eISSN: 2299-0038
ISSN: 1643-8876
Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


2/2018
vol. 17
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Effects of vitamin B12, folate, uric acid, and serum biomarkers of inflammation on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women

Fatma Beyazit
,
Eren Pek

Menopause Rev 2018; 17(2): 69-76
Online publish date: 2018/06/30
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Osteoporosis (OP) and osteopenia are a public health concern associated with an increased risk of bone fractures and related morbidity and mortality, especially in the older population [1]. In fact, postmenopausal women have a substantially increased risk of bone-related disorders, with poorer outcomes than their age-matched male counterparts. A number of studies have reported that serum uric acid (UA), as well as subclinical inflammation, is involved in the pathogenesis of OP by affecting oxidative stress and inflammatory cascades [2]. In this context, growing evidence suggests that serum UA might protect against bone loss by its antioxidant properties and is related to postmenopausal OP [3, 4].
Uric acid is the final oxidation product of purine metabolism and exists either in a crystalline or in a soluble state with either anti-oxidant or pro-oxidant activities depending on various factors including the plasmatic and cellular environment [5, 6]. It is implicated in many disease conditions including gout, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular and renal dysfunction [7-9]. In contrast, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have shown that UA is a beneficial factor in distinct disease states including osteoporosis, Alzheimer’s disease and dementia in both men and women [4, 10-12]. Moreover, it has been found that after excluding multivariable confounders associated with adiposity including body mass index (BMI), body weight and fat mass, UA levels were positively correlated with bone mineral density (BMD) regardless of adiposity [4, 10, 12].
Clinical, serologic and molecular evidence suggests that systemic inflammation exerts a substantial effect on bone turnover and induces OP [13, 14]. Chronic inflammation and alteration in the immune system, which are characteristics of ageing, as well as other pathological situations linked with OP, might be determinant pathogenetic factors [13]. In this context, it has been found that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), which is upregulated by IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-, is associated with BMD, indicating a possible relationship between subclinical systemic inflammation and OP [15]. However, it seems that CRP acts as a surrogate for other factors that directly impact on BMD.
Certain B vitamins and folate play a substantial role in bone health in healthy adults, suggesting that suboptimal B vitamin levels and folate deficiency may contribute to an elevated risk of OP development [16]. Furthermore, large population-based studies have demonstrated that low vitamin B12 and folate levels are associated with increased fracture risk and/or decreased BMD values [17]. Although many theories have been put forward in attempts to explain the underlying causal mechanisms between bone health and B vitamins and folate, it is accepted that the main mechanism is via these vitamins’ integral roles in one carbon metabolism that is required for the methylation of DNA, proteins, and other molecules via S-adenosylmethionine [16].
Given the emerging evidence that supports the role of UA, B vitamins and inflammation on bone health, as far as we know, until today, no study has looked at the association of these parameters with BMD. The present study aims to explore associations of UA, vitamin B12, folate and conventional inflammatory markers with BMD of the femur and lumbar regions in postmenopausal women.

Material and methods

Participants and study design

The study participants were chosen from consecutive postmenopausal women who came for their regular gynecological visits to our outpatient clinic. In order to examine the relationship between serum vitamin B12, folate, UA, and inflammatory markers, the present study was carried out on 184 postmenopausal women. Menopause was defined as the last natural menstruation when followed by 12 months of amenorrhea, or when the follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) exceeds 40 IU/l in cases of subjects with hysterectomy. Women taking medications affecting bone or calcium metabolism including hormone replacement therapies and anticonvulsants, liver and renal disease, having a malignant or chronic debilitating illness, and a history of alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus (DM), or other systemic diseases, were excluded from the study. The present study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee and performed according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.
All postmenopausal subjects recruited to this study were invited to complete a questionnaire while waiting for further physical examination and laboratory testing. Demographic characteristics, including age, height, body weight, menopausal status, past and present medication history, and tobacco use, were recorded.
All women were asked to go to the appointed laboratory the following morning, after an overnight fast of 12 h. Fasting blood samples were drawn and analyzed immediately for general hematologic, biochemical and lipoprotein profiles. The following laboratory tests were applied for each woman: alkaline phosphatase (ALP), calcium (Ca), phosphor (P), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), UA, vitamin B12, folate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), hs-CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).
For each woman, weight and height were measured in light indoor clothing without shoes. Body mass index was calculated using the following formula: BMI = weight (kg) : height (m2).

Body mass index measurement

The areal BMD (grams per square centimeter) measurement of the proximal femur and lumbar spine was done using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. All BMD measurements were made by the same experienced operator on the same X-ray machine following standardized procedures to reduce the chance of technical error.
Bone mineral density results of study participants were evaluated according to the World Health Organization criteria in which osteopenia is diagnosed by a –2.5 < T-score < –1.0 standard deviation (SD), and OP is diagnosed by a T-score ≤ –2.5 SD at any sites on the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip. A T-score > –1 is considered as normal.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 19.0 (SPSS for Windows, SPSS, Chicago). One-way ANOVA was used to compare normally distributed variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to compare non-normally distributed variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between the groups. Spearman’s correlation coefficient analyses were performed between femur and lumbar BMD measurements with other variables, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The average age was 57.5 ±10.6 years and the serum mean UA level was 4.9 ±1.2 mg/dl. Postmenopausal women were divided into three groups according to BMD measurements. A T-score higher than –1 was considered as normal, women with a T-score between –2.5 and –1 were considered as osteopenic, and those with a score lower than –2.5 were considered as osteoporotic. The demographic and biochemical characteristics of study participants were evaluated both for femur neck and lumbar spine measurements (Table 1). According to the femur neck BMD results, serum UA levels were 5.3 ±1.0, 5.0 ±1.2 and 4.39 ±0.9 in normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic women, respectively (p = 0.001). Body mass index results were also statistically higher in postmenopausal osteoporotic women (p = 0.014). According to lumbar spine BMD measurements, mean serum UA levels were 5.0 ±1.2, 4.9 ±1.2 and 4.3 ±0.9 in normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic women, respectively (p = 0.015). There was no statistically significant difference in other variables between groups (Table 1). According to menopause status, out of 184 women, 44 (23.9%) reported surgical causes and 140 (76.1%) women reported natural causes. Current smoking was only reported in 11 (5.9%) women; 30 (16.3%) women were ex-smokers and 143 (77.8%) women had no history of smoking.
Correlation analysis was also performed between BMD measurements and confounding factors including age, BMI, UA, vitamin B12, folate and hs-CRP levels (Table 2). According to femur neck BMD results, only BMI (r = –0.221, p = 0.003) and serum UA (r = 0.274, p ≤ 0.001) were found to be correlated with femur neck BMD. Serum UA (r = 0.175, p = 0.017) and creatinine (r = –0.146, p = 0.049) were found to be correlated with lumbar spine BMD measurements. No correlation was observed between BMD measurements and other variables. We also conducted a correlation analysis between UA, hs-CRP and vitamin B12 in postmenopausal women with a T-score < –1. In postmenopausal women with a T-score < –1, femur neck (n = 125) and lumbar spine (n = 116) BMD measurements were also correlated with serum UA levels but no correlation was observed in hs-CRP and vitamin B12 levels (Fig. 1).
In order to better understand the clinical implications of these results, we categorized the study participants into three groups according to serum UA levels (Table 3). Serum UA levels were statistically significantly elevated in higher tertiles. Although not significant, an increasing trend was observed for ESR, PTH, and phosphorus levels, and a decreasing trend was observed for serum folate levels (Table 3). The BMD values at the femur neck (p = 0.048) were elevated in the higher tertiles. Although an increasing trend of lumbar spine BMD values in higher UA tertiles was observed, this was not statistically significant (Fig. 2).

Discussion

Our results indicate that serum UA is an important factor for both femur and lumbar spine BMD values among postmenopausal women irrespective of BMI status. Increased UA levels were found to be associated with improved bone health, supporting the original hypothesis that higher serum UA levels have a protective effect on bone loss in postmenopausal OP. We also demonstrated that UA levels are associated with femur and lumbar spine T-scores (r = –0.274, p ≤ 0.001 and r = –0.175, p = 0.017, respectively). No significant correlation was obtained between serum UA levels and inflammatory markers. Moreover, vitamin B12 and folate levels were not correlated with either serum UA levels or BMD measurements.
Although a number of observational and epidemiologic studies suggest similar findings [18, 19] to the present study, a cross-sectional study of a probability sample of the US population reported contrary findings [20]. This study reported that after adjustment for potential confounders including age, BMI, race, and alcohol consumption, serum ALP and CRP levels and serum UA levels were no longer correlated with BMD measurements. Moreover, in order to examine the causal effect of higher serum UA on skeletal health (which is not possible to measure in human subjects), the authors created a rat model of hyperuricemia in which they demonstrated no difference in terms of BMD, volume density and biomechanical properties between hyperuricemic and normouricemic rats.
In this cross-sectional analysis of 184 healthy postmenopausal women, the femoral neck BMD was positively correlated with serum UA levels. In addition, we found that postmenopausal women with a T-score < –2.5 had lower UA levels compared with age- and BMI-matched postmenopausal women with a T-score > –2.5. Similar to our results, Ahn et al. [21] found that after adjusting for multiple confounders, serum UA levels were positively associated with BMD at all sites in a large cross-sectional study including 7,502 healthy postmenopausal women. Han et al. [4] also confirmed these findings and reported that lumbar BMD was linearly associated with serum UA levels within the normal physiological range of postmenopausal women, and concluded that higher serum UA levels had a protective effect on bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis. In a cross-sectional data analysis by Makovey et al. [22] women with higher UA levels were found to have significantly higher absolute BMD values for the femur and lumbar spine, which was not affected by changes in body composition measures. Taken together, the results of these studies support the hypothesis that the protective effect of UA relies on its antioxidant effect which participates in antagonizing oxidative stress-induced bone metabolism. Moreover, as postmenopausal women are more prone to oxidative stress development, with higher levels of serum UA there would be a greater antioxidative effect with decreased oxidative stress, which will protect against OP [4, 22, 23].
In the present study, we did not find any association between serum UA and serum Ca, P, ALP or PTH levels. Similar to our findings, Xiong et al. [24] did not detect any causal relationship between serum UA and PTH, Ca, or P levels among a population of postmenopausal women and elderly men. In this Mendelian randomization study, although the authors noted a negative relationship between serum UA and PTH levels, and a positive relationship between serum UA, 25(OH)D, serum Ca and P levels in the adjustment models, these relationships were found to disappear in the two-stage least-squares Mendelian randomization analysis. Contrary to our findings, in a population study by Hui et al. [25] it was found that serum PTH levels are independently related to serum UA levels and the frequency of hyperuricemia at the population level. These contrary reports might be due to differences in the methods, scope of analysis and differences in how the methods are applied. Taken together, based on our findings, it seems that PTH, serum Ca, ALP and P levels may have little effect on the role of serum UA in bone metabolism.
Since the association between vitamin B12 and folate with BMD in postmenopausal women is controversial, our results suggest that BMD measurements of postmenopausal women are not correlated with vitamin B12 and folate levels. Moreover, our results also showed that even in lower UA tertiles, vitamin B12 and folate levels were not associated with altered bone mass. Vitamin B12 is known to be essential for folate cycling and is a determinant of total homocysteine (Hcy) concentration [26]. Hyperhomocysteinemia leads to an increase in oxidative stress and is related to decreases in bone blood flow, and is independently associated with the occurrence of OP in postmenopausal women [27, 28]. Being a crucial determinant of total Hcy status and affecting osteoblast activity, vitamin B12 may have a