
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
2/2025
vol. 78 Original paper
Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of oral squamous cell carcinoma in histopathological images: a comprehensive evaluation and performance analysis
Gürkan Ünsal
1
,
Selim Sevim
2
,
Nurullah Akkaya
3
,
Volkan Aktaş
3
,
İlknur Özcan
4
,
Revan Birke Koca Ünsal
1
,
Kaan Orhan
5
,
Deepika Mishra
6
,
Mohmed Isaqali Karobari
7
,
Akhilanand Chaurasia
8
J Stoma 2025; 78, 2: 127-131
Online publish date: 2025/05/20
Article file
- JOS-01131-Deep (1).pdf
[0.48 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
INTRODUCTIONCancer remains a major cause of mortality globally. According to the World Health Organization, oral cancer poses a serious public health challenge, responsible for over 300,000 deaths each year [1]. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common type of oral cancer, which originates in the cells lining the mouth and throat, with a mortality rate exceeding 50% [1-4]. Timely detection and precise diagnosis are vital for enhancing patient survival rates, but identifying OSCC in histopathological images can be challenging, even for experienced pathologists [5-8]. Histopathological examination of tissue samples is considered the definitive method for cancer diagnosis. However, manual evaluation conducted by pathologists can be labor-intensive, subjective, and susceptible to variations between different observers [9-12]. As a result, there is a pressing demand for automated tools to support pathologists in achieving accurate and efficient cancer diagnoses [13].Recently, deep learning (DL) algorithms showed considerable promise in automating the detection and segmentation of cancer cells in histopathological images. These algorithms employed advanced neural networks to recognize patterns within the data and generate predictions accordingly. When trained on extensive datasets of labelled images, they can accurately and rapidly identify and categorize cancer cells [14-16]. One area of focus for DL algorithms in cancer diagnosis is OSCC. By automatically segmenting OSCC cells in histopathological images, DL algorithms can assist pathologists in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and formulating more effective treatment strategies. However, developing a DL algorithm for OSCC segmentation presents unique challenges. OSCC cells can appear in a variety of shapes and sizes, and may be surrounded by non-cancerous cells that share similar visual characteristics. Additionally, variations in image quality and staining techniques can introduce noise and other artifacts, which can interfere with the algorithm’s ability to accurately identify OSCC cells. Despite these challenges, researchers have made significant progress in developing deep learning algorithms for OSCC segmentation. By incorporating advanced techniques, such as transfer learning, data augmentation, and adversarial training, these algorithms achieved progressive results in OSCC detection and segmentation [11, 12, 17-20]. In this study, we explored the development and performance of our DL algorithm specifically designed for OSCC segmentation in histopathological images. Various techniques and approaches used by the researchers to overcome the challenges posed by OSCC segmentation were examined, and the potential implications of this technology for cancer diagnosis and treatment were discussed. OBJECTIVESThis study aimed to develop and evaluate a DL algorithm for segmentation of OSCC in histopathological images.MATERIAL AND METHODSThis study developed a DL algorithm for the semantic segmentation of OSCC in histopathological images. The method involves several key steps, including data preparation with specified splits for training, validation, and test sets as well as application of augmentation techniques to improve the model’s resilience, and a tailored machine-learning pipeline for precise segmentation. Performance metrics, such as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over union (IoU), precision, and recall, were employed for the evaluation of segmentation accuracy (Figures 1 and 2).Model pipelineThe workflow adopted in this research is described as follows: 1) pre-processing and augmenting the dataset; 2) semantically segmenting each pixel within the images; 3) precisely delineating the classified regions.Pre-processing During pre-processing, the dataset was randomly divided into training (85%), validation (10%), and testing (5%) sub-sets. To enhance the dataset and strengthen the model’s generalization across different data scenarios, augmentation techniques, such as horizontal and vertical flipping, were applied to each image with a 50% probability. Semantic segmentation The machine learning task at hand is semantic segmentation, targeting precise categorization of each pixel as either carcinoma or non-carcinoma tissue. To address this challenge, U^2-Net architecture was implemented. U^2-Net incorporates both contraction and expansion paths, capturing detailed features and context, which are instrumental in executing the pixel-wise segmentation. This model captures multi-scale features, and was proven effective in dense prediction tasks. Implementation An advanced DL model, U^2-Net, was