eISSN: 2299-0038
ISSN: 1643-8876
Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


4/2023
vol. 22
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause and intestinal microbiota

Oksana Pavlovska
1
,
Olga Savelyeva
2
,
Kateryna Pavlovska
2

1.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Odessa National Medical University, Odessa, Ukraine
2.
Department of Internal Medicine №1, Odessa National Medical University, Odessa, Ukraine
Menopause Rev 2023; 22(4): 213-219
Online publish date: 2023/12/18
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

One of the pathological symptoms of menopause is the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), which, according to statistical studies, appears by the age of 55 years in 49–52% of modern women, and by the age of 70 years this figure reaches 70–74% [1]. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause includes the following clinical symptoms: vaginal dryness, irritation and burning sensation, decreased pelvic floor muscle tone, vaginal prolapse, dysuria, acute and recurrent urinary tract infections, stress urinary incontinence (upon laughter, coughing, any physical activity), pollakiuria (urination more than 8 times a day), nocturia (more than one episode of urination per night), decreased libido, discomfort and pain during intercourse, and postcoital spotting [2]. Dryness of the vaginal mucosa is the earliest precursor of GSM and indicates the approach of other unpleasant symptoms that soon begin to appear one after another.

It should be noted that GSM causes not only significant physical and sexual discomfort in a woman, but also negatively affects her self-perception, motivational behaviour, social adaptation, professional activity, and daily life, reducing the quality of life in general [3].

According to numerous clinical studies, this syndrome tends to progress over time without timely preventive measures and therapeutic correction [4]. The frequency of development of GSM is directly proportional to the duration of the postmenopausal period.

According to the results of a multivariable logistic regression, which was carried out by several large clinical diagnostic centres, many factors influence the time of occurrence and severity of GSM, the most important of which are the initial hormonal background, the number of pregnancies and complicated births, inflammatory diseases of the organs of the lesser pelvis in history, reduced immunity, diet, body mass index, as well as excessive hygiene of the external genital organs or, conversely, its absence [5].

It should be noted that, at this stage of the study, GSM has not yet been clearly formulated, and only the most probable pathogenetic links in the formation of this pathology have been identified [6]. In this regard, there is no single consensus on the management and treatment of patients with GSM.

So, according to some clinicians, GSM is associated primarily with age-related changes in the body, namely with the progressive extinction of ovarian activity, which invariably leads to cascade neuroendocrine, metabolic, and, as a result, metabolic and trophic disorders [7]. According to this concept, hypoestrogenism as the leading aetiological factor of GSM causes ischaemic damage to the structures of the urogenital tract, thinning of the epithelium (the cells of the surface and intermediate layers disappear, only a thin layer of basal and parabasal cells, poor in glycogen), shifting of the pH of the vaginal secretion toward alkaline, and colonization of the urogenital tract by opportunistic and pathogenic bacteria, which contributes to the maintenance of a recurrent inflammatory process, and impaired proliferation of both the vaginal epithelium and the urothelium [8]. Consequently, pathogenetically appropriate methods of GSM correction according to this group of specialists are long-term local oestriol replacement therapy in monotherapy mode or personalized systemic menopausal hormone therapy [9].

According to another concept, the leading pathogenetic mechanism of GSM is not a progressive deficiency of sex steroids, but their sharp fluctuation, leading to oxidative stress, a permanent imbalance between the antioxidant defence system and free radical oxidation, destabilization of the vascular wall, endothelial damage, microcirculation disorders, ischaemia and, as a result, the development of degenerative processes in the tissues of the urinary tract [10].

Also, according to this group of researchers, age-related rhythmological discoordination of the hypothalamic-diencephalic structures and the limbic-reticular complex of the brain is a significant aetiopathogenetic factor of menopausal disorders [11]. The combined effect of these factors causes a stable dysfunction of endocrine-metabolic and trophic processes, as well as a progressive decrease in the reparative potential of tissues [12]. Recommendations for GSM treatment, according to this concept, include the use of local oestriol replacement therapy in monotherapy mode in combination with drugs focused on the normalization of rhythmological activity in the central nervous system [13].

There are also many studies in which genitourinary dysfunction during menopause is considered not from the point of view of hormonal imbalance, but in certain changes in receptor mechanisms that cause inflammation and tissue atrophy [14]. The studies focus on the fact that oestrogen therapy does not significantly affect the level of ERβ receptors, which prejudices the appropriateness of hormone replacement therapy.

To date, some scientists also do not exclude the aetiopathogenetic involvement of the intestinal microbiota in the pathophysiology of menopausal disorders [15]. A turning point for large-scale scientific studies of the intestinal microflora was the rapid development of such molecular genetic technologies as metagenomic and metatranscriptome sequencing, metaproteomics, and metabolomics [16]. These advanced research methods make it possible to identify the detailed taxonomic (phylogenetic) composition of the intestinal ecosystem, obtain a detailed analysis of the genetic material (metagenome) of microbial communities in the aggregate, which provides a unique opportunity to analyse their cause-and-effect changes more purposefully and thoroughly, study and refine the mechanisms of their functioning, activity, and metabolic connections, and, first and foremost, interaction with the macroorganism [17].

At this stage of the development of science, it is known that the intestinal microbiota is a unique and unusually complex ecosystem for each individual, which is a multicomponent community of bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi, and protists, which dynamically changes depending on age, nutrition, hereditary factors, and influences of the internal and external environment [18]. It is important to note that the macroorganism and microflora, subject to their physiological functioning, are in a state of “ecological balance”.

It should be emphasized that the microorganisms of the gastrointestinal tract have fundamentally similar needs for energy and nutrition sources; therefore, fiercely competing with each other, they are forced to constantly adapt to the changing conditions of coexistence, acquiring special mediator and metabolic properties. Thanks to this constant kaleidoscope of variable biochemical transformations, multi-vector enzyme cascades, which are ordered by multilevel regulatory systems, a fundamental and accentuated role of the intestinal microbiota in maintaining the vital activity of the body is formed [19].

At present, the scientific community is also actively discussing and studying such a concept as the gut-brain axis (GBA), which is a bidirectional neurohumoral system that regulates metabolic homeostasis by converting sensory information into neuronal, hormonal, and immunological reactions at the molecular, cellular, and organ levels [20]. According to researchers, this communication is carried out through intracellular (phagocytosis, endocytosis, etc.) processes, as well as remote and contact interactions of low molecular weight compounds, signalling molecules, and structural components of symbiotic bacteria with sensitive nerve endings located in loose fibrous connective tissue of lamina propria of the mucous membrane of the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, according to the results of clinical and experimental studies, intestinal bacteria promote secretion, and some independently secrete such paramount neurotransmitters as serotonin, melatonin, gamma-aminobutyric acid, norepinephrine, dopamine, histamine, and acetylcholine in the process of metabolism. Gases synthesized by the intestinal flora (CO, NO, H2S), as well as polyamines (spermine, spermidine, putrescine, cadaverine), which are products of its metabolism, are able to modulate brain functions, affecting cognitive functions, the hypothalamic-pituitary response to stressful situations, mood, and behavioural responses [21]. The microbiota also performs the enzymatic transformation of complex steroid compounds and nitrogen derivatives, which belong to the class of prohormones. And this is only a small descriptive fragment of the metabolic processes carried out by intestinal microorganisms within the framework of the functioning of GBA.

In addition, evidence has been accumulated indicating that a change in the composition of the intestinal flora initiates the formation of a syndrome of increased intestinal permeability (leaky gut syndrome) with activation of the inflammation system, coagulation factors, accumulation of active oxygen radicals, and impaired permeability of the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract, and increased translocation of bacteria and lipopolysaccharides from the intestine, which determines the most important role of the microbiota in the pathophysiology of many diseases in connection with so-called “endotoxin aggression” [22].

Thus, at present, there is no doubt about the participation of the intestinal microbiota in the aetiopathogenesis of many pathological conditions in the body. According to generally accepted conceptual views, GSM is a chronic degenerative-dystrophic process in the vulva, perineum, vagina, urethra, and bladder of a woman, caused by a progressive oestrogen deficiency. However, many researchers still do not agree with such an unambiguous position and state the multicomponent nature of the aetiopathogenetic mechanisms of GSM. In particular, the study of the role of the intestinal microbiota in the initiation and development of menopausal disorders is an interesting and promising trend; therefore, it is attracting the attention of modern researchers.

Material and methods

A total of 65 middle-aged women (45–59 years old) took part in the present study. It was of interest for us to examine this particular age group of patients because during this period most women are socially in demand, having the opportunity to realize their professional experience in full and realize their creative potential, and they are also sexually active.

The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group I included 39 patients who were diagnosed with GSM on the basis of complaints of dryness, irritation and burning sensation in the vagina, episodes of stress urinary incontinence, nocturia, decreased libido, discomfort during sexual intercourse, as well as the results of a gynaecological examination (decrease in the tone of the muscles of the pelvic bottom, prolapse of the vaginal walls, etc.).

Depending on GSM duration, this group was divided into 2 subgroups:

  • Ia (n = 22) – duration of manifestations of GSM for 3–5 years,

  • Ib (n = 17) – duration of manifestations of GSM for more than 7 years.

Group II (control group) included 26 patients who did not have clinical manifestations of GSM.

All patients underwent general clinical studies according to the recommendations of modern clinical protocols (complete blood count, a comprehensive metabolic panel, coagulation tests, ECG, etc.).

To help diagnose iron-deficiency anaemia, complete blood count, haemoglobin concentration, red blood cells (RBC) mean corpuscular volume, RBC mean corpuscular haemoglobin, blood iron levels, and ferritin levels were used [23, 24].

The menopause rating scale (MRS) was used to determine the severity of menopause symptoms [8]. To assess the state of changes in the urogenital tract, the scale of the vaginal health index of Gloria Bachmann was used [25].

The state of the intestinal microbiota was assessed by bacteriological examination of faeces. The content of the main representatives of the obligate microflora was determined, namely Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Escherichia coli with normal enzymatic activity, Streptococcus viridans, Bacteroides, etc. and facultative (conditionally pathogenic) microorganisms – pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli, representatives of the genera Proteus, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Clostridium, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Candida albicans, etc. All examined patients followed a certain diet for 3 days before sampling, excluding food products that promote fermentation processes in the intestines, as well as alcohol and drugs (antibiotics). At least 10 hours passed from the moment of the last meal to the taking of the material. Samples for the study were placed in sterile glassware and delivered to the laboratory no more than 2 hours later. The interval between taking the biomaterial and the start of inoculation did not exceed 3–4 hours. A portion of faeces (0.5–1.0 g) was added to a sterile pre-weighed test tube, and after repeated weighing, the weight of the sample was determined. After a series of successive dilutions, inoculations were made on various nutrient media. Quantitative accounting of the grown microorganisms was carried out by calculating 1 g of faeces, taking into account the dose of the inoculated material and the degree of its dilution.

To process the results of the study, the method of variation statistics and nonparametric methods were used using Excel-2000 and Statistica for Windows v.6.0 software.

Results

The first step of our investigation was the study of somatic and gynaecological history of the patients (Table 1).

Table 1

Features of somatic and gynaecological history in patients suffering from genitourinary syndrome of menopause (subgroup Ia, Ib) and control group (group II)

Features of somatic and gynaecological historyI group, n = 39II group, n = 26
Ia subgroup, n = 22Ib subgroup, n = 17
Abs.%Abs.%Abs.%
Age of the patients
45–50 years old836.4317.6830.8
51–55 years old522.7423.5726.9
56–59 years old940.91058.91142.3
Quantity of female patients in menopause1568.21270.61246.2
Average age of menopause beginning50.3 ±2.050.9 ±1.956.5 ±1.7
Inflammatory diseases of the pelvic organs836.41164.7519.2
Precancerous lesions of cervix313.6211.827.7
Premenstrual syndrome940.9952.927.7
Uterine leiomyoma418.2317.6
Benign ovarian tumours313.6423.5
Polycystic ovary syndrome15.9
Abnormal uterine bleeding313.6529.413.8
Total number of gynaecological operations940.91370.6311.5
Childhood infections1986.41694.12180.8
Diseases of the respiratory organs (chronic tonsillitis, chronic bronchitis, etc.)522.7317.6311.5
Cardiovascular diseases (arterial hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, varicose disease)522.7529.4311.5
Diseases of the digestive system (chronic pancreatitis, chronic cholecystitis, chronic hepatitis, chronic colitis)418.2317.627.7
Blood diseases (iron deficiency anaemia)836.41058.8519.2
Diseases of the urinary system (chronic cystitis, chronic pyelonephritis, urolithiasis)418.2423.5311.5
Endocrine diseases (diabetes mellitus type 2, metabolic syndrome, obesity)522.7529.4

The average age of women in subgroup Ia was 52.7 ±4.8 years, subgroup Ib 54.6 ±4.1 years, and group II 53.1 ±4.3 years. At the time of the study, 15 (68.2%) patients in subgroup Ia were in the menopause period, subgroup Ib 12 (70.6%), and group II 12 (46.2%). An interesting observation was the fact that the average age of menopause in patients who did not suffer from symptoms of GSM was 56.5 ±1.7 years, i.e. it was significantly higher. In patients from subgroup Ia, this index was 50.3 ±2.0 years, and in subgroup Ib it was 50.9 ±1.9 years (pIa-II = 0.027, pIb-II = 0.039, pIaIb > 0.05).

The women with GSM (Ia and Ib subgroups) also had a burdened gynaecological history and, as a result, the total number of gynaecological operations in patients of subgroup Ia was 3.6 times higher compared to the control group, and in subgroup Ib it was 6.1 times higher.

The analysis of somatic pathology revealed the following features: iron deficiency anaemia was diagnosed 1.9 and 3.1 times more often in patients of subgroups Ia and Ib, respectively, as well as such endocrine and chronic metabolic diseases as type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and obesity.

The next step of the study was to assess the severity of menopausal symptoms and determine the degree of age-related changes in the urogenital tract in the patients under examination. Thus, menopausal women were asked to fill in a MRS. According to the results of the calculation, the symptoms of menopause were most pronounced in women of subgroup Ib (15.7 ±1.9 points), whereas in patients of subgroup Ia this indicator was 11.4 ±1.7 points and did not differ significantly (pIaIb = 0.100). In the control group, menopausal symptoms were assessed as mild, on average 3.3 ±1.0 points (pIb-II < 0.01, pIa-II < 0.01).

Also, all patients underwent a determination of their vaginal health index according to Gloria Bachmann. Most of the women from subgroup Ib showed signs of severe urogenital atrophy (1.3 ±0.5 points). In the women of subgroup Ia, this indicator was statistically significantly higher (2.8 ±0.4 points, pIaIb = 0.025), which led to the conclusion that the manifestations of urogenital atrophy worsened with an increase in the duration of GSM (more than 7 years). In the group II patients, the vaginal health index was 3.9 ±0.3 points (pIb-II < 0.01, pIa-II = 0.033).

The main stage of the investigation was the study of the characteristics of the intestinal microbiota in patients of the examined groups (Table 2).

Table 2

The content of intestinal microorganisms in 1 g of faeces in patients with genitourinary menopausal syndrome (subgroup Ia, Ib) and in women of the control group (group II)

MicroorganismsGroup I, N = 39Group II, n = 26
Subgroup Ia, n = 22Subgroup Ib, n = 17
Bifidobacterium (×108)17.69 ±5.15
(pIa-Ib = 0.776)
(pIa-II < 0.01)
15.76 ±4.33
(pIb-II < 0.01)
54.25 ±7.31
Lactobacillus (×106)6.47 ±1.92
(pIa-Ib = 0.343)
(pIa-II = 0.018)
4.29 ±1.21
(pIb-II = 0.004)
18.67 ±4.56
Escherichia coli with reduced enzymatic activity (×106)29.04 ±6.54
(pIa-Ib = 0.864)
(pIa-II = 0.028)
27.60 ±5.21
(pIb-II = 0.018)
12.45 ±3.26
Bacteroides (×108)18.29 ±3.79
(pIa-Ib = 0.667)
(pIa-II = 0.556)
15.88 ±4.07
(pIb-II = 0.400)
23.63 ±8.16
Streptococcus viridans (×106)0.71 ±0.12
(pIa-Ib = 0.447)
(pIa-II = 0.032)
0.83 ±0.10
(pIb-II = 0.002)
0.35 ±0.11
Enterococcus faecium (×106)34.28 ±7.53
(pIa-Ib = 0.609)
(pIa-II = 0.488)
40.01 ±8.18
(pIb-II = 0.839)
42.50 ±9.02
Staphylococcus epidermidis (×104)0.91 ±0.17
(pIa-Ib = 0.150)
(pIa-II = 0.406
0.62 ±0.10
(pIb-II = 0.424)
0.74 ±0.11
Klebsiella (×105)1.39 ±0.19
(pIa-Ib = 0.120)
(pIa-II < 0.001)
2.01 ±0.34
(pIb-II < 0.001)
0.30 ±0.04
Candida albicans (×104)0.73 ±0.19
(pIa-Ib = 0.364)
(pIa-II = 0.835)
1.08 ±0.33
(pIb-II = 0.718)
0.85 ±0.54
Enterobacter (×103)2.24 ±0.61
(pIa-Ib = 0.490)
(pIa-II = 0.678)
1.76 ±0.32
(pIb-II = 0.719
1.94 ±0.38
Citrobacter (×103)1.54 ±0.32
(pIa-Ib = 0.919)
(pIa-II = 0.624)
1.49 ±0.37
(pIb-II = 0.732)
1.33 ±0.28
Clostridioides difficile (×105)0.22 ±0.07
(pIa-Ib = 0.595)
(pIa-II = 0.363)
0.29 ±0.1
1(pIb-II = 0.227)
0.15 ±0.03
Proteus (×103)1.02 ±0.29
(pIa-Ib = 0.679)
(pIa-II = 0.575)
0.86 ±0.25
(pIb-II = 0.842)
0.78 ±0.31

It was found that in patients suffering from GSM, there was an imbalance in the intestinal microbiota compared with the control group. Thus, there was a significant decrease in such representatives of the obligate microflora as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. In patients from group II, the content of Bifidobacterium was within (54.25 ±7.31) × 108, and for Lactobacillus – (18.67 ±4.56) × 106. In women suffering from GSM for no more than 7 years, the data indices were within (17.69 ±5.15) × 108 (pIa-II < 0.01) and (6.47 ±1.92) × 106 (pIa-II = 0.018), in patients with a duration of GSM manifestations of more than 7 years they were (15.76 ±4.33) × 108 (pIb-II < 0.01) and (4.29 ±1.21) × 106 (pIb-II = 0.004), respectively. In addition, there was a significant increase in the number of strains of opportunistic microorganisms such as Streptococcus viridans, Klebsiella, as well as Escherichia coli with reduced enzymatic activity. In patients of the control group, the content of Streptococcus viridans was within (0.35 ±0.11) × 106, Klebsiella – (0.30 ±0.04) × 105, and Escherichia coli with reduced enzymatic activity – (12.45 ±3.26) × 106. In women of subgroup Ia, the content of these opportunistic microorganisms was significantly higher – (0.71 ±0.12) × 106 (pIa-II = 0.032), (1.39 ±0.19) × 105 (pIa-II < 0.001), and (29.04 ±6.54) × 106 (pIa-II = 0.028), respectively. Similar results were obtained when analysing the intestinal microbiota in patients of subgroup Ib-(0.83 ±0.10) × 106 (pIb-II = 0.002), (2.01 ±0.34) × 105 (pIb-II < 0.001), and (27.60 ±5.21) × 106 (pIb-II = 0.018).

Thus, the result of our study was the identification of certain disorders of the intestinal microbiota in patients suffering from symptoms of GSM. It is possible to suggest that reduced colonization of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, as well as overgrowth of opportunistic bacteria such as Escherichia coli with reduced enzymatic activity, and Klebsiella and S treptococcus may affect the highly selective semi-permeable intestinal barrier with the formation of leaky gut syndrome. According to modern scientific concepts, the development of this syndrome slows the metabolism, causes a lack of vitamins, minerals, and amino acids, causes immune dyscrasia, and initiates the processes of chronic systemic inflammation, which, interfering in interactions in the gut-brain axis, can be one of the leading biological markers of body aging and an important pathogenetic factor of age-related diseases.

