eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Videoforum Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

vol. 14
Case report

A case of stapled resection of redundant diaphragm and early evisceration of gastrointestinal content

Pedram Talebian, Mohammad Kermansaravi, Abdolreza Pazouki, Ali Kabir

Videosurgery Miniinv 2019; 14 (1): 141-144
Online publish date: 2018/08/07
Article file
- a case of stapled.pdf  [0.17 MB]
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero


Diaphragm paralysis can involve one hemidiaphragm, which is known as unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, and both hemidiaphragms, which are known as bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis [1]. Unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis can be seen during head, neck, and cardiovascular operations due to phrenic nerve injury [2]. Thoracoabdominal trauma, sub-phrenic abscesses, atelectasis, and pleural infection are considered to be the causes of diaphragm paralysis when the phrenic nerve is not involved [3]. Unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis patients usually have no symptoms [1], but they may experience dyspnea on exertion [4].

While repairing diaphragm paralysis, there are surgical procedures including plication of the diaphragm, which have several open and minimally invasive approaches [5] as well as resection of the diaphragm [6].

We report the case of a 49-year-old man with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis who underwent laparoscopic resection using staplers. He then underwent thoracotomy by using mesh reinforcement due to the unsuccessful initial procedure.

Case report

A 49-year-old man, who had a long-term history of asthma and dyspnea, exhibited an elevated left hemidiaphragm on his chest radiograph and computed tomography (CT) scan. Diaphragm paralysis was diagnosed through a chest radiograph and a CT scan. The patient underwent a surgical resection of the diaphragm using laparoscopy. He was placed in the supine and reverse Trendelenburg position. The surgical operation was carried out under general anesthesia and one-lung ventilation. By perforating the left hemidiaphragm and developing pneumothorax by using an atraumatic single grasper, we pulled the middle segment of the diaphragm down into the abdomen. Then, we transversely resected the bulged portion of the diaphragm using a tri-stapler. The procedure was concluded by inserting the chest tube in the left thorax cavity and converting one-lung ventilation into two-lung ventilation (Photo 1).

Photo 1

Laparoscopic resection of redundant diaphragm: A – acheieving pneumothorax after one lung ventilation, B – stapling of rendundant diaphragm, C – final view after resection


The day after the surgical procedure, the patient had low O2 saturation, tachypnea, and dyspnea. His chest radiograph showed an opening of the diaphragm and the entry of the gut into the thorax. Then, we performed thoracotomy and reduced the herniated contents to the abdominal cavity and repaired the diaphragm with reinforcing mesh (Photo 2). The patient’s clinical status was thus improved.

Photo 2

Thoracotomy repair of diaphragm with reinforcing mesh: A – diaphragm repair, B – mesh placement


Timeline of intervention of outcome was presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Timeline of intervention of outcome



Surgical resection of the diaphragm, another intervention for repairing diaphragm paralysis, is revealed to clinically improve patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis [6]. Several studies have indicated that diaphragm plication, using various techniques [3, 79], improves symptoms and respiratory function. A recent report on a patient with diaphragmatic paralysis, who underwent laparoscopic diaphragmatic plication using intermittent sutures, reported an improvement in the patient’s clinical status [3]. A case series of three patients with hemidiaphragm paralysis, who were treated with laparoscopic plication using robotic assistance, reported the clinical improvement of the patients. They carried out plication with interrupted horizontal sutures [7]. Another case series of 21 adult patients with diaphragmatic hernias and eventration, who underwent laparoscopic repair, reported the successful management of the patients. Larger defects were repaired using both suturing and mesh reinforcement, and smaller defects were repaired using simple suturing alone [8]. Laparoscopic diaphragmatic plication, with thoracoscopic verification in patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis, has been described by Welvaart et al. Diaphragmatic plications were performed using running nonabsorbable sutures and simple plications were performed using full-thickness horizontal mattress sutures. A significant improvement of the preoperative symptoms of dyspnea and orthopnea was reported [9]. There is a report in which diaphragm plication is performed using staplers. Jin et al. revealed that thoracoscopic plication with knifeless endostaplers improved the pulmonary functions and the dyspnea of the patient, who experienced dyspnea on exertion and left diaphragm elevation [2].

A study of 36 patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis revealed that diaphragm resection improves the clinical status of patients [6]. This was not observed in the present report. Using staplers in the surgical resection of the diaphragm led to worsening of the patient’s clinical status and provided inappropriate safety, due to disruption of the stapled area of the diaphragm. We strongly recommend performing plication alone without resection or resection with mesh reinforcement to prevent disruption.


Based on our report, using staplers can result in failure of surgical resection of the diaphragm. We can conclude that any diaphragmatic resection without reconstruction is not safe and effective in diaphragmatic paralysis and is not a good alternative to plication. Using bladeless staplers or surgical threads, in order to decrease the injury of the diaphragm, and thoracoscopic or laparoscopic mesh reinforcement which provides more stability, are suggested to prevent diaphragmatic disruption.


We gratefully appreciate the patient and her family for their cooperation in this manuscript.

The patient signed an informed consent form letting us use his document information to write this case report.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.



McCool FD, Tzelepis GE , authors. Dysfunction of the diaphragm. N Engl J Med. 2012. 366:p. 932–42


Moon SW, Wang YP, Kim YW, et al. , authors. Thoracoscopic plication of diaphragmatic eventration using endostaplers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000. 70:p. 299–300


Reyna-Sepúlveda F, Vásquez-Fernández F, Rodríguez-Briseño Á, et al. , authors. Laparoscopic diaphragmatic plication for paralysis posterior to trauma. Case report. Med Univers. 2016. 18:p. 95–7


Versteegh MI, Braun J, Voigt PG, et al. , authors. Diaphragm plication in adult patients with diaphragm paralysis leads to long-term improvement of pulmonary function and level of dyspnea. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007. 32:p. 449–56


Groth SS, Andrade RS , authors. Diaphragm plication for eventration or paralysis: a review of the literature. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010. 89:p. S2146–50


Elefteriades J, Singh M, Tang P, et al. , authors. Unilateral diaphragm paralysis: etiology, impact, and natural history. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2008. 49:p. 289–95


Zwischenberger BA, Kister N, Zwischenberger JB, Martin JT , authors. Laparoscopic robot-assisted diaphragm plication. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016. 101:p. 369–71


Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Rajapandian S, et al. , authors. Laparoscopic repair of adult diaphragmatic hernias and eventration with primary sutured closure and prosthetic reinforcement: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2009. 23:p. 978–85


Welvaart WN, Ong KH, Paul MA, et al. , authors. Laparoscopic diaphragmatic plication in patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis with thoracoscopic verification. Open J Thorac Surg. 2012. 2:p. 25262

Copyright: © 2018 Fundacja Videochirurgii This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe