Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
eISSN: 2449-8238
ISSN: 2392-1099
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Ethical standards and procedures Instructions for authors Publication charge
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2026
vol. 12
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Campesterol induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation in HepG2 liver cancer cells

Awais Altaf
1
,
Tahir Maqbool
1
,
Amber Hassan
2
,
Gul E. Nasreen
3
,
Mah G. Summan
4
,
Aisha Tahir
5
,
Urooj Iqbal
6
,
Dahlia S. Mirdad
7
,
Ebtihal Alharbi
8
,
Hussain Noorwali
9
,
Ali A. Mousa
10
,
Zayd Jastaniah
11
,
Nazia Koser
12

  1. Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  2. European School of Molecular Medicine (SEMM), University of Milan, Italy
  3. Abwa Medical College, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  4. WMO ENT Department, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  5. Department of Biochemistry, University of Health Sciences Lahore, Pakistan
  6. Specialized Healthcare and Medical Education Department Lahore Punjab, Pakistan
  7. Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  8. Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia
  9. Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Division of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  10. Department of Anatomy, Collage of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka, Jouf, Saudi Arabia
  11. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia
  12. Department of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
Clin Exp HEPATOL 2026; 12, 1: 49–54
Online publish date: 2026/01/22
Article file
- Campesterol.pdf  [0.10 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction


Primary liver cancer remains a major global health challenge, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for the majority of cases and ranking among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide [1]. Incidence and outcomes vary substantially across regions, reflecting differences in the distribution of risk factors as well as disparities in surveillance and access to treatment. Most cases are diagnosed in Asia, typically between 30 and 60 years of age, with male predominance. Despite improvements in prevention and therapy, the overall 5-year survival remains below 20%, underscoring the urgent need for more effective interventions [2, 3].
HCC develops through a complex interplay of non-infectious and infectious factors. Non-infectious drivers include cirrhosis, chronic alcohol intake, tobacco smoking, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Among infectious causes, persistent infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or HBV-hepatitis D virus (HDV) co-infection represents a major etiological contributor [4]. In Asia, an epidemiological shift has been noted from viral hepatitis-driven HCC to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its progressive form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Cirrhosis, whether viral or metabolic in origin, remains one of the strongest risk factors for malignant transformation; however, HCC can also arise in NAFLD without cirrhosis. Notably, the coexistence of HBV infection and fatty liver in Asian populations accelerates fibrosis progression and HCC development [5].
Additional exposures further influence disease burden. In Africa and Southeast Asia, the dietary ingestion of aflatoxin B1, produced by Aspergillus species, synergistically enhances the risk of HCC in individuals with HBV infection. The recently defined entity metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) also contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis by promoting fat accumulation, inflammation, and immune dysregulation within the hepatic microenvironment. While early-stage tumours are potentially curable, most cases are diagnosed late; hence, risk-based surveillance remains a cornerstone of improving survival [6].
Parallel to advances in systemic therapies, there is increasing interest in natural compounds with anticancer properties. Campesterol, a dietary phytosterol abundant in nuts, seeds, cereals, and vegetable oils, is synthesised via the mevalonate pathway and shares structural similarity with cholesterol. Traditionally recognised for its cholesterol-lowering, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial effects, campesterol has recently been implicated in cancer prevention. Experimental studies suggest that it exerts anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects by modulating oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activity, and apoptotic pathways [7].
Based on this background, we hypothesised that campesterol would decrease viability and promote apoptosis in HepG2 liver cancer cells. The present study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the effect of campesterol on cell proliferation, viability, and apoptosis in vitro, while also defining its dose-response relationship.

Material and methods

Cell culture


The human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2 was obtained from the cell culture facility at the University of Lahore. Cells were preserved in liquid nitrogen until required. For recovery, cryovials were thawed rapidly at 37°C and transferred into culture flasks containing Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1× penicillin-streptomycin. Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Subculturing was performed at 70-80% confluence using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA, as previously described [8].

Preparation of campesterol


Campesterol was obtained from the Department of Pharmacy at the University of Lahore. Stock solutions were prepared in culture medium and diluted to final concentrations of 10, 50, 100, and 200 µg/ml for use in the experiment.

Growth medium preparation and MTT assay


DMEM was supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1× penicillin-streptomycin solution. The complete medium was sterilised by filtration through a 0.2 µm membrane filter and stored at 4°C until use. Cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay [9]. Briefly, HepG2 cells were seeded into 96-well plates and treated with campesterol (10, 50, 100, and 200 µg/ml) for 24 h. After treatment, wells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with 100 µl of serum-free medium containing 25 µl of MTT solution (0.5 mg/ml) for 3 hours at 37°C. Formazan crystals were solubilised with 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), and absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader. Viability was calculated relative to untreated controls.

