eISSN: 2449-8580
ISSN: 1734-3402
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

 
3/2021
vol. 23
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in outpatient practice

Yavor Kornovski
1
,
Yonka Ivanova
1
,
Stoyan Kostov
2
,
Stanislav Slavchev
1
,
Angel Yordanov
3

1.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinic, Medical University – Varna, St. Anna University Hospital – Varna, Bulgaria
2.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinic, St. Anna University Hospital – Varna, Bulgaria
3.
Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Medical University Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2021; 23(3): 313–317
Online publish date: 2021/10/05
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 
1. Sehnal B, Driák D, Cibula D, et al. Tailoring surgical treatment of cervical precancerosis. J Ceska Gynekol 2014; 79(5): 372–377.
2. Sehnal B, Cibula D, Slama J. Factors influencing decisions about surgical treatment of cervical precancerous lesions. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 14(4): 441–451.
3. Aitken CA, Siebers AG, Matthijsse SM, et al. Management and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the Netherlands after referral for colposcopy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98(6): 737–746.
4. Grisot C, Mancini J, Giusiano S, et al. How to optimise excisional procedures for the treatment of CIN? The role of colposcopy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285(5): 1383–1390.
5. Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Schünemann HJ, et al. World Health Organization Guidelines for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2–3 and screen-and-treat strategies to prevent cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016; 132(3): 252–258.
6. Munmany M, Torné A, Nonell R, et al. Colposcopy evaluation at the time of loop electrosurgical excision procedure may avoid unnecessary treatment. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2018; 22(4): 367–374.
7. Volante R, Giubilato P, Ronco G. Quality of colposcopy and treatment – data from the national survey of Italian organised cervical screening programmes: 2006 activity. Epidemiol Prev 2009; 33(3 Suppl. 2): 75–82.
8. Boonstra H, Aalders JG, Koudstaal J, et al. Minimum extension and appropriate topographic position of tissue destruction for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75(2): 227–231.
9. Castle PE, Murokora D, Perez C, et al. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017; 138(Suppl. 1): 20–25, doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12191.
10. Javaheri G, Balin M, Meltzer RM. Role of cryosurgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 58(1): 83–87.
11. Favalli G, Lomini M, Schreiber C, et al. The use of carbon-dioxide laser surgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix. UA. Prz Lek 1999; 56(1): 58–64.
12. Vetrano G, Ciolli P, Carboni S, et al. Laser vaporisation in the management of CIN. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2010; 31(1): 83–86.
13. Williams OE, Bodha M, Alawattegama AB. Outcome of cold coagulation for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a department of genitourinary medicine. Genitourin Med 1993; 69(1): 63–65.
14. Kristensen GB Jensen LK, Hølund B. A randomised trial comparing two methods of cold knife conisation with laser conisation. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76(6): 1009–1013.
15. Naumann RW, Bell MC, Alvarez RD, et al. LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold-knife conisation. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 55(2): 224–228.
16. Kolben TM, Etzel LT, Bergauer F, et al. A randomised trial comparing limited-excision conisation to Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) in cervical dysplasia patients. J Gynecol Oncol 2019; 30(3): e42.
17. Preaubert L, Gondry J, Mancini J, et al. Benefits of direct colposcopic vision for optimal LLETZ procedure: a prospective multicenter study. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2016; 20(1): 15–21.
18. Berget A, Andreason B, Bock J, et al. Outpatient treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia: the CO2 laser versus cryotherapy: a randomised trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 531–536.
19. Berget A, Andreason B, Bock J. Laser and cryosurgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991; 70: 231––235.
20. Duggan B, Felix J, Muderspach L, et al. Cold-Knife conisation versus conisation by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomised, prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 276–282.
21. Giacalone PL, Laffargue F, Aligier N, et al. Randomised study comparing two techniques of conisation: cold knife versus loop excision. J Gynecol Oncol 1999; 75(3): 356–360.
22. Yap SJ, Nathan E, Farrell L. LLETZ make it simple: anxiety, pain and treatment outcomes with outpatient large loop excision of the transformation zone under local anaesthesia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 60(3): 438–443.
23. Borbolla Foster A, Symonds I. A comparative study of efficacy and outcomes of large loop excision of the transformation zone procedure performed under general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 52(2): 128–132.
Copyright: © 2021 Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2021 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe