Effectiveness and safety of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Our experience in implementing the drug program of the Polish National Health Fund

Summary

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors offer a chance to treat hypercholesterolemia when widely available therapeutic strategies with statin and ezetimibe are insufficient to achieve recommended treatment goals. This was a single-center analysis of 22 patients diagnosed with familiar hypercholesterolemia (FH) treated with the PCSK9 inhibitors. These patients achieved a significant reduction of LDL-C and total cholesterol with the safety of this treatment in follow-up. PCSK9 inhibitors should be intensively implemented in patients with FH besides conventional treatment.

Introduction

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) leads to substantially increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and a significantly increased risk of atherosclerosis and premature cardiovascular diseases. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is one of the main pathogenic FH genes, so an increasing number of studies have focused on finding effective therapeutic methods based on PCSK9 [1]. PCSK9 regulates the level of circulating LDL-C by enhancing the intracellular degradation of hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptors. A decreased level of low-density lipoprotein receptor causes growth of LDL-C concentration in plasma. Alirocumab and evolocumab are human monoclonal antibodies whose mechanism of action involves reduction of the plasma level of PCSK9. Thus, it will result in increased expression of hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptors at the cell surface and a reduction of serum LDL-C levels [2]. This pharmacotherapy is effective in all patients with hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptor expression as well as in people with heterozygous FH. Patients with homozygous FH without low-density lipoprotein receptors respond poorly to these medications [3, 4]. These drugs represent a chance to treat hypercholesterolemia when widely available therapeutic strategies with statin and ezetimibe are insufficient to achieve recommended treatment goals [4]. PCSK9 inhibitors are rarely used in Poland due to the high cost of this treatment and no refunds. The National Health Fund drug program provides a treatment opportunity to selected Polish patients with FH.

Aim

This study presents data on the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with FH.

Material and methods

The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

The mean age of included patients was 51.9 ±15.3 years. Men constituted 40.9% (9 patients) of the study group. Among all patients, 7 (31.8%) had a history of at least one myocardial infarction, 11 (50.0%) patients underwent percutaneous cardiac intervention and 5 (22.7%) coronary artery bypass grafting. Four (18.2%) patients had a history of peripheral angioplasty. Four (18.2%) patients suffered from diabetes mellitus, 11 (50.0%) from arterial hypertension, 2 (9.1%) from atrial fibrillation, 3 (13.6%) had previous stroke, 4 (18.2%) had diagnosed thyroid disorders, 2 (9.1%) peptic ulcer disease, 3 (13.6%) chronic kidney disease but they had GFR > 30 ml/min/1.73 m², and 7 (31.8%) were active smokers or had quitted. Three (13.6%) had at least mild aortic stenosis in echocardiography. The median (IQR) score of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network scale was 11 (9–16). Eight patients had a genetic test performed, which confirmed FH. In physical examination tendon xanthomas were found in 4 (18.2%) patients and xanthelasma palpebrarum in 3 (13.6%) patients, whereas no patients had an arcus cornealis at age < 45 years. All patients had normal TSH levels (the mean value 1.5 (0.7) μIU/ml (normal range: 0.27–4.2)). A combination of rosuvastatin 20–40 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg was used by 12 (54.5%) patients; atorvastatin 40–80 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg was used by 3 (13.6%) patients. Due to the intolerance of treatment with maximum doses, 1 (4.5%) patient was using atorvastatin 10 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg, 3 (13.6%) rosuvastatin 5–10 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg and 2 (9.1%) patients only ezetimibe 10 mg. Due to complete intolerance of statins and an allergic reaction to ezetimibe, 1 (4.5%) patient did not use either statin or ezetimibe.

The mean (SD) baseline level of LDL-C was 4.7 ±1.6 mmol/l in the whole group of patients and was reduced to 1.7 ±1.6 and 1.6 ±1.1 mmol/l after 3 and 15 months, respectively, after the first dose of PCSK9 inhibitors. The percentage reduction of LDL-C level was 64.9 ±23.7% after 3 months and 66.9 ±18.4% after 15 months. The average total cholesterol level in patients was 7.1 ±1.7 mmol/l at baseline. A significant reduction of total cholesterol compared to baseline was observed at both time points: 4.2 ±2.2 after 3 months and 4.0 ±1.5 after 15 months. All p-values of total cholesterol and LDL-C before versus successive time points were statistically significant (Table I). After 3 months of therapy 17 (77.3%) patients had LDL-C < 1.4 or < 1.8 mmol/l, as recommended by the guidelines. We did not observe a significant increase in the level of alanine transaminase, creatinine, or creatine kinase. Furthermore, we did not report any cardiovascular events during the follow-up period. Detailed data for all blood test results are listed in Table I.

