Contemporary Oncology
eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Addendum Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2025
vol. 29
 
Share:
Share:
Review paper

Food interactions with tyrosine kinase inhibitors used to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma

Agata Sałek-Zań
1
,
Mirosława Püsküllüoğlu
1
,
Karolina Syrek-Kaplita
2
,
Tomasz Banaś
3

  1. Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Kraków Branch, Kraków, Poland
  2. Mrukmed Medical Centre, Rzeszów, Poland
  3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Kraków Branch, Kraków, Poland
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2025; 29 (1): 1–10
Online publish date: 2025/03/07
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) develops from the epithelial cells of renal tubules, accounting for more than 90% of kidney malignancies and approximately 4.4% of all malignant tumors. It ranks 14th in global incidence [1, 2]. Recently, RCC cancers of unknown primary (CUP-RCC) have emerged as a distinct subset of CUP. Sharing morphological and molecular features with RCC, CUP-RCC is treated with RCC-specific therapies, contributing to the observed increase in RCC incidence due to advances in diagnostics [3]. Mortality from RCC constitutes 1.6% of all cancer-related deaths [1, 2]. It is estimated that, at the time of diagnosis, metastatic RCC is present in approximately 17% of patients [4]. However, in recent years, continuous advancements in medical diagnostic technology have contributed to heightened rates of early RCC detection and favorable clinical prognoses. Exosomes have emerged as promising non-invasive tumor biomarkers. Their bilayer membrane protects enclosed mRNAs, miRNAs, and proteins, making them sensitive markers for diagnosis. Tumor-derived exosomal miRNAs in serum and urine show potential for early detection and monitoring in RCC [5] An increase in incidence is observed among individuals over 60 years of age and in males [2, 4].

In 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) published the 5th edition of the Classification of Urinary and Male Genital Tumors, which is based on current knowledge regarding the morphological, immunohistochemical, molecular, epidemiological, and clinical characteristics of individual kidney tumors [6].

Surgical treatment can provide a cure for RCC if performed on individuals with localized disease; however, recurrence can occur in a subset of patients [7]. Adjuvant treatment should be considered for patients with clear cell RCC who are at high risk of recurrence following radical surgical treatment [8, 9]. Renal cell carcinoma is characterized by chemo- and radioresistance, which has unfavorably impacted the chances of a cure, particularly in advanced disease. A breakthrough in therapy occurred with the introduction of molecularly targeted treatments aimed at specific intracellular signaling pathways. These include tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway [7]. Recent studies have shown that downregulation of lactotransferrin (LTF), a key protein in the innate immune system, promotes metastasis in clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Interestingly, this downregulation also increases the responsiveness of ccRCC tumor cells to mTOR inhibitors, suggesting that LTF levels could serve as a predictive biomarker for the effectiveness of mTOR-targeted therapies [10]. Another treatment option for RCC is immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (i.e., immunotherapy), which involves the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 [11]. Currently, the aforementioned drugs are used in monotherapy or combination therapy [12].

The aim of this study was to review and analyze the available literature on the interactions between TKIs used to treat advanced RCC and commonly consumed food products and dietary supplements.

Kinase inhibitors used in renal cancer

One of the main treatment strategies for advanced RCC is the use of TKIs. Tyrosine kinases (TK) belong to a group of enzyme proteins (protein kinases) that transfer a phosphate group from a phosphate donor to a substrate – an amino acid acceptor [13]. There are 4 groups of protein kinases: serine/threonine, tyrosine, histidine, and asparagine/glutamine kinases [14]. There are also dual-specificity kinases that phosphorylate serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues. Protein kinases play crucial roles in regulating essential cellular processes such as cell division, differentiation, and apoptosis [15]. Stimulation of cell division occurs primarily through interactions between growth factors and receptors located on the cell membrane. Most of these receptors have a TK activity domain, which is located in the cytoplasm. Examples of ligands for these receptors include growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor. The loss of functional von Hippel-Lindau protein drives ccRCC via hypoxia-inducible factor 2-α (HIF-2α) accumulation and constitutive HIF activity. Belzutifan, a HIF-2α inhibitor, blocks its dimerization with HIF-1β, showing efficacy in ccRCC. A phase III trial reported belzutifan’s superiority over everolimus in progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates in advanced ccRCC [16]. The action of growth factors on receptors activates receptor kinase activity, triggering signaling pathways that result in changes in gene expression patterns, leading to mitosis. The deregulation of these pathways contributes to the formation of cancer cells through the overexpression of growth factors and receptors. Mutations in the cytoplasmic domain of TK also have an impact on this [17]. Abnormal protein kinase activity is the main mechanism by which cancer cells evade the physiological mechanisms that limit growth and survival [18]. Figure 1 illustrates the mechanism of action of TKIs.

Fig. 1

Mechanism of action of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

/f/fulltexts/WO/55705/WO-29-55705-g001_min.jpg

In the various stages of advanced RCC therapy, the following TKIs are utilized: sunitinib, pazopanib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, axitinib, sorafenib, and tivozanib [8]. TKIs such as sunitinib, pazopanib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, axitinib, sorafenib, and tivozanib are integral to advanced RCC treatment. For patients ineligible for immunotherapy, TKI monotherapy remains a suitable first-line option. The STAR trial specifically evaluated the efficacy of TKI monotherapy in this cohort. Additionally, some patients may receive TKIs as second-line monotherapy following other treatments. While treatment breaks can be considered to mitigate toxicity, caution is advised, as these patients often experience shorter PFS compared to those on continuous first-line TKI therapy [19]. Table 1 presents the characteristics of these drugs.

Table 1

Characteristics of tyrosine kinase inhibitors used to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma, approved by the European Medicine Agency and the Food and Drug Administration (based on product characteristics, 15.10.2024)

InhibitorMechanism of actionReferences
AxitinibInhibits RTKs:
  • VEGFR-1, -2, -3

[8, 9]
[20, 21]
CabozantinibInhibits tyrosine activity of:
  • MET

  • VEGFR-1, -2, -3

  • KIT

  • TRKB

  • FLT3

  • GAS6/AXL

  • RET

  • ROS1

  • TYRO-3

  • MER

  • TIE-2

[8, 9]
[20, 22]
LenvatinibInhibits RTKs:
  • VEGFR-1, -2, -3

  • FGFR-1, -2, -3, -4

  • PDGFRα

  • KIT

  • RET

[8, 9]
[20, 23]
PazopanibInhibits RTKs:
  • PDGFR-α, -β

  • VEGFR-1, -2, -3

  • KIT

  • Itk

  • Lck

  • c-Fms

[8, 9]
[20, 24]
SorafenibMultikinase inhibitor:
  • KIT

  • VEGFR-2, -3

  • PDGFR-β

  • RAF

  • FLT-3

[8, 9]
[20, 25]
SunitinibInhibits RTKs:
  • PDGFR-α, -β

  • VEGFR-1, -2, -3

  • KIT

  • FLT3

  • CSF-1R

  • RET

[8, 9]
[20, 26]
TivozanibInhibits RTKs:
  • VEGFR-1, -2, -3

  • KIT

  • PDGFR-β

[8, 9]
[20, 27]

[i] c-Fms – transmembrane glycoprotein receptor tyrosine inhibitor, CSF-1R – colony stimulating factor receptor, FGFR – fibroblast growth factor receptor, FLT3 – Fms-like tyrosine kinase-3, GAS6/AXL – growth arrest-specific protein 6/receptor – member of the tumor-associated macrophage family tyrosine kinase receptors, Itk – interleukin-2 receptor inducible T-cell kinase, KIT – stem cell growth factor receptor, Lck – leukocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase, MET – mesenchymal epithelial transition receptor, MER – receptor member of the tumor-associated macrophages family tyrosine kinase receptors, PDGFR – plated-derived growth factor receptor, RAF – V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene, RET – rearranged during transfection receptor, ROS1 – proto-oncogene 1 receptor, RTKs – receptor tyrosine kinases, TIE-2 – angiopoietin-1 receptor, TRKB – tropomyosin receptor kinase B, TYRO-3 – member of the tumor-associated macrophage family tyrosine kinase receptors, VEGFR – vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

TKIs used to treat advanced RCC are available orally. This formulation enhances the comfort of patient treatment, among other things, by allowing flexibility in the location and timing of medication intake. The treatment outcome is influenced not only by genetic factors but also by external variables such as dietary habits (e.g., timing and composition of meals), adherence to prescribed medication schedules, and the concomitant use of other substances, including food or drugs [28]. While TKIs offer flexibility in administration, they can cause treatment-mediated toxicities due to their inhibition of multiple targets. The extended presence of troublesome side effects could result in stopping the treatment [29]. Notably, hematologic and hepatic toxicities are significant and require careful monitoring. Although a definitive link between adverse event severity and treatment efficacy is lacking, TKIs’ blockade of VEGF receptors is associated with hypertension and other cardiovascular complications. Specifically, pazopanib may induce side effects such as hair depigmentation, diarrhea, nausea, anorexia, vomiting, and, in rare instances, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome [30].

Drug-food interactions

A drug is a chemical substance intended to induce a specific pharmacological effect once delivered to the body [31]. After administration, it undergoes a series of transformations, categorized into three types: pharmaceutical, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic. The pharmacokinetic phase is further divided into stages: release, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion [32]. Similarly, the food we consume undergoes transformations and consists of a mixture of various chemical compounds. For this reason, there are significant opportunities for interactions between food components and drugs [33].

An interaction refers to the physical, chemical, or physiological influence between at least two substances, resulting in changes to their individual properties or in a combined effect [34]. Drug-food interaction specifically refers to changes in the strength, timing, mechanism of action, or toxicity of a medication caused by a food component [33]. Such interactions can lead to treatment failure, increased therapy toxicity, or worsening of nutritional status [35]. Knowledge about possible drug-drug interactions is fairly widespread, with numerous publications on the topic. However, drug-food interactions represent a relatively new area of medical research, and assessing the impact of diet and nutritional status on drug efficacy remains challenging. This challenge is due to the emergence of new therapeutic substances and the continuous diversity and evolution of dietary patterns [36].

Since 2017, within the framework of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology, an international research group called the European Network on Understanding Gastrointestinal Absorption-related Processes has been active, bringing together scientists from various fields. Their task is to analyze drug-food interactions and prepare appropriate recommendations [37]. Interactions between drugs and food can occur at any phase and stage of drug metabolism [38].

Pharmaceutical phase

The pharmaceutical phase pertains to the stage of preparing a drug for administration to the patient [39]. This phase takes place outside the body, so interactions between the drug and food are rare at this stage. An exception occurs when the drug and food/drink are combined before being administered to the patient, for example, through a gastric tube [37]. This interaction most commonly involves drug inactivation due to processes such as hydrolysis, oxidation, or neutralization [40].

In the case of TKIs used to treat advanced RCC, the tablet should not be crushed before administration and should be taken with chemically neutral water [2127, 40].

Pharmacodynamic phase

The changes that occur in the body under the influence of drugs and the mechanisms of these changes are determined by the pharmacodynamic phase [41]. Pharmacodynamic drug-food interactions occur when the effect of a drug is altered by food. A positive action is called synergy, whereas an opposing action is called antagonism. Synergy involves a mutual increase in the effect of at least two substances taken at the same time or in close succession. On the other hand, antagonism is a reaction contrary to synergy [42, 43]. The pharmacodynamic phase determines clinical effects such as increased or decreased bioavailability, which can affect drug toxicity [35]. In the case of TKIs used in advanced RCC treatment, drug-food interactions occurring in the pharmacodynamic phase are poorly known and documented. This may be due to a lack of clear methods for evaluating interaction events in this phase [44]. Moreover, due to the increasing number of food ingredients, determining pharmacodynamic interactions is challenging [45].

Pharmacokinetic phase

The pharmacokinetic phase describes the fate of a drug in the body [42]. First, ingested food alters the physiological conditions in the gastrointestinal tract, impacting various stages of the pharmacokinetic processes of orally administered drugs [45]. Food has the greatest effect on pharmacological substances during the absorption stage (approximately 60%), followed by metabolism (27.14%) and elimination (12.86%) [46].

The release stage involves the drug transitioning into solutions within body fluids [39]. It consists of three parts: breakdown of the drug formulation, dissolution of the active substance, and transfer of the drug to the absorption site [42]. At this stage, drug-food interaction does not occur [40]. A critical condition for drug release and dissolution is an adequate volume of fluid in the gastrointestinal tract [45].

Although drug-food interaction typically does not occur at this stage [40], other factors, such as the use of laxatives or changes in gastrointestinal motility and fluid volume, may influence the release and dissolution of the drug. An adequate volume of fluid in the gastrointestinal tract remains a critical condition for drug release and dissolution [45, 4750].

Absorption

Absorption is the transition of a medicinal substance into the systemic circulation. This stage is associated with the concept of bioavailability, which determines the amount of drug that reaches the bloodstream. For drugs administered intravenously or intra-arterially, the bioavailability is 100%. However, for orally administered drugs, this percentage is less than 100% and depends on various factors including the size of the drug molecule, its solubility in fats, the degree of drug ionization, and blood flow at the absorption site [51]. The bioavailability of drugs is evaluated on the basis of the biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system, introduced in 2005. Drugs are categorized into 4 classes on the basis of their solubility and ability to pass through the gastrointestinal mucosa [51, 52]. Class 1 drugs are characterized by high solubility and high permeability. Class 4 drugs have low solubility and low permeability. The classification of a drug within a particular group allows the prediction of the range of interactions between the drug and another substance [5355]. These groups are significant in the case of consuming a high-fat meal before taking the medication or in combination with it. Such a meal increases intestinal permeability, leading to higher drug concentrations in the plasma, which may increase drug toxicity [28].

Pazopanib, cabozantinib, axitinib, and sorafenib belong to group 2, whereas sunitinib belongs to group 4. However, there are no clear data on whether tivozanib and lenvatinib belong to group 2 or group 4 [28].

The absorption of orally administered medication usually begins in the oral cavity. This process then continues in the stomach and the small intestine, where it proceeds most rapidly due to the rich blood supply of the mucosa in this area of the gastrointestinal tract [41]. Food can affect bioavailability by accelerating, delaying, or increasing the absorption of the drug. It may also have no effect at all [43].

In the case of possible drug-food interactions, the type of meal/liquid consumed prior to taking the medication is significant at this stage. The type of food affects the motility of the gastrointestinal tract, which varies in different parts of the digestive system, thereby influencing the degree of dissolution and absorption of the drug. Since 2002, the US Food and Drug Administration has required that any application for the registration of a new substance assess the drug’s bioavailability on the basis of standardized guidelines, depending on the type of meal taken with it, and that this information be included in the Summary of Product Characteristics and Package Leaflet. The volume of fluid in the gastrointestinal tract also impacts drug absorption and bioavailability. It is advisable to wash down the medication with 150–220 ml of water [45], which dilutes digestive juices and thus reduces their negative impact on the drug [41].

In certain situations, when TKIs are taken, it is permissible to swallow the medication and wash it down with a small amount of nonfat yogurt – this possibility has been approved for nilotinib [56]. These data may be extrapolated to other small-molecule TKIs [28]. However, there is a lack of evidence that fluids other than water do not affect the reduction in bioavailability.

The type of meal or the timing of its consumption does not affect the absorption of axitinib [21], lenvatinib [23], sunitinib [26] or tivozanib [27]. Just before pazopanib [24] and sorafenib [25] are taken, high-fat meals are recommended. In the case of sorafenib, a high-fat meal decreases its bioavailability, which in turn reduces its effectiveness [25]. However, pazopanib accelerates its absorption, thereby increasing the risk of toxicity [24].

Accelerated absorption of cabozantinib has been demonstrated after a high-fat meal; however, no definitive information has been obtained regarding an increase in toxicity. Therefore, cabozantinib should not be taken with food [22]. In Table 2, the guidelines for the administration of TKIs in RCC are presented.

Table 2

Guidelines for administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma

Name of active substanceApplicationBiopharmaceutical group numberReferences
AxitinibWith meal or without meal2[21, 28, 57]
CabozantinibThe medication should be taken at least 1 hour before a meal or 2 hours after a meal.2[22, 28, 57]
LenvatinibWith meal or without meal2 or 4[23, 28, 57]
PazopanibThe medication should be taken at least 1 hour before a meal or 2 hours after a meal.*2[24, 28, 57]
SorafenibThe medication should be taken at least 1 hour before a meal or 2 hours after a meal.*2[25, 28, 57]
SunitinibWith meal or without meal4[26, 28, 57]
TivozanibWith meal or without meal2 or 4[27, 28, 57]

* If taken with a meal, high-fat content increases the risk of enhanced bioavailability.

For absorption, the pH prevailing in different parts of the digestive tract is also important. Changes in pH in the digestive tract depend on the type and volume of food consumed, as well as on the amount and type of enzymes secreted into the digestive tract lumen for this purpose. Drugs undergo ionization above or below a certain pH value. Changes in pH affect the solubility of a drug as well as its absorption and bioavailability. TKIs belong to the group of weak bases [28].

Drugs in the bloodstream are transported passively – on the basis of concentration gradients – or actively through transporters [33, 42]. Transporters are proteins located primarily in the cell membrane of enterocytes and liver cells. They regulate the absorption and bioavailability of drugs [35]. The group of transporters includes organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs), P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), oligopeptide transporter and multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs). Drug molecules and nutrients often compete for the same transport pathways, leading to interactions between them and with transporters [45]. Both drugs and food components can act as modulators or substrates for specific transport proteins, thereby affecting the absorption and distribution processes of other substances [28].

TKIs used in RCC can be inhibitors, inducers, or substrates for specific transport proteins. Inhibitors decrease the concentration of a given substance in the blood, inducers increase the concentration, and substrates block the action of the transporter. These interactions most commonly involve P-gp and BCRP [58]. Cabozantinib and sorafenib are P-gp inhibitors [16, 17, 20]. Pazopanib is an OATP inhibitor [19] and tivozanib a BCRP inhibitor [21]. However, MRP inhibitors increase plasma concentrations of cabozantinib [22], whereas inhibitors of P-gp and BCRP increase plasma concentrations of pazopanib [24]. Inducers of P-gp and BCRP reduce the plasma concentration of pazopanib [24]. There is no relationship between sunitinib and endothelial transporters [26].

The consumption of grapefruit juice, orange juice, apple juice, and green tea inhibits the action of OATP [45]. Furanocoumarins, found in various vegetables, including those from the legume and celery families [59], as well as flavonoids [60], constitute a significant group of P-gp inhibitors. The most well-known inducer of P-gp is St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) [45]. Additionally, flavonoids are also inhibitors of BCRP and MRPs [45].

Distribution

Distribution is the process of drug movement between compartments [61]. To exert its effects, a drug must reach its site of action at the appropriate concentration. Factors influencing distribution include the rate of diffusion, the drug’s affinity for tissues, blood flow in the area, and the binding of the drug to plasma proteins [51]. After entering the bloodstream or lymphatic system, drugs reversibly bind to circulating proteins, such as albumin, α-1 acid glycoprotein (AAG), and lipoproteins [61]. Albumin plays a major role in this process [45]. A drug that is bound to a protein is inactive and does not interact with cells. The binding of the drug to plasma proteins is reversible [51]. If the unbound drug is eliminated, some of the bound drug will detach from the plasma protein and be released [45].

A food ingredient can compete for the same binding site on plasma proteins as a drug. This may lead to changes in the distribution of the drug and its bioavailability [61]. The tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in RCC bind to plasma proteins, mainly albumin, in more than 95% of cases [2127].

In the literature, data indicating that the interaction between drugs and nutrition is significant at this phase of pharmacokinetics are lacking. However, the nutritional status of the patient is important. Malnutrition can decrease the levels of albumin and AAG, which may lead to increased drug toxicity, whereas a high-protein diet can increase the concentration of proteins in plasma [45].

Metabolism

Metabolism is a process in which substances introduced into the body undergo chemical changes [62]. This process is divided into two phases: in phase 1, a group of enzymes modifies the chemical structure of the drug, and in phase 2, another group of enzymes converts these compounds into polar forms to facilitate their excretion. Drug metabolism primarily occurs in the liver but also occurs in the intestines, kidneys, and lungs [51]. Aging brings about unavoidable changes, including alterations in drug metabolism in the liver [63].

The enzyme groups responsible for drug metabolism are as follows: cytochrome P450 (CYP) – 73%, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) – 15%, esterases – 9%, flavin-containing monooxygenase (FMO), N-acetyltransferase (NAT) – 1%, and monoamine oxidase (MAO) – 1% [61]. Enzymes from the CYP450 and UGT [2127] groups are involved in the metabolism of TKIs. Table 3 presents the enzymes involved in the metabolism of TKIs used in advanced kidney cancer.

Table 3

Enzymes involved in metabolism of tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in renal cell carcinoma

Name of active substanceMetabolizing enzymesReferences
AxitinibPrimarily metabolized by CYP3A4/5, minor contributions from CYP1A2 and CYP2C19. Also undergoes glucuronidation by UGT1A1.[21, 57, 64, 65]
CabozantinibMetabolized mainly by CYP3A4, oxidation enhanced by cytochrome b5. Additionally, it is a substrate of MRP2.[22, 57, 65]
LenvatinibMetabolized primarily by CYP3A4 and by AO. Non-enzymatic processes also contribute to its metabolism.[23, 57, 65]
PazopanibMetabolized predominantly by CYP3A4, minor contributions from CYP1A2 and CYP2C8.
Pazopanib inhibits UGT1A1-mediated glucuronidation.
[24, 57, 65]
SorafenibMetabolized primarily by CYP3A4 and undergoes glucuronidation by UGT1A9[25, 57, 65]
SunitinibMetabolized mainly by CYP3A4[26, 57, 65]
TivozanibMetabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP1A1. Also undergoes glucuronidation by UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A7, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, and UGT1A10.[27, 57]

[i] AO – aldehyde oxidase, CYP3A4 – cytochrome P450 3A4, CYP3A4/5 – cytochrome P450 3A4/5, CYP1A2 – cytochrome P450 1A2, CYP2C19 – cytochrome P450 2C19, CYP2C8 – cytochrome P450 2C8, CYP1A1 – cytochrome P450 1A1, MRP2 – multidrug, resistance-associated protein 2, UGT1A1 – uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 enzyme, UGT1A3 – uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A3 enzyme, UGT1A7 – uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A7 enzyme, UGT1A8 – uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A8 enzyme, UGT1A9 – uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 enzyme, UGT1A10 – uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A10 enzyme

The enzymes belonging to the group of human cytochrome P450 enzymes are responsible for the production of cholesterol, prostacyclin, and thromboxane A2, among other products. They participate in the biotransformation of drugs in phase 1 biotransformation [66, 67]. Cytochrome P450 enzymes are expressed primarily in the liver but also in the small intestine, lungs, and kidneys [66]. In humans, there are over 57 types of CYPs, which are divided into 18 families and 43 subfamilies [62]. Cytochrome P450 isoforms belonging to the CYP1, CYP2, and CYP3 families are responsible for the metabolism of approximately 80% of drugs [68].

On the other hand, UGT enzymes participate in the second phase of drug biotransformation [67] and are also believed to be involved in intracellular processes such as apoptosis. UGTs are found not only in the liver but also in the small intestine, bladder, and kidneys. This group is divided into two families (UGT1 and UGT2) and three subfamilies (UGT1A, UGT2A, and UGT2B) [69].

Many studies have demonstrated the impact of food on the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes [7073]. Food products, specifically the chemical compounds contained within them, act as inducers, inhibitors, or substrates for individual enzymes, thereby increasing or decreasing the concentration of a given drug in the plasma, which affects the treatment outcome and toxicity [43]. Table 4 shows the impact of popular dietary supplements on the metabolism of TKIs used in advanced RCC.

Table 4

The impact of popular dietary supplements on the metabolism of tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in advanced renal cell carcinoma [43, 45, 74, 75]

Food productLatin nameActionAxitinibCabozantinibLenvatinibPazopanibSorafenibSunitinibTivozanib
AgaricusAgaricus subrufescensInhibitor of CYP 3A4+++++++
AloeAloe veraInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2D6+++++++
Apple/apple juiceJuice from MalusInhibitor of CYP1A1*00**0+
AshwagandhaWithania somniferaInhibitor of CYP3A4+++++++
Black pepperPiper nigrumInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2D6+++++++
Black radishRaphanus sativus L. var. nigerInducer of CYP1A200*0*
Black seedNigella sativaInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2D6+++++++
Broccoli sproutsBrassica oleraceaInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP1A2+++++++
CannabisCannabis sativaInhibitor of CYP1A2+00+*0*
Cat’s clawUncaria tomentosaInhibitor of CYP3A4+++++++
ChamomileMatricaria recutitaInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP1A2+++++++
CinnamonCinnamom-um verumInhibitor of CYP3A4+++++++
CoffeeCoffea speciesInhibitor of CYP1A2+00+*0*
CranberryVaccinium macrocarponInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2C8+++++++
DandelionTaraxacum officinaleInhibitor of CYP1A2+00+*0*
EchinaceaEchinacea purpureaInducer of CYP3A4; Inhibitor of CYP1A2+/–+/–
GingerZingiber officinaleInhibitorCYP2C8×××+×××
GingkoGingko bilobaInhibitor of CYP2C8×××+×××
GinsengPanax ginsengInducer of CYP3A4; Inhibitor of CYP2D6
GojiLycium barbarumInhibitor of CYP2D6, CYP1A2+××+×××
Grape/vineVitis viniferaInhibitor of CYP3A4; Inducer of CYP1A2+/–+++/–+++
GrapefruitCitrus paradisiInhibitor of CYP3A, CYP1A2+++++++
Green teaCamellia sinensisInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2C8+++++++
Grilled/fried meatCooked meats (various types)Inducer of CYP1A1*00**0+
HawthornCrataegus monogynaInhibitor of CYP2D6, CYP1A2+××+×××
HuanglianCoptis chinensisInducer of CYP3A4, Inhibitor of CYP2D6, CYP1A2+/–+/–
HopsHumulus lupulusInhibitor of CYP1A2+00+*0*
LicoriceGlycyrrhiza glabraInducer of CYP3A4, CYP1A2; Inhibitor of CYP2D6, 2C8___–/+___
LimeCitrus aurantifoliaInhibitor of CYP3A4+++++++
Milk thistleSilybum marianumInhibitor of CYP2C8*00+*0*
MistletoeViscum albumInhibitor of CYP3A4+++++++
NettleUrtica dioicaInhibitor of CYP3A4+++++++
Omega-3Omega-3 fatty acids (found in fish oil, flaxseed, etc.)Inhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP1A2+++++++
PeanutsArachis hypogaeaInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP2C8; Inducer of CYP1A2+/–+++/–+++
PeppermintMentha piperitaInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2D6+++++++
Pollen extractExtracts from pollenInhibitor of CYP1A2+**+***
PomegranatePunica granatumInhibitor of CYP1A2+00+*0*
PomeloCitrus maximaInhibitor of CYP3A4+++++++
PropolisResinous mixture produced by beesInhibitor of CYP1A2+00+*0*
Red cloverTrifolium pratenseInhibitor of CYP2D6, CYP1A2+00+*0*
Red vineVitis viniferaInhibitor of CYP3A4, inhibitor of CYP2D6+++++++
RhubarbRheum palmatumInducer of CYP3A4, CYP2D6
RooibosAspalathus linearisInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2C8+++++++
RosemaryRosmarinus officinalisInducer of CYP3A4
Saint John’s wortHypericum perforatumInducer of CYP3A4
Seville orangeCitrus aurantiumInhibitor of CYP3A4+++++++
SoyGlycine maxInducer of CYP3A4, Inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2C8–/+–/+
Star fruitAverrhoa carambolaInhibitor of CYP3A4+++++++
SteviaStevia rebaudianaInducer of CYP1A2×××××
StrawberryFragaria ananassaInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP2C8; Inducer of CYP1A2+/–+++/–+++
Tomato juiceJuice from Solanum lycopersicumInhibitor of CYP3A4+++++++
TurmericCurcuma longaInhibitor of CYP2D6, CYP1A2+00+*0*
Vitamin CAscorbic acidInducer of CYP1A200*0*
Vitamin DCholecalciferol or ergocalciferolInhibitor of CYP2C8*00+*0*
Vitamin ETocopherolInhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP1A2+++++++
Willow barkSalix albaInducer of CYP3A4

[i] CYP – cytochromes

[ii] (+) – increased the effect of the drug, (–) – reduced the effect of the drug, (0) – no effect on the action of the drug, (+/–) – inhibition and induction, (x) – conflicting date data, (*) – incomplete data

During metabolism, blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), elderberry (Sambucus nigra), evening primrose (Oenothera biennis), fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum), garlic (Allium sativum), lavender (Lavandula angustifolia), olive (Olea europaea), papaya (Carica papaya), and valerian (Valeriana officinalis) do not interact with cabozantinib, lenvatinib, or sunitinib. There is a lack of information in the literature regarding the interactions during the metabolism of axitinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, and tivozanib with the aforementioned food products [75].

In the literature, there is a lack of data regarding interactions with TKIs used in RCC at the metabolism stage of the following food products: bladder wrack (Fucus vesiculosus), flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum), maté (Ilex paraguariensis), shiitake (Lentinula edodes), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), lemon balm (Melissa officinalis), guarana (Paullinia cupana), kombucha (Medusomyces gisevii), oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus), sorrel (Rumex acetosella), salvia (Salvia divinorum), chia (Salvia hispanica), wheat grass (Triticum aestivum), tea tree oil (Melaleuca alternifolia), bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus), manuka honey (honey produced from the nectar of the Manuka tree – Leptospermum scoparium), psyllium (Plantago ovata), royal jelly (a secretion produced by worker bees – Apis mellifera), shark cartilage (cartilage derived from sharks – class Chondrichthyes).

An interesting issue is the role of the gut microbiome in drug metabolism. This activity may result in a different metabolite profile than that produced by host cells. It may be associated with varying levels of activation or inactivation of the pharmacological and/or toxic effects of a drug compared with those metabolites that are the result of transformations in host cells [45]. Research is ongoing to assess whether probiotic supplementation can influence the treatment effects of, for example, TKIs in advanced kidney cancer [76].

Once ethanol is introduced into the body, it undergoes all pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic transformations similar to those of a drug [41]. It also influences the course of these processes in the case of TKIs. In the presence of ethanol, the solubility of the TKIs used to treat advanced RCC increases, which increases the gradient between the intestine and plasma, consequently increasing the amount of drug in the plasma. This may lead to an increase in drug toxicity [45]. Ethanol is metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase and CYP2E1 [68]. In this context, there is no competition between TKIs and ethanol [2127]. This specifically pertains to pure ethanol.

Excretion

The last stage of the pharmacokinetic phase is excretion. This process involves elimination through bile and urine [61, 77]. For a substance to be excreted, it must be polar [41]. The drug-food interaction at this stage is related to the effect of consumed food on the speed of this process [61]. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in RCC are primarily excreted in the feces, followed by the urine [2127]. High-fat meals stimulate bile secretion, which may lead to a decrease in the bioavailability of these drugs [61]. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors belong to the group of weak bases [28]. The consumption of animal-derived foods such as fish, meat, eggs, and cheeses lowers the pH of the urine, thereby accelerating the excretion of these drugs through the kidneys [41].

Conclusions

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent a cornerstone in the treatment of advanced or metastatic RCC. A significant advantage of these agents is their oral administration, which enables patients to undergo therapy in the comfort of their own homes. However, the concomitant intake of these medications can lead to interactions, not only with other drugs but also with certain foods. Such interactions may impact both the tolerability and efficacy of the treatment. Therefore, understanding potential TKI-food interactions is crucial for optimizing the safety and therapeutic outcomes in patients with advanced RCC.

Disclosures

Institutional review board statement

Not applicable.

Assistance with the article

None.

Financial support and sponsorship

ASZ obtained travel grants and lecture honoraria from Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Astra Zeneca, Pierre Fabre, and MSD. MP obtained travel grants and lecture honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Elli Lilly, Janssen, Gilead, and Amgen. KSK and TB declare no conflict of interest.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

1 

Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, e al. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2024, France.

2 

Bahadoram S, Davoodi M, Hassanzadeh S, Bahadoram M, Barahman M, Mafakher L. Renal cell carcinoma: an overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. G Ital Nefrol 2022; 39: 2022-vol3.

3 

Rassy E, Parent P, Lefort F, Boussios S, Baciarello G, Pavlidis N. New rising entities in cancer of unknown primary: Is there a real therapeutic benefit? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 147: 102882.

4 

Capitanio U, Bensalah K, Bex A, et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2019; 75: 74-84.

5 

Boussios S, Devo P, Goodall ICA, et al. Exosomes in the diagnosis and treatment of renal cell cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24: 14356.

6 

Montironi R, Cimadamore A. Tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs: 2022 World Health Organization classification and multidisciplinarity. Eur Urol 2022; 82: 483-486.

7 

Atkins M. Antiangiogenic and molecularly targeted therapy for advanced or metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma. UpToDate. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/antiangiogenic-and-molecularly-targeted-therapy-for-advanced-or-metastatic-clear-cell-renal-carcinoma (accessed: 16.02.2024).

8 

Version 3.2024, 03/11/24 © 2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network®

9 

Abraham J, Gulley JL. The Bethesda handbook of clinical oncology sixth edition. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022.

10 

Aweys H, Lewis D, Sheriff M, et al. Renal cell cancer–insights in drug resistance mechanisms. Anticancer Res 2023; 43: 4781-4792.

11 

George D. Systemic therapy for advanced and metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma. UpToDate. Literature review current through: Feb 2024. This topic last updated: Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/systemic-therapy-for-advanced-and-metastatic-clear-cell-renal-carcinoma?topicRef=2962&source=see_link (accessed: 16.02. 2024).

12 

Gebrael G, Sahu KK, Agarwal N, Maughan BL. Update on combined immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19: 2193528.

13 

Hunter T. Protein kinase classification. Methods in enzymology. Academic Press 1991; 200: 3-37.

14 

Krauss G. Biochemistry of signal transduction and regulation. 4th ed. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA, Weinheim 2008.

15 

Esteban-Villarrubia J, Soto-Castillo JJ, Pozas J, et al. Tyrosine kinase receptors in oncology. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 8529.

16 

Choueiri TK, Powles T, Peltola K, et al. Belzutifan versus everolimus for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2024; 391: 710-721.

17 

Perona R. Cell signalling: growth factors and tyrosine kinase receptors. Clin Transl Oncol 2006; 8: 77-82.

18 

Zhang J, Yang PL, Gray NS. Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 2009; 9: 28-39.

19 

Brown JE, Royle KL, Gregory W, et al. Temporary treatment cessation versus continuation of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced clear cell renal cel carcinoma (STAR): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24: 213-227.

20 

Grela-Wojewoda A, Pacholczak-Madej R, Adamczyk A, Korman M, Püsküllüoğlu M. Cardiotoxicity induced by protein kinase inhibitors in patients with cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022 4; 23: 2815.

28 

Veerman GDM, Hussaarts KGAM, Jansman FGA, Koolen SWL, van Leeuwen RWF, Mathijssen RHJ. Clinical implications of food-drug interactions with small-molecule kinase inhibitors. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21: e265-e279.

29 

Gibek K. Side effects of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia and the occurrence of depressive symptoms. Contemp Oncol 2023; 27: 277-283.

30 

Savaliya M, Surati D, Surati R, Padmani S, Boussios S. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after pazopanib therapy. Diseases 2023; 11: 76.

31 

San Miguel MT, Martinez JA., Vargas E. Food-drug interactions in the summary of product characteristics of proprietary medicinal products. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 61: 77-83.

32 

Currie GM. Pharmacology, part 1: introduction to pharmacology and pharmacodynamics. J Nucl Med Technol 2018; 46: 81-86.

33 

Preskon S, Werder S. Detrimental antidepressant drug-drug interactions: are they clinically relevant? Neuropsychopharmacol 2006; 31: 1605-1612.

34 

Interakcje leków z żywnością. In: Jachowicz R (ed.). Farmacja praktyczna. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa 2017, 537-585.

35 

Roy R, Marakkar S, Vayalil MP, et al. Drug-food interactions in the era of molecular big data, machine intelligence, and personalized health. Recent Adv Food Nutr Agric 2022; 13: 27-50.

36 

Wolf CPJG, Rachow T, Ernst T, et al. Interactions in cancer treatment considering cancer therapy, concomitant medications, food, herbal medicine and other supplements. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 148: 461-473.

38 

Koni AA, Nazzal MA, Suwan BA, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of potentially significant drug-drug, drug-herb, and drug-food interactions among cancer patients receiving anticancer drugs. BMC Cancer 2022; 22: 547.

39 

Ruiz-Garcia A, Bermejo M, Moss A, et al. Pharmacokinetics in drug discovery. J Pharm Sci 2008; 97: 654-690.

40 

Genser D. Food and drug interaction: consequences for the nutrition/health status. Ann Nutr Metab; 52: 29-32.

41 

Buczko W, Danysz A. Kompendium farmakologii i farmakoterapii. 6th ed. Wydawnictwo Urban & Partner, Wrocław 2016, 3-33.

42 

Skrypnik D, Skrypnik K, Suliburska J, Bogdański P, Pupek-Musialik D. Interakcje leków z żywnością. Forum Zab Metab 2013;. 4: 192-198.

43 

Swora-Cwynar E, Marcinkowska E, Olejniczak M. Interactions between food and drugs. Nursi Public Health 2015; 5: 427-439.

44 

Wicha SG, Chen C, Clewe O, Simonsson USH. A general pharmacodynamic interaction model identifies perpetrators and victims in drug interactions. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 2129.

45 

Koziolek M, Alcaro S, Augustijns P, et al. The mechanisms of pharmacokinetic food-drug interactions–a perspective from the UNGAP group. Eur J Pharm Sci 2019; 134: 31-59.

