Advances in Interventional Cardiology
eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current Issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2025
vol. 21
 
Share:
Share:
Image in intervention

Atrial fibrillation following shockwave intravascular lithotripsy

Barbara Zdzierak
1, 2
,
Piotr Jarosz
1
,
Łukasz Rzeszutko
1, 2
,
Wojciech Zasada
1, 2, 3
,
Stanisław Bartuś
1, 2
,
Artur Dziewierz
1, 2

  1. Clinical Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland
  2. Second Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
  3. KCRI, Krakow, Poland
Adv Interv Cardiol 2025; 21, 2 (80): 274–277
Online publish date: 2025/05/30
Article file
Get citation
 
 

A 75-year-old woman was admitted to the cardiology department for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the right coronary artery (RCA). Five days prior, she had been diagnosed with unstable angina and underwent coronary angiography, which confirmed severe coronary stenosis within the RCA. PCI with rotational atherectomy was performed; however, underexpansion of the stent was observed (Figures 1 A, B). Her medical history included arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes mellitus. On admission, she was hemodynamically stable with sinus rhythm on electrocardiogram (Figure 2). She had neither a history of palpitations nor prior documentation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Transthoracic echocardiography revealed preserved left ventricular ejection fraction of 65% with segmental contractility disorders. A hybrid coating guidewire was advanced to the distal part of the RCA using a 6F JR4.0 guiding catheter. Pre-PCI optical coherence tomography (OCT) confirmed underexpansion of the stent with a minimum lumen area of 1.67 mm2 (Figure 3 A). Additionally, significant stenosis was observed in the proximal part of the RCA (Figure 3 B). Given the severe calcific nature of the RCA lesions, the decision was made to use coronary shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (S-IVL). Pre-dilation with a 3.5 × 12 mm non-compliant balloon to 20 atm (Figure 4) facilitated positioning of the S-IVL 2.5 × 12 mm balloon (Shockwave C2+, Shockwave Medical, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A total of 6 cycles of 10 pulses were delivered to the middle and proximal segments of the RCA. Subsequent inflations of a non-compliant balloon 4.0 × 20 mm to 20–26 atm were performed (Figure 5). A drug-eluting stent (4.0 × 18 mm) was implanted in the proximal RCA at 16 atm. The technique resulted in successful treatment of the coronary lesions (Figure 6), confirmed by OCT. A few hours later, the patient reported chest pain and dyspnea. An electrocardiogram revealed AF (Figure 7). Sinus rhythm was restored with amiodarone infusion. After modification of anticoagulant treatment, she was discharged home in good general condition.

Figure 1

A, B – Coronary angiogram showing underexpansion of the stent in the middle segment of the right coronary artery (RCA, arrows)

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/56175/PWKI-21-2-56175-g001_min.jpg
Figure 2

An electrocardiogram upon admission showing sinus rhythm

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/56175/PWKI-21-2-56175-g002_min.jpg
Figure 3

Optical coherence tomography showing underexpansion of the stent in the middle segment of the RCA (A) and narrowing in the proximal segment of the RCA (B)

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/56175/PWKI-21-2-56175-g003_min.jpg
Figure 4

Pre-dilation with a 3.5 × 12 mm compliant balloon within the underexpanded stent with a marked waist caused by a nondilatable calcific lesion (arrow)

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/56175/PWKI-21-2-56175-g004_min.jpg
Figure 5

Complete non-compliant balloon 4.0 × 20 mm opening within the RCA following shockwave intravascular lithotripsy application (arrow)

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/56175/PWKI-21-2-56175-g005_min.jpg
Figure 6

Final coronary angiogram showing successful treatment of the coronary lesions within the RCA

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/56175/PWKI-21-2-56175-g006_min.jpg
Figure 7

An electrocardiogram a few hours after the procedure showing atrial fibrillation

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/56175/PWKI-21-2-56175-g007_min.jpg

Coronary calcifications encountered during PCI increases the probability of unsuccessful procedures. Heavy calcification may lead to difficulty in catheter transition, problems with balloon dilatation, and suboptimal stent expansion. As a result, it may increase the risk of stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis. Recently, S-IVL has been used to help defragment calcium deposits in coronary arteries and facilitate PCI [1]. The lithotripsy device generates pulsatile mechanical energy that disrupts calcium at the target site, allowing optimal dilation of calcified coronary lesions [1]. However, this energy can trigger cardiac depolarization and arrhythmia [2], as demonstrated in patients undergoing lithotripsy for renal stones [3]. Arrhythmias caused by S-IVL are very rare, with only sporadic case reports confirming both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias during impulse delivery [2, 4, 5]. In our case, AF appeared several hours after the procedure, suggesting a different arrhythmia mechanism. The delayed AF could be attributed to ischemic damage during PCI or electrolyte disturbances. Nonetheless, physicians should be aware of the risk of cardiac arrhythmias when using S-IVL, including those that may present in a delayed fashion. However, the observed benefits of this technique appear to clearly outweigh these risks.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Dawood M, Elwany M, Abdelgawad H, et al. Coronary calcifications, the Achilles heel in coronary interventions. Adv Interv Cardiol 2024; 20: 1–17.

2 

Kechichian A, Allam C, Njeim M, et al. Atrial flutter following shockwave intravascular lithotripsy during percutaneous intervention of left anterior descending disease. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2022; 40S: 205–8.

3 

Kataoka H. Cardiac dysrhythmias related to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using a piezoelectric lithotriptor in patients with kidney stones. J Urol 1995; 153: 1390–4.

4 

Jakobsen L, Christiansen EH, Thim T. A case report of ventricular fibrillation following Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy during percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2024; 24: 219.

5 

Curtis E, Khan A, El-Jack S, Glenie T. Precipitation of de novo atrial fibrillation during Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy® after pacing capture during the treatment of proximal right coronary artery disease: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep 2019; 3: 1–4.

Copyright: © 2025 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.