eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2024
vol. 20
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Evaluation of the non‑alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score in predicting short-term outcomes and severe coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography

Esra Colak
1
,
Burak Acar
1
,
Ozgur Cakir
2
,
Umut Celikyurt
1
,
Ozgur Baris
3
,
Akın Torun
1
,
Mustafa Eren Tosun
1
,
Aysen Agir
1
,
Tayfun Sahin
1
,
Ercument Ciftci
2

1.
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
2.
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
3.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
Adv Interv Cardiol 2024; 20, 1 (75): 45–52
Online publish date: 2024/03/15
Article file
- evaluation (10).pdf  [0.10 MB]
Get citation
 
 

Summary

This study investigated the short-term predictive value of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS) in patients who underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). Patients with higher NFS were found to have a greater incidence of myocardial infarction, death, and coronary angiography. Moreover, both NFS and Agatston scores were equally effective in predicting severe coronary artery disease and short-term primary outcomes (mainly driven by repeated coronary angiography). An NFS above –0.92 could predict the primary outcome (death, myocardial infarction, and coronary angiography) with 61% sensitivity and 63% specificity, while an NFS above –0.88 could predict severe coronary artery disease with 62% sensitivity and 65% specificity.

Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease in Western countries [1]. NAFLD is associated with many additional diseases such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia [2]. The NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) is based on laboratory tests and it has proven to be a prognostic indicator for predicting the risk of developing advanced fibrosis and mortality [3]. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with a high NFS have been shown to have more vascular complications [4]. Another study found that the patients with hepatic steatosis and a high liver fibrosis score had a more atherogenic lipid profile [5]. Additionally, cardiovascular mortality is higher in patients with high liver fibrosis scores [6].

Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is the most important non-invasive diagnostic tool for showing coronary plaque burden and characteristics [7]. A study using a 64-slice computed tomography (CT) scan showed a correlation between NFS and FIB-4 score with coronary artery calcification [8].

Aim

In the present study, using high-slice (640-slice) CCTA, we aimed to examine plaque formation in CCTA and its relationship with NAFLD. Additionally, we aimed to demonstrate the short-term impact of NFS on outcomes such as the need for coronary angiography, death, and recurrent revascularization in these patients.

Material and methods

Study design and population

This study took place from January 2021 to January 2022 and involved retrospectively evaluating patients who underwent CCTA. We reviewed the demographic and clinic characteristics of these patients from their medical records. To ensure the accuracy of our results, we excluded patients who were under 18 years of age, had known coronary artery disease, lacked clinical information, consumed excessive amounts of alcohol (more than 21 drinks per week for men and more than 14 drinks per week for women), had missing liver enzyme levels, or had active or chronic liver disease. After excluding 334 patients, a total of 499 patients remained for analysis. We followed the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained approval from the Ethics Committee of our university (GOKAEK-2023/05.10).

Data collection and definitions

The present study collected admission and follow-up clinical information, including demographic data, biochemical data, lifestyle, medical history, and use of medications, for each patient from computerized hospitalization medical records. Telephone interviews were used when necessary. Diabetes at baseline was defined as fasting blood glucose levels of ≥ 126 mg/dl and/or a history of diabetes, while hypertension was defined as blood pressure levels of ≥ 140/90 mm Hg at admission and/or a previous diagnosis of hypertension. Dyslipidemia was defined according to the latest guidelines or treatment with lipid-lowering drugs, considering patient risk factors [8]. Additionally, a family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) was determined when CAD was found in first-degree relatives aged < 55 (male) or < 65 (female) years.

Liver fibrosis score

Liver fibrosis was estimated by NFS: −1.675 + 0.037 × age (years) + 0.094 × body mass index (kg/m2) + 1.13 × diabetes mellitus (if present, given 1) + 0.95 × aspartate transferaminase (AST) (U/l) to ALT (U/l) ratio – 0.013 × platelet count (10–9/l) – 0.66 × albumin (mg/l) [9]. The patients were divided into three groups based on NFS values: lower risk (NFS < –1.455), moderate risk (–1.455–0.676), and high risk (> 0.676) [9].