Crystal violet staining assay


Cell viability was also evaluated using crystal violet staining. HepG2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with campesterol as above. Following treatment, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 2% ethanol, and stained with a 0.1% crystal violet solution for 15 minutes at room temperature. Wells were washed thoroughly to remove excess dye, and the bound stain was solubilised with 100 µl of 1% SDS for 5-10 min. Absorbance was recorded at 540 or 595 nm using a microplate reader.

Statistical analysis


All experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times independently. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical comparisons between groups were carried out using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test to identify pairwise differences. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (version X.X, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Effect of campesterol on HepG2 cell viability (MTT assay)


The effect of campesterol on HepG2 cell viability was evaluated using the MTT assay after 24 h of treatment. Cells were exposed to increasing concentrations (10, 50, 100, and 200 µg/ml). Campesterol did not significantly alter viability at lower concentrations (10-100 µg/ml). However, a marked reduction in cell viability was observed at 200 µg/ml compared with untreated controls (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test) (Fig. 1).

Effect of campesterol on adherent cell biomass (crystal violet assay)


To further confirm the effect of campesterol on cell viability, crystal violet staining was performed. Similar to MTT results, HepG2 cells treated with campesterol at 200 µg/ml showed significantly reduced staining intensity compared with untreated controls, indicating a reduction in adherent viable cells. No significant differences were detected at lower concentrations (10-100 µg/ml) (Fig. 2).

Effect of campesterol on cell death (trypan blue assay)


Cell death was further quantified using trypan blue exclusion. Exposure of HepG2 cells to campesterol for 24 h induced a concentration-dependent increase in the proportion of non-viable cells. The most pronounced effect was observed at 200 µg/ml, where the percentage of dead cells was significantly higher than in controls (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3).

Discussion


Liver cancer remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with HCC representing 75-85% of cases and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma comprising the majority of the remainder [10, 11]. Despite preventive strategies and therapeutic advances, the global incidence of HCC continues to rise, and prognosis remains poor. This underscores the need for alternative or adjunctive therapeutic approaches, including the exploration of natural bioactive compounds with anticancer potential [12-14]. Over the past decades, natural products have emerged as a rich source of anticancer agents. Many plant-derived compounds exert cytotoxic effects by modulating key signalling pathways involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis [15, 16]. Among these, phytosterols have garnered increasing attention due to their favourable safety profile and broad range of biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, cholesterol-lowering, and anticancer effects [17-20].
In this study, campesterol, a dietary phytosterol, was found to reduce viability and promote apoptosis in HepG2 liver cancer cells. Across three complementary assays – MTT, crystal violet, and trypan blue – campesterol consistently decreased proliferation and increased cell death at higher concentrations (200 µg/ml) [21, 22]. These findings are in agreement with previous studies, which have shown that sterol derivatives, such as 7-ketositosterol and β-sitosterol [23], suppress proliferation and induce apoptosis in liver, breast, and ovarian cancer cells through mechanisms involving p53 signalling [24], mitochondrial dysfunction, and endoplasmic reticulum stress [25, 26].
Apoptosis is a central target in anticancer drug development, as tumour cells often acquire the ability to evade programmed cell death. Our results suggest that campesterol triggers apoptotic pathways in HepG2 cells, as evidenced by reduced viability and increased non-viable cell fractions. Although our assays confirmed cytotoxicity, further mechanistic studies, such as Annexin V/PI staining, caspase-3/7 activation, PARP cleavage, and mitochondrial membrane potential assays, are necessary to establish the molecular events underlying campesterol-induced apoptosis conclusively.
An essential strength of this study is the use of multiple viability assays to validate the cytotoxic effect of campesterol. However, there are limitations. First, only one liver cancer cell line (HepG2) was tested; additional HCC models are required to assess generalizability. Second, mechanistic apoptosis assays were not performed, which limited our ability to pinpoint the precise signalling pathways involved. Finally, this was an in vitro study; in vivo validation and pharmacokinetic profiling are essential before clinical translation can be considered.
Despite these limitations, our findings support the growing evidence that dietary phytosterols possess anticancer potential. Campesterol, in particular, may represent a promising low-toxicity adjunct for liver cancer management. Future studies should expand to multiple liver cancer models, explore synergistic interactions with established agents such as sorafenib or lenvatinib, and investigate the translational potential of phytosterols in vivo.

Conclusions


This study demonstrates that campesterol, a dietary phytosterol, reduces cell viability and promotes apoptosis in HepG2 liver cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner. By integrating complementary viability assays, our findings provide preliminary evidence for the anticancer potential of campesterol. While the precise molecular mechanisms remain to be elucidated, these results highlight phytosterols as promising candidates for low-toxicity adjuncts in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Future studies should extend to additional liver cancer models, incorporate mechanistic apoptosis assays, and evaluate in vivo efficacy to determine the translational applicability of campesterol in cancer management.

