eISSN: 2084-9869
ISSN: 1233-9687
Polish Journal of Pathology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
vol. 73
Original paper

The significance of StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 expression in breast cancer

Abdulfattah Fararjeh
Ezidin Kaddumi
Ali Al-Khader
Walid Aburayyan

Departament of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Science, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan
Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan
Pol J Pathol 2022; 73 (3): 215-222
Online publish date: 2023/01/10
Article file
- The significance.pdf  [0.45 MB]
Get citation
PlumX metrics:


The most frequent type of cancer in females is breast cancer (BC), which accounts for almost 25–30% of new cancer diagnoses among females worldwide [1]. Breast cancer is also the leading cause of cancer death in women aged 20–60. Breast cancer is divided into five molecular subgroups based on the 2015 St Gallen International expert consensus definition, each with distinct prognosis and treatment implications: luminal A [estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and/or progesterone (PgR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative]; luminal B – HER2-negative (ER-positive and/or PgR-positive, HER2-negative); luminal B-HER2-positive (ER- positive and/or PgR-positive, HER2-positive); HER2- enriched (ER-negative and PgR-negative, HER2- positive); and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ER-negative and PgR-negative and HER2-negative) [2, 3]. In around one-fifth of all breast tumors, overexpression of the receptor tyrosine kinase HER2 is induced by 17q12–q21 amplification [4]. Cancer progression and aggressive behavior have been linked to HER2-independent signaling pathways, which could explain why HER2-targeted therapy has failed in a large percentage of patients [5, 6].
StAR-related lipid transfer protein 3 (STARD3), also known as metastatic lymph node 64 (MLN64), is a member of the START domain protein family of lipid transfer proteins [7]. It is located in the q12–21 region of chromosome 17. There are two domains for STARD3: the MENTAL domain binds the protein in late endosomes, while the cytoplasmic START domain facilitates cholesterol transport [7–9]. As a result of this interaction, a membrane contact point between late endosomes and the ER is formed, allowing cholesterol to be transferred to late endosomes.
A recent study revealed that STARD3 may be a target for age-related macular degeneration as it enhances the elimination of intracellular cholesterol and slows the course of the disease [10]. StAR- related lipid transfer protein-3, like other STAR family members, may mediate cholesterol trafficking between late endosomes and other organelles such the endoplasmic reticulum or plasma membrane [11–13]. Overexpression of STARD3 has been shown to improve cholesterol production by boosting the expression of cholesterol synthesis enzymes [13].
StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 was shown to be highly expressed in HER2-positive breast carcinomas at the mRNA level in 14 out of 19 primary invasive BC cases [14]. Co-silencing of STARD3 with HER2 has been reported to have an additive effect on inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis [15]. Previous studies have examined the expression of STARD3 at the mRNA level in BC [13, 16]; STARD3 mRNA level was high in HER2-positive BC and low expression has been detected in ER-positive and TNBC. In BC, especially HER2-positive BC, increased STARD3 expression was associated with lower overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and disease metastasis-free survival (DMFS) [16]. In this study, we aimed to confirm the correlation of STARD3 expression at the protein level in BC, and correlate the expression with clinicopathological features of BC patients using tissue microarray.