In the study group 5 patients finished the therapy earlier: 1 patient refused to continue treatment after almost 12 months of therapy due to muscle and joint pain and 4 patients did not fulfill the criteria for continuation therapy after 3 months of treatment (LDL-C cholesterol decreased < 30%). The reason was the later genetic diagnosis of the variant of homozygous FH in 1 patient and probably discontinuation of baseline therapy (statin plus ezetimibe) in another.

Discussion

The analysis shows significant differences between the baseline values of LDL-C and total cholesterol compared to those obtained in successive follow-up periods.

In Poland, the prevalence of FH is 1 : 250 based on a meta-analysis of six observational studies of 136 300 adults [5–7]. In a very-high-risk Polish population, FH occurs much more often [8, 9]. In the studies mentioned above, the diagnosis of FH was established based on the phenotypic criteria and the DLCN algorithm but without determining the FH mutation due to the low availability and cost of genetic testing. There were alarming reports that FH is inadequately recognized and treated in Poland. Only 32.8% of patients with a DLCN score ≥ 6 received high statin doses. Other therapies, such as ezetimibe combined with statins or ezetimibe monotherapy, were used in a minority of patients [6]. The optimal lipid-lowering therapy is necessary to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. Based on the results from many clinical trials, which were carried out on a wide range of patients, evolocumab and alirocumab were approved for treatment in 2015 [10]. In patients with heterozygous FH, evolocumab was well tolerated and caused a 60% decrease in LDL-C [11]. Also, alirocumab reduced LDL-C levels by approximately 40–60% in patients with this diagnosis [12, 13]. Additionally, the PCSK9 inhibitor plus high-intensity statin and plus ezetimibe could result in an average LDL-C reduction of about 85% [4]. The treatment with these two monoclonal antibodies reduced the risk of cardiovascular events [14, 15]. In large trials on PCSK9 inhibitors, clinical benefits occurred with lowering the plasma LDL-C levels more aggressively below current targets to approximately 20 mg/dl [16]. In our study, the mean (SD) LDL-C reduction after 3 months of therapy was 64.9 ±23.7% and after 15 months was 66.9 ±18.4%. Four (18.2%) patients showed a reduction in LDL-C of < 30%. Table II shows the LDL-C and total cholesterol reduction after 3 months of PCSK9 inhibitors with other lipid-lowering therapies.

In the literature, PCSK9 inhibitor therapy is safe, with no serious adverse effects. The most common side effect was injection-site reactions [16]. We observed muscle-related adverse events in 1 patient after almost 12 months of alirocumab therapy. No side effects were observed in the remaining patients. In the FOURIER trial, the rate of muscle-related events was approximately 5%, while the rate of allergic reactions was 3.1% in the evolocumab group and did not differ significantly from the placebo group [17]. The ODYSSEY outcomes trial showed a general allergic reaction after alirocumab in 7.9% of patients and there was no significant difference from placebo groups [15]. Statin-associated muscle symptoms were reported in about 10–15% of individuals in observational studies [4]. In comparison, in blinded randomized trials of statins versus placebo, muscle symptoms were not so common [18, 19].

In our group of patients, 10 (45.5%) patients used rosuvastatin 40 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg, and 2 (9.1%) used a combination of atorvastatin 80 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg. The PCSK9 inhibitor therapy was essential for patients with FH who cannot tolerate maximum doses of statin and ezetimibe, as it gives a chance to approach the therapeutic goal of LDL-C.

There were some limitations of the study. First, this was a single-center study, and therefore there was a small sample size relating to a limited number of patients with FH and the difficult conditions to receive the treatment refunds. The 15-month follow-up was unavailable in all patients because some were treated in this program for a shorter time. Nevertheless, we present preliminary results and believe that this study will increase PCSK9 inhibitors’ popularity as a new line of effective treatment of FH.

Conclusions

In patients with FH PCSK9 inhibitors reduced LDL-C by about 65% during follow-up. Four (18.2%) patients did not achieve an LDL-C reduction > 30%. There were no adverse cardiovascular events throughout the observation period as well as an increase in the levels of creatine kinase, alanine transaminase and creatinine. These new therapeutic options should be intensively implemented in patients with FH besides conventional treatment.