Biology of Sport
eISSN: 2083-1862
ISSN: 0860-021X
Biology of Sport
Current Issue Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Archive Ethical standards and procedures Contact Instructions for authors Journal's Reviewers Special Information
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

Open access

without publication fees
Share:
Send email
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Effects of unilateral and bilateral training on performance in team sports athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bitai Wu
1
,
Mingyue Yin
2
,
Zhiquan Song
3
,
Meiling Tao
1
,
Kai Xu
1
,
George P. Nassis
4
,
Chris Bishop
5
,
Olivier Girard
6

  1. School of Physical Education and Sports Science, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang, Hunan, China
  2. School of Coaching, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
  3. School of Physical Education, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
  4. College of Sport Science, University of Kalba, Sharjah 89841, United Arab Emirates
  5. School of Science and Technology, London Sport Institute, Middlesex University, London, UK
  6. School of Human Science (Exercise and Sport Science), University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
Biol Sport. 2026;43:1019–1049
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2026.159564
Online publish date: 2026/03/16
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Team sports athletes rely heavily on unilateral movements, yet the comparative performance benefits of unilateral training (UT) versus bilateral training (BT) remain controversial. This meta-analysis systematically examined the effects of UT and BT on strength, jumping, sprinting, and agility in team sports, while considering sport type and training program as potential moderators. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases was conducted to identify controlled trials meeting the PICOS criteria. Primary outcomes were strength, jumping (countermovement jump [CMJ], horizontal jump [HJ], reactive strength index [RSI]), sprinting, and agility. Pooled effects were calculated using standardized mean difference (Hedges’ g) through a three-level meta-analysis model, with subgroup and moderator analyses conducted. Fifteen studies involving 355 team sports athletes (basketball, soccer, rugby, and ice hockey) were included. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between UT and BT in overall strength, jumping, sprinting, and agility. However, UT significantly outperformed BT in unilateral strength (g = 0.68, p = 0.007), unilateral CMJ (g = 0.37, p = 0.025), and unilateral HJ (g = 0.45, p = 0.03). No significant differences were found in bilateral strength, bilateral jumping, and RSI. Subgroup analysis revealed no overall differences across sports, but in basketball, UT had significant advantages over BT in sprinting (g = -0.37, p = 0.04) and agility (g = -0.77, p = 0.04). Regarding training types, UT using plyometric training outperformed BT in strength (g = 0.54, p = 0.03) and sprinting (g = -0.30, p = 0.03), while UT with compound training had significant advantages in agility (g = -0.74, p = 0.04). UT outperforms BT in improving unilateral strength and jumping ability, while producing comparable effects in bilateral performance, sprinting, and agility. These findings underscore the value of UT in team sports involving unilateral movements. Future research should explore its long-term effects, recovery from injury, and neuromuscular adaptations to better optimize training.
keywords:

Unilateral training, Bilateral exercise, Strength development, Jumping, Sprinting, Agility, Neuromuscular adaptation, Team sports

  
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.