Materials and methods

Reagents and tissue microarrays
We used two tissue microarrays (TMA) provided from, US-Biomax; BC081116d and BC081120f. Primary antibody against STARD3 was purchased from Abcam [anti-MLN64 antibody (ab3478)]. The Mouse and Rabbit Specific HRP/DAB immunohistochemistry (IHC) Detection Kit was purchased from Abcam (cat number: ab64261).
Case selection
The two TMAs contain 200 cases of invasive breast carcinomas and 20 normal breast epithelial tissues. There were 200 core biopsies from 200 patients and 20 cores from normal tissues. The core diameter was 1 mm and the thickness was 5 µm. There were no special types of invasive breast carcinoma. Specialized pathologists reevaluated the original hematoxylin and eosin slides and all of the special staining results. The clinicopathological medical records were collected: age, sex, tumor size, histological grade, pathological stage, lymph node status and BC molecular subtypes, based on the 2018 Tumor Node-Metastasis Staging System developed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer. As shown in Table I, tumor size (T) was classified into four categories according to the TNM grading system: T1 – size ≤ 2 cm (n = 15 cases), T2 – size > 2 cm but ≤ 5 cm (n = 137 cases), T3 – size > 5 (n = 23) and T4 – with skin involvement and inflammatory carcinoma (n = 25 cases). The lymph node status was determined using the following criteria: N0 – no regional lymph node metastasis (n = 135 cases), N1 – metastasis in 1–3 regional lymph nodes (n = 48 cases) and N2 – metastasis in 4–9 regional lymph nodes (n = 17 cases). There were no distant metastases in any of the cases. The tumor grade was classified into three groups: well-differentiated (n = 57), moderately differentiated (n = 133) and poorly differentiated (n = 7). Furthermore, the clinical stage system was classified as follows: Stage I (n = 15 cases), Stage II (n = 141 cases), Stage III (n = 44 cases).
Immunohistochemical staining and evaluation
To determine the clinical importance of STARD3 expression in BC, immunohistochemical staining for STARD3 was done on TMA BC tissues, which included a total of 220 cases. For antigen retrieval, the TMA slides were pretreated by heating at 95°C for 30 min in a citric acid retrieval buffer (pH = 6.0). Then, the sections were incubated with 3% H2O2  for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase. The slides were incubated with antibody raised against STARD3 (1 : 200 dilution) in a humidified chamber at 4°C overnight. The immunohistochemical staining was established according to the Mouse and Rabbit Specific HRP/DAB IHC Detection Kit. Specialized pathologists evaluated STARD3 immunostaining. Staining was evaluated based on the intensity and the percentage of positively stained tumor cells. If the cytoplasm and nuclei of the tumor cells were at least faintly stained with STARD3, the cells were classified as STARD3-positive. The H-score was calculated using the following equation: H-score = Pi (i + 1), where i is the intensity of the stained tumor cells (0–3+), and Pi is the percentage of stained tumor cells for each intensity [17]. The cutoff value was set as 6 out of 12, which was the mean of the H-score. Cases that exceeded H-score = 6 were considered as having high STARD3 expression. For a positive control we used adrenal gland tissues (pheochromocytoma) and IgG as a negative control.
Statistical analysis
SPSS version 18.0 was used to analyze the data (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way ANOVA and χ2 tests were used to analyze the association between STARD3 and BC clinicopathological parameters. Statistical significance was defined as * p < 0.05.


Patients’ characteristics
The clinicopathological characteristics of the 200 BC patients studied in this research are presented in Table I. In this study we used two microarrays, 200 invasive BC tissue cases, and 20 cores were normal breast tissues. About 129 of the patients were over 45 years old, whereas 91 were under 45 years old. At the time of diagnosis, three of the patients were under the age of 30. There were 58 HER2-positive cases and 142 HER2-negative cases, 116 ER-positive cases and 84 ER-negative cases, 46 TNBC cases and 154 non- TNBC cases. StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 positivity and clinicopathological features The breast cancer cases were evaluated according to expression of STARD3 (negative, weak 1+, moderate 2+ and strong 3+); representative images are shown in Figure 1. The patients were divided into two groups: high H-score STARD3 and low H-score (Fig. 2 A). One hundred fifty-two out of 220 (69.1%) cases were positive for STARD3 (high H-score) and 70 out of 220 (30.9%) cases had a low STARD3 H-score (Table II). The H-score for STARD3 ranged from 0 to 12 with an average of 8.9. The details of STARD3 H-score with clinicopathological parameters are shown in Table II.
StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 immunoexpression was found to be higher in tumor tissues (n = 200) with H-score = 10.4 than in normal tissues (n = 20) with H-score = 7.7; p-value = 0.043. StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 was associated with tumor grade; high STARD3 H-score tended to be more associated with moderately (99/155) to poorly differentiated (41/155) tumors in comparison to well-differentiated tumors. High SATDR3 H-score was more associated with patients older than 45 years (95/150) than patients under 45 years old. StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 was also found to be associated with larger tumor size (p < 0.001), advance tumor stage (p < 0.001), HER2-positive (p < 0.001), ER-positive (p < 0.001), and non-TNBC patients (p < 0.01). In ER-positive BC cases (n = 79; average H-score = 10.2), the STARD3 H-score was higher than in ER-negative BC cases (n = 62; average H-score = 9.2) with p-value = 0.009. Furthermore, the STARD3 H-score was higher in HER2-positive BC cases (n = 55; average H-score = 10.7) than in HER2-negative BC cases (n = 156; average H-score = 8.7), with a p-value of less than 0.001.
When STARD3 was present, the H-score tended to be moderate to strong. In 20 cases, STARD3 staining was patchy, with less than 50% of them being TNBC patients. When it came to HER2 and ER-positive cases, more than 50% of the staining was spotty. StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 protein expression has been detected in the cytoplasm and nuclear of the BC cells (Fig. 2 B).