Coronary computed tomography angiography

The present study involved the performance of CCTA using a state-of-the-art 640-slice scanner, the Aquilion ONE Genesis Edition, manufactured by Canon Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan. The scan was conducted utilizing a voltage of 100–120 kV, which was tailored to the patient’s body weight, and a current intensity of 250–500 mA, which was automatically determined based on the patient’s scanogram data. The gantry rotation time was set at 275 ms, while the scan collimation was manually planned in the range of 0.5 × 100 mm to 0.5 × 160 mm, taking into account the size and location of the area of the heart to be scanned. Moreover, the field of view (FOV) was set between 200 and 270 mm to cover the region from the tracheal bifurcation to the base of the heart.

Non-contrast-enhanced coronary tomography was performed in each patient for assessment of the Agatston calcium score [10]. The extent of CAC is calculated by multiplying the area of lesions with a density of ≥ 130 Hounsfield units (HU) with a density factor derived from the maximum density of each lesion (1 for 130–199 HU, 2 for 200–299 HU, 3 for 300–399 HU, and 4 for lesions ≥ 400 HU). The total score was calculated by summing up the scores of each lesion.

During the medical procedure, a volume of 50–80 ml of iodinated contrast medium (350 mg/ml) was administered intravenously at a rate of 5 ml/s, followed by a saline solution of 20 ml. The images were reconstructed in synchronization with an electrocardiogram (ECG) in prospective (40–70 BPM), modulated (70–90 BPM), and retrospective (90–120 BPM) scans. The imaging system automatically provides images at the 75% phase of the RR interval, as well as the most optimal phase generated by the software. However, in cases where the optimal phase is not achieved, the operator utilizes the software to create the most appropriate phase, beat, and functional information.

The acquired images were transferred to a workstation (Vitrea Advanced, United States) for image reconstruction. Various image reconstruction techniques such as axial images, multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), three-dimensional volume rendering (VR), curved planar reformat (CPR), cinematic rendering using global illumination rendering (GIR), and three-dimensional maximum intensity projection (MIP) images were employed to meticulously evaluate the existence of coronary artery stenosis and plaque.

The degree of stenosis was meticulously evaluated and quantified in each coronary segment. Severe coronary artery disease was defined as the presence of stenosis equal to or greater than 50% in the main coronary artery, or equal to or greater than 70% in other coronary arteries [11, 12]. The interpretation of the CCTA was done by an experienced radiologist.

Statistical analysis

All calculations were performed using the SPSS 20.0 software package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normal distribution of data was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Numerical variables showing normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation, while numerical variables not following normal distribution were presented as median (interquartile range). Categorical variables were presented as frequencies (percentages). For normally distributed numerical data, group comparisons were conducted using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for numerical variables that did not follow a normal distribution. Categorical variables were evaluated using cross-tables and the χ2 test. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to calculate the predictive value of the NFS for primary outcomes and severe coronary artery disease. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess factors influencing primary outcomes, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of severe coronary artery disease. Survival analysis for primary outcomes was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, stratified by NFS groups. Survival differences were analyzed using the log-rank test. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The study included 499 patients, with a mean age of 61.9 ±9.3 years, and 54.7% of whom were male. No significant differences were found in gender and BMI among the NFS groups (p > 0.005). However, patients in the higher NFS groups were older than those in the other groups (p < 0.001) (Table I). The low NFS group had higher LDL values (p = 0.019), whereas the high NFS group had significantly lower hemoglobin levels and higher blood glucose values (respectively, p < 0.001 and 0.001). Triglycerides, HDL, albumin, creatinine, AST, ALT, and platelet values were similar in all three groups. The high NFS group had a higher prevalence of hypertension, while the intermediate NFS group had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) (p < 0.001). Dyslipidemia, family history of coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, smoking, and exercise history were similar among the groups (p > 0.05). Patients in the low NFS group had lower use of statins and acetylsalicylic acid (Table I).

