Advances in Interventional Cardiology
eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current Issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2026
vol. 22
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Intravascular lithotripsy of the femoropopliteal arteries: analysis of a prospective two-center pilot study

Frantisek Stanek
1, 2
,
David Prochazka
2
,
Oleksandr Zubkovskyy
2
,
Boris Koznar
1
,
Marian Rybar
3

  1. Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
  2. Department of Radiology, District Hospital, Kladno, Czech Republic
  3. Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic
Adv Interv Cardiol 2026; 22, 1 (83): 114–120
Online publish date: 2026/03/09
View full text Get citation
 
Introduction
Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is an emerging option for endovascular treatment of calcified lesions of the peripheral arteries. However, its clinical significance has not yet been firmly established. It is also hypothesized that IVL may improve long-term outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty by disrupting calcified barriers, thereby enabling improved drug penetration.

Aim
The aim of this pilot study was to clarify the feasibility and safety of IVL in calcified femoropopliteal stenoses. Another objective was to determine whether IVL can potentiate the long-term effect of DCB angioplasty in calcified femoropopliteal lesions.

Material and methods
Patients with significant calcified stenoses of the femoral and/or popliteal arteries were enrolled and assigned to two groups. The DCB plus group (DCB+) received IVL and subsequent DCB angioplasty, while the DCB minus group (DCB–) underwent IVL and, if necessary, plain balloon angioplasty.

Results
A total of 45 procedures were performed: 22 in the DCB+, 23 in the DCB– group. Angiographic success rates were 90.9% in the DCB+ group and 87.0% in the DCB– group. At the 24-month follow-up, cumulative patency did not differ significantly between the groups (65.22% for DCB–, 58.85% for DCB+). No amputations were required during follow-up.

Conclusions
IVL has proven to be a safe approach, yielding favorable immediate results. Regarding long-term patency, our study found no significant differences between the DCB+ and DCB– groups. However, the smaller number of patients in each group may have limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions.

keywords:

calcified femoral and popliteal lesions, endovascular treatment, intravascular lithotripsy, safety and efficacy, long-term outcomes


Quick links
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.