaded for statistical analysis (Statistica 13; Statsoft, Krakow). The correlation matrix analysis, tests for the difference between two structure indices and c2 test were employed. P-value used in testing of the null-hypothesis was 0.05.

Results

The respondents of the survey were university students of years 1–6. 148 (60.9%) of them represented medical faculty and 95 (39.1%) other faculties. Among the respondents, 187 (77%) were females and 56 (23%) were males. Regarding the Fitzpatrick scale for skin types, 74 (30.4%) had type II, 86 (35.4%) type III, 49 (20.2%) type I , 32 (13.2%) type IV and 2 (0.8%) type V.

Attitudes related to sun exposure

Exposure to sun radiation is mainly associated with being outdoors. Respondents were asked about time of the year, number of hours and type of activity during which they spent time outside. A hundred and one (41.6%) students declared spending time outside throughout the year, 140 (57.6%) only in the summer and 2 (0.8%) only in the winter. Weekly most respondents (77 (31.7%)) spent from 5 to 10 h outdoors. Fifty-seven (23.5%) students answered that they spent outside up to 5 h and 49 (20.2%) from 10 to 15 h. Sixty students declared spending more hours outdoors – 24 (9.9%) from 15 to 20 h, 16 (6.6%) from 20 to 25 h, 6 (2.5%) from 25 to 30, 6 (2.5%) from 30 to 35 h and 8 (3.3%) over 35 h during a week. Two hundred and twenty-eight (93.8%) respondents spent their free time outdoors. A hundred and thirty-five (55.6%) students preferred exercising and 94 (38.7%) sunbathing. Other activities involved working (n = 29; 11.9%), walking (n = 11; 4.5%), sightseeing (n = 3; 1.2%), gardening (n = 3; 1.2%), learning (n = 3; 1.2%), walking the dog (n = 2; 0.8%), riding a bike (n = 2; 0.8%) and reading (n = 2; 0.8%). Two (0.8%) students declared avoiding sun exposure.

The use of tanning booths and sunburn

Forty (16.5%) of the surveyed students used tanning booths and 23 (9.5%) did it before the age of 18. Regarding the use of tanning booths, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups of medical and non-medical students (p = 0.37). Among all respondents, 178 (73.3%) got a sunburn in their childhood and 168 (69.1%) suffered sunburn later in life.

The use of sunscreen

A total of 208 (85.6%) used sunscreen in their childhood, 235 (96.7%) students reported using sunscreen currently. Women used sunscreen significantly (p = 0.007) more frequently than men (98.4% and 91.1%, respectively) (Figure 1). A hundred and sixteen (47.7%) students used sunscreen only during summer holidays and 69 (28.4%) put on sunscreen during sunny days regardless of the season of the year. Forty-six (18.9%) respondents used this kind of photoprotection every day during the year. Eight (3.3%) students did not use sunscreen at all and 4 (1.7%) gave other responses – 2 (0.8%) used sunscreen in summer, late spring and early autumn, 2 (0.8%) only during hot and sunny weather, 1 (0.4%) only in countries with warmer climate (detailed data not shown). When it comes to using sunscreen in the winter during sport activity, the respondents' answers were evenly distributed. During stay in the mountains in the winter, 83 (34.2%) respondents used sunscreen, 68 (28%) did not use sunscreen and 92 (37.9%) did not go to the mountains in the winter. Sunscreen was used by 59 (39.6%) medical students and 24 (25.3%) students of other faculties. Medical students used sunscreen in winter statistically more frequently (p = 0.024) comparing to students of other faculties.
A total of 159 (65.4%) students used sunscreen only once during sun exposure. Of them, 53 (21.8%) applied it 15 to 30 min before exposure, 71 (29.2%) less than 15 min before exposure and 35 (14.4%) during sun exposure. Seventy-six (31.3%) respondents admitted to reapplying sunscreen products during the sun exposure. Eight (3.3%) did not use this kind of photoprotection at all. There was no significant difference between students of the medical faculty and other faculties regarding time of application of sunscreen before sun exposure and single or multiple application of the product (p = 0.861 and p = 0.334, respectively). The most commonly used SPF value among sunscreen product users was 15–30 (n = 110; 45.3%), followed by SPF 30-50 (n = 63; 25.9%). Thirty-nine (16.1%) respondents used SPF > 50. Seventeen (7%) reported the use of sunscreen with SPF < 15. Six (2.5%) students gave other answers – they declared that SPF value that they use depends on the season, light intensity and part of the body (detailed data not shown). Students of the medical faculty used sunscreen with SPF > 30 statistically more frequently (p = 0.009) than students of other faculties (50.3% and 28.7%, respectively). Students used sunscreen on different parts of the body with different frequencies. A hundred and fifty-four (63.4%) respondents chose face, 114 (46.9%) exposed body parts and 97 (39.9%) neck. Other chosen body parts were arms (7 respondents (2.9%)), ears (5; 2.1%), mouth and back (4; 1.7% both), hands (3; 1.2%) and legs (2; 0.8%).
A hundred and ninety-four (79.8%) sunscreen product users bought their products mainly in drugstores. Pharmacies were chosen by 107 (44%) respondents. Thirteen (5.4%), students purchased sunscreen on the internet, 3 (1.2%) in supermarkets, 30 (12.4%) in other shops and 1 (0.4%) at the dermatologist’s. Twelve (4.9%) people did not buy sunscreen themselves. Among additional methods of sun protection, the most popular was use of sunglasses (n = 201; 82.7%) and a cap or hat (n = 151; 62.1%). A hundred and thirteen (46.5%) respondents declared that they avoid sun exposure around noon hours. Students of the medical faculty avoided sun exposure statistically more frequently (p = 0.04) than students of other faculties (51.7% and 38.3%, respectively). Thirty-seven (15.2%) students also indicated protective measures such as clothes with long sleeves and 6 (2.5%) used other like sunshades and beach slings. Ten people (4.1%) did not use other methods of photoprotection than sunscreen. Dermoscopy examination
In the study group comprising 70 (28.8%) students, 54 (36.2%) students of the medical faculty and 16 (17%) of other faculties, underwent dermoscopy in the past. The difference was highly significant (p = 0.001). Thirty-six students underwent dermoscopy examination once, 18 twice, 5 people three and four times, 3 people five times, 1 person six times and 1 eight times. Photoprotection in families of respondents As many as 175 (72%) people indicated that their families used sunscreen. Thirty-seven (15.2%) respondents were convinced that their families did not use sunscreen and 31 (12.8%) did not know if this kind of sun protection was used.

