eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Addendum Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
vol. 16
Case report

Bilateral Leydig cell tumor of the testis: a case report

Nurettin Sönmez
Özlem Ton
Serdar ArIsan
Fatih KIlInç
Kamile Eken
Soner Güney

Wspolczesna Onkol 2012; 16 (4): 356–359
Online publish date: 2012/09/29
Article file
- Bilateral Leydig.pdf  [1.23 MB]
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero


Leydig cell tumors are rare testicular tumors of the male gonadal interstitium. Although uncommon, Leydig cell testicular neoplasms are the most common sex cord-stromal tumors and comprise 1–3% of all testicular neoplasms [1]. The majority have been recognized in males between the ages of 20 and 60 years. However, approximately one fourth have been reported before puberty [2]. They are frequently hormonally active, leading to feminizing or virilizing syndromes. Approximately 10% of Leydig cell tumors are bilateral and 10% are malignant. The malignant variants occur only in adults and metastasis is the major criterion of malignancy [3]. Malignancy has not been reported in Leydig cell tumors in children. The etiology of Leydig cell tumors remains unknown. It is thought that an endocrine role may contribute to the development of these tumors. They have a tendency to cause endocrine manifestations, and testicular swelling, decreased libido (20%) and gynecomastia (15%) are common symptoms in adults [4, 5]. Leydig cell tumors were once managed primarily with radical orchiectomy [6–8]. However, testis sparing surgery has been used increasingly in both the adult and pediatric populations. Here we report a new case with bilateral testicular Leydig cell tumor in order to review the clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of this uncommon tumor.

Case report

A 30-year-old patient presented with a complaint of infertility since two years of marriage. Spermatogram showed oligoasthenoteratospermia. Physical examination of the external genitalia revealed atrophic left testis and no palpable tumor mass and a solid painless mass in the upper right testicular pole in the patient. Bilateral testicular tumor was shown by scrotal Doppler ultrasound examination, which originated from the bilateral mediastinum testis. There was no gynecomastia. Hormonal assay showed normal plasma levels of -fetoprotein (AFP), -human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), estradiol, prolactin, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and serum testosterone. Urinary 17-ketosteroids were not measured. Chest X ray and abdomen CT scan showed no evidence of metastatic spread. Sperm cryopreservation was done before the surgical procedure. The patient underwent bilateral radical orchiectomy; because both tumors originated from the mediastinum testis, testis sparing surgery was not performed. A frozen section during surgery from the bilateral testis was suggestive for Leydig cell tumor which was confirmed by histopathological examination showing bilateral Leydig cell tumor of the testis. The gross examination of the right testis showed a well-circumscribed, brown homogeneous solid mass with soft consistency measuring 2.5 cm in diameter. The microscopic examination revealed a nodular pattern of large polygonal cells with round nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm (Fig. 1). Necrosis was not seen. The mitotic count was very low. Tunica albuginea and spermatic cord involvement were not seen; however, rete testis involvement was identified (Fig. 2). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for inhibin-, melan-A and CD56, but negative for ACTH and p53 (Fig. 3).

The tumor in the left testis was 2.5 cm in diameter. Histopathological features of the left testicular tumor were similar to the tumor in the right testis. Microscopically similar histological features were seen in the left testicular mass.

There was no disease recurrence in follow-up for 9 months and the patient is currently disease-free and under androgen supplementation for androgen insufficiency.


The etiology of Leydig cell tumors remains unknown. Unlike germ cell testicular tumors, Leydig cell neoplasms are not associated with cryptorchidism. An endocrine function may contribute to the development of these tumors. For example, excessive stimulation of Leydig cells with luteinizing hormone due to a disorder of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis may induce their oncogenesis. Animal models have also demonstrated Leydig cell tumorigenesis following long-term estrogen administration. Although these tumors usually secrete testosterone, the production of estrogen, progesterone, and corticosteroids has also been shown. Estrogen excess and feminizing syndromes may occur from the peripheral aromatization of testosterone or from the direct production of oestradiol by the tumor itself. In 20% of the cases, increased oestradiol and decreased testosterone levels result in feminization in the adult and masculinization in the child. The endocrinological manifestations may precede the palpable testicular mass, which is the most common presenting feature. Suardi et al. presented the largest case study of Leydig cell tumor and 32% of the patients referred for a testicular mass, 8% for gynaecomastia, 8% for testicular pain, 11% for infertility and 5% for isosexual pseudo-puberty [8]. Carmignani et al. presented 24 cases with one bilateral tumor. Testicular tumor markers (-HCG, LDH, AFP) were negative in all patients and one patient with gynecomastia showed high preoperative testosterone levels [9].

