eISSN: 2299-0038
ISSN: 1643-8876
Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


1/2024
vol. 23
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Evaluation of cleaved caspase-3 and Ki-67 index on diagnostic biopsy in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the context of post-treatment tumour ypT stage, ypN stage, grade, and molecular subtype

Vasil Nanev
1
,
Hristo Milev
2
,
Desislava Dimitrova
2
,
Silvia Naneva
3
,
Strahil Asenov Strashilov
1
,
Angel Yordanov
1
,
Miroslava Mihailova
3
,
Simoneta Ivanova
3
,
Milena Karcheva
1
,
Ivan Ivanov
1

1.
Medical University of Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
2.
MHAT “Medika”, Ruse, Bulgaria
3.
UMHAT “D-r Georgi Stranski”, Pleven, Bulgaria
Menopause Rev 2024; 23(1): 31-40
Online publish date: 2024/03/28
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

The necessity of accurate therapeutic decisions, adequate follow-up of response, and further disease management requires appropriate risk stratification, prediction, and prognosis in breast cancer (BC) patients. The administration of chemotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy – NAC) is increasing, and it has become standard of care for advanced and high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive/HER2+/triple-negative BC. Recently, neoadjuvant therapy has been considered an optional strategy even in early BC patients, extending its benefits beyond downstaging the tumour, making it operable, but also providing prognostic information for further therapeutic decisions and better oncological outcomes [1]. The tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system is still universally used in BC patients, but the application of the histological grade and contemporary biomarkers defines new pathologic insights that have changed the decision for treatment in almost 40% of the patients, giving clinicians better and more precise individual prognostication [2].

The most commonly used biomarkers in BC patients include oestrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and they are frequently enhanced by others having an independent prognostic value, such as proliferation index Ki-67, histological grade, or gene expression profiling, which is not always available in daily practice. Caspase-3 has recently been studied, mostly in combination with the Ki-67 proliferation index. It was found to have an additive negative predictive value on overall survival. Recent studies support the idea that disrupted apoptosis/proliferation balance contributes more to tumour progression or inhibition than either marker alone in BC patients [3]. The clinical prognostic group stratification is useful not only at baseline before any therapeutic intervention, but also after neoadjuvant therapy comparing with the initial clinical stage, thus providing an accurate assessment of response prior to the next therapy [4]. Still, there is an insufficient database to achieve accurate and precise staging for BC patients who are suitable to receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy before surgery. The prognostic staging often lacks complete information about the initial evaluation due to lab availability, inappropriate diagnostic method, or intra-tumour heterogeneity. More data are needed from a large population-based cohort [5].

The aim of this study was to assess how cleaved caspase-3 and Ki-67 index evaluated on diagnostic biopsy are related to response to NAC in the context of molecular subtype, post-treatment tumour T category, N category, and grade.

Material and methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out among 110 BC patients/cases (108 female and 2 male). Five patients were excluded from further analyses due to insufficient tissue samples. Based on the staging, the patients were divided as followed IIA 5 patients, IIB 48 patients, IIIA 24 patients, IIIB 23 patients, IIIC 3 patients, and IV 7 patients. Tissue samples from diagnostic biopsies and post-neoadjuvant therapy tissue samples were retrieved for further analysis. Tumours were typed, graded, staged, categorised (ypT and ypN category), and subdivided into surrogate immunohistochemically determined “molecular subtypes” according to the current World Health Organisation recommendations [6]. The characteristics of the studied cases are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Characteristics of the studied cases

