Ta strona używa pliki cookies, w celu polepszenia użyteczności i funkcjonalności oraz w celach statystycznych. Dowiedz się więcej w Polityce prywatności.
Korzystając ze strony wyrażasz zgodę na używanie plików cookies, zgodnie z aktualnymi ustawieniami przeglądarki.
Akceptuję wykorzystanie plików cookies
Advances in Interventional Cardiology
eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current Issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2025
vol. 21
 
Share:
Share:
Image in intervention

How to unfold a folded large-bore sheath after Impella-supported percutaneous coronary intervention

Szymon Glanowski
1
,
Ewa Kwiatkowska
1
,
Michalina Jelonek-Harasiuk
1
,
Łukasz Niewiara
2
,
Jacek Legutko
2
,
Paweł Kleczyński
2

  1. Students’ Scientific Group of Modern Cardiac Therapy at the Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
  2. Department of Interventional Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
Adv Interv Cardiol 2025; 21, 1 (79): 127–128
Online publish date: 2025/02/28
Article file
- how ro unfold (1).pdf  [0.29 MB]
Get citation
 
 

Patients with impaired left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) have a significant risk of sudden cardiac death after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) [1]. Therefore, prevention of complications that may be critical for patients’ prognosis is crucial [2].

A 72-year-old man with multimorbidity (hypertension, type II diabetes, dyslipidemia, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney failure) and reduced LVEF to 30%, presenting with chronic coronary syndrome with class III symptoms according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society scale, was admitted to undergo elective invasive diagnostics of coronary artery disease. Coronary angiography revealed multivessel coronary disease with significant calcified lesions in the right coronary artery (RCA) (Figure 1 B) and chronic total occlusions of both the left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex artery with poor collateral flow. Due to low LVEF and lack of venous material for grafting as well as non-surgical mid and distal portion of the LAD, the patient was planned for high-risk PCI with MCS on the last remaining vessel. Computed tomography angiography was performed to assess the access site and iliac arteries and showed bilateral iliac tortuosity with moderate calcifications more present on the left, so the right common femoral artery (RCFA) was used as a large-bore access site. Under ultrasound guidance, the RCFA was punctured and mechanical sutures were deployed. 19F Impella peel-away short and long sheaths could not be delivered, so predilation with a peripheral 7.0 × 30 mm Armada balloon (Abbott, USA) was performed. However, still the sheath was unable to cross. We decided on the off-label use of the 14F iSleeve sheath (Boston Scientific, USA), which is our routine approach as bailout for access, and the sheath easily crossed the lesion and ported in the abdominal aorta, with subsequent Impella insertion (Figure 1 A) and delivery to the left ventricle, but with former balloon inflation within the sheath.

Figure 1

A – angiography of right external iliac artery, inserted Impella (arrow: folding of the sheath during insertion), B – coronarography of right coronary artery (RCA), before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), C – final result of PCI RCA, D – removing Impella (trouble with inserting cannula to iSleeve sheath) (arrow: peripheral balloon), E – longitudinal distortion visible on the sheath, after removal

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/55675/PWKI-21-55675-g001_min.jpg

Imaging-guided PCI on the severely calcified RCA included lesion preparation with coronary lithotripsy using a 3.0 × 12 mm balloon, resulting in huge myocardial ischemia. Finally, two drug-eluting stents were implanted under intravascular ultrasound control. After completed revascularization (Figure 1 C), the Impella was removed from the left ventricle and typically pulled back down to the entry site. However, it was stuck within the iSleeve sheath and could not be retrieved. After increasing the tension on the whole system, the MCS device was able to reach the femoral artery but together with the folded sheath; thus, it could not be removed again. Using the right radial approach, from which PCI was performed, we crossed towards right iliac arteries with an 0.018′′ wire (Figure 1 D) and delivered a long shaft peripheral 4.0 × 40 balloon, which was inflated at the site of resistance. Then, after partial removal of the sheath, the Impella was successfully removed. A longitudinal distortion of the sheath was visible on fluoroscopy. The 0.035′′ wire could not cross the folded sheath, so we used a dilator with the wire; this successfully unfolded the sheath, which was then removed (Figure 1 E), and the artery was successfully closed with mechanical sutures and a collagen-based device. Follow-up angiography showed a minor dissection of the right external iliac artery, without impairment of the flow. The patient was discharged home after 3 days in a good overall condition.

Large-bore access-related complications are quite frequent [3, 4]. Here we presented one such case, with subsequent solution.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Turkiewicz K, Rola P, Włodarczak S, et al. Recovery from severe ischemic cardiomyopathy after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention facilitated by levosimendan infusion and Impella CP support and prolonged use of a wearable defibrillator vest. Adv Interv Cardiol 2024; 20: 370-1.

2 

Kaki A, Blank N, Alraies MC, et al. Access and closure management of large bore femoral arterial access. J Interv Cardiol 2018; 31: 969-77.

3 

Sorrentino S, Di Costanzo A, Salerno N, et al. Strategies to minimize access site-related complications in patients undergoing transfemoral artery procedures with large-bore devices. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2024; 22: 79-87.

4 

Meijers TA, Aminian A, van Wely M, et al. Randomized comparison between radial and femoral large-bore access for complex percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14: 1293-303.

Copyright: © 2025 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.