Discussion

The effectiveness of the treatment of any disease or pathological condition depends primarily on the aetiopathogenetic orientation of therapy.

In the early 2000s, several studies were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of oestrogen monotherapy in women with GSM. At that time, the pathogenetic rationale for the use of oestriol for the correction of urogenital atrophy did not raise doubts, because the scientific community was dominated by the concept according to which GSM was considered to be the result of a progressive depletion of the ovarian follicular reserve with the formation of an oestrogen-deficient state [26]. However, accumulated clinical experience and analysis of retrospective studies have shown that when hormonal therapy is discontinued, the symptoms of GSM not only recur, but also intensify [27, 28]. In this regard, the assertion that local oestrogens are the “gold standard” for the treatment of GSM began to be reasonably questioned [29].

Currently, more and more researchers consider GSM to be a consequence of age-related polyhormonal insufficiency, namely, a staged and sequential decrease in secretion, first of progesterone, then of androgens and oestrogens [30]. According to this concept, progesterone deficiency plays an important trigger role, triggering a cascade of sequential reactions in the processes of cellular and systemic aging, which opens new opportunities for optimizing GSM pharmacotherapy.

It should also be emphasized that the rapid development of nanotechnologies in biology and medicine has contributed to a certain change in the ideas of scientists about the dynamics of life processes. According to modern views, the human body is a symbiotic community of numerous eukaryotic cells and various microorganisms, the optimal number, ratio, functioning, and interaction of which in specific environmental conditions determine its health [31].

The results of our study showed that in the women with GSM there was a significant inhibition of the growth of “beneficial” microflora, accompanied by excessive reproduction of various types of opportunistic microorganisms. It is quite possible that a more in-depth study of the intestinal microbiota in this pathology will become an important step towards understanding the pathogenetic mechanisms of the formation of GSM, and the impact on the intestinal microbiota may become a significant condition for the effective prevention and treatment of this pathological condition.

Conclusions

Modern medicine has in its arsenal various options for treating GSM, including surgical treatment, laser technology, and local or systemic hormone replacement therapy [32, 33]. But the problem of effective pathogenetic pharmacotherapy of GSM in women has not been fully resolved. Therefore, according to experts, the need to revise the GSM formation paradigm has become obvious. It is quite possible that not only age-related deficiency of sex steroids, but also altered intestinal homeostasis interfere with the pathogenetic outline. It is known that an indispensable condition for the normal functioning of the body is to maintain the physiological constancy and activity of the intestinal microbiota. Influencing the intestinal metabolism can become a new therapeutic strategy in the prevention and treatment of genitourinary syndrome in order to ensure a high quality of life for women at any age.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Angelou K, Grigoriadis T, Diakosavvas M, Zacharakis D, Athanasiou S. The genitourinary syndrome of menopause: an overview of the recent data. Cureus 2020; 12: e7586.

2 

Alves Sarmento AC, Ferreira Costa AP, Vieira-Baptista P, et al. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: epidemiology, physiopathology, clinical manifestation and diagnostic. Front Reprod Health 2021; 3: 779398.

3 

Scavello I, Maseroli E, Di Stasi V, Vignozzi L. Sexual health in menopause. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019; 55: 559.

4 

Kaunitz AM, Manson JE. Management of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: 859-876.

5 

Karakoç H, Kul Uçtu A, Özerdoğan N. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: effects on related factors, quality of life, and self-care power. Prz Menopauz 2019; 18: 15-22.

6 

Lee SR, Cho MK, Cho YJ, et al. The 2020 menopausal hormone therapy guidelines. J Menopausal Med 2020; 26: 69-98.

7 

Kim HK, Kang SY, Chung YJ, Kim JH, Kim MR. The recent review of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. J Menopausal Med 2015; 21: 65-71.

8 

Meeta M, Digumarti L, Agarwal N, Vaze N, Shah R, Malik S. Clinical practice guidelines on menopause: an executive summary and recommendations: Indian menopause society 2019–2020. J Midlife Health 2020; 11: 55-95.

9 

Kamilos MF, Borrelli CL. New therapeutic option in genitourinary syndrome of menopause: pilot study using microablative fractional radiofrequency. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2017; 15: 445-451.