ParametersValuesn
Age105
Median62.0
Years30–81
Gender, n (%)105
Female103 (98.10)
Male2 (1.90)
Histological grade, n (%)103 and 2 mucinous carcinomas
G12 (1.94)
G247 (45.6%)
G354 (52.43)
Histologic variant, n (%)105
NST (ductal)85 (80.95)
Invasive lobular carcinoma13 (12.38)
Mucinous1 (0.95)
Micropapillary1 (0.95)
Metaplastic2 (1.90)
Mixed (1 mucinous + NST and 1 metaplastic + mucinous)2 (1.90)
With medullary features1 (0.95) (NST with lymphocyte rich stroma)
ypT stage, n (%)105
T012 (11.43)
T122 (20.95)
T247 (44.76)
T38 (7.62)
T412 (11.43)
Tis4 (3.81)
Lymph node status, n (%)102 and 3 cases were Nx
N032 (31.37)
N131 (30.39)
N226 (25.49)
N313 (12.75)
Surrogate molecular subtype (defined by immunohistochemistry), n (%)Luminal A 15 (15.46)
Luminal B (High Ki-67/PgR negative) 45 (46.39)
Treated predominantly with epirubicin hydrochloride and cyclophosphamide97 and 8 cases were not defined
Luminal B (HER2 enriched) 7 (7.22) HER2 21 (21.65)Treated with docetaxel; trastuzumab and pertuzumab
Triple negative 9 (9.28)Treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin
Steroid receptor positivity, n (%)101 and 4 were uninterruptable due to artefacts
ER positive80 (79.21)
ER negative21 (20.79)
PgR positive66 (65.35)
PgR negative35 (34.65)
HER 2 status, n (%)104 and one was uninterpretable
HER2 positive27 (25.96)
HER2 negative77 (74.04)
Lymphovascular invasion, n (%)105
Present88 (83.81)
Not evident17 (16.19)
Surface occupied by tumour infiltrating lymphocytes, n (%)99 and 6 have added acute inflammatory infiltrate
0: < 1%22 (22.22)
1: 1–10%34 (34.34)
2: 11–49%40 (40.40)
3: > 50%3 (03.03)

[i] ER – oestrogen, HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, NST – no special type (invasive ductal carcinoma), PgR – progesterone receptor

Treatment was according to contemporary guidelines [7]. In the studied population, some advanced-stage and heterogeneous tumours received neoadjuvant therapy and were included in the study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect was estimated on resection specimens (on archival FFPE materials; in particular, representative haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides) using the Sataloff criteria [8]. Biopsies (tissue samples) taken prior to NAC and post-neoadjuvant therapy were analysed, and cleaved caspase-3 and Ki-67 index were investigated on tissue samples taken prior to NAC, using immunostaining according to protocols provided by the manufacturers (Ki-67 rabbit monoclonal antibody clone SP6/Biocare USA; caspase-3 rabbit polyclonal antibody/Biocare USA; visualisation system MACH1 Univ. HRP kit/Biocare USA). Staining was scored according to methods available in the literature [9, 10]. The expression of caspase-3 was evaluated according to Engels et al., and levels of > 0.5% were considered as increased [3]. Variables including Ki-67 levels on diagnostic biopsy, caspase-3 expression on diagnostic biopsy, and their relation to tumour grade, surrogate molecular subtype, ypT, ypN categories, and T and N categories according to the Sataloff criteria (on post-therapeutic resection specimens) were evaluated. Missing variables from cases (missing for reasons such as insufficient materials in the archival samples or other tissue-related reasons) were excluded from the individual analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using the ANOVA F, Kruskal-Wallis, and χ2 tests, and calculated using SPSS software. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. Permission for the current study was obtained from the Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Pleven.

Results

Tumour heterogeneity (morphologic/molecular) was observed in 12 of the cases. For the whole population, Ki-67 demonstrated a median value of 26% (ranging 8–94%). Examples of Ki-67 values of less than 14% and equal to or above 14% are demonstrated in Figure 1.

Fig. 1

A) Ki-67 values of less than 14%, Ki-67, 400×; B) Ki-67 values equal to or above 14% Ki-67, 400×

/f/fulltexts/PM/52709/MR-23-52709-g001_min.jpg

Caspase-3 was found positive in 17 cases and negative in 88 cases. Examples of positive and negative cases for caspase-3 immunostaining are presented in Figure 2.

Fig. 2

A) Caspase-3 positive, caspase-3, 400×; B) caspase-3 negative, caspase-3, 400×

/f/fulltexts/PM/52709/MR-23-52709-g002_min.jpg

In our study, the cases negative for caspase-3 demonstrated median values for Ki-67 = 25% (range 8–94%), compared to the cases positive for caspase-3, demonstrating values for Ki-67 = 35% (range 12–87%), with no significant difference between the 2 groups; K-W = 1.7631, p = 0.1842.

When compared to the studied prognostic factors and parameters, Ki-67 demonstrated the following relations: statistically significant difference was found between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and degree of differentiation (G) K-W = 24.2932, p < 0.0001. As might be expected, low-grade (G1) tumours had the lowest Ki-67 index and G3 tumours had the highest Ki-67 index (Table 2). A statistically significant difference was found between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and (surrogate) molecular subtype of the tumours (on diagnostic biopsies); K-W = 28.5439, p < 0.00000967538. Luminal A carcinomas were with the lowest Ki-67% index compared to the other categories (Table 2). A statistically significant difference was found between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and the size and invasion of the primary tumour after NAC, radical surgery, and histopathological examination; K-W = 11.7944, p < 0.0377169. The tumours that demonstrated complete pathological response (referred to yT0 and yTis) were among the tumours with the highest Ki-67 in the studied group (Table 2). No statistically significant difference was found between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and the extent of regional lymph node involvement after NAC, radical surgery, and histopathological examination; K-W = 4.19294, p > 0.241366 (Table 2). No statistically significant difference was found between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of neoadjuvant therapy assessed according to the Sataloff classification category T; K-W = 3.2385, p = 0.0719229 (Table 2). No statistically significant difference was found between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy), the effect of neoadjuvant therapy, and the Sataloff classification category N; K-W = 1.40937 p > 0.703338 (Table 2).

Table 2

Ki-67 and its relationship with the studied prognostic factors

Prognostic factorsNumber of casesMedian values of Ki -67 (%)Min–max (%)
Tumour grade
G121210–14
G247208–73
G3543711–94
Molecular subtype
Luminal A15149–20
Luminal B Ki-67 ≥ 14%45358–94
Luminal B HER2 positive72519–43
HER2213514–61
TNT92718–87
ypT
01237.514–87
12225.59–70
247238–94
383514–90
41221,510–73
In situ (ypTis)44840–60
ypN
03227.511–70
131279–94
22625.510–87
313208–59
Sataloff T
A (complete response)184014–61
B, C, D (non-complete response and no response)71269–94
Sataloff N
A83918–60
B222614–70
C32269–87
D23359–94

[i] HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, TNT – triple negative tumour

When compared to the studied prognostic factors and parameters, caspase-3 demonstrated the following:

  • A tendency towards association was found between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the size and invasion of the primary tumour after neoadjuvant therapy and surgical removal, but the number of patients in the study was small, making the statistical significance unreliable; χ2 = 27.02, df = 5, p = 0. 0001 (Table 3).

  • A statistically significant association was found between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, evaluated according to the Sataloff classification; χ2 = 5.97, df = 1, p = 0.0145. More than half of the patients demonstrating complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant treatment were found to be caspase-3 positive on diagnostic biopsy, but only 1/8 of the non-responders were found to express caspase-3 on diagnostic biopsy (Table 4).

  • No statistically significant association was outlined between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the grade of differentiation; χ2 = 0.64, df = 2, p = 0.7251 (Table 5).

  • No statistically significant association was outlined between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and YN status; χ2 = 2.7, df = 3, p = 0.4401 (Table 6).

  • No statistically significant association was outlined between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the Sataloff response category; N χ2 = 3.88, df = 3, p = 0.2746 (Table 7).

  • No statistically significant relation was found between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the molecular (surrogate) subtype of the tumour; χ2 = 6.98, df = 4, p = 0.1372 (Table 8). Additionally, the effect from neoadjuvant therapy in the context of proliferative Ki-67 index and the expression of caspase-3 on diagnostic biopsy was analysed separately for each therapeutic and molecular subtype.

  • Luminal tumours treated predominantly with epirubicin hydrochloride and cyclophosphamide demonstrated no statistically significant difference between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of neoadjuvant therapy assessed according to the Sataloff classification category T; K-W = 0.0957, p = 0. 7570 (Table 9).

  • Luminal tumours treated predominantly with epirubicin hydrochloride and cyclophosphamide demonstrated no significant association between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, evaluated according to the Sataloff classification; χ2 = 0.19, df = 1, p = 0. 6592 (Table 10).

  • Luminal tumours treated predominantly with epirubicin hydrochloride and cyclophosphamide demonstrated no statistically significant difference between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of neoadjuvant therapy, the Sataloff classification category N, K-W = 0.7656 p = 0.8577 (Table 9). Luminal tumours treated predominantly epirubicin hydrochloride and cyclophosphamide demonstrated no statistically significant association between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the Sataloff response category N; χ2 = 4.17, df = 3, p = 0.2434 (Table 11).

  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumours treated with docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab demonstrated no statistically significant difference between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of neoadjuvant therapy assessed according to the Sataloff classification category T; F = 3.38, p = 0.0780 (Table 9). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumours treated with docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab demonstrated a tendency towards association between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, evaluated according to the Sataloff classification; χ2 = 4.34, df = 1, p = 0.0372. Nearly half of the patients demonstrating complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant treatment were found to be caspase-3 positive on diagnostic biopsy. In contrast, less than 1/10 of the non-responders were found to express caspase-3 on diagnostic biopsy. The number of cases was small, and due to their distribution, no general conclusions can be made (Table 12).

  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumours treated with docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab demonstrated no statistically significant difference between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of neoadjuvant therapy, assessed according to the Sataloff classification category N; F = 0.40 p = 0.7515 (Table 9).

  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumours treated with docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab demonstrated no statistically significant association between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the Sataloff response category N; χ2 = 1.97, df = 3, p = 0.5779 (Table 13).

  • Triple-negative tumours treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin demonstrated no statistically significant difference between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of neoadjuvant therapy assessed according to the Sataloff classification category T; F = 0.01, p = 0.9278 (Table 9).

  • Triple-negative tumours treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin demonstrated no significant association between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, evaluated according to the Sataloff classification. No caspase-3 positive cases were found (Table 14).

  • Triple-negative tumours treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin demonstrated no statistically significant difference between Ki-67 levels (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of neoadjuvant therapy, evaluated according to the Sataloff classification category N; F = 0.83, p = 0.5582 (Table 9).

  • Triple-negative tumours treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin demonstrated no statistically significant association between the expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the Sataloff response category N; χ2 = 7,00, df = 3, p = 0.0.0719 (Table 15).

Table 3

Expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the size and invasion of the primary tumour after neoadjuvant therapy and surgical removal

ypT01234In situ
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)9 (8.57)17 (16.19)42 (40.00)8 (7.62)12 (11.43)0 (0.00)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)3 (2.86)5 (4.76)5 (4.76)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)4 (3.81)
Table 4

Expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, evaluated according to the Sataloff classification

Sataloff TA (complete response)B, C, D (non-complete response and no response)
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)11 (12.36)63 (70.79)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)7 (7.87)8 (8.99)
Table 5

Caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the grade of differentiation

GradeG1G2G3
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)2 (1.94)40 (38.83)44 (42.72)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)0 (0.00)7 (6.80)10 (9.71)
Table 6

Expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and yN status

ypNN0N1N2N3
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)24 (23.53)27 (26.47)22 (21.57)12 (11.76)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)8 (7.84)4 (3.92)4 (3.92)1 (0.98)
Table 7

Caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the Sataloff response category N

Sataloff NABCD
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)6 (7.06)17 (20.00)25 (29.41)22 (25.88)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)2 (2.35)5 (5.88)7 (8.24)1 (1.18)
Table 8

Caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the molecular (surrogate) subtype of the tumour

Molecular subtypeLuminal ALuminal B Ki-67 ≥ 14%Luminal B HER2 positiveHER2TNT
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)12 (12.37)40 (41.24)7 (7.22)14 (14.43)8 (8.25)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)3 (3.09)5 (5.15)0 (0.00)7 (7.22)1 (1.03)

[i] HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, TNT – triple negative tumour

Table 9

Ki-67 and its relation to treatment response in different tumour (therapy) groups

Tumour (therapy) groupSataloff categoryNumber of casesMedian values of Ki-67 (%)Average values of Ki-67 (%)/SDMin–max (%)
Luminal tumours, treated predominantly with EC epirubicin + EndoxanSataloff TA (complete response)23715–60
B, C, D (non-complete response and no response)54259 –94
Sataloff NA24122–60
B72415–62
C26259–60
D18319–94
HER2 positive tumours, treated with docetaxel, Herceptin (trastuzumab) + Perjeta (pertuzumab)Sataloff TA (complete response)1440.14/15.5614–61
B, C, D (non–complete response and no response)1330.46/11.2819–60
Sataloff NA439.75/16.2821–60
B1233.34/15.6614–61
C529.8/ 8.0720–40
D437.0/15. 8526–60
Triple-negative tumours treated with paclitaxel + carboplatinSataloff TA (complete response)239/29.7018–60
B, C, D (non-complete response and no response)441/21.7122–70
Sataloff NA239/29.7018–60
B339.67/26.3922–70
C187/0.0087–87
D145/0.0045–45

[i] EC – epirubicin hydrochloride + cyclophosphamide, HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

Table 10

Expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, evaluated according to the Sataloff classification

Sataloff TA (complete response)B, C, D (non-complete response and no response)
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)1 (1.79)47 (83.93)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)1 (1.79)7 (12.50)
Table 11

Caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the Sataloff response category N

Sataloff NABCD
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)1 (1.89)5 (9.43)22 (41.51)17 (32.08)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)1 (1.89)2 (3.77)4 (7.55)1 (1.89)
Table 12

Expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, evaluated according to the Sataloff classification

Sataloff TA (complete response)B, C, D (non-complete response and no response)
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)8 (29.63)12 (44.44)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)6 (22.22)1 (3.70)
Table 13

Caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the Sataloff response category N

Sataloff NABCD
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)3 (12.00)9 (36.00)3 (12.00)4 (16.00)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)1 (4.00)3 (12.00)2 (8.00)0 (0.00)
Table 14

Expression of caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the effect of treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, evaluated according to the Sataloff classification

Sataloff TA (complete response)B, C, D (non-complete response and no response)
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)2 (33.33)4 (66.67)
Table 15

Caspase-3 (on diagnostic biopsy) and the Sataloff response category N

Sataloff NABCD
Caspase-3 negative, n (%)2 (28.57)3 (42.86)0 (0.00)1 (14.29)
Caspase-3 positive, n (%)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)1 (14.29)0 (0.00)

Discussion

Tumour size and lymph node status are independent prognostic factors but also additive, time dependent, and associated with a worsening prognosis [11]. The histological grade, assessed upon the degree of tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism, and mitotic count, shows a very strong correlation with prognosis, but it is not identified as independent prognostic factor [12]. These 3 factors form the multifactorial Nottingham prognostic index were used to stratify patients for appropriate therapy. The molecular BC subtypes and proliferative and apoptotic index can be used as markers of efficacy evaluation before and after NAC, but they have limited independent significance, and their prognostic value has been inconsistent [4].

Ki-67 protein has long been studied as a proliferation marker expressed in dividing cells. Although loss of Ki-67 has been proven to have little or no impact on cell proliferation, it still plays a critical role in cancer development [13]. Mrouj et al. suggest that Ki-67 plays a role in cellular adaptation to the environment, thus favouring carcinogenesis and drug resistance, but also making tumour cells more sensitive to antitumour immune responses [14].

To date, a lot of studies have presented results showing that high Ki-67 expression in patients with early-stage BC is related to higher recurrence rate and poor overall survival [15, 16]. Other reports indicate that tumours with high Ki-67 expression respond more effectively to NAC [17] and are more likely to attain pathological complete response after NAC [4, 18]. High Ki-67 expression after NAC can be a poor prognostic marker for efficacy evaluation of NAC and subsequent therapy management [19]. Generally, Ki-67 is unlikely to predict the response to endocrine neoadjuvant therapy in hormone receptor-positive BC [20]. These observations are in accordance with the tendency observed in our study, where Ki-67 expression in patients with complete pathologic response was not significantly higher compared to the other groups. This may be a result of the relatively low number of patients, the antibody used, or tumour heterogeneity in about 10% of the studied population. It is also possible that the Ki-67 index might be predictive for a specific molecular subtype [21]. The therapy response in the N category in our study demonstrates that Ki-67 may be high in cases with either complete response or no response, but again it was not statistically significant, underlining the fact that neoadjuvant therapy response may not be predicted by Ki-67. This leads to the need for alternative methods of evaluation like dynamics in Ki-67 expression between pre- and post-NAC or follow-up in combination with other markers. Such a marker could be caspase-3, the most widely studied member of the cysteine protease family, which plays a central role in the induction of apoptosis in response to various stimuli, including chemotherapy. Apart from being an apoptotic executor, caspase-3 also takes part in other important cellular events like proliferation, differentiation, and migration, which may explain metastasis, and chemotherapy resistance in tumours [22].

Most studies confirm the relationship between the level of apoptosis and caspase-3 expression [23]. Liu et al. even suggest that cleaved caspase-3 is related to better chemotherapy response but worse prognosis [24]. Our study presents similar observations on caspase-3, suggesting that its expression may be related to response to neoadjuvant therapy, although it was not focused on overall survival.

A parallel increase in apoptosis and proliferation in progressive ductal epithelial lesions with proliferative activity significantly outweighing apoptotic activity leading to clonal expansion, and thus progression was observed by Bai et al. [25]. Such a predominance of apoptotic over proliferative activity in situ carcinomas/ DCIS/a possible explanation of their stable state, with delayed subsequent invasion [26, 27].

Cleaved caspase-3 and Ki-67 index on diagnostic biopsy are also found to be related to some of the post-treatment prognostic factors (tumour T stage, N stage, and grade), thus being complimentary to them in the prediction of treatment response and further disease management [28, 29].

Our results concerning the relationship between caspase-3 expression and prognostic factors in BC are in accordance with the data found in the literature, summarised in a meta-analysis of 3091 cases in 21 studies by Yang et al. up to 2017, in which an association of high levels of caspase-3 and progression and poor prognosis in patients with breast carcinoma was largely confirmed. The study did not prove an association between caspase-3 and TNM and histology grade, but a statistically significant relationship between PR and HER2 status was observed [30].

According to data from the current study, the response to therapy in luminal A, luminal B, and triple- negative tumours cannot be predicted based on Ki-67 expression or activated caspase-3 expression (evaluated on preoperative biopsy). In practice, a Ki-67-based follow-up to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for stage 2 and stage 3 ER receptor-positive breast carcinomas is proposed [31]. It is still uncertain how applicable this method is to heterogeneous breast tumours.

Existing data demonstrate the prognostic value of caspase-3 for disease outcome in ER, PR, or HER2 subsets and non-basal-like subgroup [32]. Data are generally scarce and controversial, assessing expression of caspase-3 together with tumour size, age, histologic type, ER, progesterone receptor, HER2 status, lymph node status, prognosis, and overall survival [33].

Expression of Ki-67 and activated caspase-3 in the different therapeutic subgroups shows a tendency towards overexpression in HER2-positive tumours, where it is most often associated with a complete pathological response in the primary tumour [34].

According to our observations, some HER2-driven breast carcinomas preserve their apoptotic properties (presence of cleaved caspase-3), which makes them sensitive to anti-HER2 therapy (and good responders). In our opinion, Ki-67 shows a similar predictive potential for therapeutic response evaluation in HER2 tumours on target therapy.

In the context of tumour heterogeneity, the study of Ki-67 expression and activated caspase-3 on diagnostic biopsy samples is relevant in all types of tumours, and in practice they play a potentially significant role in the HER2-associated progression pathway. Systematic studies are required on these potential biomarkers in the context of neoadjuvant therapy effect prediction.

Conclusions

Caspase-3 expression was found to be significantly related to complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment in the studied BC patients. Although there were noticeably increased Ki-67 values in patients who responded completely compared to patients with partial response or no response to neoadjuvant therapy, there was no statistical significance. The present study demonstrated that both markers have the potential to be used for prediction of the response to neoadjuvant therapy in BC. Further investigations are required to allow the possible introduction of the studied markers in routine diagnostic practice as predictors of neoadjuvant treatment response.

Acknowledgements

The present study received financial support as part of research project № 6/2022 “Evaluation of apoptotic marker expression (factor) caspase-3 and proliferative index estimated by Ki-67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in individual molecular subtypes of BC (in the context of tumour heterogeneity) and analysis of their clinical relevance”, funded by Medical University – Pleven. Permission for the current study was obtained from the Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Pleven (№ 707/03.06.2022).

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Provenzano E. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: moving beyond pathological complete response in the molecular age. Acta Med Acad 2021; 50: 88-109.

2 

Hortobagyi G, Edge S, Giuliano A. New and important changes in the TNM staging system for breast cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018; 38: 457-467.

3 

Engels C, Ruberta F, de Kruijf, et al. The prognostic value of apoptotic and proliferative markers in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 142: 323-339.

4 

Wang H, Mao X. Evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther 2020; 14: 2423-2433.

5 

Zhang A, Wang X, Fan C, et al. The role of Ki67 in evaluating neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12: 687244.

6 

WHO classification of tumours editorial board breast tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours. 5th ed. IARC Press, Lyon 2019.

7 

Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2019; 30: 1194-1220.

8 

Sataloff D, Mason B, Prestipino A, et al. Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 180: 297-306.

9 

Nielsen T, Leung S, Rimm D, et al. Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: updated recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113: 808-819.

10 

Dowsett M, Nielsen T, A’Hern R, et al; International Ki-67 in breast cancer working group. Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in breast cancer working group. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 1656-1664.

11 

Carter C, Allen C, Henson D. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 1989; 63: 181-187.

12 

Elston C, Ellis I. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991; 19: 403-410.

13 

Andrés-Sánchez N, Fisher D, Krasinska L. Physiological functions and roles in cancer of the proliferation marker Ki-67. J Cell Sci 2022; 135: jcs 258932.

14 

Mrouj K, Andrés-Sánchez N, Dubra G, et al. Ki-67 regulates global gene expression and promotes sequential stages of carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118: e2026507118.

15 

Urruticoechea A, Smith I, Dowsett M. Proliferation marker Ki-67 in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 7212-7220.

16 

De Azambuja E, Cardoso F, de Castro G Jr, et al. Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12,155 patients. Br J Cancer 2007; 96: 1504-1513.

17 

Yoshioka T, Hosoda M, Yamamoto M, et al. Prognostic significance of pathologic complete response and Ki67 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2015; 22: 185-191.

18 

Faneyte I, Schrama J, Peterse J, et al. Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Br J Cancer 2003; 88: 406-412.

19 

Sheri A, Dowsett M. Developments in Ki67 and other biomarkers for treatment decision making in breast cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 2012; 23: x219-227.

20 

Zhang A, Wang X, Fan C, et al. The role of Ki67 in evaluating neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12: 687244.

21 

Ács B, Zámbó V, Vízkeleti L, et al. Ki-67 as a controversial predictive and prognostic marker in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Diagn Pathol 2017; 12: 20.

22 

Ghorbani N, Yaghubi R, Davoodi J, Pahlavan S. How does caspases regulation play role in cell decisions? apoptosis and beyond. Mol Cell Biochem 2023.

23 

Vakkala M, Pääkkö P, Soini Y. Expression of caspases 3, 6 and 8 is increased in parallel with apoptosis and histological aggressiveness of the breast lesion. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 592-599.

24 

Liu X, Jiang S, Tian X, et al. Expression of cleaved caspase-3 predicts good chemotherapy response but poor survival for patients with advanced primary triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2018; 11: 4363-4373.

25 

Bai M, Agnantis N, Kamina S, et al. In vivo cell kinetics in breast carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res 2001; 3: 276-283.

26 

Harn H, Shen K, Yueh K, et al. Apoptosis occurs more frequently in intraductal carcinoma than in infiltrating duct carcinoma of human breast cancer and correlates with altered p53 expression: detected by terminal-deoxynucleotidyl-transferase-mediated dUTP-FITC nick end labelling (TUNEL). Histopathology 1997; 31: 534-539.

27 

Shen K, Harn H, Ho L, et al. The extent of proliferative and apoptotic activity in intraductal and invasive ductal breast carcinomas detected by Ki-67 labeling and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated digoxigenin-11-dUTP nick end labeling. Cancer 1998; 82: 2373-2381.

28 

Krüger S, Fahrenkrog T, Müller H. Proliferative and apoptotic activity in lobular breast carcinoma. Int J Mol Med 1999; 4: 171-174.

29 

Jager J, Jansen R, Arends J. Clinical relevance of apoptotic markers in breast cancer not yet clear. Apoptosis 2002; 7: 361-365.

30 

Yang X, Zhong D, Qin H, et al. Caspase-3 over-expression is associated with poor overall survival and clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 3091 cases. Oncotarget 2017; 9: 8629-8641.

31 

Reinert T, Gonçalves R, Ellis M. Current status of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in early stage breast cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2018; 19: 23.

32 

Pu X, Storr S, Zhang Y, et al. Caspase-3 and caspase-8 expression in breast cancer: caspase-3 is associated with survival. Apoptosis 2017; 22: 357-368.

33 

Nassar A, Lawson D, Cotsonis G, et al. Survivin and caspase-3 expression in breast cancer: correlation with prognostic parameters, proliferation, angiogenesis, and outcome. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2008; 16: 113-120.

34 

Carpenter R, Lo H. Regulation of apoptosis by HER2 in breast cancer. J Carcinog Mutagen 2013; 2013 (Suppl 7): 003.

Copyright: © 2024 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.