employed in this study. Training of the model utilized a batch size of 4, with images of dimensions 512 × 1,024 pixels and containing three color channels. The network optimization was carried out using the Adam optimizer, with an initial learning rate set at 0.0002. L2 regularization was applied with a weight decay set at 0.001. The segmentation process capitalized on a loss function, specifically the sparse categorical cross-entropy. The training spanned over 250 epochs to fine-tune the network parameters for reliable predictions. Statistical analysisThe research harnessed an array of quantitative measures to objectively assess the segmentation’s performance. Metrics, such as DSC, IoU, precision, and recall, provided a multidimensional perspective on effectiveness of the model. Specifically, these metrics determined the extent of agreement between the segmented regions by the algorithm and the expert annotations considered as the gold standard.RESULTSIn the current comprehensive evaluation of the DL-based algorithm for OSCC segmentation in histopathological images, multiple metrics were employed to assess accuracy, robustness, and generalization capabilities. The accuracy metric revealed that the algorithm correctly classified 95.3% of OSCC pixels out of the total pixels in the images. Furthermore, DSC, measuring the overlap between the predicted OSCC regions and ground truth annotations, achieved a high value of 0.947, demonstrating the algorithm’s precise delineation of OSCC regions. IOU, indicating an overlap between the predicted and ground truth regions, reached a strong segmentation accuracy of 0.902.The algorithm’s robust generalization to new, unseen data was evident in the maximum DSC validation of 0.862 and the maximum IoU validation of 0.77. Specifically calculated on the test dataset, the Dice coefficient was 0.865, emphasizing the algorithm’s strong performance in accurately segmenting OSCC regions in previously unseen data. The F1 score on the test dataset was 0.889, providing a balanced measure of precision and recall in OSCC segmentation, while the intersection over union on the test dataset was 0.781. Test precision and recall were notably high at 0.889 and 0.893, respectively, further confirming the algorithm’s capability to identify OSCC regions with precision. In the validation phase, the proportion of correctly identified OSCC pixels reached 85.4%, as indicated by the validation accuracy metric. The Dice coefficient validation was 0.843, underscoring the algorithm’s accurate segmentation performance, while the intersection over union on the validation dataset was 0.741, demonstrating strong segmentation accuracy. DISCUSSIONThe utilization of artificial intelligence and DL algorithms in the field of medical pathology demonstrated promising results in assisting pathologists in various organs and different ways. AI and DL algorithms were employed in tasks, such as counting mitosis and Ki67 in tumors, assessing tumor metastasis in lymph nodes, and calculating the percentage of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. These algorithms, including the LYNA algorithm evaluated by Yang et al. [21], showed exceptional accuracy, as indicated by area under the curve values close to 100%, signifying their potential to enhance diagnostic precision [22]. Furthermore, AI algorithms were instrumental in predicting mutation profiles from histopathological images, contributing significantly to understanding tumor sub-types and molecular characteristics. A study by Wang et al. [23] used data from the Cancer Genome Atlas and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium databases to train and validate AI models, and reported promising performance in identifying genetic mutations associated with various cancers. Moreover, Elmakaty et al. [24] conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the precision of AI-assisted detection of OSCC, highlighting the effectiveness of AI in improving early diagnosis through various techniques. This meta-analysis revealed high accuracy in distinguishing between the healthy oral tissue and OSCC, with specific diagnostic tests, such as fluorescence spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and photography, indicating distinct groups with confirmed effectiveness. Additionally, AI-assisted gene sequencing of oral tissue and machine learning assistance in conductive polymer spray mass spectrometry, showed promising results in OSCC diagnosis. Furthermore, the integration of AI into oral cancer diagnosis, particularly in conjunction with tele-cytology, was found to significantly enhance detection accuracy. Studies reported up to a 30% improvement in detection accuracy when AI was combined with tele-cytology, highlighting the synergistic potential of these technologies [24]. Oya et al. [25] conducted a study on the diagnosis of OSCC in digitized histological images using convolutional neural networks, showing the potential of AI algorithms in accurately identifying and classifying oral cancer based on histological images. Similarly, Das et al. [26] differentiated OSCC from normal tissue using DL approaches, and achieved an accuracy of 82%, surpassing other state-of-the-art models. Moreover, Yang et al. [21] demonstrated the