According to a prior study on the chr17q copy number (CN) trends for HER2 and HER2-related genes. HER2 gene is localized at chr17q12, one of the adjacent genes to HER2 that shown high CN concurrently with HER2 is STARD3, which is located at ch17q21 [18]. The StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 and HER2 genes are located 30–40 kb apart on chromosome 17q11–12. There are several genes in this region. Coamplification of STARD3 with HER2 has been identified because of the strong interaction between these two genes. It is still unknown whether this amplification could lead to STARD3 overexpression and subsequently BC carcinogenesis. Few studies have been conducted to unveil the molecular role of STARD3 in HER2-positive BC.
Survival of HER2-amplified cells has been linked to STARD3. Indeed, RNA interference inhibits STARD3 expression solely in HER2-amplified cells, limiting cell proliferation [15]. A previous study demonstrated that epigenetic changes on the STARD3 gene such as DNA methylation did not play a role in the STARD3 overexpression in BC. However, promoter analysis of both STARD3 and HER2 genes has shown to share the SP1 transcription factor binding site [7]. As a result, they concluded that a member of the Sp/KLF family may mediate STARD3 and HER2 gene expression in cancers.
StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 has been linked to the development of a variety of malignancies, including colorectal, prostate and gastric cancers [19–22]. StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 was recently found to be overexpressed at the mRNA level in BC, notably in HER2-positive BC, and to be low in ER-positive and TNBC patients. In fact, roughly a quarter of all BC cases show co-overexpression of HER2 and STARD3, as we point above [23].
To confirm the association between STARD3 and BC molecular subtypes, we investigated the expression of STARD3 at the protein level in BC using IHC assay. We looked at STARD3 protein expression in 200 cases of BC, with 116 ER-positive, 58 HER-positive, and 46 TNBC cases. As we expected, STARD3 H-score was highly linked with HER2-positive and ER-positive, but not with TNBC. This is consistent with a previous study that reported increased STARD3 mRNA expression in the ER-positive cases, as demonstrated by the MCF7 cell line [24].
Patients with high STARD3 levels typically experienced poor clinical outcomes and had shorter OS, RFS, and DMFS compared to those with lower levels, based on previous research [21, 24]. In our study, we found a link between high STARD3 protein expression and tumor grade and tumor size, but not with clinical stage or node status, which is consistent with the role of STARD3 in tumor proliferation.
In contrast to our work, a recent large study examined STARD3 protein expression by IHC in over 2000 human BC cases from two complete Finish cohorts [13] using anti-STARD3 affinity-purified antibody. The results showed that just 10% of BC had strong STARD3 expression. STARD3 is hypothesized to be involved in BC carcinogenesis via cholesterol metabolism disruption and changing the makeup of lipids in cellular membranes. A previous study demonstrated that overexpression of STARD3 enhances cholesterol biosynthesis and increases the SRC kinase activity in BC cell lines. Thus, it may contribute to BC tumorigenesis by enhancing the signaling pathways [13].
Moreover, fusion genes between STARD3 and PPP1R1B have been detected in around 4 cases out of 18 primary gastric cancer tissues, which may play an important role in gastric cancer development through PI3K/AKT [22]. In BC, no research has been done to elucidate the chimeric fusion genes that comprise STARD3.
An intriguing result revealed that the lack of STARD3 expression in preadipocytes, as revealed by 3T3-L1 cell lines, resulted in decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production from mitochondria, as well as inhibiting adipocyte differentiation [25]. It is critical to elucidate how STARD3 affects ROS levels in BC and therefore affects BC development.
A few points need to be mentioned; firstly, it has been demonstrated that cases with ER positivity also exhibited high levels of STARD3 that were unrelated to HER2 amplicon overexpression. The molecular basis for the link between ER and STARD3 has not yet been fully elucidated. Second, according to Figure 2 B, STARD3 protein expression is primarily found in the cytoplasm and in the nuclei of some cells. To ascertain whether STARD3 has a role in the nucleus, more studies are required. Finally, additional research is required to compare STARD3 protein expression across cohort studies in various fields.
Additionally, we found some heterogeneity in normal tissues, with most having weak to moderate STARD3 levels and only a few having significant levels. It could be due to the tiny section size in compared to the whole section; this can be considered as a limitation of using tissue microarrays.


Our IHC investigation revealed that malignant BC tissues had higher levels of STARD3 immunoexpression than normal tissues. Poor prognostic variables such as tumor size and histological grade have been linked to high STARD3 H-score. StAR-related lipid transfer protein-3 has a strong correlation with HER2-positive BC, suggesting that it may serve as a marker for this type of cancer.


