Journal of Stomatology

Abstract

4/2023 vol. 76
Original paper

Joint space measurement in centric occlusion between panoramic temporomandibular joint radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: a comparison in patients with clicking disorders

  1. Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
  2. Prof. Soedomo Dental Hospital, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
  3. Dental Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
J Stoma 2023; 76, 4: 265-270
Online publish date: 2023/12/15
View full text
Confronting perimenopausal women’s knowledge of coronary heart disease with their health behaviours. Controversial role of hormone replacement therapy in the protection of coronary heart disease

Introduction

Patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) commonly experience clicking. Measuring the joint space between the condyle and glenoid fossa can assist a dentist in determining potential cause of this pathological anomaly. Initial examination of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osseous structure can be performed with panoramic temporomandibular joint radiography (PanTMJ) that has a lower radiation and cost than cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the difference in joint space measurement between PanTMJ and CBCT among patients with clicking in centric occlusion.

Material and methods

The study included thirty-four patients diagnosed with clicking in at least one of the TMJs. Patients underwent PanTMJ and CBCT in centric occlusion position, following clinical examination. Anterior joint space (AJS), superior joint space (SJS), and posterior joint space (PJS) were measured. Mann-Whitney test was applied to examine differences between PanTMJ and CBCT joint space measurements, while Wilcoxon test was used to compare differences between right and left joint space.

Results

The results showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in AJS, SJS, and PJS between PanTMJ and CBCT. The width of joint space in PanTMJ tended to be underestimated compared with that in CBCT. With the exception of AJS in Pan TMJ (p < 0.05), there was no statistically significant difference between the right and left condyle space in any radiography technique (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The results of the current study show that joint space measurements on PanTMJ cannot be compared with those on CBCT.

>
Share