In our case no hormonal abnormality was present, serum tumor markers were in the normal range, and palpable testicular mass was the only manifestation of the tumor. In pure Leydig cell tumors, levels of serum tumor markers such as serum  fetoprotein (AFP),  human chorionic gonadotropin (-HCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) must be within the reference range.

The presenting features are enlarged testis, gynecomastia and sexual dysfunction. But in most cases, patients present with an incidental finding of a testicular mass on scrotal ultrasonography during evaluation of hydroceles or varicoceles or during diagnostic workup for infertility, as in our case. Giannarini et al. in a series with 17 patients with no bilateral lesions found that 5 patients (29.4%) presented with primary infertility, 4 (23.5%) with gynecomastia and 2 (11.8%) after selfpalpation of a scrotal mass. In the remaining 6 patients (35.3%) the tumor was incidentally discovered during scrotal ultrasound. A total of 14 tumors (82.4%) were nonpalpable [10]. Prepubertal boys with androgen-secreting tumors may present with signs of precocious puberty. Boys with estrogen-secreting tumors may present with feminizing symptoms such as gynecomastia or breast tenderness. Adults with androgen-secreting tumors are generally asymptomatic. But in adults with estrogen-secreting tumors, loss of libido, erectile dysfunction, and infertility have been observed.

Scrotal ultrasonography is performed to confirm the diagnosis and most of the tumors are hypoechoic and show hypervascularization [9, 10]. MRI may be an alternative diagnostic tool for small nonpalpable Leydig cell tumors not otherwise visible on sonograms. If malignancy is suspected CT scanning of the abdomen and chest radiography are indicated. Bilateral testicular tumor was detected by scrotal Doppler ultrasound in our case.

As in all intrascrotal tumors, the final diagnosis is based on the histopathological findings after removal of the tumor. Macroscopically, Leydig cell tumors present as well-circumscribed, yellow to brown masses within the testicle. Microscopically, these tumors are composed of large, closely packed cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, bland nuclei, and small nucleoli. Reinke crystals are pale staining, cylindrical, rectangular, or rhomboid inclusions that are pathognomonic for Leydig cell tumors and are found in up to 30% of patients with such tumors. All definitive diagnoses interpreted the neoplasia as benign LCT using the criteria originally proposed by Kim et al., which included dimensions (maximum neoplasia diameter), the presence of infiltrating margins and extratesticular extension, atypias, the presence of necrosis and of angioinvasion, and high mitotic index [11].

Leydig cell tumors have been primarily managed with radical inguinal orchiectomy [6, 9, 12]. However, conservative management with testis sparing surgery in younger adults and children were reported in the literature [8, 10]. Inguinal orchiectomy should be performed with early control of the spermatic cord and without violation of the scrotal skin. Testis sparing surgery with enucleation of the mass has been reported in children and younger adults in order to maintain fertility [13–15]. Bilateral radical orchiectomy was performed in our case; because both tumors originated from the mediastinum testis, testis sparing surgery could not be performed.

Chemotherapy with the bleomycin-etoposide-platinum regimen used for germ cell malignancies has limited efficacy in managing malignant Leydig cell tumors. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib has shown some chemotherapeutic activity in animal models, although this was not demonstrated in human trials [16]. No known role exists for radiation therapy in malignant Leydig cell tumors.