effectiveness of a specifically designed DL model to boost both the precision and efficiency of OSCC diagnosis, underscoring the potential of AI in streamlining diagnostic processes. Additionally, Rahman et al. [27] utilized transfer learning with Alex Net in a convolutional neural network to forecast oral cancer using biopsy images of OSCC, and reported an accuracy of 90.06% based on various performance parameters. Musulin et al. [28] proposed a two-phase AI-driven system for automated grading and segmentation of OSCC from histopathological images, and reported significant performance metrics. Their integration of Xception and SWT for classification, coupled with DeepLabv3+ for segmentation, resulted in impressive outcomes, suggesting substantial potential for aiding clinicians in OSCC diagnosis by reducing variability in interpretation.Additionally, Albalawi et al. [29] developed a deep learning model based on EfficientNetB3 architecture, designed to distinguish normal epithelium from OSCC tissues using histopathological images, and achieved an impressive accuracy of 99%. Their research underscores the promising utility of DL models in enhancing OSCC diagnosis accuracy, potentially enabling earlier detection and better patient outcomes. Considering the increasing use of targeted therapies, AI algorithms hold promise in reducing diagnosis time and lowering the costs associated with mutation analyses. While AI has not yet completely replaced pathologists, its integration into pathology practice seems promising for enhancing both efficiency and accuracy. Collaboration between regulatory authorities and pathologists is essential to establish legal and ethical frameworks regulating the use of AI in pathology [30]. The discussed studies collectively illustrate the significant advances made in using DL algorithms to enhance diagnostic capabilities in medical pathology, particularly in the diagnosis of OSCC. These advancements not only contribute to early detection and improved patient outcomes, but also underscore the importance of continuous collaboration and regulatory oversight to guarantee the ethical and efficient incorporation of AI into pathology practices. CONCLUSIONSIn conclusion, the application of DL algorithms in medical pathology demonstrated their potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, improve efficiency, and reduce costs. Although AI has not fully replaced pathologists, it is believed that pathologists who utilize AI technology can perform their tasks more quickly and accurately. The incorporation of AI into diagnostic systems yielded encouraging outcomes in the early identification of OSCC as well as in predicting mutation profiles from histopathological images. However, it is crucial to consider legal and ethical regulations in the implementation of AI in pathology, and collaborative efforts between regulatory authorities and pathologists are essential in establishing appropriate frameworks.Disclosures1. Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Saveetha Medical College and Hospital (approval number: 072/01/2024/Faculty/SRB/SMCH).2. Assistance with the article: None. 3. Financial support and sponsorship: None. 4. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. References1. El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ (eds.). WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC; 2017. 2.
Madhura MG, Rao RS, Patil S, Fageeh HN, Alhazmi A, Awan KH. Advanced diagnostic aids for oral cancer. Dis Mon 2020; 66: 101034. DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2020.101034. 3.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69: 7-34. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21551. 4.
Rivera C. Essentials of oral cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015; 8: 11884-11894. 5.
Balachander K, Vijayashree Priyadharsini J, Paramasivam A. Advances in oral cancer early diagnosis and treatment strategies with liquid biopsy-based approaches. Oral Oncol 2022; 134: 106108. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106108. 6.
Fujimoto T, Fukuzawa E, Tatehara S, Satomura K, Ohya J. Automatic diagnosis of early-stage oral cancer and precancerous lesions from ALA-PDD images using GAN and CNN. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2022; 2022: 2161-2164. 7.
Gupta S, Shah JS, Parikh S, Limbdiwala P, Goel S. Clinical correlative study on early detection of oral cancer and precancerous lesions by modified oral brush biopsy and cytology followed by histopathology. J Cancer Res Ther 2014; 10: 232-238. 8.
Varela-Centelles P. Early Diagnosis and diagnostic delay in oral cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14: 1758. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071758. 9.
Hegde S, Ajila V, Zhu W, Zeng C. Artificial intelligence in early diagnosis and prevention of oral cancer. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2022; 9: 100133. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100133. 10.
Khened M, Kori A, Rajkumar H, Krishnamurthi G, Srinivasan B. A generalized deep learning framework for whole-slide image segmentation and analysis. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 11579. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90444-8. 11.
