eISSN: 1897-4252
ISSN: 1731-5530
Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska/Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2008
vol. 5
 
Share:
Share:

FORUM MŁODYCH CHIRURGÓW
Intraoperative use of transoesophageal echocardiography in routine mitral valve replacement – a justified standard

Piotr Olszówka
,
Ahmed Azzu
,
Sivagnanam Karthikeyan

Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska 2008; 5 (4): 460–462
Online publish date: 2008/12/30
Article file
- Intraoperative.pdf  [0.11 MB]
Get citation
 
 
Introduction
Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a valuable tool with regard to cardiac surgery, particularly in valve repair [1-3] and complex congenital lesions surgery [4].
However, its routine application in valve replacement surgery is less clear. Recent studies have provided additional data on the importance of intraoperative TEE in valve replacement operations with an emphasis on the pre-bypass data [4-11]. Nevertheless, the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Task Force, in its 2006 update for the clinical application of echocardiography, considered intraoperative TEE in valve replacement as only a class IIA indication, namely, a condition for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness and/or efficacy of the procedure, but the weight of evidence and/or opinion is in favour of its usefulness and/or efficacy [12].
The preoperative TEE assessment may introduce important modifications into the surgical plan and the post-pump assessment, as well as providing quality control of the surgical result including the efficiency of the removal of air and the haemodynamic status in terms of effective intravascular volume and biventricular contraction [4].
We would like to report a case of a stuck prosthetic valve, detected by intraoperative TEE, despite an uneventful weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Case
A 71-year-old woman was electively admitted to the hospital for surgical treatment of mild aortic stenosis, mixed mitral valve disease and coronary artery disease. She was in CCS class 1 and NYHA class 3. Her preoperative risk assessed by Parsonnet score was 23, by EuroSCORE 6 and by logistic EuroSCORE 4.52. Preoperative TTE revealed: good left ventricle function, calcified non-coronary cusp of aortic valve causing moderate aortic stenosis with mean gradient across the valve 28 mmHg. Mitral valve in preoperative assessment was calcified with mild stenosis and severe regurgitation. Coronary angiogram revealed occluded right coronary artery (RCA). Intraoperative pre-CPB TEE confirmed the results of preoperative TTE. During surgery single vein graft to distal RCA was anastomosed. Because of extended rheumatic mitral valve disease with severe calcifications, both leaflets were removed without sparing of subvalvular apparatus. The mitral valve was replaced with a mechanical St. Jude prosthesis size 27 mm in the anti-anatomical position. Intraoperative assessment of the aortic valve revealed restricted movement of the non-coronary cusp due to severe calcifications causing moderate stenosis. During surgery calcifications were removed, restoring good leaflet movement in postoperative TEE. After completion of the heart surgery, the patient was weaned from CPB under no inotropic support without difficulty, and her haemodynamic condition was stable. However, when the prosthesis was assessed for the first time using TEE during weaning from CPB, one of the leaflets of the prosthesis was seen to be stuck in the closed position (Fig. 1). The next assessment after weaning from CPB revealed movement of both leaflets although there was an extra echo shadow above the valve in the left atrium (Fig. 2). CPB was instituted again, cardioplegia was given, and the left atrium was reopened. On inspection of the prosthesis, both leaflets were moving; however, on the side of the anterolateral commissure there was residual tissue (secondary chord) coming from the left ventricle across the valve. Normal valve function was restored by resection of the extra tissue. The further postoperative period was uncomplicated and the patient was discharged home 10 days after surgery.

Discussion
Intraoperative TEE during cardiac surgery permits immediate assessment of left ventricular function and native or prosthetic valve function and de-airing, immediate detection of aortic disease such as dissection or atheromatous changes of the aorta, and confirmation of the position of an intra-aortic balloon pump [1, 2]. In particular, recent adoption of frequent intraoperative assessment of valve repair using TEE may contribute significantly to the success and popularity of mitral valve repair [1, 3]. In recent years, the results of valve replacement have improved, and controversy persists as to whether routine intraoperative TEE is indicated in valve replacement, as opposed to its established indication in repair.
Leaflet sticking due to residual tissue like that detected in the present case is believed to be rare [1-3], and this was the first case in our institution. Elsewhere, Kumano and associates [1] presented a case of blocked CarboMedics prosthesis in the mitral position. In their case weaning from CPB was under inotropic support also without any difficulty. In this case prosthetic valve dysfunction was due to residual tissue [1]. Similar complications were described by Shapira and associates in 3 cases [4]. Also Jaggers and associates [15] described a case of MVR in which one leaflet of a St. Jude Medical mitral prosthesis had become stuck, although the underlying cause of this valve dysfunction was not identified. In their case, weaning from CPB could not be achieved because the patient developed marked pulmonary hypertension. Upon assessment using TEE, they found a stuck leaflet, and operatively corrected the valve dysfunction.
Successful management in our case resulted from the use of TEE in the initial phase of operation, permitting assessment of the unexpectedly malfunctioning prosthetic valve immediately after the termination of CPB. Because patients may be haemodynamically stable despite prosthetic valve dysfunction undetected by the electrocardiogram, arterial pressure, or Swan-Ganz catheter monitoring, intraoperative TEE should be added to other routine assessments in valve replacement operations to prevent postoperative complications. Valves like St. Jude even with one leaflet blocked may provide periods of adequate cardiac output with transient periods of haemodynamic instability. Moreover, postoperative instability with an extra echo shadow above the prosthetic valve may suggest endocarditis requiring urgent redo operation.
According to Daniel and associates [16], complications associated with TEE occurred in 18 cases (0.18%) of 10,218; bleeding due to insertion occurred in only two, including a case where bleeding was caused by an oesophageal tumour. In our institution, TEE monitoring has started to be used routinely in the initial phase of cardiac surgery without complications. Insertion of the TEE probe should precede CPB with its associated systemic heparinization in order to avoid bleeding.
In conclusion, we emphasize the importance of performing routine intraoperative TEE in cardiac surgery from the initial phase of operation, for immediate management of unpredicted events.

References
1. Kumano H, Suehiro S, Shibata T, Hattori K, Kinoshita H. Stuck valve leaflet detected by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1484-1485.
2. Bryan AJ, Barzilai B, Kouchoukos NT. Transesophageal echocardiography and adult cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 773-779.
3. Freeman WK, Schaff HV, Khandheria BK, Oh JK, Orszulak TA, Abel MD, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Intraoperative evaluation of mitral valve regurgitation and repair by transesophageal echocardiography: incidence and significance of systolic anterior motion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 599-609.
4. Shapira Y, Vaturi M, Weisenberg DE, Raanani E, Sahar G, Snir E, Battler A, Vidne BA, Sagie A. Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 579-583.
5. Deutsch HJ, Curtius JM, Leischik R, Borowski A, Huttarsch H, de Vivie ER, Hilger HH. Diagnostic value of transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardio Surg 1991; 39: 199-204.
6. Sutton DC, Kluger R. Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography: impact on adult cardiac surgery. Anaest Intensive Care 1998; 26: 287-293.
7. Mishra M, Chauhan R, Sharma KK, Dhar A, Bhise M, Dhole S, Omar A, Kasliwal RR, Trehan N. Real-time intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. How useful? Experience of 5,016 cases. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998;12:625-632.
8. Click RL, Abel MD, Schaff HV. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography: 5-year prospective review of impact on surgical management. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75: 241-247.
9. Ionescu AA, West RR, Proudman C, Butchart EG, Fraser AG. Prospective study of routine perioperative transesophageal echocardiography for elective valve replacement: clinical impact and cost-saving implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 659-667.
10. Nowrangi SK, Connolly HM, Freeman WK, Click RL. Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 863-866.
11. Fujii H, Suehiro S, Shibata T, Hattori K, Watanabe H, Yoshikawa J. Value of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in preventing serious complications during valvular surgery. A report of four cases. J Heart Valve Dis 2002; 11: 135-138.
12. American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease); Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O’Gara PT, O’Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B. ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1-148.
13. Fiane AE, Saatvedt K, Svennevig JL, Geiran O, Nordstrand K, Frfysaker T. The CarboMedics valve: midterm follow-up with analysis of risk factors. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 1053-1058.
14. rnandez J, Laub GW, Adkins MS, Anderson WA, Chen C, Bailey BM, Nealon LM, McGrath LB. Early and late-phase events after valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis in 1200 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107: 394-407.
15. Jaggers J, Chetham PM, Kinnard TL, Fullerton DA. Intraoperative prosthetic valve dysfunction: detection by transesophageal echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 755-757.
16. Daniel WG, Erbel R, Kasper W, Visser CA, Engberding R, Sutherland GR, Grube E, Hanrath P, Maisch B, Dennig K, et al. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations. Circulation 1991; 83: 817-821.
Copyright: © 2008 Polish Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons (Polskie Towarzystwo KardioTorakochirurgów) and the editors of the Polish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.