Disclosures


This research received no external funding.
This study was approved by the biomedical ethical committee (Ref-IMBB-BBBC-24-00-C). The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided informed consent.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74: 229-263.
2. Starnawski P, Nowak K, Augustyn Z, et al. Role of hepatotropic viruses in promoting hepatocellular carcinoma – current knowledge and recent advances. Med Oncol 2025; 42: 111.
3. Sabir K, Sajid J, Butt NI, et al. Clinical profile and outcome of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] taking sorafenib or lenvatinib: Real-world experience from a low-middle resource country. Cureus 2025; 17: e83681.
4. Ioannou GN. Epidemiology and risk-stratification of NAFLD-associated HCC. J Hepatol 2021; 75: 1476-1484.
5. Yip TCF, Lee HW, Chan WK, et al. Asian perspective on NAFLD-associated HCC. J Hepatol 2022; 76: 726-734.
6. Park S, Davis AM, Pillai AA. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA 2024; 332: 1013-1014.
7. Akkol E, Acıkara O. Phytosterols in the treatment of gastrointestinal tract cancers. in: phytonutrients in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer [Internet]. Bentham Science Publishers 2023 (cited 2025 Aug 11); 231-262. Available from: https://www.benthamdirect.com/content/books/9789815049633.chap10
8. Maqbool T, Awan SJ, Malik S, et al. In-vitro anti-proliferative, apoptotic and antioxidative activities of medicinal herb kalonji [Nigella sativa]. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2019; 20: 1288-1308.
9. Pintor AVB, Queiroz LD, Barcelos R, et al. MTT versus other cell viability assays to evaluate the biocompatibility of root canal filling materials: a systematic review. Int Endod J 2020; 53: 1348-1373.
10. Banik D, Patra P. Possibility of liver cancer treatment by nanoformulation of phenolic phytochemicals. Curr Nanomedicine 2022; 12: 108-125.
11. Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018; 69: 182-236.
12. Kendall T, Verheij J, Gaudio E, et al. Anatomical, histomorphological and molecular classification of cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int 2019; 39: 7-18.
13. Gaballah HH, Gaber RA, Mohamed DA. Apigenin potentiates the antitumor activity of 5-FU on solid Ehrlich carcinoma: Crosstalk between apoptotic and JNK-mediated autophagic cell death platforms. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2017; 316: 27-35.
14. Chen H, Guan Q, Guo H, et al. The genetic changes of hepatoblastoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 690641.
15. Mandlik DS, Mandlik SK. Herbal and natural dietary products: Upcoming therapeutic approach for prevention and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nutr Cancer 2021; 73: 2130-2154.
16. Wu J, Li Y, He Q, Yang X. Exploration of the use of natural compounds in combination with chemotherapy drugs for tumour treatment. Molecules 2023; 28: 1022.
17. Kumar N, Singh H, Sharma SK. Antioxidants: responses and importance in plant defence system. In: Roychowdhury R, Choudhury S, Hasanuzzaman M, Srivastava S (Eds.). Sustainable agriculture in the era of climate change [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020 (cited 2025 Aug 12); 251-264. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45669-6_11
18. Jampilek J, Kralova K. Anticancer applications of essential oils formulated into lipid-based delivery nanosystems. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14: 2681.
19. Ali SS, Al-Tohamy R, Al-Zahrani M, et al. Essential oils and plant-derived bioactive compounds: a comprehensive review of their therapeutic potential, mechanisms of action, and advances in extraction technologies. Phytochem Rev [Internet] 2025 (cited 2025 Aug 12). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-025-10123-8
20. Bae H, Park S, Yang C, et al. Disruption of endoplasmic reticulum and ROS production in human ovarian cancer by campesterol. Antioxidants 2021; 10: 379.
21. Silva BIM, Nascimento EA, Silva CJ, et al. Anticancer activity of monoterpenes: a systematic review. Mol Biol Rep 2021; 48: 5775-5785.
22. Uttu AJ, Sallau MS, Ibrahim H, Iyun ORA. Isolation, characterisation, and docking studies of campesterol and β-sitosterol from Strychnos innocua [Delile] root bark. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2023; 18: 566-578.
23. Rajabi S, Maresca M, Yumashev AV, et al. The most competent plant-derived natural products for targeting apoptosis in cancer therapy. Biomolecules 2021; 11: 534.
24. Laka K, Makgoo L, Mbita Z. Cholesterol-lowering phytochemicals: targeting the mevalonate pathway for anticancer interventions. Front Genet 2022; 13: 841639.
25. Barut Z, Aslan M, Çırçırlı B, et al. Antiproliferative effect of 7-ketositosterol in breast and liver cancer cells: possible impact on ceramide, extracellular signal-regulated kinases, and nuclear factor kappa B signalling pathways. Pharmaceuticals 2024; 17: 860.
26. Bae H, Park S, Ham J, et al. ER-mitochondria calcium flux by β-sitosterol promotes cell death in ovarian cancer. Antioxidants 2021; 10: 1583.
Copyright: © Clinical and Experimental Hepatology. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Quick links
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.