direct impact on bone metabolism [27, 29]. However, the results of published trials are inconsistent, possibly due to methodological differences across studies. For example, in a cross-sectional analysis by Golbahar et al. [30] plasma vitamin B12 levels were not found to be a predictor of BMD at either the femoral neck and lumbar spine even adjusted for age and BMI. Similarly, Haliloglu et al. [31] revealed that vitamin B12, folate and Hcy levels were not associated with BMD in postmenopausal women. Baines et al. [32] reported a strong association between Hcy and vitamin B12, but they also did not demonstrate any association between vitamin B12 and BMD. In a recent meta-analysis from China, a total of 16 studies were explored in order to analyze the relationship of Hcy, vitamin B12 and folate with BMD. Although Hcy and vitamin B12 were found to be associated with postmenopausal BMD, folate levels were not associated with BMD. The evidence from our study indicated that vitamin B12 and folate levels did not have a beneficial effect on postmenopausal bone health.
Apart from vitamin B12 and folate, certain dietary and metabolic factors are also related to BMD in postmenopausal women. It has been shown that distinct factors including dyslipidemia, abnormal glucose metabolism, obesity and hypertension might affect bone mineral dynamics differently. Obesity may lead to increased BMD with causing elevated 17-estradiol levels and higher mechanical load [33]. Nevertheless, lower serum TG or LDL and higher HDL concentrations were found to be associated with lower trabecular BMD. In this context, dyslipidemic changes occur more prominently in the postmenopausal period including an increase in LDL and TG and a decrease in HDL levels, causing increased hypertension and DM [34]. These metabolic alterations therefore highlight the importance of maintaining glycemic and lipidemic control in postmenopausal women to preserve bone health.
Although in this study we excluded postmenopausal women with DM, serum UA and BMD in type 2 DM postmenopausal women have been investigated in several studies. In a recent study by Xu et al. [35] a positive association between UA and BMD was demonstrated. The authors suggested that relatively high UA might be a protective factor for bone health in postmenopausal diabetic women. Similarly, Ishii et al. [36] showed that higher UA levels were linearly associated with higher lumbar spine BMD in peri- and postmenopausal Japanese women.
Pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1, IL-6 and TNF- have been shown to play a substantial role in bone health and metabolism [37]. IL-6 is a soluble mediator with a pleiotropic effect on inflammation and has been shown to increase with estrogen deficiency, and correlates with late life diseases such as osteoporosis, cancers, cardiac issues and frailty [38, 39]. Moreover, an increased level of circulating or locally produced soluble IL-6 receptor induces osteoclast formation by various immunologic mechanisms [40]. In cases of tissue damage, infection and inflammation IL-6 can also lead to CRP secretion from the liver by a direct stimulatory effect. The association between CRP and bone metabolism is therefore attributed to the close relationship between CRP and IL-6 and other pro-inflammatory cytokines [41]. Although we found no association between CRP and BMD measurements in conjunction with other biochemical and metabolic variables in the present study, there are conflicting results [37, 42-44] in the literature on the influence of CRP on progressive bone loss or osteoporosis. In a recent study in which 2,915 members of the Framingham Offspring Study were explored, associations between serum concentrations of IL-6, TNF-, and CRP with BMD at the femoral neck, trochanter, total femur, and spine were investigated [44]. As a result of this study, statistically significant, modest inverse associations between CRP and femoral neck and trochanter BMD were observed among premenopausal women. But no associations were noted between these parameters and BMD among postmenopausal women who receive no hormone replacement therapy. This lack of consistency suggested that increased levels of circulating inflammatory biomarkers may not be a risk factor for decreased BMD measurements.
There were, however, several limitations related to the present study. First, although we did not calculate fat mass and abdominal visceral fat area in this study, BMI values were similar in each group. The second limitation is the inability to assess changes in CRP in the local bone microenvironment that may have a biological effect, but which may not be detected in the serum. Third, it would be beneficial if bone resorption markers, as well as serum Hcy and IL-6 levels, were included in the results. Finally, the relatively small sample size at a single center necessitates validation of these results with additional multicentre studies.