46 

Welk B, Szeligowski M, Trochonowicz I. Analiza interakcji leków z pokarmami. Część I. Farm Pol 2004; 60: 315-319.

47 

Müller-Lissner S. Classification, pharmacology, and side-effects of common laxatives. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 31: S234-7.

48 

Bassotti G, Battaglia E. Considerations for laxatives in terms of their interactions with other drugs. Exp Op Drug Metab Toxicol 2023; 19: 121-123.

49 

Mori H, Tack J, Suzuki H. Magnesium oxide in constipation. Nutrients 2021; 13: 421.

50 

Vičič V, Pandel Mikuš R, Ferjančič B. Review of history and mechanisms of action of lactulose (4-O-β-D-Galactopyranosyl-β-D-fructofuranose): present and future applications in food. J Food Sci Technol 2024; 61: 2036-2045.

51 

Currie GM. Pharmacology. Part 2: introduction to pharmacokinetics. J Nucl Med Technol 2018; 46: 221-230.

52 

Wu CY, Benet LZ. Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: transport/absorption/elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system. Pharm Res 2005; 22: 11-23.

53 

Benet LZ. Predicting drug disposition via application of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2010; 106: 162-167.

54 

Hosey CM, Chan R, Benet LZ. BDDCS predictions, self-correcting aspects of BDDCS assignments, BDDCS assignment corrections, and classification for more than 175 additional drugs. AAPS J 2016; 18: 251-260.

55 

Bocci G, Oprea TI, Benet LZ. State of the art and uses for the biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system (BDDCS): new additions, revisions, and citation references. AAPS J 2022; 24: 37.

56 

Yin OQ, Rudoltz M, Galetic I, et al. Effects of yogurt and applesauce on the oral bioavailability of nilotinib in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2011; 51: 1580-1586.

57 

Jatoi A, Kaasa S, Strijbos M. ESMO Handbook of Nutrition and Cancer, 2nd ed. ESMO Press 2023.

58 

Taskar KS, Yang ×, Neuhoff S, et al. Clinical relevance of hepatic and renal P-gp/BCRP inhibition of drugs: an international transporter consortium perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 112: 573-592.

59 

Piechocka J, Owczarek P, Chwatko G. Furanocoumarins-naturally occurring compounds that possess a wide range of benefical biological properties. Wiad Chem 2023; 77: 9-10.

60 

Panche AN, Diwan AD, Chandra SR. Flavonoids: an overview. J Nutr Sci 2016; 5: e47.

61 

Deng J, Zhu ×, Chen Z, et al. A review of food-drug interactions on oral drug absorption. Drugs 2017; 77: 1833-1855.

62 

Zhao M, Ma J, Li M, et al. Cytochrome P450 enzymes and drug metabolism in humans. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 12808.

63 

Domański P, Jarosińska J, Kruczyk B, et al. Prognostic value of pan-immune-inflammation value and body mass index in geriatric patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first line treatment. A single-center retrospective study. Contemp Oncol 2023; 27: 242-248.

64 

Van Leeuwen RWF, van Gelder T, Mathijssen RHJ, Jansman FGA. Drug-drug interactions with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: a clinical perspective. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: e315-e326

65 

Jackson KD, Durandis R, Vergne MJ. Role of cytochrome P450 enzymes in the metabolic activation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19: 2367.

66 

Lynch T, Price A. The effect of cytochrome P450 metabolism on drug response, interactions, and adverse effects. Am Fam Physician 2007; 76: 391-396.

67 

Fujiwara R, Yokoi T, Nakajima M. Structure and protein-protein interactions of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7: 388.

68 

Ingelman-Sundberg M. Human drug metabolizing cytochrome P450 enzymes: properties and polymorphisms. Naunyn Schmiedeberg Arch Pharmacol 2004; 369: 89-104.

69 

Kiang TK, Ensom MH, Chang TK. UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and clinical drug-drug interactions. Pharmacol Ther 2005; 106: 97-132.

70 

Petric Z, Žuntar I, Putnik P, Bursać Kovačević D. Food-drug interactions with fruit juices. Foods 2020; 10: 33.

71 

Hano C, Tungmunnithum D. Plant polyphenols, more than just simple natural antioxidants: oxidative stress, aging and age-related diseases. Medicines (Basel) 2020; 7: 26.

72 

Gupta N, Verma K, Nalla S, Kulshreshtha A, Lall R, Prasad S. Free radicals as a double-edged sword: the cancer preventive and therapeutic roles of curcumin. Molecules 2020; 25: 5390.

73 

Bailey DG, Dresser G, Arnold JM. Grapefruit-medication interactions: forbidden fruit or avoidable consequences? CMAJ 2013; 185: 309-316.

74 

Jarosz M, Dzieniszewski J. Uważaj co jesz, gdy zażywasz leki – interakcje między żywnością, suplementami diety a lekami. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa 2007.

75 

Gougis P, Hilmi M, Geraud A, Mir O, Funck-Brentano C. Potential cytochrome P450-mediated pharmacokinetic interactions between herbs, food, and dietary supplements and cancer treatments. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 166: 103342.

76 

Dizman N, Hsu J, Bergerot PG, et al. Randomized trial assessing impact of probiotic supplementation on gut microbiome and clinical outcome from targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Med 2021; 10: 79-86.

77 

Hosey CM, Broccatelli F, Benet LZ. Predicting when biliary excretion of parent drug is a major route of elimination in humans. AAPS J 2014; 16: 1085-1096.

Copyright: © 2025 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.