All authors listed above have contributed sufficiently to this work to take responsibility for the content, including participation in the data analysis, writing, or revision of the manuscript. This study was supported by a grant from Scientific Research Deanship and Innovation, Al-Balqa Applied University (2021/2020/2).
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209-249.
2. Masuda S. Breast cancer pathology: the impact of molecular taxonomy on morphological taxonomy. Pathol Int 2012; 62: 295-302.
3. Kakudji BK, Mwila PK, Burger JR, du Plessis JM, Naidu K. Breast cancer molecular subtypes and receptor status among women at Potchefstroom Hospital: a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J 2021; 38: 85.
4. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131: 18-43.
5. Junttila TT, Akita RW, Parsons K, et al. Ligand-independent HER2/HER3/PI3K complex is disrupted by trastuzumab and is effectively inhibited by the PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941. Cancer Cell 2009; 15: 429-440.
6. O’Brien NA, Browne BC, Chow L, et al. Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT signaling confers resistance to trastuzumab but not lapatinib. Mol Cancer Ther 2010; 9: 1489-1502.
7. Alpy F, Boulay A, Moog-Lutz C, et al. Metastatic lymph node 64 (MLN64), a gene overexpressed in breast cancers, is regulated by Sp/KLF transcription factors. Oncogene 2003; 22: 3770-3780.
8. Di Mattia T, Wilhelm LP, Ikhlef S, et al. Identification of MOSPD2, a novel scaffold for endoplasmic reticulum membrane contact sites. EMBO Rep 2018; 19: e45453.
9. Alpy F, Rousseau A, Schwab Y, et al. STARD3 or STARD3NL and VAP form a novel molecular tether between late endosomes and the ER. J Cell Sci 2013; 126: 5500-5512.
10. Almarhoun M, Biswas L, Alhasani RH, et al. Overexpression of STARD3 attenuates oxidized LDL-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in retinal pigment epithelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 2021; 1866: 158927.
11. Charman M, Kennedy BE, Osborne N, Karten B. MLN64 mediates egress of cholesterol from endosomes to mitochondria in the absence of functional Niemann-Pick Type C1 protein. J Lipid Res 2010; 51: 1023-1034.
12. Elustondo P, Martin LA, Karten B. Mitochondrial cholesterol import. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 2017; 1862: 90-101.
13. Vassilev B, Sihto H, Li S, et al. Elevated levels of StAR-related lipid transfer protein 3 alter cholesterol balance and adhesiveness of breast cancer cells: potential mechanisms contributing to progression of HER2-positive breast cancers. Am J Pathol 2015; 185: 987-1000.
14. Moog-Lutz C, Tomasetto C, Regnier CH, et al. MLN64 exhibits homology with the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (STAR) and is over-expressed in human breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1997; 71: 183-191.
15. Sahlberg KK, Hongisto V, Edgren H, et al. The HER2 amplicon includes several genes required for the growth and survival of HER2-positive breast cancer cells. Mol Oncol 2013; 7: 392-401.
16. Fararjeh A F S AKA, Kaddumi E, Obeidat M, AL-Fawares O. Differential expression and prognostic significance of STARD3 gene in breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2021; 10: 34-44.
17. Fararjeh AS, Chen LC, Ho YS, et al. Proteasome 26S Subunit, non-ATPase 3 (PSMD3) regulates breast cancer by stabilizing HER2 from degradation. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11: 527.
18. Kotoula V, Bobos M, Alexopoulou Z, et al. Adjusting breast cancer patient prognosis with non-HER2-gene patterns on chromosome 17. PLoS One 2014; 9: e103707.
19. Qiu Y, Zhang ZY, Du WD, et al. Association analysis of ERBB2 amplicon genetic polymorphisms and STARD3 expression with risk of gastric cancer in the Chinese population. Gene 2014; 535: 225-232.
20. Stigliano A, Gandini O, Cerquetti L, et al. Increased metastatic lymph node 64 and CYP17 expression are associated with high stage prostate cancer. J Endocrinol 2007; 194: 55-61.
21. Fararjeh AFS, Al Khader A, Kaddumi E, Obeidat M, Al-Fawares O. Differential expression and prognostic significance of STARD3 gene in breast carcinoma. Int J Mol Cell Med 2021; 10: 34-41.
22. Yun SM, Yoon K, Lee S, et al. PPP1R1B-STARD3 chimeric fusion transcript in human gastric cancer promotes tumorigenesis through activation of PI3K/AKT signaling. Oncogene 2014; 33: 5341-5347.
23. Dressman MA, Baras A, Malinowski R, et al. Gene expression profiling detects gene amplification and differentiates tumor types in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 2194-2199.
24. Cai W, Ye L, Sun J, Mansel RE, Jiang WG. Expression of MLN64 influences cellular matrix adhesion of breast cancer cells, the role for focal adhesion kinase. Int J Mol Med 2010; 25: 573-580.
25. Zhou X, Gao H, Guo Y, Chen Y, Ruan XZ. Knocking down Stard3 decreases adipogenesis with decreased mitochondrial ROS in 3T3-L1 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2018; 504: 387-392.
Copyright: © 2023 Polish Association of Pathologists and the Polish Branch of the International Academy of Pathology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2023 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.