Discussion

Photoprotection is the foundation of skin protection from harmful UV rays. As sun exposure is a modifiable factor, it is important to spread the knowledge how it affects the skin and how to guard from it. It is necessary to increase the knowledge about prevention from the sun exposure, especially among medical students, so they can promote healthy behaviours to their patients. Awareness about sun protection has been increasing in recent years. In our study, we observed that at present students use sunscreen more often than in childhood. Additionally, we noticed that nowadays the percentage of sunburn is lower than in childhood. However, still, only 18.9% of students reported sunscreen use all year round. We observed that vast majority do it only during holidays or sunny days regardless of the season. Similar results have been indicated in other studies [8, 9].
Baykal Selcuk et al. [10] revealed that women protected themselves from the sun more than men. In line with this observation, we found that women use sunscreen statistically more frequently than men, what can be associated with a greater tendency to risky behaviour in young men. Similarly to the study of Urasaki et al. [9], in which they investigated sun protection habits in university students in Brazil, SPF 15-30 was the most commonly chosen one. Comparing to the Polish study of Laskowska and Reich [11], we observed a higher frequency of using sunscreen with SPF > 30 and in use of additional photoprotective methods especially in medical students. In our study students of the medical faculty used sunscreen with SPF > 30 more often than students of other faculties. Furthermore, we observed that both medical and non-medical students did not apply the sunscreen perfectly. The main problems concerned how much time should pass from application to the sun exposure and the fact that sunscreen was applied only once. Similarly, Nanyes et al. [12] emphasized that correct application of sunscreen was confusing for the medical students. Students did not know how to properly apply the sunscreen. In other studies the problem with reapplication was also reported [9, 13]. The research of Forsea et al. [8] analysed attitudes of medical students in Romania. They found out that most popular methods of photoprotection were avoiding sun exposure from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. and wearing sunglasses. In our sample students of medical and non-medical faculties also willingly chose sunglasses, as well as hats or caps regardless of the field of the study. On the other hand, in our study, the future healthcare professionals statistically more often avoided sunlight from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. than the students of other faculties.
In our research we observed that 39.6% of medical students used sunscreen in the winter. It is a much higher percentage comparing to the study by Forsea et al. [8] who demonstrated that only 16.16% of respondents used it at that time of the year. This results may be partially related to the fact that most people have the wrong impression that sunlight is harmful only in summer which was described by Costa et al. [14]. On the other hand, it must be taken into consideration that the study by Forsea et al. [8] was published in 2012 and since then the general awareness about photoprotection has increased and knowledge on this subject has been disseminated by newer and newer/more and more media. We found that medical students presented more awareness about photoprotection than students of other faculties. In contrast to our study, Isvy et al. [15] demonstrated that French sixth-year medical students’ practices were almost the same as in the general population.
According to our data, 16.5% of students used tanning booths, of them 9.5% before the age of 18. Since 2017 in Poland using of tanning booths has been forbidden before that age [16]. As our results showed this restriction is very important because young people may be unaware of the harmful effects of ultraviolet radiation and do not know or care about future consequences related to the UV exposure. When we compared groups of medical and non-medical students there was no significant difference in frequency of using sun beds between them. Similar results were observed by Laskowska et al. [11]. Slightly better results were reported by Forsea et al. [8] in Romania (6.8%) and Dallazem et al. [17] in Brazil (5.4%). We are aware that our study may carry a risk of bias due to the limited availability of the online survey. Although the survey was available to many student groups on Facebook®, it excluded students unrelated to these groups as well as students not interested in the subject.