Conclusions

This study revealed that femur neck and lumbar BMD was associated with serum UA levels irrespective of subclinical inflammation in postmenopausal women. Furthermore, it was found that vitamin B12 and folate did not have any significant effect on BMD and UA levels. Nevertheless, further studies focused on the exact underlying mechanisms of how UA affects bone health, particularly in women, need to be undertaken.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1. Varacallo MA, Fox EJ. Osteoporosis and its complications. Med Clin North Am 2014; 98: 817-831.
2. Kim SC, Paik JM, Liu J, et al. Gout and the Risk of Non-vertebral Fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2017; 32: 230-236.
3. Pirro M, Mannarino MR, Bianconi V, et al. Uric acid and bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporotic women: the link lies within the fat. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28: 973-981.
4. Han W, Bai X, Wang N, et al. Association between lumbar bone mineral density and serum uric acid in postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study of healthy Chinese population. Arch Osteoporos 2017; 12: 50.
5. Kushiyama A, Nakatsu Y, Matsunaga Y, et al. Role of Uric Acid Metabolism-Related Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Metabolic Syndrome Components Such as Atherosclerosis and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Mediators Inflamm 2016; 2016: 8603164.
6. Sautin YY, Johnson RJ. Uric acid: the oxidant-antioxidant paradox. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2008; 27: 608-619.
7. Genoni G, Menegon V, Secco GG, et al. Insulin resistance, serum uric acid and metabolic syndrome are linked to cardiovascular dysfunction in pediatric obesity. Int J Cardiol 2017; 249: 366-371.
8. Palazzuoli A, Ruocco G, De Vivo O, et al. Prevalence of Hyperuricemia in Patients With Acute Heart Failure With Either Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction. Am J Cardiol 2017; 120: 1146-1150.
9. Hahn K, Kanbay M, Lanaspa MA, et al. Serum uric acid and acute kidney injury: A mini review. J Adv Res 2017; 8: 529-536.
10. Veronese N, Carraro S, Bano G, et al. Hyperuricemia protects against low bone mineral density osteoporosis and fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest 2016; 46: 920-930.
11. Euser SM, Hofman A, Westendorp RG, et al. Breteler MM. Serum uric acid and cognitive function and dementia. Brain 2009; 132 (Pt 2): 377-382.
12. Du N, Xu D, Hou X, et al. Inverse Association Between Serum Uric Acid Levels and Alzheimer’s Disease Risk. Mol Neurobiol 2016; 53: 2594-2599.
13. Ginaldi L, Di Benedetto MC, De Martinis M. Osteoporosis, inflammation and ageing. Immun Ageing 2005; 2: 14.
14. Kim SC, Paik JM, Liu J, et al. Gout and the Risk of Non-vertebral Fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2017; 32: 230-236.
15. Ganesan K, Teklehaimanot S, Tran TH, et al. Relationship of C-reactive protein and bone mineral density in community-dwelling elderly females. J Natl Med Assoc 2005; 97: 329-333.
16. Clarke M, Ward M, Dickey W, et al. B-vitamin status in relation to bone mineral density in treated celiac disease patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 50: 975-984.
17. Morris MS, Jacques PF, Selhub J. Relation between homocysteine and B-vitamin status indicators and bone mineral density in older Americans. Bone 2005; 37: 234-242.
18. Ahn SH, Lee SH, Kim BJ, et al. Higher serum uric acid is associated with higher bone mass, lower bone turnover, and lower prevalence of vertebral fracture in healthy postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 2961-2970.
19. Nabipour I, Sambrook PN, Blyth FM, et al. Serum uric acid is associated with bone health in older men: a cross-sectional population-based study. J Bone Miner Res 2011; 26: 955-964.
20. Zhang D, Bobulescu IA, Maalouf NM, et al. Relationship between serum uric Acid and bone mineral density in the general population and in rats with experimental hyperuricemia. J Bone Miner Res 2015; 30: 992-999.
21. Ahn SH, Lee SH, Kim BJ, et al. Higher serum uric acid is associated with higher bone mass, lower bone turnover, and lower prevalence of vertebral fracture in healthy postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 2961-2970.
22. Makovey J, Macara M, Chen JS, et al. Serum uric acid plays a protective role for bone loss in peri- and postmenopausal women: a longitudinal study. Bone 2013; 52: 400-406.
23. Yang S, Feskanich D, Willett WC, et al. Association between global biomarkers of oxidative stress and hip fracture in postmenopausal women: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29: 2577-2583.
24. Xiong A, Yao Q, He J, et al. No causal effect of serum urate on bone-related outcomes among a population of postmenopausal women and elderly men of Chinese Han ethnicity – a Mendelian randomization study. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27: 1031-1039.
25. Hui JY, Choi JW, Mount DB, et al. The independent association between parathyroid hormone levels and hyperuricemia: a national population study. Arthritis Res Ther 2012; 14: R56.
26. Coşar A, Ipçioğlu OM, Ozcan O, et al. Folate and homocysteine metabolisms and their roles in the biochemical basis of neuropsychiatry. Turk J Med Sci 2014; 44: 1-9.
27. Bahtiri E, Islami H, Rexhepi S, et al. Relationship of homocysteine levels with lumbar spine and femur neck BMD in postmenopausal women. Acta Reumatol Port 2015; 40: 355-362.
28. Jianbo L, Zhang H, Yan L, et al. Homocysteine, an additional factor, is linked to osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. J Bone Miner Metab 2014; 32: 718-724.
29. Kim GS, Kim CH, Park JY, et al. Effects of vitamin B12 on cell proliferation and cellular alkaline phosphatase activity in human bone marrow stromal osteoprogenitor cells and UMR106 osteoblastic cells. Metabolism 1996; 45: 1443-1446.
30. Golbahar J, Aminzadeh MA, Hamidi SA, et al. Association of red blood cell 5-methyltetrahydrofolate with bone mineral density in postmenopausal Iranian women. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 1894-1898.
31. Haliloglu B, Aksungar FB, Ilter E, et al. Relationship between bone mineral density, bone turnover markers and homocysteine, folate and vitamin B12 levels in postmenopausal women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 281: 663-668.
32. Baines M, Kredan MB, Usher J, et al. The association of homocysteine and its determinants MTHFR genotype, folate, vitamin B12 and vitamin B6 with bone mineral density in postmenopausal British women. Bone 2007; 40: 730-736.
33. Ohta H, Ikeda T, Masuzawa T, et al. Differences in axial bone mineral density, serum levels of sex steroids, and bone metabolism between postmenopausal and age- and body size-matched premenopausal subjects. Bone 1993; 14: 111-116.
34. Vitale S, Caruso S, Rapisarda A, et al. Isoflavones, calcium, vitamin D and inulin improve quality of life, sexual function, body composition and metabolic parameters in menopausal women: result from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Prz Menopauzalny 2018; 17: 32-38.
35. Xu M, Su J, Hao J, Zhong N, et al. Positive association between serum uric acid and bone mineral density in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by gender and BMI. J Bone Miner Metab 2017; doi: 10.1007/s00774-017-0877-9.
36. Ishii S, Miyao M, Mizuno Y, et al. Association between serum uric acid and lumbar spine bone mineral density in peri- and postmenopausal Japanese women. Osteoporos Int 2014; 25: 1099-1105.
37. Brincat SD, Borg M, Camilleri G, et al. The role of cytokines in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Minerva Ginecol 2014; 66: 391-407.
38. Ferrari SL, Ahn-Luong L, Garnero P, et al. Two promoter polymorphisms regulating interleukin-6 gene expression are associated with circulating levels of C-reactive protein and markers of bone resorption in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 255-259.
39. Jilka RL, Hangoc G, Girasole G, et al. Increased osteoclast development after estrogen loss: mediation by interleukin-6. Science 1992; 257: 88-91.
40. Tamura T, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, et al. Soluble interleukin-6 receptor triggers osteoclast formation by interleukin 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 11924-11928.
41. Weinhold B, Rüther U. Interleukin-6-dependent and -independent regulation of the human C-reactive protein gene. Biochem J 1997; 327 (Pt 2): 425-429.
42. Scheidt-Nave C, Bismar H, Leidig-Bruckner G, et al. Serum interleukin 6 is a major predictor of bone loss in women specific to the first decade past menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 2032-2042.
43. Huang JV, Schooling CM. Inflammation and bone mineral density: A Mendelian randomization study. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 8666.
44. Sponholtz TR, Zhang X, Fontes JD, et al. Association between inflammatory biomarkers and bone mineral density in a community-based cohort of men and women. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014; 66: 1233-1240.
Copyright: © 2018 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.