Xu Y, Jia Z, Wang LB, Ai Y, Zhang F, Lai M, et al. Large scale tissue histopathology image classification, segmentation, and visualization via deep convolutional activation features. BMC Bioinformatics 2017; 18: 281. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1685-x. 12.
Kleczek P, Jaworek-Korjakowska J, Gorgon M. A novel method for tissue segmentation in high-resolution H&E-stained histopathological whole-slide images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2020; 79: 101686. DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.101686. 13.
Elemento O, Leslie C, Lundin J, Tourassi G. Artificial intelligence in cancer research, diagnosis and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2021; 21: 747-752. 14.
Lee K, Lockhart JH, Xie M, Chaudhary R, Slebos RJ, Flores E, et al. Deep learning of histopathology images at the single cell level. Front Artif Intell 2021; 4: 754641. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2021.754641. 15.
Dabeer S, Khan MM, Islam S. Cancer diagnosis in histopathological image: CNN based approach. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2019; 16: 100231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2019.100231. 16.
Chen M, Zhang B, Topatana W, Cao J, Zhu H, Juengpanich S, et al. Classification and mutation prediction based on histopathology H&E images in liver cancer using deep learning. NPJ Precis Oncol 2020; 4: 14. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-020-0120-3. 17.
Adeoye J, Koohi-Moghadam M, Lo AWI, et al. Deep Learning predicts the malignant-transformation-free survival of oral potentially malignant disorders. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236054. 18.
Garcia-Pola M, Pons-Fuster E, Suarez-Fernandez C, Seoane-Romero J, Romero-Mendez A, Lopez-Jornet P. Role of artificial intelligence in the early diagnosis of oral cancer. A scoping review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13: 4600. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184600. 19.
Sathyakumar K, Munoz M, Singh J, Hussain N, Babu BA. Automated lung cancer detection using artificial intelligence (AI) deep convolutional neural networks: a narrative literature review. Cureus 2020; 12: e10017. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10017. 20.
Ünsal G, Orhan K. Deep learning and artificial intelligence applications in dentomaxillofacial radiology. In: Ozsahin I, Uzun-Ozsahin D (eds.). Applied Machine Learning and Multi-Criteria. Bentham Science Publishers; 2021, pp. 126-140. 21.
Yang SY, Li SH, Liu JL, Sun XQ, Cen YY, Ren RY, et al. Histopathology-based diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma using deep learning. J Dent Res 2022; 101: 1321-1327. 22.
Pereira-Prado V, Martins-Silveira F, Sicco E, Hochmann J, Isiorda-Espinoza MA, Gonzalez RG, et al. Artificial intelligence for image analysis in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142416. 23.
Wang JM, Hong R, Demicco EG, Tan J, Lazcano R, Moreira AL, et al. Deep learning integrates histopathology and proteogenomics at a pan-cancer level. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4: 101173. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101173. 24.
Elmakaty I, Elmarasi M, Amarah A, Abdo R, Malki MI. Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 178: 103777. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103777. 25.
Oya K, Kokomoto K, Nozaki K, Toyosawa S. Oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis in digitized histological images using convolutional neural network. J Dent Sci 2023; 18: 322-329. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.08.017. 26.
Das DK, Chakraborty C, Sawaimoon S, Maiti AK, Chatterjee S. Automated identification of keratinization and keratin pearl area from in situ oral histological images. Tissue Cell 2015; 47: 349-358. 27.
Rahman AU, Alqahtani A, Aldhafferi N, Nasir MU, Khan MF, Khan MA, Mosavi A. Histopathologic oral cancer prediction using oral squamous cell carcinoma biopsy empowered with transfer learning. Sensors (Basel) 2022; 22. DOI: 10.3390/s22103833. 28.
Musulin J, Stifanic D, Zulijani A, Cabov T, Dekanic A, Car Z. An enhanced histopathology analysis: an AI-based system for multiclass grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma and segmenting of epithelial and stromal tissue. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081784. 29.
Albalawi E, Thakur A, Ramakrishna MT, Khan SB, SankaraNarayanan S, Almarri B, Hadi TH. Oral squamous cell carcinoma detection using EfficientNet on histopathological images. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10: 1349336. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1349336. 30.
Fu Q, Chen Y, Li Z, Jing Q, Hu C, Liu H, et al. A deep learning algorithm for detection of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma from photographic images: a retrospective study. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 27: 100558. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100558.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
|