Table I

Baseline characteristics of patients by non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score

ParameterNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis scoreP-value
LowIntermediateHigh
Number of patients19423768
Non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score range< –1.455–1.455–0.676> 0.676
Non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score, mean ± SD–2.78 ±0.640.6 ±0.611.56 ±0.7< 0.001
Age [years] mean ± SD51.2 ±10.456.3 ±1.363.3 ±13.1< 0.001
Male, n (%)109 (56.2)125 (52.7)39 (57.4)0.693
Body mass index [kg/m2] mean ± SD27.9 ±4.829.0 ±4.928.9 ±4.70.075
Laboratory findings:
 Albumin [g/l], mean ± SD44.6 ±3.344.1 ±3.243.9 ±4.20.208
 Triglycerides [mg/dl], mean ± SD175.2 ±98.8170.9 ±9.4168.1 ±83.00.882
 Low density lipoprotein [mg/dl], mean ± SD125.4 ±42.9113.1 ±44.8107.6 ±46.70.019
 High-density lipoprotein (IQR) [mg/dl]44 (18)44.5 (16.3)45 (21.0)0.925
 Hemoglobin [g/dl], mean ± SD13.8 ±1.713.1 ±1.712.7 ±1.9< 0.001
 Fasting glucose [mg/dl], mean ± SD103.1 ±29.2119.6 ±54.5124.0 ±41.50.001
 Aspartate aminotransferase [U/l], mean ± SD22.1 ±8.320.5 ±6.721.7 ±6.90.092
 Alanine aminotransferase [U/l], mean ± SD24.1 ±9.723.5 ±11.722.9 ±11.10.731
 Platelet [× 109/l] [IQR]236 (65)235 (70)230 (35)0.261
 Creatinine [mg/dl] [IQR]0.9 (0.3)0.9 (0.3)0.8 (0.3)0.458
Cardiovascular risk factors, n (%):
 Hypertension76 (39.2)127 (53.6)41 (60.3)0.002
 Diabetes33 (17.0)100 (43.0)27 (39.7)< 0.001
 Dyslipidemia49 (25.3)62 (26.2)19 (27.9)0.909
 Family history for coronary artery disease69 (35.6)78 (32.9)30 (44.1)0.235
 Chronic renal disease4 (2.1)5 (2.1)4 (5.9)0.189
 Smoking history119 (61.3)135 (57.0)39 (57.4)0.636
Use of medications before admission, n (%):
 B-blocker34 (17.5)61 (25.7)10 (14.7)0.044
 Calcium channel blocker25 (12.0)30 (12.7)9 (13.2)0.992
 Nitrates010
 Acetylsalicylic acid23 (11.9)51 (21.5)13 (19.1)0.029
 ADP blocker6 (3.1)6 (2.5)2 (2.9)0.938
 Trimetazidine3 (1.5)3 (1.3)00.598
 RAS blocker51 (263)67 (28.3)21 (30.9)0.753
 Statins11 (5.7)35 (14.8)7 (10.3)0.016

[i] SD – standard deviation, RAS – renin-angiotensin system.

The study found that patients with higher NFS had significantly higher Agatston score values (30 ±71.6 in the low NFS group, 61.4 ±17.9 in the intermediate NFS group, 370.3 ±549.2 in the high NFS group, p < 0.001). Furthermore, in the high NFS group, there was a significantly higher degree of stenosis compared to the other two groups (p = 0.001). As NFS increased, so did the degree of stenosis. It was observed that no stenosis was present in 61.9% of patients in the low NFS group and 50.6% of patients in the intermediate NFS group. The percentage of patients with atherosclerotic plaque was 42.8% in the low NFS group, 54.9% in the moderate NFS group, and 75% in the high NFS group (p < 0.001). The primary purpose of CCTA was to rule out coronary artery disease, as shown in Table II, with 341 patients undergoing the procedure.

Table II

Coronary computed tomography angiography characteristics of patients according to non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score

ParameterNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis scoreP-value
Low (194)Intermediate (237)High (68)
Agatston score, mean ± SD30 ±71.661.4 ±17.9370.3 ±549.2< 0.001
Stenosis, n (%):< 0.001
 0120 (61.9)120 (50.6)21 (30.9)
 1–241 (0.5)2 (0.8)0 (0)
 25–4937 (19.1)65 (27.4)14 (20.6)
 50–6914 (7.2)22 (9.3)11 (16.2)
 70–-9921 (10.8)28 (11.8)22 (32.4)
 100100
Participants with any plaque, n (%)83 (42.8)130 (54.9)51 (75.0)< 0.001
Indication for CCTA, n (%):0.006
 Exclusion of coronary artery disease133 (68.5)160 (67.5)48 (70.5)
 Before cardiac surgery4 (2)10 (4.2)9 (13.2)
 Arrythmia21 (10.8)24 (10.1)5 (7.3)
 Other36 (18.5)43 (18.1)6 (8.8)

[i] CCTA – coronary computed tomography angiography, SD – standard deviation.

The primary endpoint of our study was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), coronary angiography after CCTA in the following year, and death. No significant differences were observed in the numbers of MI and death among the groups (p > 0.05). The statistical analysis revealed that a greater number of individuals in the high NFS group underwent coronary angiography as compared to the low NFS group. This difference was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). The patients with higher NFS showed a significantly higher prevalence of severe coronary artery disease as compared to those with lower NFS (p < 0.001) (Table III).

Table III

Primary endpoint and severe coronary artery disease frequency according to non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score

ParameterNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis scoreP-value
LowIntermediateHigh
Event after CCTA, n (%):
 Myocardial infarction03 (1.3)1 (1.5)0.274
 Death04 (1.7)1 (1.5)0.198
 Coronary angiography27 (13.9)34 (14.3)28 (41.2)< 0.001
Severe coronary artery disease, n (%)23 (11.9)27 (11.4)22 (32.4)< 0.001

[i] CCTA – coronary computed tomography angiography.

A comprehensive analysis was conducted to determine the predictors for severe coronary artery disease in CCTA. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the NFS (OR = 1.264, 95% CI [1.008–1.585], p = 0.043) and Agatston score (OR = 1.002, 95% CI [1.001–1.003], p = 0.004) were independent predictors for severe coronary artery disease. These findings are presented in detail in Table IV.

Table IV

Logistic regression analysis for severe coronary artery disease detected in coronary computed coronary angiography

ParameterUnivariateMultivariate
OR95% CIP-valueOR95% CIP-value
Age1.0791.052–1.107< 0.001*1.0250.991–1.0600.153
Body mass index1.0290.979–1.0820.263
Male1.4550.870–2.4310.153
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score1.7041.435–2.024< 0.001*1.2641.008–1.5850.043
Agatston score1.0031.002–1.004< 0.001*1.0021.001–1.0030.004
Diabetes2.0901.259–3.470.004*1.2810.631–2.5980.493
Hypertension2.3571.393–3.9870.001*1.3550.689–2.6670.379
Dyslipidemia1.6310.957–2.7790.072
Family history1.4550.876–2.4170.147
Smoking history0.9820.591–1.6290.943
Exercise1.0830.649–1.8100.759
Low-density lipoprotein0.9660.989–1.0030.264
Admission glucose1.0051.000–1.0100.042*0.9990.992–1.0070.841
Creatinine1.9761.038–3.7640.038*1.5200.948–2.4380.082

* Parameters included in multivariate analysis.

Cox regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the parameters affecting the primary endpoints. The NFS (HR =1.239, 95% CI [1.044–1.470]; p = 0.014) and Agatston score (HR = 1.001, 95% CI [1.000–1.001]; p = 0.015) were independent predictors of the primary endpoint (Table V).

Table V

Cox regression analysis of primary endpoint (death, coronary angiography, myocardial infarction)

ParameterUnivariateMultivariate
HR95% CIP-valueHR95% CIP-value
Age1.0190.996–1.0440.111
Body mass index1.0090.970–1.0500.652
Male1.0550.687–1.6220.806
Non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score1.2591.088–1.4560.002*1.2391.044–1.4700.014
Agatston score1.0001.000–1.0010.054*1.0011.000–1.0010.015
Diabetes1.2940.852–1.9660.227
Hypertension1.2310.793–1.9110.355
Dyslipidemia1.3280.875–2.0160.182
Family history0.9300.608–1.4210.736
Smoking0.9370.612–1.4340.764
Exercise0.9330.614–1.4170.933
Low-density lipoprotein1.0020.997–1.0060.498
Admission glucose1.0041.000–1.0080.053*1.0030.999–1.0070.155
Creatinine1.2001.922–1.5620.176

* Parameters included in multivariate analysis.

The results from the ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the primary endpoint was 0.657 (95% CI: 0.592–0.723, p < 0.001). An NFS value above –0.92 was found to be predictive of the primary endpoint with a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 63%, as shown in Figure 1. For severe coronary artery disease, the AUC was 0.693 (95% CI: 0.623–0.764, p < 0.001), and an NFS value above –0.88 could predict severe coronary artery disease with a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 65% (Figure 2).

Figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score predicting primary endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, coronary angiography)

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/52664/PWKI-20-52664-g001_min.jpg
Figure 2

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score predicting severe coronary artery disease

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/52664/PWKI-20-52664-g002_min.jpg

Survival analysis was conducted for the primary endpoints using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to compare NFS groups. The results showed that patients with higher NFS experienced primary outcomes earlier during the follow-up period (p = 0.009), as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curve showing freedom from cardiovascular events according to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease group

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/52664/PWKI-20-52664-g003_min.jpg

Discussion

In this study, we examined the short-term predictive value of NFS in patients who underwent CCTA. Patients with higher NFS were found to have a greater incidence of myocardial infarction, death, and coronary angiography. Moreover, the NFS and Agatston scores were equally effective in predicting severe coronary artery disease and short-term primary outcomes (mainly driven by repeated coronary angiography). An NFS above –0.92 could predict the primary outcome (death, myocardial infarction (MI), and CA) with 61% sensitivity and 63% specificity, while an NFS above –0.88 could predict severe CAD with 62% sensitivity and 65% specificity.

NAFLD is the most common chronic liver disease in developed countries. It is mostly caused by obesity, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and insulin resistance. This disease is believed to be the hepatic component of metabolic syndrome. The most important predictor of mortality in NAFLD is fibrosis. Although biopsy is the gold standard in evaluating fibrosis, various scoring systems have been developed due to its invasive nature and cost-effectiveness [13]. One scoring method used for this purpose is the NFS, which can indicate the presence or absence of advanced fibrosis and can be easily obtained from clinical and laboratory parameters [9]. Recent guidelines have recommended the use of the NFS to predict patients with NAFLD who are at a higher risk of developing fibrosis and cirrhosis [1, 14].

It is not yet clear how liver fibrosis and CAD are related, but some possibilities have been suggested. It is believed that chronic inflammation and oxidative stress can lead to endothelial dysfunction, which can cause both coronary atherosclerosis and liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD [15]. In the case of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, lipoproteins accumulate in the intima layer of coronary arteries. This leads to the deposition of leukocytes into the vessel after oxidative stress and cytokine release. As a result, smooth muscle cells begin to proliferate. In advanced stages, fibrosis and calcification contribute to the completion of atherosclerotic plaque formation. On the other hand, in NAFLD, the initial stage is the storage of fat in the liver and the development of insulin resistance. The second stage involves oxidative stress that occurs during the oxidation of fatty acids [9]. Recent studies have revealed a close correlation between NAFLD and coronary artery disease due to their similarities [16, 17].

CAD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and its diagnosis and management are of paramount importance in clinical practice. CCTA is a non-invasive imaging technique that provides valuable information for the diagnosis and management of CAD. Moreover, CCTA can be utilized to visualize different phases of atherosclerosis, including the development of plaque, its progression, and eventual rupture. Therefore, CCTA can contribute significantly to the understanding of the pathophysiology of CAD and the development of effective therapeutic strategies for its prevention and treatment [18]. A 64-slice contrast-enhanced CT scan study found a strong correlation between NAFLD and high-risk plaque, as well as progressive stenosis of the coronary arteries in individuals suspected of having coronary artery disease [19]. This study revealed a significant relationship between Agatston score, degree of stenosis, presence of plaque, and CCTA indication with NFS. These findings highlight the correlation between NAFLD and atherosclerosis. Our results suggest that invasive coronary artery angiography is more necessary for those with high NFSs due to the practical implications of the parallel relationship between CCTA and NAFLD. Moreover, patients with high NFSs are more likely to have severe coronary artery disease. Therefore, the NFS is an important consideration when deciding on invasive coronary angiography. CCTA is a valuable test with a short examination time and low radiation exposure, and can be used to predict and assess the prognosis of coronary artery disease. The CCTA used in our study had high slices and good resolution, providing low radiation exposure and shorter examination time with mostly prospective scans without controlling heart rate in most patients.