Observation is sufficient in patients in whom a benign Leydig cell tumor is treated with radical inguinal orchiectomy. Patients with malignant tumors require regular follow-up imaging, including CT scanning of the chest and abdomen [9]. Metastases most frequently involve the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Other reported metastatic sites include the liver (45%), lungs (40%), and bone (25%) [17]. In the review of the literature, there is no proven treatment of choice in case of progressive disease making any one superior to the others (surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) [17]. On the other hand, when there are no metastases and there is no evidence of malignancy, a regular follow-up is preferred by clinical examination, CT scan or ultrasound of the abdomen and by measuring the testosterone and estradiol levels because of the risk of metastases many years after orchiectomy even in a histologically bland tumor [9].

Late onset of metastasis, up to 8 years after orchiectomy, has been reported, which supports the recommendation of long-term tumor surveillance for 10-15 years after surgery [12].

The prognosis for benign Leydig cell tumors is excellent. The mean survival in patients with a malignant variant is

2–3 years [2, 3, 18].


 1. Walsh PC. Campbell’s Urology. Saunders 2007; 925-7.

 2. Rosai J. Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology. Mosby, Edinburgh 2004; 1436-7.

 3. Mahon FB Jr, Gosset F, Trinity RG, Madsen PO. Malignant interstitial cell testicular tumor. Cancer 1973; 31: 1208-12.

 4. Özyavuz R, Özen HA, Gedikoglu G, Ozgü HI, Sahin A, Tekgül S, Remzi O. Leydig Cell Tumour of testis: Presentation of two cases. Intern Urol et Nephrol 1993; 25: 385-8.

 5. Gana BM, Windsor PM, Lang S, Macintyre J, Baxby K. Case report, Leydig cell tumour. Br J Urol 1995; 75: 676-8.

 6. Mati W, Lam G, Dahl C, Thorup Andersen J, Balslev E. Leydig cell tumour – A rare testicular tumour. Int Urol Nephrol 2002; 33: 103-5.

 7. Ilkhanizadeh B, Taghizadieh M, Mahzad-Sadaghiani M, Noroozinia F, Jahandideh B. Bilateral Leydig cell tumor and male infertility: A case report. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2005; 3: 47-9.

 8. Suardi N, Strada E, Colombo R, Freschi M, Salonia A, Lania C. Leydig cell tumour of the testis: presentation,therapy, long-term follow-up and the role of organ-sparing surgery in a single-institution experience. BJU Int 2009; 103: 197-200.

 9. Carmignani L, Salvioni R, Gadda F, et al. Long-term followup and clinical characteristics of testicular Leydig cell tumor: experience with 24 cases. J Urol 2006; 176: 2040-3.

10. Giannarini G, Mogorovich A, Fabris FM, et al. Long-term followup after elective testis sparing surgery for Leydig cell tumors: a single center experience. J Urol 2007; 178 (3 Pt 1): 872-6.

11. Kim I, Young RH, Scully RE. Leydig cell tumors of the testis. A clinicopathological analysis of 40 cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 1985; 9: 177-92.

12. Bertram KA, Bratloff B, Hodges GF, Davidson H. Treatment of malignant Leydig cell tumour. Cancer 1991; 68: 2324-9.

13. Konrad D, Schoenle EJ. Ten-year follow-up in a boy with Leydig cell tumor after selective surgery. Horm Res 1999; 51: 96-100.

14. Di Tonno F, Tavolini IM, Belmonte P, et al. Lessons from 52 patients with leydig cell tumor of the testis: the GUONE (North-Eastern Uro-Oncological Group, Italy) experience. Urol Int 2009; 2: 152-7.

15. Valla JS. Testis sparing surgery for beningn testicular tumors in children. J Urol 2001; 165: 2280-3.

16. Millar AW, Lynch KP. Rethinking clinical trials for cytostatic drugs. Nat Rev Cancer 2003; 3: 540-5.

17. Bertram KA, Bratloff B, Hodges GF, Davidson H. Treatment of malignant Leydig cell tumour. Cancer 1991; 68; 2324-9.

18. Fletcher C. Diagnostic histopathology of tumors. Churchill Livingstone, London 2002; 802-3.

Address for correspondence

Nurettin Sönmez

Sisli Etfal Research and Training Hospital

Istambul, Turkey

e-mail: urologturk@yahoo.com

Submitted: 25.05.2011

Accepted: 23.01.2012
Copyright: © 2012 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe