eISSN: 2084-9869
ISSN: 1233-9687
Polish Journal of Pathology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2022
vol. 73
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

Increased Glypican-3 immunostaining is associated with longer survival outcomes in colorectal carcinoma

Jaudah Al-Maghrabi
1, 2
,
Zuhoor Al-Mansouri
2
,
Abdullah Al-Harbi
3
,
Mourad Assidi
4, 5
,
Abdelbaset Buhmeida
4, 5
,
Wafaey Gomaa
6

1.
Department of Pathology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2.
Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
3.
Department of Pathology, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4.
Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
5.
Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
6.
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Al Minia, Egypt
Pol J Pathol 2022; 74 (1): 14-20
Online publish date: 2022/06/28
Article file
- 02-PJP-02259.pdf  [0.65 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Introduction

Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is in third place in the rank of malignant tumours. In industrialised countries, CRC is second among causes of death related to malignancy [1]. The pathogenesis of CRC involves a multistep process through the accumulation of several genetic and epigenetic abnormalities. Aberrant activation of the Wnt signalling pathway, typically via mutation of APC, and mutations of other genes such as KRAS have been observed [2, 3, 4].
Glypicans (GPCs), constitute a family of heparan sulphate proteoglycans. Glypicans are attached to the plasma membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol and form a complex with Wnt signalling pathway [5, 6]. GPC-3 has a role in cell signalling pathways, cell division and apoptosis. Interestingly, it has different effect in different signalling pathways; supressing effect in the Hedgehog pathway [7] but a stimulating effect in the Wnt pathway [8].

The immunohistochemistry expression of GPC3 in normal tissues differs between embryogenic and adult tissues. In adults, it was found to be expressed in few normal tissues (e.g., gastric glands, kidney tubules, placenta and testicular germ cells) while absent in many others including colon and liver tissue [9, 10]. Hard work has been done by researchers to study the association between GPC-3 and different tumours especially hepatocellular carcinoma [11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. Only a few studies have been done to explore the association between GPC-3 and CRC [4, 16].
The present work was designed to investigate the immunostaining expression of GPC-3 in CRC and its relation to clinicopathological features as well as the prognostic significance of GPC-3 immunostaining.

Material and methods

Patients

The study is retrospective and included formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour tissue from 137 patients with CRC and 44 corresponding nodal metastases in the period 1995-2013. Blocks were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Clinicopathological characteristics of patients are listed in Table I. The study was approved by the Research Committee of the Biomedical Ethics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University.

Tissue microarray

Paraffin-embedded CRC samples were retrieved and used to create TMA recipient blocks. Tumour areas were marked on haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides. Areas of necrosis and any defect were avoided. The marked areas were correlated with selected paraffin blocks, and two cores of tissue – each 1.5 mm in diameter – were punched within the automated TMA instrument (Master 3D Histech) [17, 18].

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin blocks of tumour were cut at 4 µm thickness, and mounted on positive-charged slides (Leica Microsystems Plus Slides). Sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in an automated immunostainer (BenchMark XT, Ventana® Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). Pre-treatment was done using CC1 (prediluted cell conditioning solution) for 60 min. Mouse monoclonal anti-glypican-3 antibody (1G12 from Cell Marque) was incubated at 37°C for 20 min. Ventana® I-view DAB detection kit was used according to kit manufacturer instructions. Subsequently, slides were washed, counterstained with Mayer’s haematoxylin and mounted. Negative control (substitution of primary antibody with Tris buffered saline) and positive control slides (normal liver tissue previously known to be positive to glypican-3) were included.

Interpretation of glypican-3 immunostaining

Scoring was performed independently by two pathologists (AH, WG) without prior knowledge of clinicopathological data. GPC-3 immunostaining was semi-quantitatively evaluated and the percentage of tumour cells showing cytoplasmic GPC-3 staining was recorded. GPC-3 immunostaining was considered as low when less than 5% of tumour cells were stained. When 5% or more of tumour cells were stained, GPC-3 immunostaining was considered as high GPC-3 [19].

Statistical analysis

Association between two variables was tested using the χ2 test. To test the association in three groups of patients for one independent variable, the Kruskal Wallis test was used. The non-parametric χ2 test was used to test variance along one variable. The Kaplan-Meier procedure was used to calculate the survival probabilities and the log rank test was used to compare the difference between survival rates. The end point for patients was last seen or death. Disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated as the time from diagnosis to the appearance of recurrent disease (or date last seen disease-free). Overall survival was calculated from the time of diagnosis to the date last seen or death. Statistical procedures were performed using SPSS® Release 16.0. Statistical significance was determined at p value of ≤ 0.05 and was 2-sided.

Results

Immunostaining for GPC-3 was seen in the cytoplasm of malignant cells both in primary tumours and nodal metastatic deposits. High GPC-3 immunostaining was statistically significantly higher than low GPC-3 in both the primary tumour and nodal metastasis. In primary CRC, high GPC-3 immunostaining was observed in 70.1% while low GPC-3 was seen in 29.9% (p < 0.001). In nodal metastasis, high GPC-3 immunostaining was reported in 70.4% while low GPC-3 immunostaining in 29.6% (< 0.001). There was no difference in GPC-3 immunostaining between primary CRC and nodal metastasis (p = 0.744). Data are shown in Table II. Representative examples of GPC-3 immunostaining are shown in Figure 1 (A-D). GPC-3 immunostaining in CRC showed not association with any of the clinicopathological parameters (data are shown in Table III). On the other hand, in the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, patients with high GPC-3 immunostaining in primary CRC showed a significant longer disease-free survival than in patients with low immunostaining (p = 0.021 log rank [Mantel-Cox] = 5.311). Also, there was longer overall survival in patients with high GPC-3 immunostaining than those with low immunostaining (p = 0.05 and Log Rank [Mantel-Cox] = 3.674).

Discussion

Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most common cancers worldwide with high morbidity and mortality. The postsurgical outcome varies among patients. Multiple factors are considered in management including tumour stage, lymph nodes involvement, lymphovascular invasion, tumour budding and others. The status of different mutation is now a well-known predictive factor that plays a role in the oncologist decision when it comes to treatment options. It has been observed that patients with CRC at the same stage may have different outcomes. Therefore, lots of efforts are being made to understand the pathogenesis, prognostic and predictive factors for the purpose of improving and personalising the management. Given the role of GPC3 in the cell cycle, studies have been performed to understand its role in tumorigenesis and tumour progression in different organs. Trials to highlight its role and diagnostic and prognostic values have been conducted on various tumours including hepatocellular carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, breast carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, pancreaticobiliary carcinoma and colon carcinoma [16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. Different methods have been used to detect expression of glypican proteins in the tissues. These methods include mass spectrometry [31, 33], functional genomic mRNA profiling [29, 34] and immunohistochemistry. Poor prognosis was observed to be associated with higher expression of GPC3 in hepatocellular carcinoma [24, 36] and pancreatic adenocarcinoma [28]. A subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma with expression of GPC3 was found to have poor prognosis [37]. GPC-3 expression has been found to be increased in some regenerative processes as well [34, 38]. Some researchers have investigated GPC3 as potential therapeutic target in some tumours [22, 39, 40].
There are not enough data about GPC-3 and CRC and few studies have investigated GPC3 expression in CRC. In previous studies, immunostaining of GPC-3 was higher in cancer tissue in comparison to non-cancerous tissue [16] and also a significant increase in the expression of the GPC3 gene was revealed in about half of CRC tumours tissues as compared to the normal adjacent tissues [29]. In contrary, another study found however that CRC tissue had lower expression of GPC3 in comparison to normal tissue [31]. Also, GPC-3 was higher non-mucinous cancer in comparison to mucinous CRC [30]. In the present study, high GPC-3 immunostaining was associated with shorter survival outcome (disease-free survival and overall survival. This is a new finding and may help in patient stratification for post-operative therapeutic modalities.
In the current study, immunohistochemical staining method was chosen to detect GPC-3 expression in CRC as it is an easy way, with less limitation and available for most laboratories worldwide. The variability in conclusions among the scant studies conducted over the years might be related to different patient populations, aetiology, risk factors, mutations status, methods used to detect GPC-3 expression and other factors. Although only one other study was found that have investigated the prognostic values of GPC-3 in CRC, it showed no correlation between GPC-3 expression and CRC prognosis [30]. This difference might be related to the sample size, duration for which the patients were followed up, or other factors. A limitation of the current study is not including normal colorectal tissues or adenomatous tissue. This may be further studied in a prospective study.
In conclusion, we showed for the first time the prognostic value of GPC-3 in relation to survival outcome in CRC in a good cohort of patients. It is an interesting and potentially promising independent prognostic factor. Further investigations are required to confirm its value.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures American Cancer Society. 2014.
2. Fearon ER, Carethers JM. Molecular subtyping of colorectal cancer: time to explore both intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity to evaluate patient outcome. Gastroenterology 2015; 148: 10-13.
3. Fearon ER. Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Annu Rev Pathol 2011; 6: 479-507.
4. Serafino A, Moroni N, Zonfrillo M, et al. WNT-pathway components as predictive markers useful for diagnosis, prevention and therapy in inflammatory bowel disease and sporadic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2014; 5: 978-992.
5. Lin X. Functions of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in cell signaling during development. Development 2004; 131: 6009-6021.
6. Franch-Marro X, Marchand O, et al. Glypicans shunt the Wingless signal between local signalling and further transport. Development 2005; 132: 659-666.
7. Capurro MI, Xu P, Shi W, et al. Glypican-3 inhibits Hedgehog signaling during development by competing with patched for Hedgehog binding. Dev Cell 2008; 14: 700-711.
8. Capurro MI, Xiang YY, Lobe C, Filmus J. Glypican-3 Promotes the Growth of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Stimulating Canonical Wnt Signaling. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 6245.
9. Baumhoer D, Tornillo L, Stadlmann S, et al. Glypican 3 expression in human nonneoplastic, preneoplastic, and neoplastic tissues: a tissue microarray analysis of 4,387 tissue samples. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 129: 899-906.
10. Montalbano M, Georgiadis J, Masterson AL, et al. Biology and function of glypican-3 as a candidate for early cancerous transformation of hepatocytes in hepatocellular carcinoma (Review). Oncol Rep 2017; 37: 1291-1300.
11. Baumhoer D, Tornillo L, Stadlmann S, et al. Glypican 3 expression in human nonneoplastic, preneoplastic, and neoplastic tissues: a tissue microarray analysis of 4,387 tissue samples. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 129: 899-906.
12. Capurro M, Filmus J. Glypican-3 as a serum marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 372.
13. Capurro MI, Xiang YY, Lobe C, Filmus J. Glypican-3 promotes the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma by stimulating canonical Wnt signaling. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 6245-6254.
14. Chan ES, Pawel BR, Corao DA, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of glypican-3 in pediatric tumors: an analysis of 414 cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2013; 16: 272-277.
15. Ning S, Bin C, Na H, et al. Glypican-3, a novel prognostic marker of hepatocellular cancer, related with postoperative metastasis and recurrence in hepatocellular cancer patients. Mol Biol Rep 2012; 39: 351-357.
16. Yuan DH, Xie HH, Wang Y, et al. [Expression and significance of glypican-3 in colorectal cancer]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2008; 88: 1540-1542.
17. Al-Maghrabi J, Gomaa W, Buhmeida A, et al. Prognostic significance of VEGFR1/Flt-1 immunoexpression in colorectal carcinoma. Tumour Biol 2014; 35: 9045-9051.
18. Gomaa W, Ke Y, Fujii H, Helliwell T. Tissue microarray of head and neck squamous carcinoma: validation of the methodology for the study of cutaneous fatty acid-binding protein, vascular endothelial growth factor, involucrin and Ki-67. Virchows Arch 2005; 447: 701-709.
19. Ou-Yang RJ, Hui P, Yang XJ, Zynger DL. Expression of glypican 3 in placental site trophoblastic tumor. Diagn Pathol 2010; 5: 64.
20. Castillo LF, Tascón R, Lago Huvelle MA, et al. Glypican-3 induces a mesenchymal to epithelial transition in human breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 60133-60154.
21. Fleming BD, Ho M. Glypican-3 Targeting Immunotoxins for the Treatment of Liver Cancer. Toxins (Basel) 2016; 8: 274.
22. Haruyama Y, Kataoka H. Glypican-3 is a prognostic factor and an immunotherapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 275-283.
23. Liu H, Yang C, Lu W, Zeng Y. Prognostic significance of glypican-3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e9702.
24. Zhang J, Zhang M, Ma H, et al. Overexpression of glypican-3 is a predictor of poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: An updated meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e11130.
25. Aydin O, Yildiz L, Baris S, et al. Expression of Glypican 3 in low and high grade urothelial carcinomas. Diagn Pathol 2015; 10: 34.
26. Maeda D, Ota S, Takazawa Y, et al. Glypican-3 expression in clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary. Mod Pathol 2009; 22: 824-32.
27. Hakim SA, Raboh NMA. Immunohistochemical expression of glypican 3 in endometrial carcinoma and correlation with prognostic parameters. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015; 8: 13225-13232.
28. Yao H, Yang Z, Liu Z, et al. Glypican-3 and KRT19 are markers associating with metastasis and poor prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biomark 2016; 174: 397-404.
29. Azizpour S, Ezati R, Saidijam M, et al. The expression of glypican-3 in colorectal cancer. Cytology and Genetics 2019; 53: 430-440.
30. Foda AA, Mohammad MA, Abdel-Aziz A, El-Hawary AK. Relation of glypican-3 and E-cadherin expressions to clinicopathological features and prognosis of mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma. Tumour Biol 2015; 36: 4671-4679.
31. Joo EJ, Weyers A, Li G, et al. Carbohydrate-containing molecules as potential biomarkers in colon cancer. OMICS 2014; 18: 231-241.
32. De Robertis M, Arigoni M, Loiacono L, et al. Novel insights into Notum and glypicans regulation in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 41237-41257.
33. Marolla AP, Waisberg J, Saba GT, et al. Glycomics expression analysis of sulfated glycosaminoglycans of human colorectal cancer tissues and non-neoplastic mucosa by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015;13(4):510-7.
34. Moek KL, Fehrmann RSN, van der Vegt B, et al. Glypican 3 Overexpression across a Broad Spectrum of Tumor Types Discovered with Functional Genomic mRNA Profiling of a Large Cancer Database. Am J Pathol 2018; 188: 1973-1981.
35. Luo W, Ren Z, Gao S, et al. Clinical correlation of calpain-1 and glypican-3 expression with gallbladder carcinoma. Oncol Lett 2016; 11: 1345-1352.
36. Chen IP, Ariizumi S, Nakano M, Yamamoto M. Positive glypican-3 expression in early hepatocellular carcinoma predicts recurrence after hepatectomy. J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 117-125.
37. Kim JY, Park DY, Kim GH, et al. Does clear cell carcinoma of stomach exist? Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of clear cell changes in gastric adenocarcinomas. Histopathology 2014; 65: 90-99.
38. Morford LA, Davis C, Jin L, et al. The oncofetal gene glypican 3 is regulated in the postnatal liver by zinc fingers and homeoboxes 2 and in the regenerating liver by alpha-fetoprotein regulator 2. Hepatology 2007; 46: 1541-1547.
39. Li N, Gao W, Zhang Y-F, Ho M. Glypicans as Cancer Therapeutic Targets. Trends Cancer 2018; 4: 741-754.
40. Shimizu Y, Suzuki T, Yoshikawa T, et al. Cancer immunotherapy-targeted glypican-3 or neoantigens. Cancer Sci 2018; 109: 531-541.
Copyright: © 2022 Polish Association of Pathologists and the Polish Branch of the International Academy of Pathology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2022 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.