The study found that NAFLD was linked to cardiovascular disorders and cardiac mortality was increased in patients with NAFLD who had higher NFS [20]. Liu et al. reported that patients with CAD had a higher risk of recurrent cardiovascular events with increasing liver fibrosis scores [7]. According to a recent study, liver fibrosis was associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The evaluation of this risk was carried out through the use of various fibrosis scores [21]. The myocardial infarction and death rates were similar between the groups. The low number of patients and relatively short follow-up might have affected the statistical significance. The patients with higher NFS were older, more hypertensive, and had diabetes. Recent evidence showed an association between hypertension and NAFLD [22].

Limitations

The most important limitation of our study was the retrospective inclusion of patients and the short follow-up period. The exclusion of patients who were not reached and patients whose NFS could not be calculated may also have affected the statistical results.

Conclusions

The NFS was found to be an effective parameter in predicting cardiovascular outcomes such as death, coronary angiography, and myocardial infarction. This easily accessible, cost-effective, and reliable parameter could be considered in predicting severe coronary artery disease and plaque formation.

Acknowledgments

The data about the patients enrolled in the present study were also included in the medical specialization thesis of Doctor Esra Colak.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Diehl AM, Day C. Cause, pathogenesis, and treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 2063-72.

2 

Medina-Santillán R, López-Velázquez JA, Chávez-Tapia N, et al. Hepatic manifestations of metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2013. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2410.

3 

Treeprasertsuk S, Björnsson E, Enders F, et al. NAFLD fibrosis score: a prognostic predictor for mortality and liver complications among NAFLD patients. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 1219-29.

4 

Lombardi R, Airaghi L, Targher G, et al. NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) can be used in outpatient services to identify chronic vascular complications besides advanced liver fibrosis in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2020; 34: 107684.

5 

Tutunchi H, Naeini F, Ebrahimi-Mameghani M, et al. The association of the steatosis severity, NAFLD fibrosis score and FIB-4 index with atherogenic dyslipidaemia in adult patients with NAFLD: a cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75: e14131.

6 

Chen Q, Li Q, Li D, et al. Association between liver fibrosis scores and the risk of mortality among patients with coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2020; 299: 45-52.

7 

Liu HH, Cao YX, Jin JL, et al. Liver fibrosis scoring systems as novel tools for predicting cardiovascular outcomes in patients following elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10: e018869.

8 

Lee J, Kim HS, Cho YK, et al. Association between noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and coronary artery calcification progression in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 18323.

9 

Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology 2007; 45: 846-54.

10 

Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 827-32.

11 

Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014; 8: 342-58.

12 

Xie JX, Cury RC, Leipsic J, et al. The Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS): prognostic and clinical implications associated with standardized coronary computed tomography angiography reporting. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018; 11: 78-89.

13 

Targher G, Marra F, Marchesini G. Increased risk of cardiovascular disease in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: causal effect or epiphenomenon? Diabetologia 2008; 51: 1947-53.

14 

Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology 2012; 55: 2005-23.

15 

Villanova N, Moscatiello S, Ramilli S, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk profile in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2005; 42: 473-80.

16 

Ichikawa K, Miyoshi T, Osawa K, et al. Prognostic value of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease for predicting cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus with suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2021; 20: 8.

17 

Song Y, Dang Y, Wang P, et al. CHD is associated with higher grades of NAFLD predicted by liver stiffness. J Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 54: 271-7.

18 

Abdelrahman KM, Chen MY, Dey AK, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography from clinical uses to emerging technologies: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76: 1226-43.

19 

Saraya S, Saraya M, Mahmoud M, et al. The associations between coronary artery disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by computed tomography. Egypt Heart J 2021; 73: 96.

20 

Takahashi T, Watanabe T, Shishido T, et al. The impact of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score on cardiac prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart Vessels 2018; 33: 733-9.

21 

Myers RP, Lee SS. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy and liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2000; 6: S44-52.

22 

Ma C, Yan K, Wang Z, et al. The association between hypertension and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): literature evidence and systems biology analysis. Bioengineered 2021; 12: 2187-202.

Copyright: © 2024 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.