10 

Wu YH, Chueh KS, Chuang SM, Long CY, Lu JH, Juan YS. Bladder hyperactivity induced by oxidative stress and bladder ischemia: a review of treatment strategies with antioxidants. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 6014.

11 

Alblooshi S, Taylor M, Gill N. Does menopause elevate the risk for developing depression and anxiety? Results from a systematic review. Australas Psychiatry 2023; 31: 165-173.

12 

Alperin M, Burnett L, Lukacz E, Brubaker L. The mysteries of menopause and urogynecologic health: clinical and scientific gaps. Menopause 2019; 26: 103-111.

13 

Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C. Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 213-240.

14 

Cavallini A, Dinaro E, Giocolano A, et al. Estrogen receptor (ER) and ER-related receptor expressoin in normal and atrophic human vagina. Maturitas 2008; 59: 219-225.

15 

Qi X, Yun C, Pang Y, Qiao J. The impact of the gut microbiota on the reproductive and metabolic endocrine system. Gut Microbes 2021; 13: 1894070.

16 

Morgan EW, Perdew GH, Patterson AD. Multi-Omics strategies for investigating the microbiome in toxicology research. Toxicol Sci 2022; 187: 189-213.

17 

Aggarwal N, Kitano S, Puah GRY, Kittelmann S, Hwang IY, Chang MW. Microbiome and human health: current understanding, engineering, and enabling technologies. Chem Rev 2023; 123: 31-72.

18 

Hou K, Wu ZX, Chen XY, et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022; 7: 135.

19 

Olofsson LE, Bäckhed F. The metabolic role and therapeutic potential of the microbiome. Endocr Rev 2022; 43: 907-926.

20 

Berding K, Vlckova K, Marx W, et al. Diet and the microbiota-gut-brain axis: sowing the seeds of good mental health. Adv Nutr 2021; 12: 1239-1285.

21 

Pferschy-Wenzig EM, Pausan MR, Ardjomand-Woelkart K, et al. Medicinal plants and their impact on the gut microbiome in mental health: a systematic review. Nutrients 2022; 14: 2111.

22 

Camilleri M. The leaky gut: mechanisms, measurement and clinical implications in humans. Gut. 2019; 68: 1516-1526.

23 

Hagras AM, Hussein NA, Abdelazim I, Elhamamy N. Ferric carboxymaltose for treatment of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia caused by abnormal uterine bleeding. Prz Menopauz 2022; 21: 223-228.

24 

Obaid M, Abdelazim IA, AbuFaza M, Al-Khatlan HS, Al-Tuhoo AM, Alkhaldi FH. Efficacy of ferric carboxy maltose in treatment of iron deficiency/iron deficiency anaemia during pregnancy. Prz Menopauz 2023; 22: 16-20.

25 

Bachmann G. Urogenital ageing: an old problem newly recognized. Maturitas 1995; 22: S1-S5.

26 

Raghunandan C, Agrawal S, Dubey P, et al. A comparative study of the effects of local estrogen with or without local testosterone on vulvovaginal and sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 1284-1290.

27 

Castelo-Branco C, Cancelo MJ, Villero J, Nohales F, Juliá MD. Management of post-menopausal vaginal atrophy and atrophic vaginitis. Maturitas 2005; 52 Suppl 1: S46-52.

28 

Baber J, Panay N, Fenton A. The IMS Writing Group 2016 IMS Recommendations on women’s midlife health and menopause hormone therapy. Climacteric 2016; 19: 109-150.

29 

Benini V, Ruffolo AF, Casiraghi A, et al. New innovations for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy: an up-to-date review. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022; 58: 770.

30 

Chollet JA, Carter G, Meyn LA, Mermelstein F, Balk JL. Efficacy and safety of vaginal estriol and progesterone in postmenopausal women with atrophic vaginitis. Menopause 2009; 16: 978-983.

31 

Fan Y, Pedersen O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 2021; 19: 55-71.

32 

Monti M, Fischetti M, DI Pinto A, et al. Update on surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 73: 140-144.

33 

Monti M, Fischetti M, Santangelo G, et al. Urinary incontinence in women: state of the art and medical treatment. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 73: 135-139.

Copyright: © 2023 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.