Conclusions

There are differences in pro-health attitudes regarding photoprotection between medical and non-medical students. Students of the medical faculty showed a greater awareness of the harmfulness of solar radiation, which was manifested in more frequent use of products with higher SPF, sunscreen use in the winter, as well as avoiding sun exposure around noon and undergoing dermoscopy examination. However, some practices associated with sunscreen application should be improved in both groups. Particular attention should be paid to reapplication and everyday use of sunscreen. Anyway, our study indicates that medical students may be involved in creation and promotion of education activities to the general public.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Narbutt J, Wolska H, Kaszuba A, et al. Photoprotection. Recommendations of the Polish Dermatological Society. Part 2: Sunscreen use. Dermatol Rev 2018; 105: 30-40.
2. Hirst NG, Gordon LG, Scuffham PA, Green AC. Lifetime cost-effectiveness of skin cancer prevention through promotion of daily sunscreen use. Value Health 2012; 15: 261-8.
3. Green AC, Williams GM, Logan V, Strutton GM. Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: randomized trial follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 257-63.
4. van der Pols JC, Williams GM, Pandeya N, et al. Prolonged prevention of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin by regular sunscreen use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 2546-8.
5. Krutmann J. Ultraviolet A radiation-induced biological effects in human skin: relevance for photoaging and photodermatosis. J Dermatol Sci 2000; 23 Suppl 1: 22-6.
6. Wolber R, Schlenz K, Wakamatsu K, et al. Pigmentation effects of solar-simulated radiation as compared with UVA and UVB radiation. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2008; 21: 487-91.
7. Young AR, Narbutt J, Harrison GI, et al. Optimal sunscreen use, during a sun holiday with a very high ultraviolet index, allows vitamin D synthesis without sunburn. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181: 1052-62.
8. Forsea A, Popescu I, Turcu G, et al. Knowledge, behavior and attitudes related to skin cancer prevention among final year medical students. Eur J Dermatol 2012; 22: 790-2.
9. Urasaki MBM, Murad MM, Silva MT, et al. Exposure and sun protection practices of university students. Rev Bras Enferm 2016; 69: 114-21.
10. Baykal Selcuk L, Aksu Arica D, Ates E, et al. Sun-protective behaviours of Turkish young adults. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2019; 35: 178-86.
11. Laskowska M, Reich A. The assessment of students’ knowledge about the harmfulness of sun exposure and prophylactic measures. Forum Dermatologicum 2016; 2: 155-8.
12. Nanyes J, McGrath J, Krejci-Manwaring J. Medical students' perceptions of skin cancer: confusion and disregard for warnings and the need for new preventive strategies. Arch Dermatol 2012; 148: 392-3.
13. Scott AJ, Harris V, Lee A, Smith S. Assessment of sun-protective attitudes and behaviours of Australian medical students. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017; 31: 497-8.
14. Costa FB, Weber MB. Avaliação dos hábitos de exposição ao sol e de fotoproteção dos universitários da Região Metropolitana de Porto Alegre, RS. An Bras Dermatol 2004; 79: 149-55.
15. Isvy A, Beauchet A, Saiag P, Mahe E. Medical students and sun prevention: knowledge and behaviours in France. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013; 27: 247-51.
16. Ustawa z dnia 15 wrzeœnia 2017 r. o ochronie zdrowia przed nastêpstwami korzystania z solarium. Dziennik Ustaw 2017; poz. 2111: art. 5.
17. Dallazem LND, Benvegnú AM, Stramari, et al. Knowledge and habits of sun exposure in university students: a cross-sectional study in Southern Brazil. An Bras Dermatol 2019; 94: 172-81.
Copyright: © 2021 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2022 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.